12.07.2015 Views

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

38769at 11:35 a.m. ECMM observed in Orlić that around 50 per cent of the village had burntand there were five soldiers conducting sm<strong>al</strong>l sc<strong>al</strong>e looting. 3947 At 12:46 p.m. on 26August 1995, an ECMM team witnessed three Croatian soldiers near a house in Orlićthat, according to the team, had recently been s<strong>et</strong> on fire. One of the soldiers loaded hisweapon and told the team that there had been fire <strong>al</strong>ready the day before. 3948 Before 8p.m. on 19 September 1995, UNMO observed civilians and uniformed men lootingOrlić. 39491061. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber has received evidence that by 11:35 a.m. on 12 August 1995,around 50 per cent of Orlić village was burnt. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber finds that around 10or 11 August 1995, three persons in camouflage uniforms, armed with automatic riflesand wearing black headbands, s<strong>et</strong> fire to houses and one hay barn in Orlić village. TheTri<strong>al</strong> Chamber rac<strong>al</strong>ls its findings in chapter 4.2.15 (Knin-Drniš road). Based on theforegoing, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber finds that the three persons were members of the HV.Considering the <strong>et</strong>hnic composition of Orlić in 1991, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber finds that asignificant number, if not <strong>al</strong>l of the burnt property was owned or inhabited by KrajinaSerbs. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber will further consider the incident in relation to Counts 1 and 5of the Indictment.1062. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber has further received evidence that on 12 August 1995, fivepersons referred to as soldiers, were looting in Orlić village, which the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamberunderstands to mean they took unspecified objects away. Given the description of thesepersons as soldiers by the ECMM report and Erik Hendriks, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber issatisfied that these persons wore military-type uniforms. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber hasreceived no other reliable evidence about which armed forces, if any, the <strong>al</strong>legedperp<strong>et</strong>rators belonged to. Nor has the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber received sufficient evidenceregarding which armed forces, if any, were present in or in the vicinity of Orlić villageat that time. Therefore, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber is unable to draw any conclusions regardingthe identity or affiliation of the <strong>al</strong>leged perp<strong>et</strong>rators.1063. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber has <strong>al</strong>so received evidence that on at 12:46 p.m. on 26August 1995, an ECMM team observed three persons referred to as Croatian soldiersnear a house in Orlić village which had recently been s<strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>ight. Given the description of3947 P1290 (Survey report by Marker Hansen, 20 September 1995), p. 7.3948 P766 (ECMM report, 26 August 1995), p. 1.3949 P154 (UNMO Sector South daily situation report, 8 p.m., 19 September 1995), pp. 1, 4.546Case No.: IT-06-90-T 15 April 2011 `

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!