12.07.2015 Views

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

More oxford <strong>books</strong> @ www.OxfordeBook.<strong>com</strong><strong>Fore</strong> <strong>more</strong> <strong>urdu</strong> <strong>books</strong> <strong>visit</strong> <strong>www.4Urdu</strong>.<strong>com</strong>266LEGACIESarms control, for she believed the USSR could never be trusted. In otherappearances she attacked Native Americans as savages, arguing thatEuropean colonists had a right to seize their land because native tribesdid not recognize individual rights. She extended this reasoning to theIsrael-Palestine conflict, arguing that Palestinians had no rights and thatit was moral to support Israel, the sole outpost of civilization in a regionruled by barbarism. Rand revealed that Israel was the first public causeto which she had donated money. And she continued to flay anarchistsand libertarians as “worse than anything the New Left has proposed.” 55Without NBI or significant new publications, Rand had nothing positiveto offer that could offset her negativity or support her sweepingjudgments on current events.By the end of 1972, even SIL had had enough. On the front page ofSIL News the directors announced, “We are not in sympathy with oridentified with all of the political applications that Ayn Rand cares tomake based on her philosophy of Objectivism,” citing her positionson draft resistance, the Vietnam War, the space program, civil liberties,amnesty for draft evaders, and support for collectivist politicians. “Thebasic works of Rand continue to be the most powerful influence on ourmembership,” the directors admitted. “However, moral men cannotstand quiet.” 56 Only a year earlier SIL had published an article defendingRand against the “anti-Rand mentality.” Now they too wished to drawa distinction between Rand’s beliefs and their own. As Rand becameever <strong>more</strong> jingoistic, libertarians remained deeply suspicious of all stateaction. They were also sympathetic to the cultural changes sweeping thenation that Rand found so alarming. The political spectrum was shifting,and Rand was moving to the conservative side of the right.The real rift between Rand and the libertarians came with the foundingof the Libertarian Party in 1971. The party’s founder, David Nolan,was an MIT graduate and Rand fan. He was galvanized to action byNixon’s announcement of wage and price controls, intended to curbinflation. (By contrast Rand endorsed Nixon twice, regarding him asthe lesser of two evils.) Nolan and a few friends announced plans for alibertarian national convention, held in Denver the following year. Atthe convention libertarians organized themselves into a loose network

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!