Mission Design for the CubeSat OUFTI-1

Mission Design for the CubeSat OUFTI-1 Mission Design for the CubeSat OUFTI-1

leodium.ulg.ac.be
from leodium.ulg.ac.be More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

CHAPTER 5Figure 5.11: OUFTI-1: orbit’s tridimentional view. Optimum case: the subsatellitepoint at apogee is at the same latitude as Liège.Given a perigee of 350 Km and an apogee of 1200 Km altitude, we calculatedall the above mentioned parameters:• semi-major axis: a = 7153.14Km• eccentricity: e = 0.0594• angular momentum: h = 5.33 · 10 4 Km2s• orbit parameter: p = 7127.7Km• energy: E = −27.8 Km2s 2• period: T = 6020.8s = 100.35min• perigee speed: v p = 7.922 Kms• apogee speed: v a = 7.034 Kms• mean motion: n = 14.35 revdayGalli Stefania 38 University of Liège

CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISIn figure 5.12 the true, eccentric and mean anomaly are represented: as theorbit is elliptic, they have different evolutions.Figure 5.12: OUFTI-1 orbit: true, eccentric and mean anomaly as a functionof time over a periodJust to have an idea of the possible circular orbit at 350 Km altitude, acomparison is reported in table 5.1.Table 5.1: Comparison between the two possible orbits350x1200 Km 350x350 KmSemi-major axis a (Km) 7153.14 6728.14Eccentricity e 0.0594 0Energy E(Km 2s 2 ))-27.8 -29.6(Perigee speed v Kmp(7.922 7.697sApogee spped v Km)a 7.034 7.697sPeriod T (min) 100.35 91.53The most important difference between the two orbit is the speed: in fact,in order to have a good communication, we would like to have a satellite passingover the ground station as slowly as possible. This reduces in fact the dopplereffect and, even more important, increases the time during which the satelliteis in the the ground station’s field of view.As the link budget guarantees a sufficient signal-to-noise level at 1200 Km altitude(seechapter 10), we prefer the elliptic orbit with the apogee over thenorthern hemisphere at the mission’s beginning.Galli Stefania 39 University of Liège

CHAPTER 5.MISSION ANALYSISIn figure 5.12 <strong>the</strong> true, eccentric and mean anomaly are represented: as <strong>the</strong>orbit is elliptic, <strong>the</strong>y have different evolutions.Figure 5.12: <strong>OUFTI</strong>-1 orbit: true, eccentric and mean anomaly as a functionof time over a periodJust to have an idea of <strong>the</strong> possible circular orbit at 350 Km altitude, acomparison is reported in table 5.1.Table 5.1: Comparison between <strong>the</strong> two possible orbits350x1200 Km 350x350 KmSemi-major axis a (Km) 7153.14 6728.14Eccentricity e 0.0594 0Energy E(Km 2s 2 ))-27.8 -29.6(Perigee speed v Kmp(7.922 7.697sApogee spped v Km)a 7.034 7.697sPeriod T (min) 100.35 91.53The most important difference between <strong>the</strong> two orbit is <strong>the</strong> speed: in fact,in order to have a good communication, we would like to have a satellite passingover <strong>the</strong> ground station as slowly as possible. This reduces in fact <strong>the</strong> dopplereffect and, even more important, increases <strong>the</strong> time during which <strong>the</strong> satelliteis in <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong> ground station’s field of view.As <strong>the</strong> link budget guarantees a sufficient signal-to-noise level at 1200 Km altitude(seechapter 10), we prefer <strong>the</strong> elliptic orbit with <strong>the</strong> apogee over <strong>the</strong>nor<strong>the</strong>rn hemisphere at <strong>the</strong> mission’s beginning.Galli Stefania 39 University of Liège

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!