The Learning and Skills Council's Annual Report and Accounts for ...

The Learning and Skills Council's Annual Report and Accounts for ... The Learning and Skills Council's Annual Report and Accounts for ...

dera.ioe.ac.uk
from dera.ioe.ac.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Making SkillsMatterThe Learning and Skills Council’sAnnual Report and Accountsfor 2008–092008–09Of interest to people and organisationsinterested in learning and skills

Making <strong>Skills</strong>Matter<strong>The</strong> <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council’s<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong><strong>for</strong> 2008–092008–09Of interest to people <strong>and</strong> organisationsinterested in learning <strong>and</strong> skills


Front cover image: Elliot Campbell,Train to Gain programme, Next Level Coaching (photographer: Chris North)


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council’s<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong><strong>for</strong> 2008–09<strong>Report</strong> presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State <strong>for</strong> Business, Innovation <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>,in accordance with Section 28 of the <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Act 2000.<strong>Accounts</strong> prepared under Schedule 1 to the <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Act 2000<strong>and</strong> presented by the Comptroller <strong>and</strong> Auditor General.Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 21 July 2009HC 876London: <strong>The</strong> Stationery Office£19.15


©LSC July 2009Extracts from this publication may be reproduced <strong>for</strong>non-commercial educational or training purposes onthe condition that the source is acknowledged <strong>and</strong>the findings are not misrepresented.ISBN: 978 0 10 296008 2


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>Skills</strong> Council existsto make Engl<strong>and</strong>better skilled <strong>and</strong>more competitive.We have a single goal:to improve the skillsof Engl<strong>and</strong>’s youngpeople <strong>and</strong> adultsto drive towardsa work<strong>for</strong>ce ofworld-class st<strong>and</strong>ard.Our commitment is threefold:• to deliver an effective <strong>and</strong> comprehensivelearning offer <strong>for</strong> young people in everyarea, in partnership with local authorities,schools, colleges <strong>and</strong> training providers• to support businesses to find the skillsthey require, <strong>and</strong>• to help adults to train, retrain <strong>and</strong> securesustainable employment.Our total budget<strong>for</strong> 2008–09 was£12.07 billion.Our <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> covers the financial yearup to 31 March 2009. It includes a review ofthe activities we carried out during the year<strong>and</strong> our accounts <strong>for</strong> the same period.Throughout this report, we write financialyears as 2008–09 <strong>and</strong> academic yearsas 2008/09.


ApprenticeshipsCreating the skilled workers ofEach year we highlight one area of the <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>Council’s work that has had an impact across the country.This year one of our key campaigns was Apprenticeships.With completionnumbers at an all-timehigh, apprentices havebecome a pivotal part ofthe economy – <strong>and</strong> arerecognised by employersas improving theirfuture competitiveness.Apprentices make things happen.<strong>The</strong>y increase the skills of the nation<strong>and</strong> make organisations – in over 180business sectors – more productive.Benefiting from on- <strong>and</strong> off-the-jobtraining, they have become a pivotalpart of the economy <strong>and</strong> are a highlyeffective way of helping businessesprepare <strong>for</strong> the economic upturn.According to research conductedon behalf of the <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>Council (LSC) over the last year,more than two-thirds of employersbelieve their apprentices have helpedthem to be more competitive in theirbusinesses. As many as 82 per centsay they rely on their Apprenticeshipprogramme to give them the skilledworkers they need <strong>for</strong> the future.Building onsuccessBased on the success of theApprenticeship programme to date,by 2020 we aim to deliver over250,000 Apprenticeship starts <strong>and</strong>190,000 successful completions inorder to achieve the ambition set outin Lord Leitch’s Review of <strong>Skills</strong>. Wehave already achieved a substantialincrease, but dem<strong>and</strong> continues to rise.Over the last year we have focusedparticularly on increasing the numberof employers offering Apprenticeships.In February 2009 we launched ahigh-profile media campaign frontedby Sir Alan Sugar that was designedto appeal to employers. <strong>The</strong> underlyinggoal was to increase the number ofApprenticeship places on offer, <strong>and</strong>the campaign saw employer enquiriesincrease by 38 per cent. In addition,it led to learner enquiries rising by24 per cent <strong>and</strong> a 10 per cent increasein applicants applying <strong>for</strong> existingApprenticeship places. ApprenticeshipWeek, also in February, saw ministers,celebrities <strong>and</strong> influential businessleaders directly promoting the benefitsof the programme to thous<strong>and</strong>s ofbusinesses. Apprenticeships werediscussed extensively in the media,with the regional coverage involvingproviders <strong>and</strong> colleges acrossthe country.<strong>The</strong> impact of theeconomic climate2007–08 saw the highest level ofApprenticeship starts, <strong>and</strong> completionswere at a record level. In 2008–09,however, the economic situation hasmade recruitment of apprentices moredifficult, particularly <strong>for</strong> the 16–18age group. Nevertheless, dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>19–24 places is up on last year <strong>and</strong>dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> 25+ Apprenticeships hasbeen such that the full-year ambitionwas met halfway through the year.During the final months of thisreporting year, some concerns wereraised by providers about the levels offunding available <strong>for</strong> Apprenticeships.While more money than ever be<strong>for</strong>ehas been invested in Apprenticeships,the current economic climate hasprompted a huge growth in dem<strong>and</strong><strong>for</strong> all types of funding, in particular<strong>for</strong> Apprenticeships <strong>for</strong> those agedover 25. While these dem<strong>and</strong>s02 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


ContentsOur StoryApprenticeships: Creating theskilled workers of the future02the futureChairman’s Statement 04Chief Executive’s Review 07are encouraging, leaving 25+Apprenticeship activity uncheckedwould exceed the available budget <strong>for</strong>2009–10 <strong>and</strong> create further pressuresin future years. We have worked withcolleges <strong>and</strong> training providers toagree contracts that we will fund thatenable growth in 25+ Apprenticeshipsto continue, but within the levels ofinvestment we have available.We are working with providers,employers <strong>and</strong> key partners tosignificantly increase the number ofApprenticeship opportunities <strong>for</strong> 16-to 18-year-olds to reach our targets.develop <strong>and</strong> deliver the NAS, whichwas launched in April 2009. <strong>The</strong> NASwill be responsive to changing needs,adopting a flexible approach during theeconomic downturn <strong>and</strong> exploring howApprenticeships can help businesseswork towards the upturn.In April, the NAS prospectus waspublished. This describes in full the roleof the NAS, including the responsibility<strong>for</strong> keeping ‘the delivery of theApprenticeship system under constantreview to ensure that delivery is asefficient as possible’. This goal sums upthe challenge <strong>for</strong> the future: makingsure that Apprenticeships continue todeliver the anticipated benefits even aseconomic conditions change.<strong>The</strong> service also provides a uniqueonline vacancy matching system –through the Apprenticeships website– enabling employers to seek outapplicants across the country <strong>and</strong>c<strong>and</strong>idates to search <strong>for</strong> vacanciesby business, sector or location.About Us 09Our Targets <strong>and</strong> Achievements 11Our Focus 13Recognising <strong>and</strong> Respondingto Regional Requirements19Management <strong>and</strong> Structure 30How We Work 32Our Responsibilities 33How We Take Care ofOur People34Our Working Practices 36Machinery of Government 39Statement on Internal Control 40Risk Management <strong>and</strong>Financial Controls<strong>Report</strong>ing of PersonalData-related Incidents4849Leadership <strong>and</strong> Governance<strong>The</strong> NationalApprenticeshipServiceIn January 2008 the Governmentpublished World Class Apprenticeships,a full review of the programme to date<strong>and</strong> a vision <strong>for</strong> the future. <strong>The</strong> centralpart of this vision was the creation of aNational Apprenticeship Service (NAS).We worked with the Department <strong>for</strong>Universities, Innovation <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>(DIUS) – now the Department <strong>for</strong>Business, Innovation <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> (BIS)– <strong>and</strong> the Department <strong>for</strong> Children,Schools <strong>and</strong> Families (DCSF) to design,<strong>The</strong> NAS will raise the profile ofApprenticeships in each sector,developing new approaches <strong>and</strong>partnerships to increase the numberof apprentices, <strong>and</strong> reviewing (withthe sector) the relevant Apprenticeshipframeworks to ensure they meet thesector’s business needs.Focusing onst<strong>and</strong>ards<strong>The</strong> LSC is committed to raisingst<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> ensuring there areconsistently high-quality learningopportunities available to all. InFebruary 2009, a consultation began<strong>for</strong> the Specification of ApprenticeshipSt<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>for</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> (SASE). <strong>The</strong> finaldocument is due <strong>for</strong> publication inAugust 2009.Remuneration <strong>Report</strong> 50Financial Commentary 61<strong>The</strong> Certificate <strong>and</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 64of the Comptroller <strong>and</strong>Auditor General to theHouses of ParliamentNet Expenditure Statement 65Balance Sheet 66Cash Flow Statement 67Notes to the <strong>Accounts</strong> 68Glossary <strong>and</strong> Further 92In<strong>for</strong>mationList of Related Documents 95Finance


Chairman’s StatementOver the past few years, we haveseen per<strong>for</strong>mance across the learning<strong>and</strong> skills sector improve significantly.As we enter the last full year of theLSC’s work, it is worth remindingourselves how much has beenachieved so far – while recognisinghow much there is to do in thecoming year.Creating adem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>learning <strong>and</strong> skillsLast year, I wrote of our commitmentto creating a culture where youngpeople, adults <strong>and</strong> employersdem<strong>and</strong> skills <strong>and</strong> qualifications. Thatcommitment has paid dividends: wehave seen unexpectedly high dem<strong>and</strong><strong>for</strong> our programmes <strong>and</strong> services.Our focus in the past year has been onincreasing the number of young peoplewho stay in learning after the ageof 16, <strong>and</strong> on continuing to increasethose achieving at least a Level 2qualification. This has been achieved.<strong>The</strong> proportion of young people inlearning <strong>and</strong> training aged 16–18st<strong>and</strong>s at 79.7 per cent, the highestlevel ever, <strong>and</strong> the percentage of16- to 18-year-olds in learningwho achieve a Level 2 is greaterthan ever, at 76.7 per cent.<strong>The</strong> number of young peoplecontinuing in learning is at its highestever level. More people than everbe<strong>for</strong>e are achieving individual success;more employers are improving theskills <strong>and</strong> the productivity of theirwork<strong>for</strong>ces; <strong>and</strong> more colleges <strong>and</strong>providers are demonstrating just howwell a responsive further education(FE) system can deliver – with successrates up 20 per cent in seven years.Overall, more than 4 million peoplehave benefited from the learningwe fund <strong>and</strong> we have enabled2.8 million more people in Engl<strong>and</strong>to gain basic skills, hitting the 2010target three years early.But there is absolutely no room <strong>for</strong>complacency. With a global recessionas the backdrop, we need to ensurethat the investments we make onbehalf of the Government are directedto areas where they can have greatestbenefit <strong>for</strong> young people, adults <strong>and</strong>employers. To do this, we have beenworking to introduce greater flexibilityinto the learning <strong>and</strong> skills sector, tomake it more responsive to real needs,<strong>and</strong> to improve <strong>and</strong> develop what ison offer to ensure it remains relevant<strong>and</strong> attractive.We have focused particularly onaddressing the number of adults whodo not have the basic skills to get a job.Between 2001 <strong>and</strong> 2008, 2.38 millionadults in the work<strong>for</strong>ce had achieveda Level 2 qualification <strong>and</strong> 2.8 millionadults had improved their basic skills.<strong>The</strong>se statistics serve to underlinethe trends we have seen over the lastdecade, of significant improvements inthe country’s skills levels as a whole,<strong>and</strong> we are hugely encouraged bythe burgeoning culture of dem<strong>and</strong><strong>for</strong> skills. <strong>The</strong> number of better-skilledpeople has increased by more than3 million – an increase of over a04 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Our Storythird – while the number of adultswithout qualifications has fallen by aquarter. <strong>The</strong> UK is now the third mostsuccessful country in Europe <strong>for</strong> adultparticipation in lifelong learning.In 2006, Lord Leitch’s Review(Prosperity <strong>for</strong> all in the global economy– world class skills) predicted anincreasing need <strong>for</strong> people to reachLevel 3 qualifications (equivalent totwo A-levels or more) if they are tomove <strong>for</strong>ward in their jobs. This is whywe continue to advocate passionately<strong>for</strong> further improvements in the skillsof the nation through training <strong>and</strong>working with businesses.Since national rollout began in April2006, Train to Gain has engagedaround 140,000 employers <strong>and</strong> hasdelivered almost 1 million peoplestarting training.Responding to the recession<strong>The</strong> economic climate of the last yearhas had a major impact on our work.As the recession began to bite, weresponded quickly to the changingeconomic situation, introducing newflexibilities to help employees updatetheir skills, as well as – with ourpartners in the Department <strong>for</strong> Work<strong>and</strong> Pensions <strong>and</strong> Jobcentre Plus –new measures to help those at risk ofredundancy, or who are unemployed,get the training they need to help themget back into work. By joining up pre<strong>and</strong>post-employment programmes,we’ve made it easier <strong>for</strong> learners tocontinue their training after getting ajob. We also appointed an EconomicResponse Director, to co-ordinate ouref<strong>for</strong>ts across the business.For small <strong>and</strong> medium-sized enterprises,Train to Gain evolved to offer a moreflexible, responsive service. <strong>The</strong> serviceis now more attuned to businessneeds: leadership <strong>and</strong> managementtraining was extended, <strong>and</strong> fullyfunded <strong>and</strong> part-funded trainingcourses in business-critical areas wereintroduced. Businesses were also able tobenefit from bespoke advice froma skills broker.Trans<strong>for</strong>mingfurther educationThis is the first recession we haveencountered since we as a nationhave truly recognised <strong>and</strong> understoodthe link between skills <strong>and</strong> globalcompetitiveness. We know that adultskills are essential both <strong>for</strong> increasingeconomic success <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> engenderingsocial inclusion <strong>and</strong> the role of thefurther education sector during sucha time is pivotal.Over the last few years, the sectorhas worked hard to raise its game, tobetter meet business needs <strong>and</strong> toincrease the flexibility of its offer. Thiswas put to the test during the lastyear, <strong>and</strong> the sector responded. Traininghas become increasingly relevant <strong>and</strong>flexible, particularly <strong>for</strong> employers,with an ever greater proportion ofcourses taking place on-site to ensureminimal disruption to the running ofthe business.St<strong>and</strong>ards too have continued to rise.Of 113 FE colleges inspected thisyear, 32 per cent were classed asoutst<strong>and</strong>ing, with 7 out of 10 deemedgood or above. Only 7 in 100 weredeemed to be in difficulty.To further encourage investment inhigh-quality education <strong>and</strong> training,we have introduced the new TrainingQuality St<strong>and</strong>ard to ensure value <strong>for</strong>money. Providers holding the St<strong>and</strong>ardcan reassure employers that they aredelivering excellent training that isflexible <strong>and</strong> can be tailored to theirneeds. Over 100 training providers<strong>and</strong> colleges have already gained thisbenchmark of quality.<strong>The</strong> growth <strong>and</strong> importance of the FEsector is reflected in the restructuringthat will come into place next year.Subject to legislation, the plans willprovide <strong>for</strong> a new <strong>Skills</strong> FundingAgency to work with employers,providers <strong>and</strong> people aged 19 <strong>and</strong>over to invest in skills development<strong>and</strong> a Young People’s <strong>Learning</strong> Agency(YPLA). <strong>The</strong> YPLA will fund <strong>and</strong> supportlocal authorities in their new duties tosecure enough suitable learning places<strong>for</strong> young people aged 16–19, as wellas their continued duties to supportlearners aged 19–24 who are subjectto a learning difficulty assessment <strong>and</strong>children <strong>and</strong> young people subject toyouth custody.Our capital funding <strong>for</strong> collegesprogramme is a commitment toproviding world-class facilities thatwill support the delivery of world-classeducation <strong>and</strong> training, <strong>and</strong> our support<strong>for</strong> the programme remains strong.Between 2001–02 <strong>and</strong> 2008–09,projects with a total cost of£5.8 billion were approved, withthe LSC contributing £2.9 billion.But the programme was one ofhigh expectations <strong>and</strong> ran into wellpubliciseddifficulties in the last year.Its success led to an increase in dem<strong>and</strong>LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 05


