12.07.2015 Views

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

39165found lying next to Uroš Ognjenović’s, indicates that the same two men killed UrošŠarić.277. The evidence of Radoslav and Mirko Ognjenović on the two men’s clothing isinconsistent: Mirko Ognjenović testified that the two men both wore camouflageuniforms, while Radoslav Ognjenović stated that one of the men wore a uniform and theother civilian clothes. Further, the UNMO report of a villager telling an UNMO teamthat two HV soldiers had killed two individu<strong>al</strong>s in Kakanj on the evening of 18 August1995 appears to relate to the same incident, but does not provide further d<strong>et</strong>ails as to thefactu<strong>al</strong> basis for the villager’s qu<strong>al</strong>ification of the two perp<strong>et</strong>rators as HV soldiers.Consequently, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber cannot assess wh<strong>et</strong>her this qu<strong>al</strong>ification was made ona proper factu<strong>al</strong> basis. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber has received no other reliable evidence aboutwhich armed forces, if any, the perp<strong>et</strong>rators belonged to. Nor has the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamberreceived sufficient evidence about which armed forces, if any, were present in or in thevicinity of Kakanj at the time. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber is therefore unable to draw anyconclusions regarding the identity or affiliation of the perp<strong>et</strong>rators. Under thesecircumstances, the Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber will not further consider this incident in relation toCounts 1, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of the Indictment.Vojin Šarić (Further Clarification no. 84)278. The Tri<strong>al</strong> Chamber has received relevant evidence on the <strong>al</strong>leged murder ofVojin Šarić primarily through the testimony of Mirko Ognjenović, and and fromdocumentation related to a crimin<strong>al</strong> investigation in Croatia. Mirko Ognjenović, a Serbborn in 1921 from the village of Kakanj in Kistanje municip<strong>al</strong>ity, 1043 stated that he wasinformed that Vojin Šarić (born in 1911) had been found dead in a well. 1044 Accordingto the witness, Vojin Šarić was the only person left in Kakanj when the witness left on26 August 1995. 1045 According to a crimin<strong>al</strong> report, signed by Ive Kardum and dated 201043 P989 (Mirko Ognjenović, witness statement, 24 January 1999), pp. 1-2; P990 (Mirko Ognjenović,witness statement, 12 July 2004), p. 1; Mirko Ognjenović, T. 10701; D873 (MUP offici<strong>al</strong> note ofinterview with Mirko Ognjenović, 6 May 2004), p. 1; D874 (L<strong>et</strong>ters from the Police Administration ofŠibenik-Knin with offici<strong>al</strong> notes), p. 6.1044 P989 (Mirko Ognjenović, witness statement, 24 January 1999), pp. 3, 9; D873 (MUP offici<strong>al</strong> note ofinterview with Mirko Ognjenović, 6 May 2004), p. 2; D874 (L<strong>et</strong>ters from the Police Administration ofŠibenik-Knin with offici<strong>al</strong> notes), p. 4.1045 P989 (Mirko Ognjenović, witness statement, 24 January 1999), p. 9; D873 (MUP offici<strong>al</strong> note ofinterview with Mirko Ognjenović, 6 May 2004), p. 2; D874 (L<strong>et</strong>ters from the Police Administration ofŠibenik-Knin with offici<strong>al</strong> notes), p. 4.150Case No.: IT-06-90-T 15 April 2011 `

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!