12.07.2015 Views

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

38858evidence is not sufficient to establish that these persons s<strong>et</strong> fire to the houses. Accordingto a VP log book, on 1 September 1995 someone saw sever<strong>al</strong> persons in VP cars withlicense plates “HV 283 VP” and “HV 719 VP” close to some burning houses inGolubić, and according to the same log book it was later established that the VPmembers had discovered the burning houses and were looking for the perp<strong>et</strong>rators. Theproximity b<strong>et</strong>ween the VP members and the fires is not sufficient to establish that thesepersons s<strong>et</strong> fire to the houses. Fin<strong>al</strong>ly, the evidence indicates that a house near Golubićwas burning on 25 September 1995. However, there is insufficient evidence as to thecircumstances under which the house was s<strong>et</strong> on fire. Under these circumstances, theTri<strong>al</strong> Chamber will not further consider these incidents in relation to Counts 1, 4, and 5of the Indictment.855. On the basis of P2610, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber finds that on 8 September 1995 fivemembers of the HV based in the Golubić area took, for their person<strong>al</strong> gain, a largenumber of items (listed on pages 7-8 of P2610) from houses in Golubić, loaded themonto a truck and drove towards Zadar. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber notes in this regard that theMunicip<strong>al</strong> Court in Knin convicted them of aggravated theft, and that there is noindication in the evidence that this judgement did not become fin<strong>al</strong> under Croatian law.Based on evidence from Mauro, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber further finds that on 5 September1995 persons referred to as Croatian military were looting in the Golubić area, whichthe Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber understands to mean that they took unspecified items away. Maurodid not provide further d<strong>et</strong>ails as to the factu<strong>al</strong> basis for her qu<strong>al</strong>ification of thesepersons as Croatian military. However, considering the presence of the HV in the areaof Golubić at the time, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber finds that these persons were members of theHV. Considering the <strong>et</strong>hnic composition of Golubić in 1991, the Chamber finds thatmost if not <strong>al</strong>l of these items were owned by Krajina Serbs. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber willfurther consider these incidents in relation to Counts 1 and 4 of the Indictment inchapters 5.5.2 5.6.2 and 5.8.2 (f) below.Knin town856. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber has received large amounts of evidence relevant to the<strong>al</strong>leged destruction and plunder in Knin. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber has considered <strong>al</strong>l of thisevidence, but only reviews and discusses parts of it below, focusing on the best457Case No.: IT-06-90-T 15 April 2011 `

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!