<strong>for</strong> funding, as the size <strong>and</strong> scale of theprojects became more ambitious.We <strong>and</strong> DIUS (now BIS) instigated anindependent review of the backgroundto these difficulties <strong>and</strong> how to take<strong>for</strong>ward the building programme.We have accepted <strong>and</strong> responded tothe review’s recommendations. <strong>The</strong>programme is being managed througha new process, with prioritisationof projects based on extensiveconsultation with the sector <strong>and</strong>independently assessed criteria. <strong>The</strong>Chancellor announced in his Budgetan additional £300 million of capitalfunding which will allow the LSC togive approval to a limited number ofprojects starting in 2009–10, <strong>and</strong> hasalso announced a continuation of theFE capital investment programme infuture years.Better skills,better jobs,better livesMore young people than ever be<strong>for</strong>ewere helped by our EducationMaintenance Allowance (EMA) thisyear. Over 553,000 young peoplewere financially supported throughEMA to help them stay on in, or getback into, learning.EMA is a programme that has made ahuge difference to the lives of youngpeople in low-income households, butwe did have some well-documenteddifficulties in the management of oursub-contractors, which affected servicedelivery to young people <strong>and</strong> ourpartners. We were unable to respondeffectively to the level of dem<strong>and</strong>,<strong>and</strong> payments were delayed. We tookdecisive action <strong>and</strong> the system is nowon track.Apprenticeships continue to be asuccess story <strong>for</strong> us. Completionrates are at a record high, with64 per cent successfully completingtheir programme, up from 26 percent in 2004–05. In 2007–08, thatequated to some 112,600 people inEngl<strong>and</strong> achieving an Apprenticeship– well above our target of 75,500.To provide further help to those whowant to earn while they learn, wehave strengthened the Apprenticeshipprogramme. We have launched theNational Apprenticeship Service <strong>and</strong>introduced the online Apprenticeshipvacancy matching system.Apprenticeships have particularlyexp<strong>and</strong>ed in sectors that are likely tobe hit hard in these difficult economictimes. <strong>The</strong>se investments will ensurethat these sectors are better placedwhen the economy starts to recover,<strong>and</strong> will ensure that the countryhas the skilled work<strong>for</strong>ce it needsto benefit from the upturn.Focusing onthe futureLooking <strong>for</strong>ward, we need to continueour focus on quality <strong>and</strong> improvedoperations <strong>and</strong> build on the firmfoundations we have established.We are working towards re<strong>for</strong>m ofvocational qualifications systems <strong>and</strong>reducing bureaucracy <strong>for</strong> providers <strong>and</strong>learners. <strong>The</strong> new adult advancement<strong>and</strong> careers service will focus onlearner progression.I want to thank all the teams at theLSC <strong>for</strong> their hard work, dedication <strong>and</strong>focus during a busy <strong>and</strong> occasionallychallenging year. National Council <strong>and</strong>regional council members continueto play a vital role in leading theorganisation <strong>and</strong> in responding to thefeedback we receive from the sector<strong>and</strong> employers, <strong>and</strong> I thank them<strong>for</strong> their guidance. I would also liketo thank our <strong>for</strong>mer Chief ExecutiveMark Haysom CBE <strong>for</strong> his strong <strong>and</strong>successful leadership of the LSC be<strong>for</strong>est<strong>and</strong>ing down from his position earlierthis year.Across the LSC <strong>and</strong> FE sector thereis real commitment to a culture oflearning <strong>and</strong> skills <strong>for</strong> all, <strong>and</strong> thatcommitment will continue within thetwo new organisations to be set upunder the Machinery of Governmentchanges. As we enter the last fullyear of the LSC’s existence, we aredetermined to leave a legacy whichreflects our commitment, <strong>and</strong> aboveall the progress we have madetogether.Christopher N Banks CBEChairman<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council10 July 200906 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Chief Executive’s ReviewOur StoryAs the new Chief Executive ofthe LSC, I take great pleasurein introducing the <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>Skills</strong> Council’s <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>Accounts</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008–09.My predecessor, Mark Haysom CBE,led the LSC throughout the reportingyear <strong>and</strong> guided both the organisation<strong>and</strong> the sector through a time ofgreat change. Under his leadership,the challenging targets set by theGovernment were met <strong>and</strong> exceeded.A dem<strong>and</strong>-led system <strong>for</strong> learning<strong>and</strong> funding was created <strong>and</strong>implemented, introducing a new era<strong>for</strong> skills development <strong>and</strong> increasinghigh-quality learning opportunities <strong>for</strong>everyone, including those who wererediscovering learning or learningnew skills.Making a difference<strong>The</strong> LSC is a success story <strong>and</strong> hasdemonstrated that it is a major <strong>for</strong>ce<strong>for</strong> change in the wider FE sector. Ourwork with the FE sector has not onlymade a huge difference to the lives ofmillions of young people <strong>and</strong> adults,but also contributed to the successof many thous<strong>and</strong>s of businesses <strong>and</strong>organisations.I will continue Mark’s legacy ofimproving the skills base of thecountry by continuously improvingquality <strong>and</strong> reducing bureaucracy<strong>for</strong> both learners <strong>and</strong> providers,ensuring that learning is accessible<strong>and</strong> progressive.<strong>The</strong> growth <strong>and</strong> importance of thesector is reflected in the restructuringthat is due to come into place in2010. Subject to legislation, the planswill provide <strong>for</strong> a new <strong>Skills</strong> FundingAgency that will work with employers,providers <strong>and</strong> learners aged 19 <strong>and</strong>over to invest in skills development.<strong>The</strong> YPLA will also be created to takeresponsibility <strong>for</strong> 16–19 funding <strong>and</strong>support local authorities in their newduties in this area. We have been fullyengaged in this work <strong>and</strong> will continueto play an active part in ensuringthat, <strong>for</strong> learners <strong>and</strong> employers, thetransition is as seamless as possible.LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 07


Looking aheadIn the coming months we face hugechallenges, in particular strengtheningour skills offer to help those affectedby the economic downturn to get backinto work, or to stay in employment,by equipping them with the skillsthey need to progress in life. We arefocusing our ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>and</strong> workingclosely with our partner organisations,developing <strong>and</strong> implementing packagesof support to deliver over 100,000training places over the next two yearsto help individuals back into work. Weare also introducing flexibilities intoexisting programmes to allow people,especially those at risk of redundancy,to update their skills.Looking further ahead, we are takingsteps towards the Government’sambition <strong>for</strong> full participationin education <strong>and</strong> learning <strong>for</strong> all17-year-olds by 2013. Our progressto date can be found within the pagesof this report, which also detailsour work on making the 14–19entitlement (being introduced in late2010) a reality, ahead of schedule.Recognising oursuccessThis last year has been one of difficultchallenges but many successes <strong>for</strong> theLSC. Success rates <strong>for</strong> young peoplein further education continued toimprove – up from 75 per cent in2005/06 to 80 per cent in 2007/08,<strong>and</strong> more than one in four of allyoung people who have a Level 2qualification at 19 have gained it asa result of LSC investment after theage of 16. Success rates <strong>for</strong> adults inFE also improved, to 80.7 per cent in2007/08. We have there<strong>for</strong>e exceededthe target of 76 per cent <strong>for</strong> FEcolleges in 2007/08.<strong>The</strong>se figures underline the continuedcommitment <strong>and</strong> professionalism ofthe staff of the LSC in the midst of achanging <strong>and</strong> challenging economicl<strong>and</strong>scape. <strong>The</strong>y are also due tothe responsiveness <strong>and</strong> reliabilityof providers in adapting to theeconomic change that has affectedall organisations in our nation.As we move to a transition phase inthe life of the LSC, I must echo ourChairman’s comments on being proudof the LSC’s legacy. I look <strong>for</strong>wardto working with him <strong>and</strong> with themembers of the National Council <strong>and</strong>regional councils to build on thosestrong foundations to create newstructures that will both carry on oursuccesses <strong>and</strong> benefit from what wehave learned about things we couldhave done better. This will ensurewe are best placed to rise to thechallenges we face as a nation in theglobal race <strong>for</strong> skills <strong>and</strong> innovation.Geoffrey RussellChief Executive<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council10 July 200908 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


About UsOur StoryOur national priorities <strong>for</strong>2008–09 were:•to increase the dem<strong>and</strong><strong>for</strong> learning <strong>and</strong> skills•to trans<strong>for</strong>m the FE systemto meet dem<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong>•to deliver better skills,leading to better lives.Our targets <strong>for</strong> 2008–09were:• to raise the educationalachievements of allchildren <strong>and</strong> youngpeople, <strong>and</strong> to narrowthe gap in educationalachievement betweenchildren from low-income<strong>and</strong> disadvantagedbackgrounds <strong>and</strong>their peers• to increase the number of17-year-olds participatingin education <strong>and</strong> training•to improve the skills ofthe adult population,as a step towards ensuringa world-class skills baseby 2020, <strong>and</strong>•to support the deliverytargets of othergovernment departments.Who we are<strong>The</strong> LSC is a publicly-fundedorganisation that exists to makeEngl<strong>and</strong> better skilled <strong>and</strong> morecompetitive. We work locally,regionally <strong>and</strong> nationally to ensurethat learning <strong>and</strong> skills are at theheart of local <strong>and</strong> regional economicdevelopment <strong>and</strong> communityregeneration.Our commitment is to deliver aneffective <strong>and</strong> comprehensive learningoffer <strong>for</strong> young people in every area,in partnership with local authorities,schools, colleges <strong>and</strong> providers.Our goal is to improve the skills ofEngl<strong>and</strong>’s young people <strong>and</strong> adultsto ensure we have a work<strong>for</strong>ce ofworld-class st<strong>and</strong>ard.Our focus is on ensuring thatgovernment investment is directedtowards areas of greatest need, <strong>for</strong> thebenefit of young people, adults <strong>and</strong>employers. We work to create a cultureof dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> skills.Our vision is <strong>for</strong> young people <strong>and</strong>adults in Engl<strong>and</strong> to have knowledge<strong>and</strong> skills matching the best inthe world <strong>and</strong> be part of a trulycompetitive work<strong>for</strong>ce.What we doOur task is to improve the FE <strong>and</strong>training sector, raising st<strong>and</strong>ards<strong>and</strong> making learning provision moreresponsive to the needs of individuals<strong>and</strong> employers.• We invest in people to give themthe skills they need <strong>for</strong> success inwork <strong>and</strong> in life.•We encourage people from allbackgrounds to engage in learningthat helps them to realise their fullpotential.•We help those who are not in workto get the training <strong>and</strong> support theyneed to get a good job.•We work with employers so thatthey can develop the skills of theirwork<strong>for</strong>ce.•We fund all learning <strong>for</strong> youngpeople aged 16–19 in colleges,schools <strong>and</strong> training providersso that they gain the skills <strong>and</strong>qualifications they need to progressinto further learning, highereducation or employment.•We are passionate advocates of therole of skills in supporting greatersocial mobility <strong>and</strong> social justice.LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 09


Why we do itWe know that:•young people are far more likelyto realise their full potential if theycontinue learning beyond the ageof 16•improving skills leads to better jobs<strong>and</strong> a better quality of life•the best route out of poverty <strong>and</strong>into economic security is throughgaining <strong>and</strong> using skills, <strong>and</strong>•more investment in training<strong>and</strong> skills helps our countrycompete more successfully ina global economy.How we do itWe work locally, regionally <strong>and</strong>nationally to:•create dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> learning<strong>and</strong> skills – we work to create aculture where young people, adults<strong>and</strong> employers dem<strong>and</strong> skills <strong>and</strong>qualifications <strong>and</strong> where businessesare fully aware of the benefits oflearning <strong>and</strong> skills, so they are moreprepared to invest their time <strong>and</strong>money in them•trans<strong>for</strong>m the further educationsystem – we work on behalf ofindividuals <strong>and</strong> employers to makesure that schools, colleges <strong>and</strong>other providers offer a wide rangeof high-quality learning <strong>and</strong>training that meets their needs<strong>and</strong> aspirations•strengthen the economy bothnow <strong>and</strong> in the future – we workwith partners to make sure thatthe skills that employers need aredeveloped in the existing <strong>and</strong> futurework<strong>for</strong>ce, which in turn helps morepeople into work <strong>and</strong> so supportssocial justice.Our valuesTrustTrust is at the heart of everything we do.AmbitionOur ambition is tounlock the potentialof every employer<strong>and</strong> learner in everycommunity thatwe serve.ExpertiseWe fully underst<strong>and</strong>the needs of thecommunities we serve,including employers <strong>and</strong>individuals in education<strong>and</strong> training.Urgency<strong>The</strong> country’s economicsuccess affects us all, sowe need to tackle longst<strong>and</strong>ingissues quickly<strong>and</strong> professionally, <strong>and</strong>be responsive.10 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Our Targets <strong>and</strong>AchievementsOur StoryIn the last year we have continued tocontribute to a sustained rise in numbers oflearners <strong>and</strong> overall qualification levels, as wellas maintaining improvements in st<strong>and</strong>ardsacross further education. We have investedmore than £11.5 billion of taxpayers’ moneyin education <strong>and</strong> training.<strong>The</strong> PSA target is <strong>for</strong>3.6 millionmore adults in thework<strong>for</strong>ce to have aLevel 2 qualificationor higher by 2010AreaAge 19 – Level 2achievementAge 19 – Level 3achievementNumber of Apprenticeshipframeworks completedTargetIncrease the percentage of 19-year-oldswho achieve a Level 2 qualification from71.4 per cent (in 2006) to 73.4 per cent(in 2008)*Increase the percentage of 19-year-oldswho achieve a Level 3 qualification*Increase the number of people whocomplete their Apprenticeships by75 per cent by 2007–08 (bringing thetotal number to 75,500)AchievementTarget achieved early74 per cent in 2007 <strong>and</strong>76.7 per cent in 2008Target achieved48.1 per cent in 2007 <strong>and</strong>49.8 per cent in 2008Target achievedIn 2007–08, 112,600 peoplecompleted their ApprenticeshipAdults – Level 2achievementFE college success<strong>Skills</strong> <strong>for</strong> LifeReduce the number of adults withouta Level 2 qualification by at least40 per cent by 2010. This is equal toan increase of 3.6 million adults*FE college success rates to be 80 per centin 2010/11Improve the basic skills of 2.25 millionadults between 2001 <strong>and</strong> 2010*In progressBy the end of 2008, 2,378,000adults in work had achieved aLevel 2 qualificationTarget achieved earlyIn 2007/08, FE college successrates were 80.7 per cent – over the2007/08 targetTarget achieved earlyBy the end of 2008, 2,835,000 adultshad improved their basic skills*Public Service Agreement (PSA) target set by the Government.LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 11


