12.07.2015 Views

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

More oxford <strong>books</strong> @ www.OxfordeBook.<strong>com</strong><strong>Fore</strong> <strong>more</strong> <strong>urdu</strong> <strong>books</strong> <strong>visit</strong> <strong>www.4Urdu</strong>.<strong>com</strong>324 NOTES TO PAGES 177–184Ayn,” Box 23, Herbert Hoover Presidential Library, West Branch, IA; Sidney Krupicka,“Letter to the Editor,” National Review, February 13, 1960, 117; Jim Kolb, “Letter to theEditor,” National Review, February 1, 1958, 119; Kevin Coughlin, “Letter to the Editor,”National Review, February 1, 1958, 119.20. Ludwig von Mises to AR, February 23, 1958, quoted in Jörg Guido Hulsmann,Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism (Auburn, AL: Ludwig Von Mises Institute, 2007), 996.21. Robert LeFevre to Rose Wilder Lane, January 10, 1958, and Rose Wilder Laneto Robert LeFevre, December 26, 1957, both in Box 27, Lane Papers, Herbert HooverPresidential Library, West Branch, IA.22. Even hostile reviewers tended to admit that Friedman’s book was valuablefood for thought. Most reviews were published in scholarly journals, which were lesslikely to employ ad hominen attacks than the mass-market magazines that reviewedAtlas Shrugged. The only popular magazine to review Capitalism and Freedom was TheEconomist, which gave it a largely positive review. “A Tract for the Times,” The Economist,February 16, 1963. Other representative reviews include Abba P. Lerner, “Capitalism andFreedom,” American Economic Review 53, no. 3 (1963): 458–60; F. X. Sutton, “Capitalismand Freedom,” American Sociological Review 28, no. 3 (1963): 491–92. A negative reviewis Oscar Handlin, “Capitalism and Freedom,” Business History Review 37, no. 3 (1963),315–16. Friedman, who never met Rand, appreciated her work, calling her “an utterlyintolerant and dogmatic person who did a great deal of good.” Brian Doherty, “Best ofBoth Worlds: Milton Friedman Reminisces,” Reason, June 1995, 32–38.23. Daniel Bell, The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties(New York: Free Press, 1960); Morton White, Social Thought in America: The Revoltagainst Formalism (New York: Viking, 1949). Nor were they looking for an uncritical perspectiveon capitalism, with some even envisioning the future as a postcapitalist world.Howard Brick, Transcending Capitalism: Visions of a New Society in Modern AmericanThought (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006); Nelson Lichtenstein, ed., AmericanCapitalism: Social Thought and Political Economy in the Twentieth Century (Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006).24. Kathleen and Richard Nickerson, Oral History, ARP. Rand’s classes formed the basisof Ayn Rand, The Art of Fiction: A Guide for Writers and Readers (New York: Plume, 2001).25. Nathaniel Branden, Judgment Day: My Years with Ayn Rand (Boston: HoughtonMifflin, 1989), 263.26. Ibid., 264.27. Murray Rothbard to AR, October 3, 1957, Letters 1957, July–Dec, Rothbard Papers,Ludwig von Mises Institute.28. Murray Rothbard to Kenneth S. Templeton, November 18, 1957, Letters 1957,July–Dec, Rothbard Papers.29. Murray Rothbard to “Mom and Pop,” Friday afternoon 5:30, Rothbard Papers.30. Details are taken from an interview with Robert Hessen, December 7, 2007;Murray Rothbard to “Mom and Pop,” July 23, 1958, Wed night 8:30 pm, Rothbard Papers.The paper was eventually published. Murray N. Rothbard, “The Mantle of Science,” inScientism and Values, ed. Helmut Schoeck and James W. Wiggins (New York: D. VanNostrand, 1960), 159–180.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!