Mission Design for the CubeSat OUFTI-1
Mission Design for the CubeSat OUFTI-1 Mission Design for the CubeSat OUFTI-1
CHAPTER 5removes energy from the orbit. As a consequence, the semi-major axis is reducedand the orbit leans towards becoming circular. In case of elliptic orbit, the dragacts mainly at the perigee but its effect is a reduction in altitude of the apogee.It generates therefore a force and the acceleration tangent to the orbit trajectory:D = − 1 2 ρv2 Sc Dmms 2 (5.17)where ρ is the atmosphere density, v the speed with respect to the atmosphere,S the satellite cross-sectional area, c D the drag coefficient and mthe mass. The termmc Dis called ballistic coefficient and is often consideredAconstant for a satellite. For small satellites this coefficient is small and thereforethe acceleration is bigger: the situation is therefor particularly critical fornanosatellites.Drag cause a variation of the semi-major axis and of the eccentricity. It hasalso an effect on the argument of perigee ω but unimportant with respect to theeffect of the earth oblateness.For our simulation we consider the cross-sectional area as the surface of a cubeface and c D = 2.2.The atmosphere density varies depending on the solar activity which has a cycleof 11 years: as the solar minimum is happened in 2006, we used a mean densityvalue.Figure 5.14: Aerodynamic drag acceleration for the first day mission.Galli Stefania 42 University of Liège
CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSIS5.3.3 The solar radiation pressureSolar radiation pressure generates a force in all the direction and varies as afunction of sun, earth and satellite position. It makes vary periodically all theorbital elements and it’s especially intense for small satellites at high altitude:it needs to be considered for the OUFTI-1 orbit.The following formulas are an approximation of the solar pressure accelerationeffect averaging the eclipses and the sunlight.The perturbing acceleration of an earth satellite can be computed by means ofthe following equation:a sum = 0.97 · 10 −7 g (1 + R) S W(5.18)where R ∈ [−1, 1] is the optical reflection constant (-1 if transparent body, 0 ifblackbody, 1 if mirror), g the gravitation acceleration at sea level, S the effectivesatellite projected area and W the total weight.We used R=0.6 to take into account the solar cells and the thermal coating:this value is probably elevated but, not having precise details on the surfaces,we preferred to overestimate the perturbing force.Anyway, the solar perturbing force is much smaller than the atmospheric drag.The direction of a sun is perpendicular to the effective area and its normalizedcomponents along the satellite orbit radius vector, perpendicular to it in theorbit plane and along the orbit normal are:( ) i ( F r,sun = cos 2 cos 2 ɛ2 2( ) i ( − sin 2 sin 2 ɛ2 2)cos (λ ⊙ − ϑ − Ω))cos (λ ⊙ − ϑ + Ω)− 1 2 sin (i) sin (ɛ) [cos (λ ⊙ − ϑ) − cos (−λ ⊙ − ϑ)]( ) i ( − sin 2 cos 2 ɛ)cos (−λ ⊙ − ϑ + Ω)2 2( ) i ( − cos 2 sin 2 ɛ)mcos (−λ ⊙ − ϑ − Ω)2 2s( )2i ( F ϑ,sun = cos 2 cos 2 ɛ)sin (λ ⊙ − ϑ − Ω)2 2( ) i ( − sin 2 sin 2 ɛ)sin (λ ⊙ − ϑ + Ω)2 2− 1 2 sin (i) sin (ɛ) [sin (λ ⊙ − ϑ) − sin (−λ ⊙ − ϑ)]( ) i ( − sin 2 cos 2 ɛ)sin (−λ ⊙ − ϑ + Ω)2 2( ) i ( − cos 2 sin 2 ɛ)sin (−λ ⊙ − ϑ − Ω)2 2(5.19)ms 2Galli Stefania 43 University of Liège
- Page 3: Space is probably the main symbol o
- Page 7 and 8: CONTENTS1 Introduction 132 The LEOD
- Page 9 and 10: LIST OF FIGURES4.1 A typical 1-unit
- Page 11: LIST OF TABLES5.1 Comparison betwee
- Page 15 and 16: CHAPTER2THE LEODIUM PROJECTThe LEOD
- Page 17: CHAPTER3THE FLIGHT OPPORTUNITYThe E
- Page 20 and 21: CHAPTER 44.1 The CubeSat conceptDur
- Page 22 and 23: CHAPTER 4have to be smooth and thei
- Page 25 and 26: CHAPTER5MISSION ANALYSISThe mission
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSIS5.1.1 Typ
- Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISIt can be
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISFigure 5.