Investing in successWhat we spent in total in 2008–09Youth participation £6,443.5m 53.4%16–18 Learner Support (inc. EMA) £631.5m 5.2%Other youth non-participation£121.0m 1.0%16–18 capital £196.8m 1.6%Adult learner responsive £1,657.6m 13.7%Employer responsive £1,223.6m 10.1%Adult safeguarded learning £214.1m 1.8%Offender <strong>Learning</strong> £139.0m 1.2%19+ Learner Support £165.4m 1.4%Other adult non-participation £239.5m 2.0%19+ capital £606.9m 5.0%Other programmes £233.1m 1.9%Administration £199.8m 1.7%Total £12,071.8m 100%Note: ‘Other programmes’ includes non-departmental spending. Administration costs are net, <strong>and</strong> include sundry income.Where we invested our money in 2008–09In 2008–09 we invested the following:• £7.3 billion to allow 1.3 million young people in school, college orwork-based learning to achieve qualifications.•£3.6 billion in adult learning, helping 3.3 million adults to improvetheir skills.• £833.5 million in FE <strong>and</strong> training facilities.Our planned programme investment<strong>for</strong> 2009–10Participation among young people:Participation among adults:Learner support <strong>and</strong> development:Capital grants:Total investment£6,923 million £3,356 million £1,109 million £1,008 million £12,396 million12 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


EMA offers financial support <strong>for</strong>16- to 19-year-olds <strong>and</strong> continues toprove effective in encouraging <strong>and</strong>supporting young people to remainin learning. In the past year, 553,480learners benefited from EMA. We havebeen trialling new eligibility criteria <strong>for</strong>EMA, to help define the scope of anywider provision.Evaluation showsthat, through EMA,participation has risenby 4 per cent <strong>and</strong>attainment amongeligible learners bybetween 2 <strong>and</strong>2.5 per centCare to Learn is focused onencouraging young parents back intolearning. Over 20 per cent of youngwomen who are classified as NEET donot participate because of pregnancyor parenthood. Care to Learn payschildcare costs to enable them tolearn. More than 7,000 young peopleare now receiving this funding.Our local partnership teams continueto work closely with local authorities,Connexions services <strong>and</strong> providers ofeducation <strong>and</strong> training to achieve theGovernment’s September Guarantee.Together, we achieved considerablesuccess in 2008, with 94.2 per centof 16-year-olds receiving an offer ofa place in learning. We are workingwith our colleagues at DCSF to ensureeven better results <strong>for</strong> young peoplein September 2009 <strong>and</strong> to prepare theground <strong>for</strong> 2010, when funding <strong>for</strong>16- to 19-year-olds transfers to localauthorities.Through theSeptember Guarantee,94.2 per cent of16-year-olds receivedan offer of a place inlearning in 2008Adultsfocusing on thegreatest needOverview Adult learning <strong>and</strong>training not only contributes tobuilding a skilled work<strong>for</strong>ce, but alsobrings the wider economic benefitsassociated with health, well-being <strong>and</strong>stronger communities.In addition to a number of specificprogrammes aimed at helping peoplegain the skills needed to get backinto work, we have also begun thework to ensure that we are using ourmainstream programmes to help boththe unemployed <strong>and</strong> those in work tobe better equipped to gain <strong>and</strong> sustainemployment.One of our main challenges in adultlearning continues to be the number ofadults who do not have the basic skillsto get a job <strong>and</strong> are excluded fromthe labour market as a result. We alsoface the increasing cost of trainingmore people to achieve a full Level 2qualification (to meet our targets <strong>and</strong>the economic needs of this country).A further challenge is the fact that,as Lord Leitch’s Review predicted,people will increasingly need toreach Level 3 qualifications if theyare to move <strong>for</strong>ward in their jobs.This provision usually involves longerlearning times, <strong>and</strong> is there<strong>for</strong>e moreexpensive to deliver than shortercourses. As a result, there has beena reduction in funding <strong>for</strong> shorterlearning opportunities that falloutside our main priorities.As a balance, we are focusing onproviding in<strong>for</strong>mation, advice <strong>and</strong>guidance <strong>for</strong> people who need newskills. We maintained our commitmentto less <strong>for</strong>mal learning by allocating£210 million to a programme ofin<strong>for</strong>mal adult learning, previouslydescribed as personal <strong>and</strong> communitydevelopment learning <strong>and</strong> widerfamily learning. With our partners, wehave made further progress towardsdeveloping a more flexible curriculumbelow Level 2, as well as a frameworkto organise qualifications at theselevels (Progression Pathways).Key risks What we spend ontraining now will not be enough topay <strong>for</strong> future training needs. <strong>The</strong>major challenge we face is persuadinglearners <strong>and</strong> employers to invest morein their own learning <strong>and</strong> training.Strategies <strong>and</strong> actionsWe are continuing to focus fundingon skills <strong>and</strong> qualifications thatare economically valuable. We arethere<strong>for</strong>e working closely with keypartners – the Qualifications <strong>and</strong>Curriculum Authority, Ofqual, theUK Commission <strong>for</strong> Employment <strong>and</strong>14 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Our Story21,000adult learners have benefitedfrom the Adult <strong>Learning</strong> Grant<strong>Skills</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Alliance of Sector <strong>Skills</strong>Councils – to put the Qualifications<strong>and</strong> Credit Framework into practice.This will make sure that ourqualifications system <strong>for</strong> adults isas inclusive, responsive <strong>and</strong> flexibleas possible.<strong>The</strong> Adult <strong>Learning</strong> Grant (ALG)gives adult learners from low-incomehouseholds financial support to helpthem to achieve their first full Level 2or full Level 3 qualifications. <strong>The</strong> ALGwas available nationally <strong>for</strong> the firsttime in 2007–08, <strong>and</strong> more than21,000 adult learners have benefited– far more than the expected take-upof 17,500.We work closely with Jobcentre Plus<strong>and</strong> have taken responsibility <strong>for</strong> itsbasic skills programme, designed toimprove the skills of people who needa job. In the future, those learnerswho are supported by public fundswill follow courses that not only leadto nationally recognised qualificationsbut also give individuals the skills theyneed to gain employment <strong>and</strong> to move<strong>for</strong>ward in work.Employersincreased flexibility<strong>for</strong> tough timesOverview Adult skills are vital toincreasing national <strong>and</strong> internationalcompetitiveness <strong>for</strong> employers. Weneed to raise Engl<strong>and</strong>’s positionamong other world economies byproviding the skilled work<strong>for</strong>ce thatemployers require. Improving skillsboosts competitiveness, productivity<strong>and</strong> profitability but it also improvespeople’s career <strong>and</strong> salary prospects.We want to help everyone – from thelow-skilled to the highly skilled – toimprove their skills <strong>and</strong> so increasetheir ability to get a job <strong>and</strong> move<strong>for</strong>ward in their lives <strong>and</strong> careers.This is even more important in a timeof downturn, where employers needto raise productivity, encourage staffto take on new responsibilities <strong>and</strong>support those whose jobs may beat risk. As a result, over the last yearour employer-focused support <strong>and</strong>provision has become more flexible tosupport emerging needs. <strong>The</strong> changeshave encouraged employers tocontinue to invest in skills <strong>and</strong> training<strong>and</strong> enabled individuals to developtheir skills to increase their flexibilityin the labour market.Key risks As learner volumescontinue to increase (predominantlythrough Train to Gain), we must ensurethat future investment is focused onhigh-quality provision that deliversagainst agreed priorities. In particular,this means ensuring that we meettomorrow’s skills needs as wellas today’s.Strategies <strong>and</strong> actionsOur flagship employer programme isTrain to Gain. Since national rolloutbegan in April 2006, Train to Gain hasengaged over 140,000 employers <strong>and</strong>has delivered almost 1 million learnerstarts. <strong>The</strong>se volumes have grownconsiderably during the course of2008–09.Through Train to Gain,some 530,000 learnershave achieved aqualificationFrom August 2008, in response toemployer dem<strong>and</strong>, Train to Gainwas significantly enhanced to ensureit provided a wider range of support<strong>and</strong> more help with the cost oftraining. This was followed by theannouncement, in October 2008,of additional flexibility <strong>for</strong> smaller<strong>and</strong> medium-sized private sectorbusinesses employing up to 250 staffto respond to the economic recession.This secured further support<strong>for</strong> training.<strong>Skills</strong> brokers have played a vital rolein driving up dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> training,<strong>and</strong> throughout the year we workedclosely with the <strong>for</strong>mer Department<strong>for</strong> Business, Enterprise <strong>and</strong> RegulatoryRe<strong>for</strong>m <strong>and</strong> the Regional DevelopmentAgencies to ensure a smooth transitionto the new integrated brokerageservice which came into place throughBusiness Link from April 2009.While Train to Gain offers flexiblesupport <strong>for</strong> businesses <strong>and</strong> learners,the <strong>Skills</strong> Pledge remains a valuabletool <strong>for</strong> gaining employer commitmentto learning.Since its inception in June 2007,around 16,000 organisations havemade the <strong>Skills</strong> Pledge, covering over6 million employees.LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 15


2008–09 has seen aphenomenal growthof nearly 14,000additional <strong>Skills</strong> PledgecommitmentsTo ensure we address sector-specificskills needs, we have continued todevelop Sector Compacts. Ten newcompacts have been announced sinceMay 2008, <strong>and</strong> each has at its heartan agreement between BIS (<strong>for</strong>merlyDIUS), the LSC <strong>and</strong> a Sector <strong>Skills</strong>Council (or sector body) to workcollaboratively to drive up dem<strong>and</strong><strong>for</strong> skills across Engl<strong>and</strong>. Alongsidethis, 2008–09 saw the approval ofthe 11th National <strong>Skills</strong> Academy,as well as delivery of a fourth roundof expressions of interest, to take thenumber of <strong>Skills</strong> Academies to 16.In response to employers’ concernsthat it is hard to identify the bestquality training, May 2008 saw thelaunch of the Training QualitySt<strong>and</strong>ard. Developed to recognise<strong>and</strong> highlight the best organisationsdelivering training <strong>and</strong> developmentsolutions to employers, the St<strong>and</strong>ardnot only identifies high-qualitytraining, but also training which isboth flexible <strong>and</strong> meets employers’needs. So far, 106 organisations haveachieved certification, covering everyEnglish region as well as a wide rangeof industries <strong>and</strong> specialist areas.Many more organisations are now inthe pipeline, with nearly 300 trainingproviders registered.FE systembetter per<strong>for</strong>manceleading to higherexpectationsOverview Our work with the FEsector over the last few years beganwith a focus on raising st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong>re<strong>for</strong>ming the system. As the impact ofthese changes has become increasinglyapparent, our focus has shiftedtowards flexibility <strong>and</strong> innovation.Key risks While we need tocontinue to focus on per<strong>for</strong>mance,it is essential that we maintain themomentum of change <strong>and</strong> further raiseour expectations of the FE system.Strategies <strong>and</strong> actions<strong>The</strong> LSC’s commissioning strategy has,over a number of years, prioritisednegotiations with providers whodeliver successful, high-per<strong>for</strong>mingprovision. Subject to af<strong>for</strong>dability, wehave there<strong>for</strong>e encouraged the growthof providers who have the capacity toexp<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> removed restrictions ongrowth funding where providers havethe quality, per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>and</strong> capacityto deliver. To reduce the burden onproviders <strong>and</strong> to simplify the process,we have introduced the QualifiedProvider Framework.We held a second round of discussionswith local authority partners onschool sixth <strong>for</strong>m per<strong>for</strong>mance.<strong>The</strong> dialogue this year centred on theuse of data to provide a nationallyconsistent view of learner outcomes,which was supplemented by otherlocal intelligence. This resulted inthe identification of those sixth<strong>for</strong>ms, at local <strong>and</strong> regional level,which are causing concern <strong>and</strong> requiresupport to improve.In 2008–09, we did not use ourstatutory powers of intervention underthe Further <strong>and</strong> Higher EducationAct 1992 as amended by the FurtherEducation <strong>and</strong> Training Act 2007.However, we did use our statutorypowers under the <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>Act 2000 to appoint up to twoadditional members to an incorporatedcollege’s governing body. We tookthis action, under the Act, at thefollowing colleges:• Braintree College• Epping Forest College• Riverside College, Halton, <strong>and</strong>• Southwark College.During 2008–09, a total of 41Notice to Improve schedules wereissued. <strong>The</strong> table on page 17 breaksdown the types of providers thatreceived a Notice to Improve <strong>and</strong>the triggers <strong>for</strong> that Notice beingissued. During this period, a total of18 Notice schedules were issued <strong>for</strong>whole provider underper<strong>for</strong>mance(as defined in Identifying <strong>and</strong> ManagingUnderper<strong>for</strong>mance).Two colleges received a Notice toImprove <strong>for</strong> poor financial health<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> an Ofsted judgement of‘inadequate’ <strong>for</strong> overall effectiveness.Another college received a Notice to16 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Our StoryImprove as a result of poor financialhealth <strong>and</strong> as a result of analysis ofsuccess rates compared with minimumlevels of per<strong>for</strong>mance. This college metthe conditions of the Notice withinthis financial year.Integratingemployment<strong>and</strong> skillsOverview We have been workingclosely with partners, including theDepartment <strong>for</strong> Work <strong>and</strong> Pensions<strong>and</strong> Jobcentre Plus, to integrateemployment <strong>and</strong> skills activities sothat the FE sector is better placedto support people into sustainableemployment. In particular, our focus ison ensuring that learners can continuetheir training after getting a job. Ourjoint working is more extensive thanever be<strong>for</strong>e as we work with partners,both nationally <strong>and</strong> regionally, todevelop an effective response to theeconomic downturn.Notices to Improve issued, 2008–09<strong>The</strong> Government is committedto ensuring that an integratedemployment <strong>and</strong> skills service will bein place nationally in 2010–11, <strong>and</strong>trials of aspects of this new servicebegan in five regions this year. <strong>The</strong>products <strong>and</strong> services will continue toevolve as we learn from these trials<strong>and</strong> ensure that the service offeredto individuals meets their needs<strong>and</strong> delivers an improved customerexperience.Key risks <strong>The</strong> skills response tothe economic downturn has exp<strong>and</strong>edthe number of programmes needed tomeet the requirements of JobcentrePlus customers <strong>and</strong> employees facingredundancy. This increases the riskof confusion <strong>for</strong> customers, <strong>and</strong> ofineffective referral to provision. It alsohas a potential adverse impact on ourwork with providers <strong>and</strong> the financialresource <strong>for</strong> continued learningopportunities once individuals enteremployment.Strategies <strong>and</strong> actionsIn the build-up to the integratedemployment <strong>and</strong> skills service, we havealready been involved in a wide rangeof joint projects <strong>and</strong> programmes.For example, we have collaboratedwith Jobcentre Plus to create LocalEmployment Partnerships (LEPs),which aim to ensure that prioritycustomers have the opportunity toacquire the skills needed to get intowork <strong>and</strong> to continue learning in workthrough Train to Gain to achieve anappropriate qualification.We have exp<strong>and</strong>ed the Employability<strong>Skills</strong> Programme, which offersJobcentre Plus customers with basicskills needs an individualised fullorpart-time learning programme.This includes literacy, numeracy <strong>and</strong>employability skills.TriggerAnalysis of success rates compared with minimum levelsof per<strong>for</strong>manceOfsted judgement of ‘inadequate’ <strong>for</strong> overalleffectivenessNumber ofadult learningprovidersNumber ofcollegesTotal15 6 21N/A 7 7Financial health N/A 13 13Total 15 26 41<strong>The</strong>se numbers reflect the number of Notices to Improve issued in the 2008–09 financial year; as such, this in<strong>for</strong>mation will be different if reportedagainst the academic year.LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 17


