Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.comFore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.comNOTES TO PAGES 184–18932531. Murray Rothbard to “Mom and Pop,” Friday afternoon, 5:30, Rothbard Papers;Murray Rothbard to Whittaker Chambers, August 25, 1958, Letters 1958 Jul–Dec,Rothbard Papers. This episode is also described in Justin Raimondo, An Enemy of theState: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2000); MurrayRothbard, “Mozart Was a Red,” available at www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/mozart.html [February 19, 2009]; Murray Rothbard, “The Sociology of the Ayn Rand Cult,”available at www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard23.html [February 28, 2009].32. Sidney Hook to Barbara Branden, April 6, 1984, Box 154, Sidney Hook Papers,Hoover Institution, Stanford University.33. See Brand Blanshard to AR, February 4, 1965, AR to Brand Blanshard, March 4,1965, and Brand Blanshard to AR, May 28, 1967, ARP 100–12A.34. John Hospers to AR, January 9, 1961, ARP 141-HO3.35. John Hospers, “A Memory of Ayn Rand,” Full Context, March/April 2001, 5.36. Biographical Interview 17.37. Martin Lean to AR, October 31, 1960, ARP 001–01A.38. AR to Martin Lean, November 30, 1961, ARP 001–01A.39. Martin Lean to AR, October 31, 1960, ARP 001–01A.40. Hospers, “A Memory of Ayn Rand,” 6.41. John Hospers, An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis, 2nd ed. (EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1967), 591–94, 602–3; John Hospers to Nathaniel Branden, June25, 1965, ARP 141-HO3. A selection of Rand’s and Hospers’s correspondence is publishedin Letters, 502–63. The existentialist philosopher Hazel Barnes was less impressed withRand, calling Objectivism “based on wish fulfillment.” Barnes, An Existentialist Ethics(New York: Knopf, 1967), 149.42. Rand claimed that the changes were only cosmetic, but they fell into two substantivecategories: she rewrote the sex scenes to make male characters dominant overfemale characters, and she reworked all passages that demonstrated her earlier interestin Nietzsche. For a close examination of these changes, see Robert Mayhew, “We theLiving: ‘36 and ‘59,” in Essays on Ayn Rand’s We the Living, ed. Robert Mayhew (Lanham,MD: Lexington Books, 2004).Chapter 71. Nathaniel Branden, Judgment Day: My Years with Ayn Rand (Boston: HoughtonMifflin, 1989), 314.2. Rand’s popularity underscores new scholarly understandings of the 1960s, anera now characterized by both conservative and liberal politics and activism, particularlyamong youth. See Rebecca E. Klatch, A Generation Divided: The New Left, the NewRight, and the 1960s (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999); John A. Andrew III,The Other Side of the Sixties: Young Americans for Freedom and the Rise of ConservativePolitics (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1997); Gregory L. Schneider,Cadres for Conservatism: Young Americans for Freedom and the Rise of the ContemporaryRight (New York: New York University Press, 1999). Other books that incorporate thissense of the 1960s as a politically divided time are Mary C. Brennan, Turning Right in the