2012-2013 Budget - City of Saginaw MI

2012-2013 Budget - City of Saginaw MI 2012-2013 Budget - City of Saginaw MI

saginaw.mi.com
from saginaw.mi.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

approved an additional four mills for public libraries when Proposal A eliminated their millage from theschool’s millage and another three mills to operate a public transportation system.Taxes are due and payable on July 1 at the City Treasurer’s Office and become delinquent after 30 days. To allreal and personal taxes paid on or after August 1, there shall be added interest at the rate of ½ of 1 percent forevery month, or fraction thereof, from August 1 until the date of payment. A penalty of ½ of 1 percent isadded after July 31. From March 1 and thereafter, real taxes are collected by the Treasurer of Saginaw County,who adds and keeps a collection fee of four percent (4%) on the unpaid balance, and in addition, adds interestat the rate of one percent (1%) per month from March 1 until the date of payment. Unpaid taxes, together withall charges thereon, become a continuing lien on the property assessed. The general tax law provides that realestate with delinquent taxes shall be sold at a state land sale.Tax LimitationBy general law, property taxes for City purposes are limited to two percent (2%) of the assessed valuation ofall real and personal property in the municipality, provided that no such restriction shall prevent the levy oftaxes required for the payment of general debt obligations.The charter of the City of Saginaw provided that City taxes shall be subject to the overall limitation (City,School and County) imposed by Section 21, Article X, of the Michigan State Constitution, which is 1-1/2percent of assessed value exclusive of debt incurred prior to December 8, 1932. Act No. 44, Public Acts of1948, effective August 20, 1948, amended all Michigan city charters nullifying charter limitations andauthorized that the levy for city purposes shall not exceed one percent (1%) of assessed valuation in any oneyear, unless and until a different tax rate limitation is provided by charter. State equalized valuations havebeen used in place of local assessed valuations.On November 6, 1979, pursuant to an initiatory referendum, the City Charter was amended by the electors ofthe City of Saginaw to reduce the maximum property tax that may be levied by the City in any year from 10mills to 7.50 mills. The amendment further provided that if in subsequent years the assessed value of allproperty within the City is increased for any reason, this maximum 7.50 mill rate would have to bepermanently reduced so as to yield the same gross dollar revenue as the fiscal year 1979 property tax revenueyield ($3,828,778). The amendment further provided for up to a 3 mill emergency levy if a specific emergencyis declared by the Mayor and concurred in by a 3/4 vote of the full Council.On November 5, 2002, May 3, 2005, and November 3, 2009, special elections were held to remove theproperty tax dollar limitation of $3,828,778 and the 7.50 mill limitation that was approved by the voters onNovember 6, 1979. The voters overwhelmingly defeated the proposal in these special elections.LOCAL INCOME TAXESThe City of Saginaw receives approximately 37.69% of its General Fund revenue from local income tax.Economic conditions continue to have a negative impact on this revenue source. For the 2012/2013 Budget, therevenue from income taxes is expected to increase $222,879, or 1.89%. This increase is primarily due to thecity aggressively pursuing delinquent income taxes by designating a Collection Specialist to that effort.60

STATE SHARED REVENUESThe City of Saginaw receives approximately 22.29% of its General Fund revenue from state revenue sharing.The State of Michigan has experienced significant budget problems, which it attempted to partially remedy bycutting payments of shared sales tax revenues to local units of government. Governor Snyder released apreliminary plan on how statutory funding will be allocated and distributed. The State constructed a threetiered criteria, known as the Economic Vitality Incentive Program, on how to comply with the governor’sproposal. The Economic Vitality Incentive Program requires that local municipalities submit to the StateTreasurer initiatives that fulfills the criteria of Accountability and Transparency, Consolidation andCollaboration of Services, and Employee Benefits Compensation. In FY 2012, the city complied and met thedeadlines for the governor initiative and expects to receive these revenues. Even though the Statutory StateShared Revenues were reduced by 1/3, the city will also realize losses in the Constitutional portion of the StateShared Revenues due to the decrease in population. Hence, the City’s 2012/2013 Approved Budget reflects anoverall decrease of $899,744, or -11.24% for revenue sharing funds.GRANTSFor FY 2013, the City budgeted $634,240 for federal grant funding related to police overtime, gasreimbursements for drug enforcement, and a traffic grant. This is a $77,116, or -10.84% reduction from the2012 approved budget levels. In FY 2013, the City will receive little or no new general fund grants for policeand development activities.LICENSES, PERMITS, & FEESThe City anticipates $1,222,700, for licenses, permits, and fees for FY 2013. This represents a decrease of$2,450, over the approved 2012 revenue. This includes business licenses, building permits, and cabletelevision franchise fees.CHARGE FOR SERVICESThe total projected charges for services for FY 2013 is $937,790. Charges for services include cemeterycharges, Public Act 425, and Police and Fire Services. Future State of Michigan Public Act 425 Agreements orcorresponding service agreements is being negotiated with other communities as they increase business andresidential development. These agreements will provide a direct revenue flow to the General Fund.FINES AND FORFEITURESThe revenue in this category includes ordinance fines, parking receipts, parking lot receipts, parking violationsand transfer affidavit fees. The revenue is anticipated to increase from the 2012 approved revenue by$641,522. This increase is due to the reassignment of the Parking and Operations Maintenance Fund from anEnterprise Fund to the General Fund. Additionally, the city administration is in the process of evaluating theparking enforcement strategy for the city and has developed a long-term strategy which will allow the city tocollect outstanding parking revenue.INTEREST REVENUEInterest revenue is projected to decrease by $2,800 from 2012 approved. This is primarily due to the expecteddecrease in the interest rate values on the City’s pooled cash.61