Funding <strong>for</strong> theEmployability <strong>Skills</strong>Programme rosefrom £22 million in2007–08 to £40 millionin 2008–09We continued to support <strong>Skills</strong><strong>for</strong> Jobs – a targeted programmeof short, bespoke pre-employmenttraining <strong>for</strong> the economically inactive.<strong>Skills</strong> <strong>for</strong> Jobs began in January 2008<strong>and</strong> discrete funding <strong>for</strong> it ended inMarch 2009, apart from in London.<strong>The</strong> provision is currently being<strong>for</strong>mally evaluated. However, regionsare continuing to support theprogramme in the interim throughfunding from the European Social Fund.One new area of focus this year hasbeen people affected by redundancy.In October 2008, it was announcedthat £100 million in funding would bemade available to help those undernotice of redundancy, those recentlymade redundant <strong>and</strong> those who areunemployed who could be madeready <strong>for</strong> work. <strong>The</strong>y can access apackage of support aimed at helpingthem to refresh their skills in a sectoror begin the work of retraining <strong>for</strong>a new one to aid progression intosustainable employment. This provisionis part-funded by Train to Gain, toencourage the link to training in theworkplace once individuals haveentered employment.In January 2009, the Prime Ministerannounced a package of enhancedsupport <strong>for</strong> people who have beenout of work <strong>for</strong> six months or more,which will include joint workingbetween the LSC, the nextstepcareers in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>and</strong> advice service<strong>for</strong> adults <strong>and</strong> Jobcentre Plus. Thisincludes £83 million of funding toprovide 75,000 additional trainingopportunities. <strong>The</strong> training, deliveredon a part-time or full-time basis, willbe relevant to the local labour market<strong>and</strong> will allow people to undertakea full Level 2 or Level 3 qualificationthen continue their training in theworkplace when they get a job.This offer is now available.Rolling out theFramework <strong>for</strong>Excellence<strong>The</strong> Framework <strong>for</strong> Excellence is aunified <strong>and</strong> simplified structure <strong>for</strong>assessing the per<strong>for</strong>mance of allproviders of education <strong>and</strong> training <strong>for</strong>young people <strong>and</strong> adults.It gives an accurate, independentpicture of the quality of per<strong>for</strong>mance,validated <strong>and</strong> supported by publisheddata, including the views of learners<strong>and</strong> employers. This in<strong>for</strong>mation, inturn, helps to in<strong>for</strong>m learner, parent<strong>and</strong> employer choice.In 2008/09 the Framework was appliedto colleges <strong>and</strong> independent trainingproviders. From summer 2009, itwill be extended to local authorities,independent specialist providers<strong>and</strong> piloted in schools with sixth<strong>for</strong>ms. From 2010/11, Framework <strong>for</strong>Excellence data will be used to in<strong>for</strong>mlocal authority <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> FundingAgency commissioning decisions <strong>for</strong>post-16 provision.<strong>The</strong> Framework, commissioned byDIUS (now BIS) <strong>and</strong> DCSF, is beingdeveloped through partnershipworking, including close links withOfsted. This partnership approach willensure that the Framework processescomplement those of other qualityinspections <strong>and</strong> assessments.18 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Recognising <strong>and</strong> Respondingto Regional RequirementsOur StoryWe know that the skills needs of one region canbe very different to those of another. Our aim isto ensure that what we deliver meets the specificneeds of young people, adults <strong>and</strong> employers ineach area. We there<strong>for</strong>e work with our regional<strong>and</strong> local partners to help us target resources tomake a real difference to skills levels locally.Regional figuresOverall FE <strong>and</strong> skills participation by age group <strong>and</strong> region, 2007/08TotalEast of Engl<strong>and</strong>103,500 311,800415,300East Midl<strong>and</strong>s86,400281,000367,400London 125,600505,000 630,600North East 63,500197,800261,300North West 173,800438,000 611,800South East 151,900437,500589,400South West 99,600329,700429,300West Midl<strong>and</strong>s 121,300375,200496,500Yorkshire <strong>and</strong> the Humber 118,400334,800453,200Other 11,500 67,40078,900Total learners 16–18: 1,055,500 19 <strong>and</strong> over: 3,278,2004,333,700Sources: FE – F05, 2007/08 final; work-based learning – W13, 2007/08 final; Ufi/learndirect – U05, 2007/08, 02/03/2009;adult safeguarded learning – C03, 09/03/09, C02, 2007/08 final.Note:Volumes are rounded to the nearest hundred. <strong>The</strong>se figures include FE (including learndirect), work-based learning (including Apprenticeships <strong>and</strong>Entry to Employment), Train to Gain <strong>and</strong> adult safeguarded learning. Region has been based upon learners’ home postcodes; postcodes outside Engl<strong>and</strong>,missing postcodes <strong>and</strong> unknown postcodes are included in the ‘Other’ field.LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 19


Swizzels Matlowestimates that usingTrain to Gain has helpedto boost profits byabout £60,000 a year.20 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Our StoryTrain to Gain proves to be sweetsuccess <strong>for</strong> Swizzels MatlowKeeping them sweetFor confectionery manufacturerSwizzels Matlow, the benefitsof training are clear: reducedturnover <strong>and</strong> increasedproductivity. In fact, thecompany estimates that usingTrain to Gain has helped to boostprofits by about £60,000 a year.Majority training<strong>The</strong> company, which produces cultfavourites including Love Hearts,Rainbow Drops, Drumstick lollies <strong>and</strong>Parma Violets, has now trained 450of its 600 employees on an NVQLevel 2 in Food <strong>and</strong> Drink through theUniversity of Derby Buxton.‘<strong>The</strong> course gives staff the chance tolearn about safe working practices <strong>and</strong>the specific safety st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>for</strong> theindustry,’ explains Tony Salt, Training<strong>and</strong> Development Manager at SwizzelsMatlow. ‘<strong>The</strong>n they get the chance todo optional units relevant to their rolewhich they’ll choose with their tutor.’Immediate impact‘Since our training initiative started, wehave seen a dramatic reduction in thestaff turnover, resulting in an increasein both productivity <strong>and</strong> efficiency,’Tony confirms.Beverley Riley is one of the employeeswho has achieved her NVQ Level 2.‘It’s great to be able to get training<strong>for</strong> the job we do on a daily basis<strong>and</strong> get a qualification <strong>for</strong> our skills,’she agrees, adding, ‘It really helps toimprove your confidence.’<strong>The</strong> programme has been so successfulthat, according to Chris Morrison,Business Development Co-ordinatorat the University of Derby Buxton,‘Swizzels Matlow are running out ofpeople to train. That’s great news <strong>for</strong>the company, although not necessarily<strong>for</strong> us! It shows that training reallyempowers staff <strong>and</strong> makes them feelmore knowledgeable <strong>and</strong> so muchhappier in their roles.’Flexible service<strong>The</strong> university has gone to somelengths to make the training fit thecompany’s needs. Chris explains: ‘Wehave had monthly meetings withmanagers at Swizzels Matlow – initiallyto tailor the course to the company’sspecific needs <strong>and</strong> then later, as thecourse has developed, to make trainingwork around the shift patterns, whichcould be in the middle of the night orover weekends.’This flexibility is one of the principlesof the Train to Gain service which aimsto meet employer needs. Tony Salt isimpressed. ‘<strong>The</strong> training is so flexible –it’s not eaten into our production timeat all, which is essential <strong>for</strong> a businesslike ours.’<strong>The</strong>re’s a mutual benefit <strong>for</strong> theprovider too, as Chris acknowledges.‘Tony has acted as an ambassador<strong>for</strong> the NVQ <strong>and</strong> since we’ve beenworking with Swizzels Matlow we’vesigned up a further six people fromother organisations <strong>for</strong> the course.’LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 21


Since September 2005,Tesco has worked withYMCA Training, a thirdsector provider, to offerKey <strong>Skills</strong> training topotential employees.22 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Our StoryAndrew grabs a second chance with the third sectorThird sectororganisationssuch as charities,social enterprises,mutuals, voluntary<strong>and</strong> communitygroups <strong>and</strong>co-operatives arevitally importantto the work ofthe LSC.<strong>The</strong> third sector allows us to reachcommunities disengaged fromtraditional <strong>for</strong>ms of learning <strong>and</strong> skillsdevelopment, as well as people whoare less likely or perhaps unwilling tolearn in further education settings. Ourresearch shows that more than 45 percent of people learning through thethird sector live in the most deprived20 per cent of communities in Engl<strong>and</strong>.<strong>The</strong> third sector also has a goodreputation <strong>for</strong> ensuring that itslearners are successful in achievingqualifications. Figures <strong>for</strong> the successrates of our providers show that thethird sector, although delivering tofewer learners, has success rates thatare on average 10 per cent higher thanthose of other providers.A partnership <strong>for</strong> learningAs one of Britain’s biggest employers,Tesco has long realised the importanceof investing in training <strong>and</strong> takinga broad approach to recruitment.Since September 2005, it has workedwith YMCA Training, a third sectorprovider, to offer Key <strong>Skills</strong> training topotential employees who missed outon qualifications during compulsoryeducation.Exp<strong>and</strong>ing every yearThat partnership is now going fromstrength to strength. After startingto support 91 stores in the firstyear,YMCA Training helped 380Tesco employees across 143 storessuccessfully achieve their Key <strong>Skills</strong><strong>and</strong> Retail Certificate. This, alongsideTesco’s own in-house NVQ in Retail<strong>Skills</strong> (Level 2), provides the basis <strong>for</strong>a full Apprenticeship qualification.A second chance <strong>for</strong>learnersAndrew Earthey is one of those whohas benefited. An assistant in the EastDidsbury store in Manchester, Andrewleft school with no qualifications afteryears of ill-health left him needinga kidney transplant. Under YMCATraining’s supervision, however, hehas excelled, com<strong>for</strong>tably passing histests <strong>and</strong>, in the words of his trainingadviser, Christine Sterndale, ‘producingtwo excellent portfolios’.Like many of the other learners, thishas also had an immediate impacton Andrew’s work. <strong>The</strong> personnelmanager at the store has noticed howAndrew’s confidence has soared sincecompleting his Apprenticeship, whichin turn has led to him taking on muchmore responsibility within his role.Recommended by allThat kind of response is why some98 per cent of trainees have said theywould recommend YMCA Training toa friend, while the same percentageof store managers would recommendthe training provider to anotheremployer. But the impact is also clearat head office.‘Over the last four years, our learningneeds have continually grown <strong>and</strong>YMCA Training has developed with us,’acknowledges Lorna Bryson, Tesco’sHead of UK Resourcing. ‘<strong>The</strong>y continueto deliver the high st<strong>and</strong>ard oflearning <strong>and</strong> teaching we require<strong>for</strong> our programme.’Since the partnership began, almost1,000 learners have benefited fromYMCA Training’s programmes <strong>for</strong> Tesco,<strong>and</strong> that number is set to rise evenfaster this year, with over 350 storessigned up. Lorna concludes: ‘We look<strong>for</strong>ward to working in partnership withYMCA Training again this year with ourbiggest apprentice intake yet.’LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 23


‘Being an apprentice means I’m notonly developing my skills all the time,I’m also getting nationally recognisedqualifications to show <strong>for</strong> it.’Karl Dodds, apprentice, Jewsons24 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Our StoryFlexible Apprenticeshipsare just the job <strong>for</strong> JewsonFaster progress,faster rewardsWith their emphasis onwork-based learning, one of thestrengths of Apprenticeships isthe way they enable learnersto quickly take on moreresponsibilities as they acquiremore skills. That means thepayback <strong>for</strong> employers is faster<strong>and</strong> learners are rewarded <strong>for</strong>their application <strong>and</strong> learning.Karl Dodds, an apprenticecustomer service representativeat timber <strong>and</strong> building productssupplier Jewson, is a perfectexample. Just six monthsinto his Apprenticeship, Karlwas already enjoying theresponsibilities of managinga major construction industryclient account. He believes thekey to this is the training he hasreceived <strong>and</strong> in particular thefact he has made rapid progresstowards an NVQ Level 2qualification. ‘It’s really boostedmy confidence, which hashelped me take on this moreresponsible role.’MotivationKarl explains: ‘<strong>The</strong> experience I’m nowgaining at work will st<strong>and</strong> me in goodstead to get more team leadership<strong>and</strong> managerial skills. <strong>The</strong>n I can worktowards an NVQ Level 3 as well.’His employer is equally impressed– both with Karl’s progress <strong>and</strong> theApprenticeship programme – <strong>and</strong>recognises the impact that thecompany’s 14 apprentices have had.‘We’re definitely seeing the benefit,’acknowledges Contracts Manager IanMcFadyen. ‘Through Apprenticeships,we get highly motivated employeesfully engaged in gaining new, up-todateskills <strong>and</strong> qualifications whichadd value directly to the service weoffer our customers.’Flexible learningCrucially, too, the training fits aroundthe business’s requirements. ‘<strong>The</strong>Apprenticeship framework is reallyflexible,’ Ian states, ‘so we can adapt itwhere we need to. It’s predominantlywork-based training <strong>and</strong> assessment,but our apprentices also get offsitetraining in the more theoreticalaspects of the job.’That additional learning is providedby CWT Chamber Training, a whollyowned subsidiary of the Coventry <strong>and</strong>Warwickshire Chambers of Commerce.‘We’ve <strong>for</strong>med a really good workingrelationship with CWT,’ Ian says.‘<strong>The</strong>y don’t just provide the off-sitetraining, they also come in <strong>and</strong> makesure the apprentice is progressing asthey should be, offering them support<strong>and</strong> advice.’Profitable partnershipsJan Ryan, Operations Manager at CWT,is equally positive about the waythe two organisations work together.‘<strong>The</strong> strength of the Apprenticeshipframework is in the partnershipbetween the employer <strong>and</strong> the trainingprovider. Jewson is a good exampleof how employers big <strong>and</strong> small cansee measurable increases in efficiency,productivity <strong>and</strong> profitability fromemploying apprentices.’As <strong>for</strong> Karl, he’s relishing theopportunities. ‘Of course, earning aliving is important but a job shouldbe about more than that. Beingan apprentice means I’m not onlydeveloping my skills all the time, I’malso getting nationally recognisedqualifications to show <strong>for</strong> it.’LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 25


