12.07.2015 Views

2012-2013 Budget - City of Saginaw MI

2012-2013 Budget - City of Saginaw MI

2012-2013 Budget - City of Saginaw MI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Performance Management PlanIntroductionIn an effort to align our <strong>City</strong> Council goals with departmental actions and to address Michigan’s Governor Rick Snyder’scall for increased transparency and accountability, the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Saginaw</strong> has refocused the manner in which it tracksperformance. The <strong>City</strong>’s revised approach is separated into two parallel tracks: CitiStat and Performance Management.The illustration below describes the main tenants <strong>of</strong> each track. The proceeding pages in this section will focus on theperformance management branch <strong>of</strong> city’s efforts.CitiStatPerformanceProblem SolvingAnalysis andReportingIssue FocusedMission FocusedImmediate ActionStepsLong-term PlanningInter-departmentalIntra-departmentalDATAPerformance Management ProcessThe performance management process for the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Saginaw</strong> begins in May and June with planning meetings for eachdepartment and concludes in early August with the completion <strong>of</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Saginaw</strong> FY Performance Managementdocument. The aforementioned meetings yield individual performance plans for each department, which are latercompiled into one document. Each performance plan includes a departmental mission, three to four performanceobjectives, a brief summary <strong>of</strong> services and 2-3 key performance indicators (KPIs) for each division. Larger departmentshave more KPIs because they have more divisions. Please note, the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Saginaw</strong> has just completed the first year <strong>of</strong> arevised performance measurement system and some measures have been replaced with other measure that reflects theoperation.Each department’s performance on their KPIs is measured twice a year: at the 6-month period and at the end <strong>of</strong> the fiscalyear in a city-wide performance management evaluation. Each KPI is evaluated in this document and rated. A greenrating indicates full achievement, a yellow rating indicates partial achievement, a red rating indicates noachievement or goal not met and a grey rating indicates no data reported on the specific key performance indicator.Rating <strong>of</strong> the Key Performance Indicators CriteriaA 10% factor was applied to all indicators to illustrate whether the indicator was achieved or partially achieved whencompared to the KPI target for FY <strong>2012</strong>. Additionally, a 50% or fewer factors is applied to all indictors to illustrate thatthe KPI target was not met. Explanations <strong>of</strong> variance have been provided for all measures that are rated yellow and red.385

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!