12.07.2015 Views

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

39128members of the HV 7th Guards Brigade, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber finds that the HV soldiersthen gathered approximately ten to twelve persons, including Dušan Dragičević, andbrought them to a nearby bus stop at gunpoint. Shortly thereafter the HV soldiers tookthem to a nearby house, and just before dark to another house where they stayedovernight. They <strong>al</strong>so brought Witness 1. The next morning, 6 August 1995, the HVsoldiers took them – excluding Witness 1 – to a school building in Knin, where thewomen and elderly remained. The HV soldiers took the men, one of whom was DušanDragičević, to the “Slavko Rodić” barracks in Knin, where they remained from 6 untilon or about 11 August 1995 with about 30 others. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber further finds thatin these barracks, d<strong>et</strong>ainees were beaten, including by persons in camouflage uniform,and forced to perform labour, including by persons referred to as soldiers. Consideringthat Dušan Dragičević saw the insignia of the 4th Guards Brigade on the uniforms of thesoldiers who ran the barracks, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber finds that the persons who d<strong>et</strong>ainedDušan Dragičević and the other persons at the barracks were members of the HV 4thGuards Brigade. Dušan Dragičević and Witness 1 were eventu<strong>al</strong>ly taken to Zadar andSplit where they stayed at various locations. In this respect, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber rec<strong>al</strong>ls itsfindings with regard to reception and collection centres in chapter 4.5.5. The evidenceregarding their passage in prisons in Zadar and Split is insufficiently d<strong>et</strong>ailed for theTri<strong>al</strong> Chamber to make relevant factu<strong>al</strong> findings.333. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber finds, based on Witness 1’s and Dušan Dragičević’sevidence, that they were Serbs. According to Witness 1’s evidence, Savo Milovojevićand more than 20 others d<strong>et</strong>ained at the latter’s house were in the SVK. Based on thisaffiliation evidence, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber finds that most or <strong>al</strong>l of these SVK d<strong>et</strong>aineeswere Krajina Serbs. As for the other persons brought with Dušan Dragičević to the busstop at gunpoint, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber finds, considering the <strong>et</strong>hnic composition of Polačain 1991 and the nature of the convoy stopped in or near the village of Kovačić, that mostof them were of Serb <strong>et</strong>hnicity. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber has received insufficient evidence tobe able to d<strong>et</strong>ermine the <strong>et</strong>hnicity of the persons held at the “Slavko Rodić” barracks,other than as mentioned above. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber will further consider these incidentsin relation to Count 1 of the Indictment in chapter 5.8.2 (e) below.187Case No.: IT-06-90-T 15 April 2011 `

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!