Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.comFore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.comNOTES TO PAGES 239–24733559. Edith Efron to AR, dated “Tuesday,” ARP 020–01M. Efron later recovered from theshock of her expulsion and criticized the conformity of life in the Collective, while remainingappreciative of Rand’s ideas. Leonard Bogart to author, private communication.60. Karen Minto, “Interview with Barbara Branden,” Full Context, September/October 1998, 9.61. Valliant, The Passion of Ayn Rand’s Critics, 241, 245.62. Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead, 50th anniversary ed. (1943; New York: Signet, 1993),496.63. See B. Branden, Passion of Ayn Rand, 347; N. Branden, Judgment Day, 387–88.64. Tod Foster, Oral History, ARP.65. Karen Reedstrom, “Interview with George Walsh,” Full Context, February 1991,4. When Rand’s attorney requested letters about Branden to support Rand’s publishedclaims against him, virtually all of Branden’s close friends, including his sister, submittedlengthy statements about the faults and flaws in his character. The material was collectedin response to Branden’s threat of legal action. See finding aid, Ayn Rand Papers, AynRand Institute.66. Ayn Rand, “To Whom It May Concern,” The Objectivist, May 1968, 449, 457.According to Rand’s attorney and accountant, her veiled accusations of Branden’sfinancial misdealing and theft were baseless. Reedstrom, “Interview with Henry MarkHolzer.”67. Nathaniel Branden, “In Answer to Ayn Rand,” in Roy Childs Papers, Box 31,“Objectivism—Ayn Rand,” Hoover Institute Archives, Stanford University.68. Reedstrom, “Interview with George Walsh,” 4.69. National Review, December 17, 1968, 1257.70. Sandra G. Wells to AR, April 7, 1969, ARP 155–04x.Chapter 91. I use “Objectivist” to indicate persons who considered themselves significantlyinfluenced by Rand, although not in complete agreement with her.2. In “No War, No Welfare, and No Damn Taxation: The Student LibertarianMovement, 1968–1972,” in The Vietnam War on Campus: Other Voices, More DistantDrums, ed. Mark Jason Gilbert (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2001), Jonathan Schoenwaldframes the libertarian movement as “a minor third wave of 1960s student activism” and“the climax of a generation’s efforts” (21, 22). Although Schoenwald is right to identifyconnections between the two activist movements, his analysis collapses left and rightand overlooks the very different provenance, goals, and ideologies of each. He suggeststhat the Libertarian Party represented the “death blow” to the movement, but my ownresearch suggests that the Libertarian Party grew out of a thriving subculture in whichstudents and recent graduates played a key role. The Party ought to be considered thepeak of that subculture rather than its end. See Jennifer Burns, “O Libertarian, WhereIs Thy Sting?,” Journal of Policy History 19, no. 4 (2007): 453–71. See also John L. Kelley,Bringing the Market Back In: The Political Revitalization of Market Liberalism (New York:New York University Press, 1997).