12.07.2015 Views

Classical Islamic Paradigms of Deterrence and their Expression in ...

Classical Islamic Paradigms of Deterrence and their Expression in ...

Classical Islamic Paradigms of Deterrence and their Expression in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In the m<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> radicalized perceivers, "div<strong>in</strong>e reward" can be replaced with "div<strong>in</strong>e punishment." Thisdisturbs, unsettles <strong>and</strong> raises questions among jihadis. Most importantly, it has the potential to deter thempsychologically.Underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g jihadi group culture, its psychic triggers <strong>and</strong> propag<strong>and</strong>a processes opens possible venues toapply such a concept. If the process <strong>of</strong> terrorist "belief" (i.e. here jihadi ideology) can be disrupted, thewhole construct <strong>of</strong> jihad loses validity. The vastness <strong>of</strong> the concept "jihad" <strong>in</strong> Islam must not beunderestimated. One only has to th<strong>in</strong>k about Sufi mystic <strong>and</strong> Sunni approaches. The Persian Sufi mysticMuhammad al-Ghazali (1058-1111), until today one <strong>of</strong> the most <strong>in</strong>fluential religious th<strong>in</strong>kers <strong>of</strong> Islam,wrote on jihad al-nafs (fight<strong>in</strong>g one’s ego): "The strong one is not the one who overcomes people, thestrong one is he who overcomes his ego (ghalaba nafsahu)." 138 salafi-jihadis are essentially open to mysticconcepts. They use them constantly <strong>in</strong> the market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> martyrs <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> ideology (forexample, "karamat" (wonders), "'alamat al-shuhada' (signs <strong>of</strong> the martyrs such as smiles on <strong>their</strong> faces, thesmell <strong>of</strong> musk, the "<strong>in</strong>vulnerability <strong>of</strong> jihadis").<strong>Islamic</strong> movements which foster non-violent <strong>in</strong>terpretations <strong>of</strong> jihad should be supported. This might havefrighten<strong>in</strong>g effects on terrorists: They have been ordered to blow themselves up, but already doubt thatthey will ga<strong>in</strong> a div<strong>in</strong>e reward from it, because <strong>of</strong> theological <strong>in</strong>terpretations that deny this reward. Onegoal is to create a "jihad"-discourse [sic] that rejects violence. A devaluation <strong>of</strong> terrorist jihad should first <strong>of</strong>all focus on controversial justifications to kill civilians, <strong>and</strong> then on constructions <strong>of</strong> jihad <strong>in</strong> war scenarios(Iraq, Afghanistan, Israel/Palest<strong>in</strong>e, Chechnya, Libya).In parallel <strong>and</strong> accord<strong>in</strong>g to po<strong>in</strong>t 3.b, a massive media-based re-br<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Islam is required. Key message:"Islam <strong>and</strong> Muslims are welcome, good <strong>and</strong> excellent partners." The ideal case would be to conv<strong>in</strong>ce animmensely popular Muslim preacher, such as Yusuf al-Qaradawi, to deconstruct jihadi salvation myths. Butone can also start on a more basic level. Western media-depictions <strong>of</strong> "moderate political Islam" <strong>and</strong>"moderate Muslims" should be loaded up with positive representations <strong>and</strong> connotations. This might helpto <strong>in</strong>fluence Muslims to support policies aga<strong>in</strong>st terrorist Islam. Muslims would eventually overtake thiswork <strong>and</strong> devaluate terrorist <strong>in</strong>terpretations by themselves. However, catastrophic military policies <strong>and</strong>public relations failures should be avoided at all costs such as further occupations <strong>of</strong> Muslim countries, orprison <strong>and</strong> torture sc<strong>and</strong>als (Abu Ghuraib 2004), or U.S.-Mar<strong>in</strong>es ur<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g on dead Afghan Muslims(January 2012). Similarly, the publication <strong>of</strong> anti-Muslim ads such as upcom<strong>in</strong>g advertisements <strong>in</strong> NewYork’s subway stations should be avoided. One <strong>of</strong> the ads <strong>in</strong> the campaign that has been <strong>in</strong>itiated by U.S.anti-Islam activist Pamela Geller reads: "In any war between the civilized man <strong>and</strong> the savage, support thecivilized man. Support Israel. Defeat jihad." 139 The statement conta<strong>in</strong>s an implicit syllogism, which - <strong>in</strong> them<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> a Muslim perceiver - compares Islam to savagery. It is counter-productive for "deterrenceconciliation"approaches that should address jihadis <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>stream Muslims <strong>in</strong> parallel.138Muhammad al-Ghazali, "'Ihya' `Ulum al-D<strong>in</strong>'" ["The Revival <strong>of</strong> the Religious Sciences"], (Accessed January 8, 2012) -http://sunnah.org/tasawwuf/jihad002.html139 Paul Harris, "Civil rights group condemn anti-Muslim New York subway ads," The Guardian, September 20, 2012,http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/20/new-york-anti-muslim-subway-ads. Accessed September 24, 2012.43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!