‘<strong>The</strong> leadership <strong>and</strong>management trainingI got through Trainto Gain is a fast<strong>and</strong> effective wayto learn how to runa company moresuccessfully.’Elliot Campbell, founder,Pixel Room26 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Our StoryTrain to Gain puts Pixel Room back on trackInvesting in thefutureFacing up to the economicdownturn has led manycompanies to reconsider theirapproach to training <strong>and</strong>development. Leeds-baseddesigners Pixel Room is oneof many small businessesthat have done exactly this– using Train to Gain to fundmanagement training thatis already strengthening thecompany <strong>for</strong> the future.Challenging timesLike many other smaller companies,Pixel Room has faced substantialchallenges over the last year: businessgrowth was stagnant <strong>and</strong> there werevery few projects in the pipeline.Founder Elliot Campbell was alsofaced with a personal dilemma: hehad been head-hunted by a leadingcompetitor. <strong>The</strong> regular income wouldhave provided financial security <strong>for</strong> hisyoung family <strong>and</strong> covered the cost ofhis wedding later in the summer.‘It came down to a simple decision:if I wanted to keep my own business,what was I prepared to do?’ heacknowledges. ‘I realised I needed toarm myself with as many tools aspossible to ensure Pixel Room survivedthe economic downturn, <strong>and</strong> one ofthose tools was management training.’Choosing trainingElliot first considered the idea ofmanagement training at a NatWestseminar in 2008, where he met skillsbroker Ian Hargreaves who told himabout the advice <strong>and</strong> support availablethrough Train to Gain.Train to Gain offers independent skillsadvice at no cost to the employer.<strong>The</strong> advice comes from a skills broker,training provider or college whichworks with businesses on a dedicated,one-to-one basis.Ian helped Elliot to identify a suitablecourse – with local training providerNext Level Coaching – <strong>and</strong> pointed outavailable sources of funding. In mid-December 2008, Elliot embarked on anine-day leadership <strong>and</strong> managementcourse, which particularly focused onimproving his new business skills.Creating commercialconfidenceWith around 75 per cent of thecoursework now completed, Elliotalready recognises the positive impactof the training on both himself <strong>and</strong> thecompany. His time management hasvastly improved so he no longer panicsabout meeting deadlines, <strong>and</strong> he isable to view <strong>and</strong> manage the businesson a macro level as well as simplytackling day-to-day actions.<strong>The</strong> new business aspect to the coursehas proved particularly valuable,giving Elliot the confidence not toslash fees when pitching <strong>for</strong> business<strong>for</strong> fear of frightening off prospectiveclients. Instead, he is operating farmore strategically. ‘Train to Gain hasenabled me to play devil’s advocatewith my own company. I’ve identifiedour strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses <strong>and</strong>am proactively working with theteam towards improving the areaswhere change is required. <strong>The</strong> traininghas helped me develop a far morestructured business model to supportour future growth.’Looking aheadWithin that model, there are plansto invest in administrative training<strong>for</strong> Elliot’s business partner, to makethe daily running of the companyeven smoother.‘For an inexperienced businessleader like myself, the leadership <strong>and</strong>management training I got throughTrain to Gain is a fast <strong>and</strong> effective wayto learn how to run a company moresuccessfully,’ Elliot concludes. ‘I spent alot of sleepless nights deciding whetherto carry on, or wind up the company<strong>and</strong> accept an external job offer. Thanksto the training, my confidence inmaking the business grow <strong>and</strong> prosperis renewed. Pixel Room is now goingfrom strength to strength, <strong>and</strong> I knowI made the right decision.’LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 27


‘All my life I wanted to learn toread. Having children was theinspiration I needed to finallydo something about it.’Declan Macintyre28 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Our StoryReading puts Declan on a new pathStarting a newchapterDyslexia had led Declan tostruggle at school, <strong>and</strong> he leftwith few qualifications. Butwhen his wife became pregnant,he realised that unless he tookaction, he wouldn’t be able tohelp his child learn or even readthem bedtime stories.He approached his employer,Brighton <strong>and</strong> Hove City Council,<strong>and</strong> signed up <strong>for</strong> a Get Onliteracy course. Despite somebanter from his fellow refusecollectors, Declan quickly got hisfirst qualification <strong>and</strong> since thenhe hasn’t looked back.Rewriting his life storyFour years on, Declan has completedseven different qualifications, includingGSCE English. What’s more, he hasbecome a bookworm. ‘I now spend allmy spare time reading <strong>for</strong> pleasure,’he admits, having discovered poetry,politics, history <strong>and</strong> social sciences.Above all, though, what Declan loves is‘being able to read to my son Finnianevery night <strong>and</strong> helping him withhis reading, now that he has startedschool’.Reading has brought with it a numberof other benefits. For example, official<strong>for</strong>ms <strong>and</strong> letters are no longer astruggle. But it’s also led to a newjob – <strong>and</strong> new career plans. Declannow works <strong>for</strong> ASLEF, the train drivers’union, as an education worker. ‘Itmeans I can help others improvetheir lives, in the same way I havebeen helped.’A happy endingHis long-term goal, meanwhile,is still broader: he has started acorrespondence course at RuskinCollege which will give him thequalifications to get into university,so he can train to become a teacher.That way, he can share his love oflearning <strong>and</strong> reading with a wholenew generation – as well as with bothFinnian <strong>and</strong> his second son, Pearce.LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 29


Chris RobertsChief Operating Officer(<strong>for</strong>merly RegionalDirector, North East)Sally StewartNational Director,Human ResourcesJill LoweryRegional Director,London (interim)*Mary ConneelyRegional Director,Regeneration LondonSimon WaughNational ApprenticeshipService, Chief ExecutivePaul HolmeEconomic ResponseDirectorDorothy SmithRegional Director,North East (interim)*NationalCouncil<strong>The</strong> National Counciloversees policy <strong>and</strong> decisionmaking,while day-to-daymanagement rests with theChief Executive <strong>and</strong> theManagement Group.ChairmanChristopher N Banks CBEChairman, <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>Skills</strong> Council <strong>and</strong> Founder,Big Thoughts LtdMembersGareth CadwalladerExecutive Director,Airas Intersoft LtdShirley Cramer CBE(stepped downNovember 2008)Chief Executive,Dyslexia ActionJohn Cridl<strong>and</strong> CBEDeputy Director-General, CBIIan Ferguson CBEChairman,Data Connection Ltd Margaret Galliers CBE(joined September 2008)Principal, Leicester CollegeBryan GrayChairman,Northwest RegionalDevelopment AgencySir Deian HopkinFormer Vice Chancellor,London South BankUniversitySally Hopson MBE(joined July 2008)Retail <strong>and</strong> People Director,Pets at HomeDame Mary MarshDirector,Clore Social LeadershipFrances O’GradyDeputy General Secretary,Trades Union CongressEmma Pearson-Winstone(joined July 2008)Learner representativeMark S<strong>and</strong>ers(joined January 2009)Chief Executive,Bury Metropolitan Borough CouncilJohn Taylor(stepped downSeptember 2008)Principal <strong>and</strong> ChiefExecutive, Sheffield CollegeMalcolm TrobePresident, Association ofSchool <strong>and</strong> College LeadersJill Youds(joined July 2008)Director of Talent <strong>and</strong><strong>Learning</strong>, Virgin MediaSpecial advisersJohn Merry CBELeader, Sal<strong>for</strong>d City CouncilSir George SweeneyFormer Principal, KnowsleyCommunity CollegeOther committees•• Audit Committee• Capital Committee•Appointments CommitteeRemuneration Committee,<strong>and</strong>• ReorganisationCommittee.Leadership <strong>and</strong> GovernanceClaire Ighodaro CBEIndependent DirectorLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 31


Our ResponsibilitiesOur National Council <strong>and</strong> committeemembers play a key role at both thenational <strong>and</strong> regional levels. At eachlevel, they support <strong>and</strong> challenge whatwe do, provide leadership to the LSC<strong>and</strong> the FE system, <strong>and</strong> act asambassadors.Statement of the<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>Council’s <strong>and</strong>Chief Executive’sresponsibilities1. Under paragraph 14(1) of Schedule 1to the <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Act 2000,the LSC is required to prepare astatement of accounts <strong>for</strong> eachfinancial year in the <strong>for</strong>m <strong>and</strong>on the basis determined by theSecretary of State, with the consentof HM Treasury. <strong>The</strong> accounts areprepared on an accruals accountingbasis <strong>and</strong> must show a true <strong>and</strong> fairview of the LSC’s state of affairsat the year-end, <strong>and</strong> of its income,expenditure <strong>and</strong> cash flows <strong>for</strong> thefinancial year.2. In preparing the accounts, the LSC isrequired to:•observe the accounts directionissued by the Secretary of State,including the relevant accounting<strong>and</strong> disclosure requirements, <strong>and</strong>apply suitable accounting policieson a consistent basis• make judgements <strong>and</strong> estimateson a reasonable basis•state whether applicableaccounting st<strong>and</strong>ards havebeen followed, <strong>and</strong> disclose <strong>and</strong>explain any material departuresin the financial statements, <strong>and</strong>•prepare the financial statementson a going-concern basis, unlessit is inappropriate to presumethat the body will continue inoperation.3. <strong>The</strong> Accounting Officer <strong>for</strong> the<strong>for</strong>mer DIUS designated theChief Executive of the LSC as theAccounting Officer <strong>for</strong> the LSC.<strong>The</strong> relevant responsibilities asAccounting Officer are set out morefully in the Framework Document<strong>for</strong> Executive NDPBs at annex7.4 of Managing Public Money, inparticular items 5 <strong>and</strong> 6 underGovernance <strong>and</strong> Accountability.Leadership <strong>and</strong> GovernanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 33


How We Take Careof Our PeopleTo meet our goal of building thenation’s skills base, it is essential thatour own staff have the skills <strong>and</strong>abilities needed to help us deliver ourambitious plans, as well as supportingthem to prepare <strong>for</strong> their own future.Development <strong>and</strong>trainingIn 2008–09, a key focus was preparingour staff <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>thcomingMachinery of Governmentchanges, which will mean thatmany will need to adapt to newroles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities. We haveemphasised accredited developmentprogrammes that increase business<strong>and</strong> management skills, as well ascontinuing to focus on per<strong>for</strong>manceimprovement.Key programmes over the last yearincluded:•work to develop processes <strong>and</strong>materials to help embed the OracleHR system, which provides staff <strong>and</strong>managers with direct access to thein<strong>for</strong>mation they need•the development <strong>and</strong> delivery of acorporate learning <strong>and</strong> developmentprogramme that focuses onper<strong>for</strong>mance•the rollout of a new <strong>and</strong> successfulDignity at Work programme,which raises awareness of equality<strong>and</strong> diversity issues across theorganisation•Enhance, a series of six developmentevents to build <strong>and</strong> improvepartnership working skills, <strong>and</strong>•our proactive managementdevelopment programme of 240guided learning hours. This can leadto a Diploma in Management. It issupported by our Introduction toManagement, which can lead to aDiploma in First Line Management.Our Introductionto Managementdevelopmentprogramme won BestPublic Service Initiativein the TJ AwardsWe will continue to introduceprogrammes during 2009–10,reflecting the transition through theMachinery of Government changes.Our aim is to provide a flexibleapproach to development. In additionto workshops <strong>and</strong> courses across thecountry, we offer a range of more than200 online materials <strong>and</strong> courses inassociation with Ashridge BusinessSchool <strong>and</strong> SkillSoft. <strong>The</strong>se allow staffto learn at work or at home <strong>and</strong> toprogress at their own pace.We continue to demonstrate ourcommitment to up-skilling our staffby monitoring attainment againstthe <strong>Skills</strong> Pledge <strong>and</strong> building onexisting good practice to maintainour Investors in People corporateaccreditation, achieved in March 2008.<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> development managers<strong>and</strong> union learning representativeswork closely with the business todrive up the per<strong>for</strong>mance of ourpeople through a robust per<strong>for</strong>mance34 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


management <strong>and</strong> review process. Webelieve in continuous improvement,<strong>and</strong> have introduced an evaluation<strong>and</strong> review framework so that wecan measure the success of ourprogrammes.Communication<strong>and</strong> consultationEmployee communications arean integral part of our businessplanning. We aim <strong>for</strong> clear <strong>and</strong>consistent messages, make sure thatcommunications are properly targeted,relevant <strong>and</strong> fit <strong>for</strong> purpose, <strong>and</strong> listento feedback <strong>and</strong> act on it.We use a range of communicationtools, including the weekly staffbulletin, management cascade briefingnotes <strong>and</strong> face-to-face briefings,as well as a dedicated intranet sitethat contains key in<strong>for</strong>mation on HRpolicies <strong>and</strong> procedures. To help dealwith common queries <strong>and</strong> particularHR or management issues, we havedeveloped a question <strong>and</strong> answersection which is regularly updated,<strong>and</strong> online toolkits <strong>for</strong> managers <strong>and</strong>employees to explain key HR areas.We work closely with the Public <strong>and</strong>Commercial Services union (PCS), therecognised trade union that representsour staff, meeting them regularly todiscuss a range of subjects. We arecommitted to building on the positivepartnership approach with the PCS atboth national <strong>and</strong> local level.<strong>The</strong> Open Forum, an employeein<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>and</strong> consultative group,is now operating across all regions<strong>and</strong> the National Office, with anoverall group at national level. It isdesigned to complement the existingchannels of communication that wehave with the PCS.Our aim is to be open <strong>and</strong> transparentin all of our communications, <strong>and</strong> torespond positively to queries.Health <strong>and</strong> safetyWe are committed to the health,safety <strong>and</strong> welfare of all of our staff,contractors, agency workers <strong>and</strong> thelearners we fund.Work-related accident rates remainbelow the national average <strong>for</strong>office-based industries, <strong>and</strong> we havea proven risk assessment approach<strong>for</strong> controlling hazards. For example,we have invested in supporting staffwho have to drive regularly <strong>for</strong> work:in 2008–09, 443 staff completed theIndividualised Driver Risk Assessment.Our West Midl<strong>and</strong>s, East of Engl<strong>and</strong><strong>and</strong> North West regional offices allsuccessfully gained the OccupationalHealth <strong>and</strong> Safety Assessment Series(OHSAS) 18001 accreditation.We have also taken steps to supportstaff with disabilities <strong>and</strong> learningdifficulties. Equipment costing£26,234 was purchased centrally <strong>for</strong>29 colleagues who needed workstationadjustments. <strong>The</strong>se included itemssuch as ergonomic chairs, visual aids<strong>for</strong> those with a sight impairment,equipment <strong>for</strong> those with a hearingimpairment, IT hardware (mice,keyboards, monitors etc) <strong>and</strong> voiceactivatedsoftware. Some £12,246 ofthis investment was reclaimed throughAccess to Work, part of Jobcentre Plus.Our quality of life,now <strong>and</strong> in thefutureIn September 2005 the LSC published itsstrategy <strong>for</strong> sustainable development,From Here to Sustainability.Our vision is that the learning <strong>and</strong>skills sector will proactively commit<strong>and</strong> contribute to sustainabledevelopment through its managementof resources, the learning opportunitiesit delivers <strong>and</strong> its engagement withemployers <strong>and</strong> communities. In thisfinal year, the LSC will continue toprovide a lead <strong>for</strong> the FE system.In 2008–09 we continued to support<strong>and</strong> promote sustainable developmentin the learning <strong>and</strong> skills sector <strong>and</strong>within the LSC, by:•working with the EnvironmentalAssociation of Universities <strong>and</strong>Colleges (EAUC) <strong>and</strong> the NationalInstitute of Adult <strong>and</strong> ContinuingEducation (NIACE) to review ouronline sustainable developmentresource, SORTED, to find waysto make it more relevant <strong>and</strong>accessible•identifying examples of goodpractice in embedding sustainabledevelopment in the curriculum in FE•again sponsoring the Green GownAwards which celebrate bestpractice in the sector•hosting a Sustainable <strong>Skills</strong> roundtable event to discuss skills <strong>for</strong>sustainable development <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>working in a low-carbon economy•establishing with the <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>Skills</strong> Improvement Service (LSIS)the Sustainable DevelopmentAlliance <strong>for</strong> <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>,which brings together relevantrepresentatives from across theFE system•launching an internal sustainabledevelopment campaign, calledDoing Our Bit, to support oursustainable development champions<strong>and</strong> share good practice, <strong>and</strong>•starting to measure our ownprogress towards a limited set o<strong>for</strong>ganisational targets.Leadership <strong>and</strong> GovernanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 35


