2012-2013 Budget - City of Saginaw MI

2012-2013 Budget - City of Saginaw MI 2012-2013 Budget - City of Saginaw MI

saginaw.mi.com
from saginaw.mi.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE – JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT (JAG) FUNDREVENUE BUDGET SUMMARYThe Department of Justice – JAG Fund accounts forrevenues and expenditures related to various projectsthat provide better services, and fight crime in thecommunity as approved by the United States’Department of Justice. This funding allocation is basedon the community’s violent crime statistics. In addition,these funds are shared with surrounding municipalitiesand the county. What is listed in the budget is strictlythe city’s portion. Moreover, the county is the fiduciaryagency and is responsible for recording all expenditureactivities.The 2012/2013 Approved Budget for the Department ofJustice – JAG will be $15,000. This represents a$93,953, reduction from the previous fiscal year.Revenues have decreased due to the utilization of grantdollars in the previous fiscal years. Additionally, at thetime of budget development, the city did not have the2012 Department of Justice’s JAG allocation. Thesefunds will be recognized later in FY 2013.SUMMARY OF REVENUES2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2011/12 2011/12 2012/13Actual Actual Actual Approved Adjusted Projected ApprovedState Grant 0 219,607 251,586 108,953 409,994 320,308 15,000REVENUE TRENDSTotal Revenues 0 219,607 251,586 108,953 409,994 320,308 15,000600,000Total DOJ - JAG Grant Revenues Since 2002500,000400,000300,000200,000Total DOJ - JAG Grant Revenues100,000-2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013The above graph reflects numerical data from FY 2002 – FY 2011 Actual Revenues, FY 2012 Approved Budget, and FY2013 Approved. Revenues for this fund are dependent on what the federal government allocates to the municipality.From FY 2001 – 2005, the city experienced a steady decline in grant allocations. For FY 2006 – 2009, no grant dollarswere received. However, In FY 2010, the City received stimulus funds from the Department of Justice, these funds wereexpected to be spent on law enforcement activities outlined by the federal government. The 2011 Budget reflects theaddition of the Regular 2010 JAG Grant and the remaining stimulus funds. By the FY 2012 Approved Budget, revenuesare begins to decrease due to the utilization of the stimulus dollars in prior years. For the FY 2013 Approved Budgetrevenues continue to decline.170

EXPENDITURE BUDGET SUMMARYThe total Department of Justice – JAG Grantexpenditures are $15,000, for FY 2013, which is -$93,953, less than the FY 2012 approved budgetedlevels. There are no Personnel Services in this fund.Operating Expenses will be $15,000, for the upcomingyear. This represents a $77,614 decrease. Thisreduction in operating expenses is due in large part to areduction in monies allocated for service fees. Nomonies are allocated for Capital Outlay.FUNDING LEVEL SUMMARY2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2011/12 2011/12 2012/13Actual Actual Actual Approved Adjusted Projected Approved3321 DOJ Grant (Stimulus) 0 219,607 239,488 108,953 112,481 90,699 03329 DOJ Grant (Regular) 0 0 12,098 0 216,733 187,135 15,0003330 DOJ Grant (2011) 0 0 0 0 80,780 42,474 0Total Expenditures 0 219,607 251,586 108,953 409,994 320,308 15,000FUNDING LEVEL BY CATEGORY2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2011/12 2011/12 2012/13Actual Actual Actual Approved Adjusted Projected ApprovedPersonnel Services 0 0 0 0 28,977 31,151 0Operating Expenses 0 57,228 29,855 92,614 49,115 27,897 15,000Capital Outlay 0 165,379 221,731 16,339 331,902 261,259 0Total Expenditures 0 222,607 251,586 108,953 409,994 320,308 15,000171

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE – JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT (JAG) FUNDREVENUE BUDGET SUMMARYThe Department <strong>of</strong> Justice – JAG Fund accounts forrevenues and expenditures related to various projectsthat provide better services, and fight crime in thecommunity as approved by the United States’Department <strong>of</strong> Justice. This funding allocation is basedon the community’s violent crime statistics. In addition,these funds are shared with surrounding municipalitiesand the county. What is listed in the budget is strictlythe city’s portion. Moreover, the county is the fiduciaryagency and is responsible for recording all expenditureactivities.The <strong>2012</strong>/<strong>2013</strong> Approved <strong>Budget</strong> for the Department <strong>of</strong>Justice – JAG will be $15,000. This represents a$93,953, reduction from the previous fiscal year.Revenues have decreased due to the utilization <strong>of</strong> grantdollars in the previous fiscal years. Additionally, at thetime <strong>of</strong> budget development, the city did not have the<strong>2012</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Justice’s JAG allocation. Thesefunds will be recognized later in FY <strong>2013</strong>.SUMMARY OF REVENUES2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2011/12 2011/12 <strong>2012</strong>/13Actual Actual Actual Approved Adjusted Projected ApprovedState Grant 0 219,607 251,586 108,953 409,994 320,308 15,000REVENUE TRENDSTotal Revenues 0 219,607 251,586 108,953 409,994 320,308 15,000600,000Total DOJ - JAG Grant Revenues Since 2002500,000400,000300,000200,000Total DOJ - JAG Grant Revenues100,000-2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 <strong>2012</strong> <strong>2013</strong>The above graph reflects numerical data from FY 2002 – FY 2011 Actual Revenues, FY <strong>2012</strong> Approved <strong>Budget</strong>, and FY<strong>2013</strong> Approved. Revenues for this fund are dependent on what the federal government allocates to the municipality.From FY 2001 – 2005, the city experienced a steady decline in grant allocations. For FY 2006 – 2009, no grant dollarswere received. However, In FY 2010, the <strong>City</strong> received stimulus funds from the Department <strong>of</strong> Justice, these funds wereexpected to be spent on law enforcement activities outlined by the federal government. The 2011 <strong>Budget</strong> reflects theaddition <strong>of</strong> the Regular 2010 JAG Grant and the remaining stimulus funds. By the FY <strong>2012</strong> Approved <strong>Budget</strong>, revenuesare begins to decrease due to the utilization <strong>of</strong> the stimulus dollars in prior years. For the FY <strong>2013</strong> Approved <strong>Budget</strong>revenues continue to decline.170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!