Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.comFore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.comA ROUND UNIVERSE 145a strange edge to her personality.) A night owl who loved to stay up latearguing the fine points of economic theory, even Rothbard could notkeep up with Rand. For days afterward he felt depressed.Still, Rothbard’s meeting with Rand had been eye-opening. Despitehis allegiance to Mises, Rothbard was bothered by the Austrian’s antipathyto natural rights. Like Rand, he was a natural moralist and wantedto ground his economics in something deeper than utilitarianism.Through Rand Rothbard learned about Aristotelian epistemology and“the whole field of natural rights and natural law philosophy, which [he]did not know existed.” 31 He went on to explore these fields through hisown reading. Eventually he combined Austrian economics and naturalrights philosophy to create his own brand of anarchist libertarianism.Rothbard acknowledged that Rand had taught him something of value.Yet he disliked her intensely and kept his distance. Rand’s growing charismaticpowers could both attract and repel.As Rand began training her own cadre of thinkers, she became lessinterested in the laborious task of converting others to her worldview.It was simply easier to start from scratch. Unlike Mises, Rothbard, andHayek, the young people she met through Barbara and Nathan were notgrounded in alternative approaches to politics or the free market. Theywere receptive to her comprehensive view of the world, her unified fieldtheory of existence. Other libertarians wanted to argue with Rand, butthe Collective merely listened.Against this background Dwight Eisenhower’s 1951 presidentialnomination became a real turning point for Rand. In a tight conventionEisenhower, a decorated war hero, had narrowly ousted Senator RobertTaft, the presumptive Republican nominee. Taft, known in the Senateas “Mr. Republican,” was the last major politician to vocalize viewsshared by Rand and her libertarian friends. He vigorously opposed theNew Deal, fought against labor unions, and questioned the wisdom ofAmerican involvement overseas. By contrast, Eisenhower was a genial,noncontroversial figure who offered Americans a reassuring, steadyhand at the tiller after the upheaval of the Depression and war. He wasso popular, and his political views so moderate, that both parties courtedhim as a presidential prospect.Rand was alert to the dangers of such a nominee. Eisenhower wasakin to Hayek, a destroyer from within, a false friend who would dilute