12.07.2015 Views

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38794owned by Krajina Serbs. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber will further consider these incidents inrelation to Counts 1 and 4 of the Indictment.995. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber finds that on one occasion during the days following 11 or 12August 1995, four HV soldiers wearing Croatian emblems on their uniforms took itemsfrom ðoko Novković’s house in Žagrović. The evidence indicates that ðoko Novkovićwas a refugee in the FRY in 1997. Considering this to be a strong indicator that he wasSerb, tog<strong>et</strong>her with the 1991 population census that shows that Žagrović was a nearly100 per cent Serb village in 1991, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber finds that ðoko Novković was aSerb. Under these circumstances, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber will further consider this incidentin relation to Counts 1 and 4 of the Indictment 5.6.2, and 5.8.2 (f) below.996. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber finds that on 15 August 1995, persons referred to as Croatiansoldiers took <strong>al</strong>l the technic<strong>al</strong> appliances, v<strong>al</strong>uable working tools, livestock, and atractor from the house in Žagrović that Witness 69 had visited earlier in the evening of11 or 12 August 1995 and that was owned by a Serb. Based on the witness’s descriptionof the persons as soldiers, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber is satisfied that they wore military-typeuniforms. Witness 69 does not provide further d<strong>et</strong>ails as to the factu<strong>al</strong> basis for theirqu<strong>al</strong>ification as Croatian. Consequently, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber cannot assess wh<strong>et</strong>her thisqu<strong>al</strong>ification was made on a proper factu<strong>al</strong> basis. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber rec<strong>al</strong>ls its findingsabove with regard to ðoko Novković’s house. Based on the foregoing, the Tri<strong>al</strong>Chamber finds that HV soldiers took the items from a house owned by a Serb. The Tri<strong>al</strong>Chamber will further consider this incident in relation to Counts 1 and 4 of theIndictment.997. The evidence indicates that in Bradaši, on 23 August 1995, one HV soldier tookparts out of a car and others took furniture out of homes. Based on the description ofthese persons as soldiers, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber is satisfied that they wore military-typeuniforms. The evidence does not provide further d<strong>et</strong>ails as to the factu<strong>al</strong> basis for thequ<strong>al</strong>ification of them belonging to the HV. Consequently, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber cannotassess wh<strong>et</strong>her this qu<strong>al</strong>ification was made on a proper factu<strong>al</strong> basis. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamberhas received no other reliable evidence about which armed forces, if any, the <strong>al</strong>legedperp<strong>et</strong>rators belonged to, including sufficient evidence about which armed forces, ifany, were present in or in the vicinity of Žagrović at the time. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber istherefore unable to draw any conclusions regarding the identity or affiliation of the521Case No.: IT-06-90-T 15 April 2011 `

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!