Our Working PracticesStakeholdercommunicationsTo achieve our goals, the LSC dependson working effectively with a largenumber of stakeholders <strong>and</strong> partners.All our work is based on two-waycommunication <strong>and</strong> open <strong>and</strong>transparent working practices.Colleges <strong>and</strong> trainingprovidersIn the last year, we have workedalongside LSC-funded trainingproviders <strong>and</strong> colleges to ensurethat they are in<strong>for</strong>med about – <strong>and</strong>involved in – our programmes <strong>and</strong>the policy decisions behind them. Wehave close working relationships, <strong>and</strong>support providers in joint activities.EmployersIn recognition of the importancewe place on our relationships withemployers, we have developed anumber of channels over the years <strong>for</strong>communicating with employers <strong>and</strong>sharing ideas <strong>and</strong> approaches.We work with large employers throughour dedicated National EmployerService, <strong>and</strong> with other employersthrough LSC programmes such asTrain to Gain <strong>and</strong> the NationalApprenticeship Service. Our staff workwith employers at a national, regional<strong>and</strong> local level, <strong>and</strong> maintain directrelationships with key employers<strong>and</strong> the organisations that representthem. We have regular meetings withgroups such as the CBI, the Instituteof Directors, the British Chambers ofCommerce <strong>and</strong> the Federation of SmallBusinesses, <strong>and</strong> attend <strong>and</strong> speak atrelevant employer conferences. We alsoensure that employers are regularlyconsulted about decisions concerninglearning <strong>and</strong> skills delivery.Third sectorWe work closely with a range of thirdsector stakeholders, as providers <strong>and</strong>employers <strong>and</strong> as a source of expertise<strong>and</strong> valuable feedback on learning<strong>and</strong> skills delivery, particularly tounderrepresented <strong>and</strong> disadvantagedgroups. <strong>The</strong> LSC also has a Third SectorAdvisory Group to its National Council,chaired by National Council memberDame Mary Marsh.Opinion <strong>for</strong>mersWe have identified a number ofbusiness <strong>and</strong> education leaders,politicians <strong>and</strong> representative groupswho we know are particularlyinterested in our work, <strong>and</strong> wemaintain regular contact with them.This is done through small discussion<strong>for</strong>ums <strong>and</strong> events, face-to-facemeetings <strong>and</strong> specialist newsletters.LearnersLearners naturally play a vital role inshaping our work, our policies <strong>and</strong> ourapproach. <strong>The</strong> LSC is advised by theNational Learner Panel, which acts asthe voice of the learner. <strong>The</strong> panel ismade up of independent volunteersinvolved in all aspects of furthereducation as learners, giving learnersa voice at national level.Other partnersWe work with a range of deliverypartners in different sectors. Detailsof our relationships with them can befound in our Statement of Priorities.Equality <strong>and</strong>diversityLike many other public sectororganisations, promoting equalopportunities is one of our coreresponsibilities – both in the waywe treat our own staff <strong>and</strong> in thest<strong>and</strong>ards that we apply to (<strong>and</strong>dem<strong>and</strong> of) the learning <strong>and</strong> skillssector. We have a statutory duty toreport annually on our actions towardsprogressing equality <strong>and</strong> diversity inaccordance with Section 42 of the<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Act 2000. Ourcontribution here discharges that duty.In April 2007 we published our firstthree-year Single Equality Scheme, ourstrategy to place equality <strong>and</strong> diversityat the heart of everything we do –from the learning we fund to the waywe support our work<strong>for</strong>ce. We havesince commissioned <strong>and</strong> published ourfirst annual review of the scheme.In 2008, we completed a majorsupport programme <strong>for</strong> learning <strong>and</strong>skills providers: 487 provider staffattended seminars which helped themto develop single equality approaches,while 50 engaged in action workingprojects, where they received tailoredsupport to address specific equalityissues.We have made substantial progresstowards assessing all of our policies<strong>for</strong> their impact on equality. Over100 policies have undergone initialscreening, <strong>and</strong> full impact assessmentshave been published <strong>for</strong>:• the Framework <strong>for</strong> Excellence•our Statutory Intervention Policy,<strong>and</strong>•dem<strong>and</strong>-led funding <strong>and</strong> the UKVocational Qualifications Re<strong>for</strong>mProgramme – Sub Programme 3.We have trained over 100 membersof staff on how to use our equalityimpact assessment framework.Through this framework, all HR policieshave now had an initial screening, <strong>and</strong>key policies have been reviewed.36 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Learners <strong>and</strong> providersAs part of the Single Equality Scheme,we put in place equality <strong>and</strong> diversityimpact measures to ensure moreequal outcomes <strong>for</strong> the learnerswe fund. We have commissioneda review of progress against thesemeasures, which will be published insummer 2009.Our Single Equality Schemecommitted us to going beyondthe requirements of legislation. Inparticular, we set out our intentionto work with the sector <strong>and</strong> supportproviders in developing their ownequality schemes <strong>and</strong> in takingpractical steps to tackle inequalities.<strong>The</strong> LSC work<strong>for</strong>ceAs part of the Single EqualityScheme, we set ourselves a numberof equality goals which aim to makeour work<strong>for</strong>ce more representative.We are making substantial progresstowards achieving these, <strong>and</strong> havealready surpassed two of our goals<strong>for</strong> 2010: the proportion of womenin middle <strong>and</strong> senior roles is now at52 per cent <strong>and</strong> the proportion of allstaff from black <strong>and</strong> minority ethnicbackgrounds is now at 14 per cent, upfrom 7.2 per cent in 2002.We have now made the first of thesegoals more challenging by focusing onthe most senior roles, 48 per cent ofwhich are filled by women. We haveexceeded our goal of 7.6 per cent ofmiddle <strong>and</strong> senior roles being filled bystaff from black <strong>and</strong> minority ethnicbackgrounds. This now st<strong>and</strong>s at10 per cent.To ensure that our work<strong>for</strong>ce practicesare fair, we have established aWork<strong>for</strong>ce Equality <strong>and</strong> DiversitySteering Group, made up of staff fromacross the organisation. This group hasalso been involved in consultationssuch as how we meet the MindfulEmployer Charter, which the LSCsigned up to in 2007.We remain committed to increasingthe proportion of staff declaringa disability or limiting illness. <strong>The</strong>figure remains low at 3.4 per centbut has improved. To this end, weare raising awareness among ourstaff, encouraging them to talk abouttheir need <strong>for</strong> support <strong>and</strong> makingreasonable adjustments <strong>for</strong> staff withdisabilities.BenchmarkingachievementsAccording to benchmarking tools fromthe Employers’ Forum on Disability,Race <strong>for</strong> Opportunity <strong>and</strong> OpportunityNow, we have already madesubstantial achievements against ourHR action plan.•Monitoring – we now have inplace a comprehensive employeemonitoring system, which enablesthe LSC to report on the diversity ofour work<strong>for</strong>ce in line with the publicduty requirements.•Case management – in<strong>for</strong>mationfrom any incidents is now reviewed<strong>and</strong> used <strong>for</strong> learning to improvepeople management <strong>and</strong> reducerisks to the LSC.•Improving personal data – wehave completed a regional eventto encourage more employees –particularly those with disabilities– to declare their personal data.Following the event, there was aclear improvement in the data <strong>for</strong>the region.• Mindful Employer Charter –our Chief Executive signed theCharter, which commits the LSC tosupporting the mental health <strong>and</strong>well-being of our employees.•Consultation <strong>and</strong> action plan –we have developed an action planto implement the principles of theCharter, <strong>and</strong> it has been approvedby our HR leadership team.•Equal pay – we implemented equalpay audits in 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2009 <strong>and</strong>are committed to undertaking thisexercise annually, which links toour responsibilities under our SingleEquality Scheme.•Dignity at Work – we havesuccessfully implemented a pilotDignity at Work programme acrossone region <strong>and</strong> have made theresource available to all employees,which will be supported by ane-learning tool.•Health <strong>and</strong> well-being – a similarpiece of work has been completedaround managing health <strong>and</strong>well-being in the workplace <strong>and</strong> isavailable regionally.As a result of these achievements,Race <strong>for</strong> Opportunity ranked the LSCin the top 10 most improved publicsector organisations in 2008. Wehave also been showcased, throughbenchmarking networks, as anexemplar of good practice in the publicsector, particularly in our approach toequality impact assessment <strong>and</strong> theSingle Equality Scheme.Leadership <strong>and</strong> GovernanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 37


Our learnerhealth <strong>and</strong> safetypolicyOur learner health <strong>and</strong> safety policystates that learners are entitled tolearning <strong>and</strong> training that takes placein a safe, healthy <strong>and</strong> supportiveenvironment. This is integral to thequality of the learner’s experience onLSC-funded provision.Following the publication of theLearner Health, Safety <strong>and</strong> Welfare: SafeLearner Blueprint in September 2007,we have produced, in consultation<strong>and</strong> in partnership with LSIS, specificguidance on Self-assessment of healthsafety <strong>and</strong> welfare: Guidance <strong>for</strong>organisations funded by the <strong>Learning</strong><strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council (March 2009).In the light of previous studies on theunder-reporting of learner incidents,we have revised <strong>and</strong> simplified theLearner Incident Management Systemto improve reporting from providers.We are currently conducting someanalysis of incidents/fatalities <strong>and</strong>correlating it with the learning atthe time of the incident. We are alsoanalysing the per<strong>for</strong>mance of all theproviders we fund in order to compareimprovements over specified periods.Finally, we have continued towork with the Health <strong>and</strong> SafetyExecutive <strong>and</strong> Sector <strong>Skills</strong> Councilson specific requirements <strong>for</strong> youngerlearners in high-risk sectors such asconstruction, <strong>and</strong> on raising awarenessof occupational health as part ofhealth <strong>and</strong> safety in the workplace.We have commissioned the Institute<strong>for</strong> Employment Studies to researchthe extent to which learners adoptsafe behaviours as a result of differingenvironments <strong>and</strong> levels of supervision.<strong>The</strong> interim report was published inautumn 2008, with final researchdata available in 2009. <strong>The</strong> research, acomparative three-year study, will linklearner experience <strong>and</strong> perceptions tothe Safe Learner Blueprint.38 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Machineryof GovernmentFrom 2010, the further educationl<strong>and</strong>scape will change considerably, withtwo new bodies established to drive theextensive agenda that the LSC has beencharged with since 2001.<strong>The</strong>se are the outcomes of theMachinery of Government consultationRaising Expectations: enabling thesystem to deliver, which ended in June2008 <strong>and</strong> paved the way <strong>for</strong> a verydifferent configuration of the post-16l<strong>and</strong>scape.Under these changes the LSC willcease to exist <strong>and</strong> a new nationalnon-departmental public body(NDPB), the Young People’s <strong>Learning</strong>Agency (YPLA), will be tasked withsupporting local authorities in theirnew responsibilities <strong>for</strong> commissioning<strong>and</strong> funding 14–19 provision. <strong>The</strong> YPLAwill be part of the DCSF.For adults, the <strong>Skills</strong> Funding Agency –an agency of BIS – will ensure thatpublic money is routed swiftly,efficiently <strong>and</strong> securely to FE colleges<strong>and</strong> providers in line with thepurchasing decisions of customersthrough the dem<strong>and</strong>-led mechanismsof Train to Gain <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong>.<strong>The</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Funding Agency will:•house the new NationalApprenticeship Service•manage Train to Gain, including theNational Employer Service•manage the new adultadvancement <strong>and</strong> careers service,<strong>and</strong>•support the FE system to deliver amore responsive service, with <strong>Skills</strong><strong>Accounts</strong> gradually <strong>for</strong>ming thepublic-facing br<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> adults.Since the changes were announced,we have reviewed our managementstructure to make sure it reflects thenew structure <strong>and</strong> provides the bestpossible plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> working withthe two departments. We are coremembers of the BIS/DCSF ProgrammeBoard that will be overseeing thetransition to the new arrangements.Our structure also enables us to sharein<strong>for</strong>mation effectively with new <strong>and</strong>existing partners <strong>and</strong> stakeholders.Leadership <strong>and</strong> GovernanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 39


