Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.comFore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com314 NOTES TO PAGES 103–10910. F. A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1944),3. For the reception of Road to Serfdom, see Alan Ebenstein, Friedrich Hayek (Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 2001). Hayek’s career and thought are described in BruceCaldwell, Hayek’s Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F. A. Hayek (Chicago: Universityof Chicago Press, 2003).11. It is hard to exaggerate the institutional centrality of the University of Chicagoto diverse strains of conservative thought. The Volker Fund also helped sponsor thenascent law and economics movement at Chicago. See Steven Michael Teles, The Riseof the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law (Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press, 2008), chapter 4. Other activity at Chicago is described inEow, “Fighting a New Deal”; John L. Kelley, Bringing the Market Back In: The PoliticalRevitalization of Market Liberalism (London: Macmillan, 1987). The university was alsohome to the political philosopher Leo Strauss, an important influence on neoconservatives.See Shadia B. Drury, Leo Strauss and the American Right (New York: St. Martin’sPress, 1997).12. AR to Rose Wilder Lane, August 21, 1946, Letters, 308.13. Juliet Williams argues that Hayek was more a pragmatist than an ideologue; see“On the Road Again: Reconsidering the Political Writings of F. A. Hayek,” in AmericanCapitalism: Social Thought and Political Economy in 20th Century America, ed. NelsonLichtenstein (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006).14. Ayn Rand, Ayn Rand’s Marginalia: Her Critical Comments on the Writings of Over20 Authors, ed. Robert Mayhew (Oceanside, CA: Second Renaissance Books, 1995), 151,147, 150.15. Angus Burgin, “Unintended Consequences: The Transformation of AtlanticConservative Thought, 1920–1970,” PhD diss., Harvard University, forthcoming; Rand,Marginalia, 146.16. Though essentially agnostic, Hayek was sympathetic to Catholicism, thereligion of his birth. His views on religion were both ambivalent and closely held,for he wished to avoid offense to believers and found religion culturally useful. SeeStephen Kresge and Leif Wenar, eds., Hayek on Hayek: An Autobiographical Dialogue(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), 41; Rand, Marginalia, 148. Hayek apparentlyliked Atlas Shrugged but skipped the philosophical parts. Roy Childs, Libertyagainst Power: Essays by Roy Childs, Jr., ed. Joan Kennedy Taylor (San Francisco: Foxand Wilkes, 1994), 272.17. AR to Leonard Read, February 28, 1946, Letters, 260; Jörg Guido Hulsmann, Mises:The Last Knight of Liberalism (Auburn, AL: Ludwig Von Mises Institute Press, 2007).I discuss Rand’s relationship with Mises more fully in the next chapter.18. Journals, 245, 258.19. Barbara Branden, The Passion of Ayn Rand (Garden City, NY: Doubleday andCompany, 1986), 218.20. “A Steel House with a Suave Finish,” Home and Garden, August 1949, 54–57.21. My description of the O’Connors’ domestic life is taken from the oral historiescited, particularly Ruth Beebe Hill and June Kurisu, Rand’s secretary.22. Evan and Micky Wright, Oral History, ARP; Jack Bungay, Oral History, ARP.