2012-2013 Budget - City of Saginaw MI
2012-2013 Budget - City of Saginaw MI 2012-2013 Budget - City of Saginaw MI
REVENUE BUDGET SUMMARYDRUG FORFEITURE GRANT FUNDThe Drug Forfeiture Fund accounts for all revenues andexpenditures received from the forfeiture or cash andproperty seized during a drug raid. The major revenuesource for the Drug Forfeiture Fund is fines and federaland state forfeitures. After a drug raid, the city turnsover these seized funds to the judicial system asevidence in prosecution. Afterwards, these funds arereleased back to the city and are utilized to offset thecost of drug enforcement activities.The budget for the Drug Forfeiture Grant Fund has beenapproved at $148,036. This represents a $16,200, or12.29% increase from the previous fiscal years. Theincrease in this fund is primarily attributed to a largerappropriation of fund equity to offset the increasingexpenditures.SUMMARY OF REVENUES2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2011/12 2011/12 2012/13Actual Actual Actual Approved Adjusted Projected ApprovedFederal Grants 10,687 0 0 0 0 0 0Fines and Forfeitures 365,485 39,127 160,255 32,360 35,906 43,869 32,360Interest and Rents 7,407 2,688 1,898 2,500 2,500 2,078 2,500Other Revenues 1,270 4,855 32,232 96,976 207,668 167,962 113,176REVENUE TRENDSTotal Revenues 384,849 46,670 194,385 131,836 246,074 213,909 148,036450,000400,000350,000300,000250,000200,000150,000100,00050,000-Total Drug Forfeiture Revenues Since 20022002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013Total Drug Forfeiture RevenuesThe above graph reflects numerical data from FY 2002 – FY 2011 Actual Revenues, FY 2012 Approved Budget, and FY2013 Approved Budget. From FY 2002-2008 there had been a steady decrease in the amounts collected from fines andforfeitures. However, by February of 2009, the city received a cash transfer of over $251,000, for federal forfeitedproperty from a judicial case that had been completed in a previous fiscal year. In FY 2010, little or no monies werereceived in fines and forfeitures. In March of 2011, the city received approximately $170,421, in monies from a federalforfeited case. These monies are not expected to be received in FY 2012. In FY 2013, the City expects an upward trendin revenues due to the large appropriation of reserves.172
EXPENDITURE BUDGET SUMMARYThe total Drug Forfeiture Fund Expenditures will be$148,036, for FY 2013. Again, this represents a$16,200, increase from the previous fiscal year. Nofunds will be appropriated for Personnel Services.Operating Expenses will be $148,036, for the upcomingyear. This represents a $66,200, increase from FY 2012.This increase is due to funds allotted to purchase 26Taser cameras, K-9 supplies, ammunition and to coverthe maintenance agreement for the City’s Shotspottersystem. The category of Capital Outlay will be zero, forthe upcoming year.FUNDING LEVEL SUMMARY2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2011/12 2011/12 2012/13Actual Actual Actual Approved Adjusted Projected Approved3040 Drug Forfeiture 63,976 118,661 158,859 131,836 246,074 213,909 148,036Total Expenditures 63,976 118,661 158,859 131,836 246,074 213,909 148,036FUNDING LEVEL BY CATEGORY2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2011/12 2011/12 2012/13Actual Actual Actual Approved Adjusted Projected ApprovedPersonnel Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Operating Expenses 63,026 118,661 79,904 81,836 138,476 117,117 148,036Capital Outlay 950 0 78,955 50,000 107,598 96,792 0Total Expenditures 63,976 118,661 158,859 131,836 246,074 213,909 148,036173
- Page 148 and 149: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 150 and 151: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 152 and 153: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 154 and 155: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 156 and 157: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 158 and 159: LOCAL STREETS FUND (203)RESOURCE AL
- Page 160 and 161: DETAIL REVENUES ANALYSIS2008/09 200
- Page 162 and 163: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 164 and 165: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 166: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 169 and 170: CITY OF SAGINAWRUBBISH COLLECTION F
- Page 171 and 172: REVENUE BUDGET SUMMARYRUBBISH COLLE
- Page 173 and 174: EXPENDITURE BUDGET SUMMARYRUBBISH C
- Page 175 and 176: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 177 and 178: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 179: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 182 and 183: PUBLIC SAFETY FUND (205)RESOURCE AL
