Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

38867therefore finds that these persons were members of Croatian military forces. For allthese cases except for the one of 31 August 1995 mentioned above, the evidence doesnot show from where the persons took the items, and therefore does not establishwhether the objects that were taken were owned by Krajina Serbs. For the latter casethat reports of HV members taking items in Kistanje, the Trial Chamber considers the1991 population census in relation to Kistanje as referred to above, and finds that thevast majority if not all of these items taken from Kistanje were owned by Krajina Serbs.The Trial Chamber will further consider these incidents in relation to Counts 1 and 4 ofthe Indictment in chapters 5.6.2 and 5.8.2 (f) below.Korde834. The Trial Chamber has received relevant evidence with regard to allegeddestruction in Korde in Kistanje municipality through an ECMM report. According tothis report, ECMM observed in Korde at 10:05 a.m. on 11 September 1995 two houseson fire and a military truck without license plates coming from the direction of thehamlet. 3288835. The evidence indicates that in the morning of 11 September 1995 two houseswere burning in Korde while a military truck was coming from the direction of thehamlet. The Trial Chamber cannot draw any inference from the sole circumstance thatthe truck was seen coming from the direction of Korde while the two houses wereburning. The Trial Chamber has not received any other evidence indicating when, bywhom and under which circumstances the houses were set alight. Therefore, the TrialChamber will not further consider this incident in relation to Counts 1 and 5 of theIndictment.Parčić836. The Trial Chamber has received relevant evidence with regard to allegeddestruction and plunder in Parčić in Kistanje municipality primarily through thetestimony of Konstantin Drča.3288 P950 (ECMM Team Knin daily report, 11 September 1995), p. 1.448Case No.: IT-06-90-T 15 April 2011 `