- Page 33 and 34: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSIS5.2 The o
- Page 35 and 36: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSIS• the s
- Page 37 and 38: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISt − t 0
- Page 39 and 40: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISIn figure
- Page 41: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSIS• if m
- Page 45 and 46: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISwhere ϑ
- Page 47 and 48: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISFigure 5.
- Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISA four ye
- Page 51 and 52: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISFigure 5.
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISFigure 5.
- Page 55: CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISFigure 5.
- Page 58 and 59: CHAPTER 66.1 Pumpkin structureThe s
- Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 6Figure 6.2: ISIS structure
- Page 62 and 63: CHAPTER 6Figure 6.3: P-POD: deploym
- Page 64 and 65: CHAPTER 77.1 Inertia propertiesBefo
- Page 66 and 67: CHAPTER 7I x = I x,cube + I x,M + I
- Page 68 and 69: CHAPTER 7This rough estimation is e
- Page 70 and 71: CHAPTER 7Otherwise, an orbit simula
- Page 72 and 73: CHAPTER 7only slow down the rotatio
- Page 74 and 75: CHAPTER 8order to prevent any failu
- Page 76 and 77: CHAPTER 8We have now the vector ˆN
- Page 78 and 79: CHAPTER 8Here we add an important h
- Page 80 and 81: CHAPTER 8Figure 8.5: Total power pr
- Page 82 and 83: CHAPTER 8Figure 8.8: Total power an
- Page 84 and 85: CHAPTER 88.4 Battery and operating
- Page 86 and 87: CHAPTER 99.1 Passive thermal-contro
- Page 88 and 89: CHAPTER 99.3 Nodes modelThe CubeSat
- Page 90 and 91: CHAPTER 9where c p is the material
CHAPTER 5removes energy from <strong>the</strong> orbit. As a consequence, <strong>the</strong> semi-major axis is reducedand <strong>the</strong> orbit leans towards becoming circular. In case of elliptic orbit, <strong>the</strong> dragacts mainly at <strong>the</strong> perigee but its effect is a reduction in altitude of <strong>the</strong> apogee.It generates <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e a <strong>for</strong>ce and <strong>the</strong> acceleration tangent to <strong>the</strong> orbit trajectory:D = − 1 2 ρv2 Sc Dmms 2 (5.17)where ρ is <strong>the</strong> atmosphere density, v <strong>the</strong> speed with respect to <strong>the</strong> atmosphere,S <strong>the</strong> satellite cross-sectional area, c D <strong>the</strong> drag coefficient and m<strong>the</strong> mass. The termmc Dis called ballistic coefficient and is often consideredAconstant <strong>for</strong> a satellite. For small satellites this coefficient is small and <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e<strong>the</strong> acceleration is bigger: <strong>the</strong> situation is <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong> particularly critical <strong>for</strong>nanosatellites.Drag cause a variation of <strong>the</strong> semi-major axis and of <strong>the</strong> eccentricity. It hasalso an effect on <strong>the</strong> argument of perigee ω but unimportant with respect to <strong>the</strong>effect of <strong>the</strong> earth oblateness.For our simulation we consider <strong>the</strong> cross-sectional area as <strong>the</strong> surface of a cubeface and c D = 2.2.The atmosphere density varies depending on <strong>the</strong> solar activity which has a cycleof 11 years: as <strong>the</strong> solar minimum is happened in 2006, we used a mean densityvalue.Figure 5.14: Aerodynamic drag acceleration <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> first day mission.Galli Stefania 42 University of Liège