Statement onInternal Control<strong>The</strong> <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council’sAccounting Officer’s Statement onInternal Control 2008–09Scope ofresponsibility1. As Accounting Officer, I haveresponsibility <strong>for</strong> maintaining asound system of internal controlthat supports the achievementof the LSC’s policies, aims <strong>and</strong>objectives. This achievementsafeguards the public funds<strong>and</strong> Council assets <strong>for</strong> whichI am personally responsible,in accordance with theresponsibilities assigned to me inManaging Public Money.2. <strong>The</strong> LSC is an NDPB established bythe <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Act 2000(the Act). <strong>The</strong> Council can only dothose things that the Act providesit can do. Nine regional councils<strong>for</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> were established on10 September 2008 under theFurther Education <strong>and</strong> TrainingAct 2007, replacing the 47 localLSC councils which were set upas part of the <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>Act 2000.3. <strong>The</strong> National Council itself consistsof between 12 <strong>and</strong> 16 nonexecutivemembers, one of whomis appointed as the Chairman. <strong>The</strong>ymeet regularly with me <strong>and</strong> withmy senior managers to providestrategic guidance to the executive.As Chief Executive I am a memberof the National Council. Schemesof Delegation exist between theNational Council <strong>and</strong> myself.4. In 2008–09 DIUS sponsored theLSC, working closely with DCSF.From 5 June 2009, the sponsorshipof the LSC transferred to BIS,<strong>and</strong> appropriate communicationchannels are in place to ensurethat the departments are in<strong>for</strong>medof the business of the LSC, <strong>and</strong>that we in turn are in<strong>for</strong>med ofthe departments’ requirements <strong>for</strong>the LSC.5. <strong>The</strong> National Council, through itsAudit Committee, is in<strong>for</strong>med ofthe risks facing the LSC <strong>and</strong> theLSC’s processes <strong>for</strong> dealingwith risk.6. <strong>The</strong> Prime Minister announced inJune 2007 that the Department<strong>for</strong> Education <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> wouldbe split into DIUS (now part ofBIS) <strong>and</strong> DCSF <strong>and</strong> that, subjectto legislation, the responsibility<strong>for</strong> funding learning provision<strong>for</strong> 16- to19-year-olds wouldpass from the LSC to the localauthorities. <strong>The</strong> LSC has workedclosely with the two departmentson the consequences of this,culminating in the White Paper,Raising Expectations, published inMarch 2008, which sets out theprocesses by which the changeswill be put into effect by 2010.<strong>The</strong> LSC has taken action to ensurethe effective delivery of currentbusiness, while absorbing theimpact of this prospective change.7. In March 2009 the previous ChiefExecutive stepped down <strong>and</strong> I wasappointed. In order to provide thisstatement I have taken assurancefrom my Internal Audit function,Management Group <strong>and</strong> otherareas of the LSC as identifiedwithin this Statement.<strong>The</strong> purpose of the system of internal control8. <strong>The</strong> system of internal controlis designed to manage risk toa reasonable level, rather thanto eliminate all risk of failure,<strong>and</strong> to achieve policies, aims<strong>and</strong> objectives; it can there<strong>for</strong>eonly provide reasonable <strong>and</strong>not absolute assurance ofeffectiveness. <strong>The</strong> system ofinternal control is based on anongoing process designed toidentify <strong>and</strong> prioritise the risksto the achievement of the LSC’spolicies, aims <strong>and</strong> objectives, toevaluate the likelihood of thoserisks being realised <strong>and</strong> theimpact should they be realised,<strong>and</strong> to manage them efficiently,effectively <strong>and</strong> economically. <strong>The</strong>system of internal control hasbeen in place in the LSC <strong>for</strong> thefinancial year ending 31 March2009 <strong>and</strong> up to the date ofapproval of the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong>, <strong>and</strong> accords withHM Treasury guidance.40 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Capacity to h<strong>and</strong>le risk9. <strong>The</strong> LSC has an establishedrisk management policy. A RiskManagement Board, consistingof a subset of my ManagementGroup, has been chaired by theDirector of Funding, Planning <strong>and</strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance since March 2008.10. A National Risk Manager, through aDirector, supports the managementof risks across the LSC network.Each group <strong>and</strong> region has anappointed senior manager to actas risk champion; these managersdo not own the risks but act asstewards of the process.11. Internal Audit per<strong>for</strong>med areview of risk managementduring 2007–08, which gave arestricted assurance <strong>and</strong> resultedin a qualification to the InternalAudit <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>. <strong>The</strong> riskprocess was refreshed in April2008 by the Director of Funding,Planning <strong>and</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>and</strong>considerable progress has beenmade to embed the refreshed riskmanagement process across theLSC. <strong>The</strong> Risk Management Boardhas met regularly during the year<strong>and</strong> risks have been reported tothe Management Group. <strong>The</strong> LSC’stop risks have been discussedfully at every Management Groupmeeting since November 2008.Risk updates have been providedat each National Audit Committee<strong>and</strong> Council throughout 2008–09.Risk management is referred tofurther within the Internal Auditsection of this Statement.<strong>The</strong> risk controlframework13. <strong>The</strong> LSC does not encourage a riskaverseculture; it accepts that risksneed to be taken <strong>and</strong> managedin order to deliver its challengingagenda. I do, however, requirerisks to be properly evaluated <strong>and</strong>managed appropriately. In doingso I expect a balanced response tobe made to risks, whereby the costof control is weighed against thelikely impact of a risk becominga reality <strong>and</strong> the estimatedconsequence if it did.Review ofeffectiveness14. As Accounting Officer I haveresponsibility <strong>for</strong> reviewing theeffectiveness of the system ofinternal control. My review of theeffectiveness of the system ofinternal control is in<strong>for</strong>med by thework of the internal auditors <strong>and</strong>the executive managers within theLSC, who have responsibility <strong>for</strong>the development <strong>and</strong> maintenanceof the internal control framework,<strong>and</strong> comments made by theexternal auditors in their otherreports. I have been advised on theimplications of the result of myreview of the effectiveness of thesystem of internal control by theAudit Committee, ManagementGroup <strong>and</strong> Internal Audit. I havealso evaluated the statementsof internal control from Regional<strong>and</strong> National Office Directorsin support of the review ofeffectiveness.Audit Committee15. A duly constituted AuditCommittee has operated throughthe year <strong>and</strong> its terms of referencereflect best practice. It consistsof National Council members,Regional Audit Committeemembers <strong>and</strong> co-opted membersrequired <strong>for</strong> their expertise; allare non-executives. <strong>The</strong> AuditCommittee has met regularly<strong>and</strong> has considered reports fromInternal Audit on the system ofinternal control, risk management<strong>and</strong> governance, from the ProviderFinancial Assurance team onproviders’ systems of internalcontrol <strong>and</strong> from the NationalAudit Office. <strong>The</strong> committeehas also taken evidence fromsenior managers when deemedappropriate. Within the LSC, eachregion has a duly constitutedRegional Audit Committee whichprovides a scrutiny <strong>and</strong> challengerole with respect to the regionaloperations. A particular strengthof these arrangements is that allRegional Audit Committees arerequired to review <strong>and</strong> adviseon each individual RegionalDirector’s personal statementof internal control. <strong>The</strong> NationalAudit Committee has recentlysought additional members fromRegional Audit Committees toenhance its membership, expertise<strong>and</strong> experience.Leadership <strong>and</strong> Governance12. Risk management is due to beaudited again during 2009–10,to follow up on progress.LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 41


ManagementGroup16. At the beginning of 2008–09,the Management Group consistedof nine Regional Directors <strong>and</strong>six National Directors (Finance<strong>and</strong> Resources; Human Resources;Funding, Planning <strong>and</strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance; Adult <strong>Learning</strong>, <strong>Skills</strong><strong>and</strong> Employment;Young People’s<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>; <strong>and</strong> NationalApprenticeship Service).17. Owing to Machinery ofGovernment changes <strong>and</strong> theneed <strong>for</strong> parallel transitionarrangements, by the end of2008–09 the ManagementGroup consisted of 20 membersconsisting of the Chief Executiveof the LSC, the Chief Executiveof the National ApprenticeshipService, the Chief OperatingOfficer of the LSC, the EconomicResponse Director, the Machineryof Government Transition Director,the National Projects Director <strong>and</strong>the Director of Regeneration <strong>for</strong>London, five National Directors(Young People’s <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>;Finance <strong>and</strong> Resources; NationalApprenticeship Service; Adult<strong>Learning</strong>, <strong>Skills</strong> <strong>and</strong> Employment;<strong>and</strong> Funding, Planning <strong>and</strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance) <strong>and</strong> nine Regional orActing Regional Directors.18. <strong>The</strong> Management Group allowsme to have a focused approachto control. I have also maintaineda requirement upon Group <strong>and</strong>Regional Directors to provide achain of personal assurance as tothe adequacy of internal control intheir areas of responsibility.Internal Audit19. A professional <strong>and</strong> independentInternal Audit service wasmaintained throughout the year.On the advice of the NationalAudit Committee, the previousChief Executive agreed the InternalAudit team’s strategy <strong>and</strong> plans<strong>for</strong> the year. I underst<strong>and</strong> that theprevious Chief Executive met withthe Chief Internal Auditor regularly<strong>and</strong> received quarterly reports onInternal Audit’s findings. I receivefrom the Chief Internal Auditor anannual report on the findings ofInternal Audit, which includes aprofessional opinion as to the levelof assurance that is applicableto the LSC. For 2008–09 theChief Internal Auditor has, withthe exception of corporate riskmanagement, capital funding<strong>and</strong> governance of EducationMaintenance Allowance (EMA),given a substantial assurance overthe operation of the LSC’s systemsof control, risk management<strong>and</strong> governance. A substantialassurance indicates that the LSChas operated basically soundsystems, but there were someweaknesses that prevented givinga full assurance.20. Through his report, the ChiefInternal Auditor has alerted meto where improvements arenecessary, <strong>and</strong> I take a personalinterest in the implementation ofsuch plans. In addition, each GroupDirector receives an annual reporton his or her operations, as doeseach Regional Director. An InternalAudit ‘control health check’ iscarried out annually in each Group<strong>and</strong> Region, <strong>and</strong> is followed upwith an annual report from theInternal Audit team, which in<strong>for</strong>mseach of the personal statements ofinternal control received from myDirectors. A spirit of co-operationexists between the LSC staff <strong>and</strong>Internal Audit <strong>and</strong> they worktogether to maintain a culture ofcontinuous improvement.21. <strong>The</strong> assurance provided by InternalAudit has been qualified in regardto corporate risk management,capital funding <strong>and</strong> governanceof EMA.Risk management22. In the 2007–08 <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>,the Internal Audit service reviewof risk management concludedthat appropriate action had notoccurred to fully embed riskmanagement within the LSC, <strong>and</strong>provided ‘restricted assurance’.Inevitably, these weaknessescould not be resolved from thestart of the year. Both the Foster<strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Ighodaro <strong>Report</strong>(see paragraphs 26 <strong>and</strong> 30 below)identified that weaknesses in riskmanagement had contributed tocritical reputational <strong>and</strong> politicalissues arising <strong>for</strong> the LSC in2008–09.23. During the year, managementresponsibility <strong>for</strong> risk managementwas moved to the Directorof Funding, Planning <strong>and</strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance. Management of riskwas given to a direct report <strong>and</strong>the risk manager transferred tothis post to enhance the focus<strong>and</strong> refresh the risk managementprocess. As part of this refresh,changes were made to the RiskManagement Board membership<strong>and</strong> the high-level reporting ofrisk to the Management Group.Significant ef<strong>for</strong>t has been takento develop risk managementprocesses throughout the LSC.Work continues to make furtherenhancements to embed riskmanagement in all business42 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


decision-making processes.However, risk management is notyet fully embedded in the LSC<strong>and</strong> further work is still requiredwhich should focus on the earlyidentification <strong>and</strong> escalationof risks.24. <strong>The</strong> wider risk managementculture issue is an area I want topersonally concentrate on <strong>and</strong> so,with immediate effect, our ChiefInternal Auditor will report directlyto me. He will also have a strongerrelationship with the Chair of theAudit Committee.25. In addition, in agreement with theChairman of the Audit Committee,I have decided to directly linkmanagement bonus <strong>for</strong> the finalyear of the LSC to the status ofthe risk register, as confirmed bythe Regional <strong>and</strong> the LSC AuditCommittees. Managing risks onthe register as well as makingsure risks get on to the registerwill be considered. In addition, thefindings of Internal Audit reportswill also affect bonuses. A newhorizon-scanning mechanism isin the process of launch that willstrengthen our ability to identifyrisks on a timely basis.Capital funding26. In 2008–09 the pace of dem<strong>and</strong><strong>for</strong> capital funding by collegesincreased significantly, exceedingthe available budget. As aconsequence the LSC decidedto defer decisions on projects inNovember 2008 <strong>and</strong> suspendedthe building programme inDecember 2008. <strong>The</strong> then <strong>Skills</strong>Secretary John Denham <strong>and</strong>Christopher Banks CBE, Chairmanof the LSC, appointed Sir AndrewFoster to lead an independentreview into the operation of thebuilding programme. Havingcompleted the review, the Foster<strong>Report</strong> was published on 1 April2009. <strong>The</strong> report reviewed thecircumstances that led to theposition on the Building Colleges<strong>for</strong> the Future programme asmanaged by the LSC, <strong>and</strong> whetherlessons could be learned. <strong>The</strong>report also assessed existing LSCprocesses <strong>and</strong> considered howthey could be enhanced to delivermore effective management ofthe programme in the currenteconomic environment <strong>and</strong>beyond.27. <strong>The</strong> Foster <strong>Report</strong> concluded thatthe most significant responsibility<strong>for</strong> the problems rested with thegeneral <strong>and</strong> financial managementof the LSC <strong>and</strong> its corporategovernance systems. <strong>The</strong> previousChief Executive accepted thisresponsibility <strong>and</strong> stepped down.<strong>The</strong> Foster <strong>Report</strong> contained anumber of recommendations, allof which the LSC <strong>and</strong> DIUS (nowBIS) have committed themselvesto implement. <strong>The</strong> present positionwith the capital budget presents acritical reputational <strong>and</strong> politicalissue <strong>for</strong> the LSC.28. In response to the report, anumber of actions are under way,including a review of the financialdata held by the LSC aboutcapital projects; appointmentof a Director to be personallyresponsible <strong>for</strong> the capitalprogramme; consultation withthe sector on the approach thatshould be used in prioritisingschemes; <strong>and</strong> the appointmentof an external team of specialiststo assist the LSC in ensuring thatthe in<strong>for</strong>mation held is accurate<strong>and</strong> comprehensive <strong>and</strong> providesa sound basis <strong>for</strong> taking futuredecisions. National <strong>and</strong> regionalmanagement are managing therelationships with colleges <strong>and</strong>associated risks to them <strong>and</strong> tothe LSC’s reputation.Learner Supportservices29. From 2002 until 2008 the LSC hadsix separate systems <strong>for</strong> deliveringLearner Support. In August 2007 acontract was awarded to Liberata<strong>for</strong> the delivery of a single systemthat would result in lower costs<strong>and</strong> an enhanced service <strong>for</strong> the2008/09 academic year. <strong>The</strong>project suffered progressive delays<strong>and</strong> the service suffered manyproblems which resulted in delaysin the issue of entitlement letters<strong>and</strong> substantial delays in paymentto many learners. <strong>The</strong> publicityassociated with this became acritical reputational issue <strong>for</strong>the LSC. Delivery issues wereresolved late in 2008. However,the costs of delivery threatenedthe financial viability of Liberata.<strong>The</strong> LSC disengaged with Liberatain November 2008. <strong>The</strong> serviceis now delivered by Capita. <strong>The</strong>rehave been some instances wherethe transfer to Capita has led tomisreporting of the numbers ofEMA recipients, but this has notaffected the actual assessment ofcases or the distribution of funds.30. In December 2008, the Chairmanof the LSC commissionedClaire Ighodaro, a NationalCouncil member, to conduct anindependent internal review ofthe issues, the causes <strong>and</strong> whatlessons could be learned.A consultant, Tim WaltonAssociates, was engaged toundertake the detailed work. <strong>The</strong>Ighodaro <strong>Report</strong> identified criticalshortcomings in the governance<strong>and</strong> management of the project.<strong>The</strong> report contains a number ofrecommendations <strong>and</strong>, togetherwith management responses, itwill be sent to DCSF’s SchoolsMinister shortly, including thecorrection of the EMA recipientnumbers referred to above.Leadership <strong>and</strong> GovernanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 43


