Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

38748back to their vehicles shortly after the house had caught fire, the Trial Chamber findsthat they set it on fire. Given the description of the perpetrators of these incidents byBerikoff and Roberts as soldiers the Trial Chamber finds that they wore military-typeuniforms. Further, considering the HV presence on this date in the nearby village ofKosovo (see 4.2.15 Kosovo village), the Trial Chamber finds that the perpetrators weremembers of the Croatian military forces. Regarding the one house that was burnt, theTrial Chamber has received no direct evidence regarding the ethnicity of the owner orinhabitant of that property. Considering the limited extent of the destruction, the 1991Population Census data will not be helpful in this instance. Regarding the unspecifieditems taken away, the Trial Chamber considered that, given that the majority of villagesalong the Knin-Drniš road were predominately Serb in 1991 and further, consideringthat houses with Croatian markings on them were spared, the Trial Chamber finds that asignificant number, if not all, of the items taken away were owned by Krajina Serbs.The Trial Chamber will further consider these incidents under Counts 1, 4, and 5 of theIndictment in chapters 5.5.2, 5.6.2, and 5.8.2 (f) and (g) below.1106. The evidence further indicates that on 6-11 and 15 August 1995 numeroushouses, fields and vehicles along the Knin-Drniš road were damaged, destroyed, burntor still ablaze while the occasional village remained intact. The evidence furtherindicates that dead livestock along this route was abounding. However, this evidence isunspecific and does not indicate when, by whom, or the circumstances under whichthese houses were set alight or the animals were killed. Under these circumstances, theTrial Chamber will not further consider these incidents in relation to Counts 1 and 5 ofthe Indictment.567Case No.: IT-06-90-T 15 April 2011 `