STATE SHARED REVENUESThe <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Saginaw</strong> receives approximately 22.29% <strong>of</strong> its General Fund revenue from state revenue sharing.The State <strong>of</strong> Michigan has experienced significant budget problems, which it attempted to partially remedy bycutting payments <strong>of</strong> shared sales tax revenues to local units <strong>of</strong> government. Governor Snyder released apreliminary plan on how statutory funding will be allocated and distributed. The State constructed a threetiered criteria, known as the Economic Vitality Incentive Program, on how to comply with the governor’sproposal. The Economic Vitality Incentive Program requires that local municipalities submit to the StateTreasurer initiatives that fulfills the criteria <strong>of</strong> Accountability and Transparency, Consolidation andCollaboration <strong>of</strong> Services, and Employee Benefits Compensation. In FY <strong>2012</strong>, the city complied and met thedeadlines for the governor initiative and expects to receive these revenues. Even though the Statutory StateShared Revenues were reduced by 1/3, the city will also realize losses in the Constitutional portion <strong>of</strong> the StateShared Revenues due to the decrease in population. Hence, the <strong>City</strong>’s <strong>2012</strong>/<strong>2013</strong> Approved <strong>Budget</strong> reflects anoverall decrease <strong>of</strong> $899,744, or -11.24% for revenue sharing funds.GRANTSFor FY <strong>2013</strong>, the <strong>City</strong> budgeted $634,240 for federal grant funding related to police overtime, gasreimbursements for drug enforcement, and a traffic grant. This is a $77,116, or -10.84% reduction from the<strong>2012</strong> approved budget levels. In FY <strong>2013</strong>, the <strong>City</strong> will receive little or no new general fund grants for policeand development activities.LICENSES, PER<strong>MI</strong>TS, & FEESThe <strong>City</strong> anticipates $1,222,700, for licenses, permits, and fees for FY <strong>2013</strong>. This represents a decrease <strong>of</strong>$2,450, over the approved <strong>2012</strong> revenue. This includes business licenses, building permits, and cabletelevision franchise fees.CHARGE FOR SERVICESThe total projected charges for services for FY <strong>2013</strong> is $937,790. Charges for services include cemeterycharges, Public Act 425, and Police and Fire Services. Future State <strong>of</strong> Michigan Public Act 425 Agreements orcorresponding service agreements is being negotiated with other communities as they increase business andresidential development. These agreements will provide a direct revenue flow to the General Fund.FINES AND FORFEITURESThe revenue in this category includes ordinance fines, parking receipts, parking lot receipts, parking violationsand transfer affidavit fees. The revenue is anticipated to increase from the <strong>2012</strong> approved revenue by$641,522. This increase is due to the reassignment <strong>of</strong> the Parking and Operations Maintenance Fund from anEnterprise Fund to the General Fund. Additionally, the city administration is in the process <strong>of</strong> evaluating theparking enforcement strategy for the city and has developed a long-term strategy which will allow the city tocollect outstanding parking revenue.INTEREST REVENUEInterest revenue is projected to decrease by $2,800 from <strong>2012</strong> approved. This is primarily due to the expecteddecrease in the interest rate values on the <strong>City</strong>’s pooled cash.61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!