12.07.2015 Views

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

Gotovina et al Judgement Volume I - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

39168Administration of Zadar-Knin had referred him on 11 September 1995 to the Red Cross,which had pronounced itself incomp<strong>et</strong>ent in this case. 1024 On 8 January 1996, the son ofUroš Šarić requested from the military prosecutor in Zadar information regarding anyaction taken in relation to his crimin<strong>al</strong> report submitted on 28 August 1995. 1025 On 15January 1996, he wrote to Assistant Minister of the Interior Benko to encourage theinvestigation. 1026 In reaction to the l<strong>et</strong>ter of 2 October 1995 and a reminder of 31January 1996, Captain Marijan Babić of the VP informed the military prosecutor inSplit on 2 February 1996 that the Police Administration Zadar-Knin was de<strong>al</strong>ing withthis case, and that Kakanj was not within the territori<strong>al</strong> comp<strong>et</strong>ence of his police. 1027 On20 February 1996, Assistant Military Prosecutor Denona sent copies of this report andthe crimin<strong>al</strong> report submitted by the son of Uroš Šarić to the Police AdministrationZadar-Knin. 1028 On 25 March 1996, Ive Kardum requested the 7th Knin police station ofthe Šibenik Police Administration to quickly find the persons stated in the enclosedcrimin<strong>al</strong> report submitted by the son of Uroš Šarić and to conduct interviews withthem. 1029 On 1 April 1996, Ive Kardum wrote to the Office of the Military Prosecutor inSplit that during the recovery of bodies 445 and 446 at the city cem<strong>et</strong>ery in Zadar, anon-site investigation was not conducted by crimin<strong>al</strong> police officers of the Zadar-Kninpolice administration, nor did they interview witnesses as they could not locate them. 1030By l<strong>et</strong>ter of December 1996, Assistant Military Prosecutor Denona sent the case, amongother unresolved cases, to the county public prosecutor of Šibenik. 1031 The crimin<strong>al</strong>report of the son of Uroš Šarić was sent on 21 February 2000 by Deputy County PublicProsecutor Višić to the Šibenik-Knin Police Administration with the request to find theperp<strong>et</strong>rators and report back on <strong>al</strong>l measures taken. 10321024 P993 (L<strong>et</strong>ter from Srećko Šarić to the public prosecutor, 6 December 1995).1025 P1000 (L<strong>et</strong>ter from Srećko Šarić to the military prosecutor, 8 January 1996).1026 P994 (L<strong>et</strong>ter from Srećko Šarić to Assistant Minister of the Interior Benko, 15 January 1996).1027 P1001 (L<strong>et</strong>ter from Head of the Crimin<strong>al</strong> Police Marijan Babić to the military prosecutor in Split, 2February 1996).1028 P1002 (L<strong>et</strong>ter from Assistant Military Prosecutor Denona to the Zadar-Knin Police Administration,20 February 1996).1029 D877 (L<strong>et</strong>ters from the Police Administration of Zadar-Knin, 11 September 1995 and 25 March1996), p. 2.1030 P1003 (Crimin<strong>al</strong> report from Ive Kardum, chief of the Crimin<strong>al</strong> Police Department, 1 April 1996).1031 P998 (L<strong>et</strong>ter from Deputy Military Prosecutor Denona to the county public prosecutor of Šibenik,December 1996).1032 P996 (Forensic records of Šibenik county state prosecutor’s office for Uroš Ognjenović and UrošŠarić), p. 1; P997 (L<strong>et</strong>ter from Deputy County Public Prosecutor Višić to the Šibenik-Knin PoliceAdministration, 21 February 2000).147Case No.: IT-06-90-T 15 April 2011 `

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!