12.07.2015 Views

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

38715city, creating the impression of an indiscriminate attack. 4234 The timing of the attack,during early morning twilight, could <strong>al</strong>so have added to the perception that the entirecity was under attack, because the lack of natur<strong>al</strong> light exacerbates the flash impacts ofartillery. 42351171. With regard to artillery or forward observers, Konings testified that forwardobservers are important intelligence ass<strong>et</strong>s, as they may initiate fire missions, controland correct fire, assess the results and advise the unit commander. 4236 According toKonings, firing artillery at a moving targ<strong>et</strong> requires a forward observer that canconstantly see the targ<strong>et</strong> moving. 4237 Further, the use of artillery and mortars againststationary targ<strong>et</strong>s in civilian-populated areas without having these targ<strong>et</strong>s underobservation by a forward observer is inadvisable, unless the targ<strong>et</strong> is beyond thecollater<strong>al</strong> damage distance and the exact location is known. 4238 Air-basedreconnaissance can be used as an <strong>al</strong>ternative to forward observers. 4239 Observation ofthe civilian-populated area containing military targ<strong>et</strong>s during artillery fire <strong>al</strong>lows acommander to know wh<strong>et</strong>her the artillery is having the intended effects and not causingunintended damage to infrastructure or people. 4240 Corn testified that artillery observerscan be used to correct fire and b<strong>et</strong>ter control the effects of the attack and mitigate therisk of collater<strong>al</strong> damage or incident<strong>al</strong> injury to civilians. 4241 However, observed indirectfire is not <strong>al</strong>ways an option: when firing artillery at long range, commanders might notbe willing or able to place observers in close proximity to long range targ<strong>et</strong>s, especi<strong>al</strong>lyin areas under significant enemy control. 4242 Unobserved indirect fire is based onintelligence indicating the location of proposed targ<strong>et</strong>s and indirect fire directionc<strong>al</strong>culations. 4243 Thus commanders should engage in a proportion<strong>al</strong>ity an<strong>al</strong>ysis,4234 Geoffrey Corn, T. 21238-21241, 21247-21250, 21254-21255.4235 Geoffrey Corn, T. 21255.4236 P1259 (Harry Konings, expert report, “Fire support during Operation Storm, August 1995”), p. 8,Annex A, pp. 3, 7; P1262 (Harry Konings, Corrigendum to the expert report), p. 1.4237 Harry Konings, T. 14344.4238 P1259 (Harry Konings, expert report, “Fire support during Operation Storm, August 1995”), p. 8;P1260 (Harry Konings, Addendum to expert report), p. 5; Harry Konings, T. 14360-14361.4239 P1259 (Harry Konings, expert report, “Fire support during Operation Storm, August 1995”), p. 8;P1260 (Harry Konings, Addendum to expert report), p. 5.4240 Harry Konings, T. 14360-14361.4241 D1642 (Expert Report of Geoffrey Corn, 28 June 2009), p. 17; Geoffrey Corn, T. 21178-21179,21185.4242 D1642 (Expert Report of Geoffrey Corn, 28 June 2009), pp. 17-18.4243 D1642 (Expert Report of Geoffrey Corn, 28 June 2009), p. 17.600Case No.: IT-06-90-T 15 April 2011 `

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!