Mission Design for the CubeSat OUFTI-1
Mission Design for the CubeSat OUFTI-1 Mission Design for the CubeSat OUFTI-1
CHAPTER6STRUCTURE AND DEPLOYMENTA CubeSat is a 10 cm cube with a mass up to 1 Kg: the structure’s shape iscompulsory and its mass has to be reduced at most. Furthermore, the OUFTI-1schedule is really challenging as the foreseen development time varies betweentwo and two and an half year. For these reasons, we chose to buy an off the shelfstructure. If on the one hand developing our own structure would have helpedin reaching the educational goal which characterized the project, on the otherhand it would have required a great amount of time and resources not availableat the moment and the result would have probably been less successful.As mentioned in paragraph 4.1, being a CubeSat impose some precise characteristics( for more details see [AD4]). Furthermore, the European SpaceAgency add in its Call for proposal [RD2] a precise requirements: two separationswitches are compulsory on Vega.There are actually on the market two CubeSat structure developers: Pumpkinand ISIS. Both the two structures have their advantages and drawbacks thatwill be exposed in the following paragraph. After an accurate analysis we chosethe structure of Pumpkin as it better fits our requirements not only in terms ofstructure performances but also in terms of provided services.Concerning the antennas deployment system, they have to be folded duringlaunch and deployed once in orbit. To this end, they will be wrapped aroundcontact points and maintained in this configuration using the deployment mechanism.57
- Page 7 and 8: CONTENTS1 Introduction 132 The LEOD
- Page 9 and 10: LIST OF FIGURES4.1 A typical 1-unit
- Page 11: LIST OF TABLES5.1 Comparison betwee
- Page 15 and 16: CHAPTER2THE LEODIUM PROJECTThe LEOD
- Page 17: CHAPTER3THE FLIGHT OPPORTUNITYThe E
- Page 20 and 21: CHAPTER 44.1 The CubeSat conceptDur
- Page 22 and 23: CHAPTER 4have to be smooth and thei
- Page 25 and 26: CHAPTER5MISSION ANALYSISThe mission
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSIS5.1.1 Typ
- Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISIt can be
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISFigure 5.
- Page 33 and 34: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSIS5.2 The o
- Page 35 and 36: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSIS• the s
- Page 37 and 38: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISt − t 0
- Page 39 and 40: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISIn figure
- Page 41 and 42: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSIS• if m
- Page 43 and 44: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSIS5.3.3 The
- Page 45 and 46: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISwhere ϑ
- Page 47 and 48: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISFigure 5.
- Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISA four ye
- Page 51 and 52: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISFigure 5.
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISFigure 5.
- Page 55: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISFigure 5.
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 6.STRUCTURE AND DEPLOYMENTA
- Page 61 and 62: CHAPTER 6.STRUCTURE AND DEPLOYMENT6
- Page 63 and 64: CHAPTER7ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEMThe
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER 7.ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEMwh
- Page 67 and 68: CHAPTER 7.ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEMwh
- Page 69 and 70: CHAPTER 7.ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEMFi
- Page 71 and 72: CHAPTER 7.ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEMWe
- Page 73 and 74: CHAPTER8POWER SYSTEMThe electrical
- Page 75 and 76: CHAPTER 8.POWER SYSTEMFigure 8.2: S
- Page 77 and 78: CHAPTER 8.POWER SYSTEMcos ( 90 ◦
- Page 79 and 80: CHAPTER 8.POWER SYSTEMEectrons/cm 2
- Page 81 and 82: CHAPTER 8.POWER SYSTEM8.3.2 Ellipti
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 8.POWER SYSTEMFigure 8.9: T
- Page 85 and 86: CHAPTER9THERMAL-CONTROL SYSTEMThe g
- Page 87 and 88: CHAPTER 9.THERMAL-CONTROL SYSTEMTab
- Page 89 and 90: CHAPTER 9.THERMAL-CONTROL SYSTEMFig
- Page 91 and 92: CHAPTER 9.THERMAL-CONTROL SYSTEMCom
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 9.THERMAL-CONTROL SYSTEM9.3
- Page 95: CHAPTER 9.THERMAL-CONTROL SYSTEMWe
- Page 98 and 99: CHAPTER 1010.1 Communication hardwa
- Page 100 and 101: CHAPTER 10to reach the receiver pas
- Page 102 and 103: CHAPTER 10Figure 10.2: Detailed lin
- Page 104 and 105: CHAPTER 10failure reasons. It’s a
CHAPTER6STRUCTURE AND DEPLOYMENTA <strong>CubeSat</strong> is a 10 cm cube with a mass up to 1 Kg: <strong>the</strong> structure’s shape iscompulsory and its mass has to be reduced at most. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> <strong>OUFTI</strong>-1schedule is really challenging as <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>eseen development time varies betweentwo and two and an half year. For <strong>the</strong>se reasons, we chose to buy an off <strong>the</strong> shelfstructure. If on <strong>the</strong> one hand developing our own structure would have helpedin reaching <strong>the</strong> educational goal which characterized <strong>the</strong> project, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rhand it would have required a great amount of time and resources not availableat <strong>the</strong> moment and <strong>the</strong> result would have probably been less successful.As mentioned in paragraph 4.1, being a <strong>CubeSat</strong> impose some precise characteristics( <strong>for</strong> more details see [AD4]). Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> European SpaceAgency add in its Call <strong>for</strong> proposal [RD2] a precise requirements: two separationswitches are compulsory on Vega.There are actually on <strong>the</strong> market two <strong>CubeSat</strong> structure developers: Pumpkinand ISIS. Both <strong>the</strong> two structures have <strong>the</strong>ir advantages and drawbacks thatwill be exposed in <strong>the</strong> following paragraph. After an accurate analysis we chose<strong>the</strong> structure of Pumpkin as it better fits our requirements not only in terms ofstructure per<strong>for</strong>mances but also in terms of provided services.Concerning <strong>the</strong> antennas deployment system, <strong>the</strong>y have to be folded duringlaunch and deployed once in orbit. To this end, <strong>the</strong>y will be wrapped aroundcontact points and maintained in this configuration using <strong>the</strong> deployment mechanism.57