- Page 184 and 185: The above graph reflects numerical
- Page 186 and 187: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 188 and 189: PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTSRESOURCE ALLOCA
- Page 190 and 191: pursued crime technology grants and
- Page 192 and 193: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 194 and 195: POLICE TRAINING FUNDREVENUE BUDGET
- Page 196 and 197: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - JUSTICE ASS
- Page 200 and 201: SAGINAW COUNTY TREATMENT AND PREVEN
- Page 202 and 203: REVENUE BUDGET SUMMARYHOMELAND SECU
- Page 204 and 205: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 206 and 207: EXPENDITURE BUDGET SUMMARYThe total
- Page 208 and 209: TIFA/LDFA/DDA (SRF)
- Page 210 and 211: REVENUE BUDGET SUMMARYCLEAN ENERGY
- Page 212 and 213: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 214 and 215: REVENUE BUDGET SUMMARYANDERSEN ENRI
- Page 216 and 217: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 218 and 219: GM TOWER PROJECTREVENUE BUDGET SUMM
- Page 220 and 221: BOAT LAUNCH OPERATIONS (239)RESOURC
- Page 222 and 223: EXPENDITURE BUDGET SUMMARYThe Boat
- Page 224 and 225: COMMERCE CENTER DDAREVENUE BUDGET S
- Page 226 and 227: FUNDING LEVEL BY CATEGORY2008/09 20
- Page 228 and 229: BROWNFIELD AUTHORITY SRRFREVENUE BU
- Page 230 and 231: REVENUE/EXPENDITURE BUDGET SUMMARYS
- Page 232 and 233: REVENUE/EXPENDITURE BUDGET SUMMARYT
- Page 235 and 236: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTBLOCK GRANT
- Page 237 and 238: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (
- Page 239 and 240: DETAIL REVENUES ANALYSIS2008/09 200
- Page 241 and 242: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 243 and 244: EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS DETAIL2012/201
- Page 245 and 246: CDBG RESIDENTIAL LOANS (276)RESOURC
- Page 247 and 248: EXPENDITURE BUDGET SUMMARYThe total
REVENUE BUDGET SUMMARYDRUG FORFEITURE GRANT FUNDThe Drug Forfeiture Fund accounts for all revenues andexpenditures received from the forfeiture or cash andproperty seized during a drug raid. The major revenuesource for the Drug Forfeiture Fund is fines and federaland state forfeitures. After a drug raid, the city turnsover these seized funds to the judicial system asevidence in prosecution. Afterwards, these funds arereleased back to the city and are utilized to <strong>of</strong>fset thecost <strong>of</strong> drug enforcement activities.The budget for the Drug Forfeiture Grant Fund has beenapproved at $148,036. This represents a $16,200, or12.29% increase from the previous fiscal years. Theincrease in this fund is primarily attributed to a largerappropriation <strong>of</strong> fund equity to <strong>of</strong>fset the increasingexpenditures.SUMMARY OF REVENUES2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2011/12 2011/12 <strong>2012</strong>/13Actual Actual Actual Approved Adjusted Projected ApprovedFederal Grants 10,687 0 0 0 0 0 0Fines and Forfeitures 365,485 39,127 160,255 32,360 35,906 43,869 32,360Interest and Rents 7,407 2,688 1,898 2,500 2,500 2,078 2,500Other Revenues 1,270 4,855 32,232 96,976 207,668 167,962 113,176REVENUE TRENDSTotal Revenues 384,849 46,670 194,385 131,836 246,074 213,909 148,036450,000400,000350,000300,000250,000200,000150,000100,00050,000-Total Drug Forfeiture Revenues Since 20022002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 <strong>2012</strong> <strong>2013</strong>Total Drug Forfeiture RevenuesThe above graph reflects numerical data from FY 2002 – FY 2011 Actual Revenues, FY <strong>2012</strong> Approved <strong>Budget</strong>, and FY<strong>2013</strong> Approved <strong>Budget</strong>. From FY 2002-2008 there had been a steady decrease in the amounts collected from fines andforfeitures. However, by February <strong>of</strong> 2009, the city received a cash transfer <strong>of</strong> over $251,000, for federal forfeitedproperty from a judicial case that had been completed in a previous fiscal year. In FY 2010, little or no monies werereceived in fines and forfeitures. In March <strong>of</strong> 2011, the city received approximately $170,421, in monies from a federalforfeited case. These monies are not expected to be received in FY <strong>2012</strong>. In FY <strong>2013</strong>, the <strong>City</strong> expects an upward trendin revenues due to the large appropriation <strong>of</strong> reserves.172