12.07.2015 Views

Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2001-2002 - Measure DHS

Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2001-2002 - Measure DHS

Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2001-2002 - Measure DHS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 14.3 shows that there were no differences in coverage for HIV testing between urban(80 percent) <strong>and</strong> rural women (79 percent). However, rural men were more likely to have been tested thanurban men (77 percent <strong>and</strong> 67 percent, respectively). Provincial differentials (Table 14.4) indicate thatLuapula province had the highest coverage rate (88 percent), while Eastern province had the lowest (61percent). As in the case of syphilis coverage, the highly urbanised provinces (Copperbelt <strong>and</strong> Lusaka) hadgenerally lower coverage rates than the rest of the provinces, except for Eastern <strong>and</strong> Western. Similarproportions of women <strong>and</strong> men in different provinces were tested for HIV. The only exception is noticedin Copperbelt <strong>and</strong> Lusaka provinces where men were substantially less likely to be tested for HIV thanwomen in the same provinces.Table 14.4 Coverage of HIV testing by province (unweighted)Percent distribution of de facto women <strong>and</strong> men eligible for HIV testing by testing status, according to province, <strong>Zambia</strong> <strong>2001</strong>-<strong>2002</strong>Testing statusCentralProvinceCopperbeltEastern Luapula Lusaka NorthernNorth-Western Southern Western TotalWomen 15-49Tested 87.3 81.3 63.4 87.9 76.7 77.1 83.3 87.7 72.3 79.4Refused 11.0 13.4 29.2 11.2 18.7 17.2 10.2 9.8 17.7 15.7Absent 1.7 3.6 4.7 0.5 2.6 2.9 6.5 0.8 3.2 3.0Interviewed in <strong>DHS</strong> 0.6 1.8 0.3 0.0 2.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 0.9 1.1Not interviewed in <strong>DHS</strong> 1.2 1.8 4.3 0.5 0.7 1.2 4.8 0.8 2.3 2.0Result missing 0.0 1.8 2.8 0.5 2.0 2.7 0.0 1.6 6.8 1.9Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Unweighted number 347 337 322 214 305 407 293 244 220 2,689Men 15-59Tested 83.0 67.8 59.3 86.0 62.5 76.8 83.5 83.6 60.4 73.3Refused 11.6 12.5 27.0 12.9 20.8 13.1 7.7 10.2 17.2 14.9Absent 5.1 14.5 10.3 0.5 11.3 6.0 7.3 2.2 13.0 8.1Interviewed in <strong>DHS</strong> 1.0 4.8 1.0 0.5 3.5 0.8 1.2 0.0 2.1 1.7Not interviewed in <strong>DHS</strong> 4.1 9.6 9.3 0.0 7.8 5.2 6.2 2.2 10.9 6.3Result missing 0.3 5.1 3.3 0.5 5.3 4.1 1.5 4.0 9.4 3.7Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Unweighted number 294 311 300 186 283 367 260 225 192 2,418Total 15-49Tested 85.4 74.0 61.1 87.6 70.6 77.2 83.2 86.3 66.5 76.5Refused 11.1 13.5 28.2 11.3 19.4 15.4 9.3 9.5 17.3 15.3Absent 3.4 9.0 7.5 0.5 6.7 4.3 6.7 1.6 8.0 5.5Interviewed in <strong>DHS</strong> 0.8 3.2 0.7 0.3 2.6 1.3 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.4Not interviewed in <strong>DHS</strong> 2.6 5.8 6.8 0.3 4.0 3.0 5.2 1.6 6.5 4.1Result missing 0.2 3.5 3.2 0.5 3.3 3.1 0.7 2.7 8.3 2.7Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Unweighted number 622 624 602 380 571 742 536 451 400 4,928228 | Prevalence of HIV <strong>and</strong> Syphilis

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!