31. Internal Audit work in theyear has also identified criticalweaknesses in terms of the overallLSC governance arrangements<strong>for</strong> Learner Support. A ProviderFinancial Assurance (PFA) auditundertaken jointly with theInternal Audit work has identifiedfurther critical control weaknesses.<strong>The</strong> Ighodaro <strong>Report</strong> hasrecommended that Internal Auditshould use the report’s findings<strong>and</strong> recommendations to in<strong>for</strong>mthe 2009–10 Internal Audit plan.32. Based on the recommendationswithin the Ighodaro <strong>Report</strong>, I amaddressing the weaknesses in2009–10 through managementactions across the LSC as wellas within Learner Support. Inparticular, risk managementprocesses will be strengthened,with reviews by the ManagementGroup <strong>and</strong> reports to the AuditCommittee <strong>and</strong> National Council;effective <strong>and</strong> rigorous contingencyplans will be developed at theoutset <strong>and</strong> regularly reviewedthroughout the delivery ofall programmes; governancearrangements <strong>for</strong> Learner Supporthave been reviewed <strong>and</strong> therewill be quarterly reports to theManagement Group <strong>and</strong> NationalCouncil; the Management Groupwill develop <strong>and</strong> implement ageneral protocol <strong>for</strong> escalation ofemerging issues; Learner Supportwill be more integrated into‘mainstream’ LSC, <strong>and</strong> is beingbuilt into the structures <strong>and</strong> waysof working of the YPLA <strong>and</strong> the<strong>Skills</strong> Funding Agency; definitionsof good vendor relationships <strong>and</strong>contract management are beingdeveloped <strong>and</strong>, where needed,staff training on programme,risk <strong>and</strong> contract management.<strong>The</strong> Management Group willreview current major contractsto ensure clarity of definition ofroles; the new SRO is a memberof the Management Group. <strong>The</strong>Management Group will reviewall existing programme boards<strong>and</strong> ensure separation of steeringgroups <strong>and</strong> programme boards;<strong>and</strong> there will be mitigationaround new technology, withcontingency planning such asphased implementation <strong>and</strong>parallel running.33. <strong>The</strong> Internal Audit service willalso provide additional support<strong>and</strong> advice where necessary orrequested.Financialmanagement34. As Accounting Officer I haveresponsibility <strong>for</strong> the financialmanagement of the budgets thatare <strong>for</strong>mally delegated to me inthe LSC’s Grant Letter. With theexception of the points raisedwithin this Statement, I canconfirm that all of the budgets Iam responsible <strong>for</strong> are managedin line with the financial rules<strong>and</strong> procedures applicable to theLSC through its draft FinancialMemor<strong>and</strong>um with DIUS (nowBIS). Apart from the exceptionsraised, the LSC has effectivefinancial management processes,based on devolved responsibility<strong>for</strong> budgetary control withregular financial reporting <strong>and</strong><strong>for</strong>ecasting that is subject to amulti-tier review <strong>and</strong> challengefunction. <strong>The</strong> overall currentfinancial position of the LSC(including <strong>for</strong>ecasts from Augustonwards) is reported to senior LSCmanagement monthly throughoutthe financial year. This ensuresthat budgets are monitored <strong>and</strong>managed appropriately across theorganisation at all times. I alsoconfirm that the expenditureincurred by the LSC in the yearhas been consistent with theremit of its Grant Letter <strong>and</strong> thatappropriate financial records aremaintained across the LSC.Other assurancemechanisms35. As Accounting Officer I amrequired to be satisfied that thoseorganisations that the LSC fundsalso operate in an appropriatelycontrolled environment. <strong>The</strong>LSC has established a PFAfunction, with responsibility <strong>for</strong>co-ordinating <strong>and</strong> carrying out aprogramme of visits designed togain assurances over the systemsof control operated by providers<strong>and</strong> providers’ application of LSCfunds. <strong>The</strong> level of assurance workcarried out by PFA teams or byothers, on which PFA teams rely,is commensurate with the levelof associated risks. I receive fromeach of my Regional Directorstheir personal assurance thatproviders maintain <strong>and</strong> operateadequate controls. <strong>The</strong>y base thisassurance on a number of things,<strong>for</strong>emost of which are:• PFA reports•receipt <strong>and</strong> examination of FEcollege accounts• contract managers’ reports• per<strong>for</strong>mance reviews••Audit Committee scrutiny, <strong>and</strong>third-party assurance (Ofsted).44 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


In<strong>for</strong>mationassurance36. During 2008 the LSC madecommitments to DIUS <strong>and</strong> theCabinet Office that requiredsignificant changes to howit managed its in<strong>for</strong>mationmanagement-relatedrisks.<strong>The</strong>se include:• general <strong>and</strong> specificrequirements called <strong>for</strong> by thePermanent Secretary, DIUS,in February 2008 (commonlyreferred to as ‘Watmore’), <strong>and</strong>• m<strong>and</strong>atory minimum datah<strong>and</strong>lingrequirements thatwere set out in the June 2008final report of the CabinetOffice entitled Data H<strong>and</strong>lingProcedures in Government(commonly referred to as‘Hannigan’).37. Additionally, in February 2009 theCabinet Office replaced the longst<strong>and</strong>ingManual of ProtectiveSecurity with the Security PolicyFramework (SPF). This defines71 m<strong>and</strong>atory requirements <strong>for</strong>departments <strong>and</strong> their deliverypartners, with which DIUS (nowBIS) has indicated the LSC will beasked to comply during 2009–10.Considerable ef<strong>for</strong>t has beenexpended <strong>and</strong> much progressmade during 2008–09 towardsmeeting first the Watmore <strong>and</strong>then the Hannigan requirements,but achieving full compliance withall SPF requirements by the endof 2009–10 will pose a significantchallenge.38. <strong>The</strong>re is an expectation that wewill fully meet the requirementsof the data-h<strong>and</strong>ling review <strong>and</strong>the SPF by the end of 2009–10.<strong>The</strong>re is significant risk that wewill fail to meet the requirement<strong>for</strong> full compliance by the end ofthe financial year, exacerbated bythe simultaneous transition to thenew organisations. We recognise,especially as in<strong>for</strong>mation is vitalto our business processes, that wemust manage our in<strong>for</strong>mationrelatedrisks more actively <strong>and</strong> areworking now to do so. <strong>The</strong>re is aneed <strong>for</strong> DIUS (now BIS) to clarify2009–10 assurance requirements.39. <strong>The</strong> work due to be undertakenduring 2009–10 will rapidlymove us towards a moreacceptable position. However,we acknowledge that the LSC iscurrently carrying a significant riskof loss of personal in<strong>for</strong>mation(with the attendant reputationaldamage that would ensue); theLSC is considering whether therehas been any further loss oflearner data during the transitionfrom Liberata to Capita.Internal controlissues40. As Accounting Officer I amsatisfied, with the exception ofrisk management, capital funding<strong>and</strong> Learner Support services (asidentified within the Internal Auditsection above), that the LSC’sgovernance <strong>and</strong> internal controlis compliant with HM Treasuryrequirements <strong>and</strong> that during2008–09 the continuing concernsdid not undermine the workingof the LSC, but they continue torepresent a threat.Continuingconcernsa. <strong>The</strong> LSC’s capacity to effectivelymanage the Machinery ofGovernment transition processposes a risk to the achievement ofthe LSC’s objectives. <strong>The</strong> changes,leading to the dissolution of theLSC in 2010 <strong>and</strong> the transfer ofits functions to successor bodies,have provided, <strong>and</strong> will continueto provide, considerable diversionfrom ongoing business. As thetransition progresses over the nextyear, there are significant risksthat the LSC will not be able tomeet its objectives, staff moralewill be affected <strong>and</strong> systems ofinternal control will break down.To manage this will requireflexibility on the part of the LSC<strong>and</strong> the sponsoring departmentsas we move from the vision <strong>and</strong>plans <strong>for</strong> the new structurestowards the reality of practical,on-the-ground management.We may have to make short-termcompromises on the vision inorder to deliver intact the newstructures while not losing controlof the current operations. I havealso appointed a Chief OperatingOfficer to focus on managing the‘business as usual’ aspects of thebusiness so that we do not losesight of our daily responsibilities.We have also accelerated themove to ‘shadow’ <strong>Skills</strong> FundingAgency/YPLA running to provideas much time as possible towork out the necessary newbusiness processes well be<strong>for</strong>ethey go live. We have a regularcommunications programme toall staff to keep them in<strong>for</strong>med,<strong>and</strong> work closely with the unionto underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> mitigate theirconcerns.Leadership <strong>and</strong> GovernanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 45


. <strong>The</strong> governance, accountability<strong>and</strong> management arrangementsin place within the NationalApprenticeship Service areimprecise <strong>and</strong> need to bedeveloped further. Significantprogress was made to ensurethat the National ApprenticeshipService became operationalfrom April 2009. However, thereare many areas that need to beclarified <strong>and</strong>, where appropriate,processes need to be implemented<strong>for</strong> 2009–10. We have beenworking closely with the NationalApprenticeship Service to resolvethe operational issues that arisefrom the arrangements <strong>and</strong> arein discussions with the NationalApprenticeship Service <strong>and</strong>sponsor departments to clarify <strong>and</strong>mitigate matters so that NationalApprenticeship Service delivery isnot compromised.c. Significant progress has beenmade in the development of acontract management frameworkwhich is to be rolled out acrossthe LSC. Bespoke contractmanagement training has notyet been delivered, although acommitment has been made todeliver this in the first six monthsof 2009–10.d. A joint Internal Audit reviewof Train to Gain with DIUSduring 2008–09 concluded thatprocedures within the LSC haveimproved since the previous jointaudit review was conducted.However, Train to Gain itselfcontinues to change. Additionalrisks arise from the transfer ofresponsibility <strong>for</strong> the provisionof skills brokerage to RegionalDevelopment Agencies in April2009. <strong>The</strong> risk management ofTrain to Gain has not kept pacewith the changing risks presentedby this funding stream.e. <strong>The</strong> LSC’s ability to controleffectively a number ofsignificant dem<strong>and</strong>-led budgetsis a serious concern. Expenditureon dem<strong>and</strong>-led programmes is,by its very nature, difficult to<strong>for</strong>ecast or control. After severalyears of under-spending, theLSC has (partly in response tonew flexibilities) experienced anincrease in dem<strong>and</strong> since autumn2008. Action is now being takento control dem<strong>and</strong> but if thisproves inadequate, there will be aserious risk of exceeding budgetsor not meeting real learner <strong>and</strong>employer needs. This is a particularrisk in relation to Train to Gain <strong>and</strong>25+ Adult Apprenticeships wherefurther urgent action is required.In response to this risk <strong>and</strong> thoseexplained in (d) above, we haveappointed National SROs <strong>for</strong>each programme to manage theoverall position <strong>and</strong> are workingclosely with sector representativesto explain the issues <strong>and</strong> worktogether to resolve them.f. It is imperative that, during thecurrent period of change, theLSC has an effective businesscontinuity planning process inplace to react quickly to anyissues <strong>and</strong> to ensure continuityof business. Work continues inthis area <strong>and</strong> plans are currentlybeing developed prior to theestablishment of a testingmethodology.g. In 2008–09 the Internal AuditInvestigations Unit (IAIU)continued to receive an increasein the number of referrals to anall-time high. This represents a22 per cent increase over theprevious year <strong>and</strong> a 115 per centincrease in two years. This hasplaced pressure on the IAIU todeal with the allegations <strong>and</strong>subsequent investigations in atimely manner. <strong>The</strong> risks in thisarea are likely to increase in the<strong>for</strong>thcoming period of change<strong>and</strong> with the current economicsituation. I am taking a personalinterest in this area <strong>and</strong> receivea monthly report. <strong>The</strong> ongoinginternal investigation which tookup significant resource in 2006–07was passed to the police <strong>and</strong>the Serious Fraud Office (SFO),with funds at risk of £2.5 million.Five people appeared in Tel<strong>for</strong>dMagistrates’ Court on 17 March2009 accused of a variety ofoffences of corruption, moneylaundering <strong>and</strong> gaining a pecuniaryadvantage. <strong>The</strong> SFO, prosecuting,requested that the case betransferred under the 1987 SFOAct out of the jurisdiction of theMagistrates’ Court. Accordingly,the case is in the process ofbeing transferred to BirminghamCrown Court. <strong>The</strong> IAIU continuesto provide ongoing assistance as<strong>and</strong> when required. <strong>The</strong> significantreputational risk to the LSC arisingfrom this investigation remains.h. <strong>The</strong>re continues to be a risk tothe delivery of LSC businesschange programmes arising frominadequate levels of alignment<strong>and</strong> buy-in from the businessteams <strong>for</strong> the developmentactivity <strong>for</strong> which they haveownership. Typically this is seen atprogramme/project specificationstages, business-side projectmanagement <strong>and</strong> sign-off,attendance at governance boards<strong>and</strong> user acceptance testing.This risk has been recognised byIn<strong>for</strong>mation Management (IM), astypically this has meant that theIT portfolio drives the businessside, rather than the businessleading the programme with ITas the enabler. Mitigation of this46 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


isk continues to be managedthrough the business cycle, whichis business-owner driven. <strong>The</strong>reare still risks around ensuringappropriate engagement of thebusiness with IM. My priority is toensure that existing systems areoperating properly <strong>and</strong> to acceptnew commissions only where wehave clear specification by thebusiness <strong>and</strong> the IM resource todo so safely. This is an area I amalso taking a personal interestin <strong>and</strong> I have recently asked theChief In<strong>for</strong>mation Officer to reportdirectly to me.i. Confirmation of the expectedrequirement to meet the DataH<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>Report</strong> (DHR) minimumrequirements was received fromDIUS (now BIS) in March 2009.This confirmed that the LSCwas not ‘m<strong>and</strong>ated to followthe Security Policy Framework(SPF) in 2008–09’. <strong>The</strong> SeniorIn<strong>for</strong>mation Risk Owner’s (SIRO)<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> on In<strong>for</strong>mationSecurity <strong>for</strong> 2008–09 has providedassurance on what has beenachieved within the context ofthe risks, issues <strong>and</strong> challengesaffecting the LSC’s ability toachieve full compliance. It alsodocuments the LSC’s position inrelation to Watmore <strong>and</strong> Hannigan<strong>and</strong> the SPF framework. <strong>The</strong>Internal Audit division separatelyreported restricted assurance inmeeting the wider dem<strong>and</strong>s of theDHR, <strong>and</strong> recommended that atransition plan be put in place bythe end of May 2009. Reference tothis opinion <strong>and</strong> recommendationis made in the SIRO’s report. <strong>The</strong>LSC is unlikely to meet the in-yearrequirement during 2009–10to achieve full compliance withthe SPF. <strong>The</strong>re is an associatedrisk relating to the potential <strong>for</strong>data loss.Other issuesj. During 2008–09 there wereinstances of non-compliancewith LSC systems, including:management of the car scheme;delegated authorities not beingproperly in place; <strong>and</strong> incorrectuse of charge cards. In addition,proposed updated guidance<strong>for</strong> areas such as travel <strong>and</strong>subsistence has not yet beenpublished, due to an issuerelating to employees’ permanentworkplaces. Finance has beenworking with HR to resolvethis issue <strong>and</strong> a final review ofthe policy is under way, withpublication expected shortly.A revised Financial Memor<strong>and</strong>umis currently being negotiatedwith BIS <strong>and</strong> DCSF.Geoffrey RussellChief Executive <strong>and</strong>Accounting Officer<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council10 July 2009Leadership <strong>and</strong> GovernanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 47


Risk Management <strong>and</strong>Financial Controls<strong>The</strong> Risk Management Board has a key responsibilityto provide an assurance that risks are being effectivelymanaged. Throughout the year, the Board, which is asub-group of <strong>and</strong> advisory to the Management Group,has been chaired by the Director of Funding, Planning<strong>and</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>and</strong> has met on three occasions.Verbal reports are made by the Chair of the Board tothe Management Group <strong>and</strong> all agendas <strong>and</strong> papersare uploaded to the Risk Management Board team site.<strong>The</strong> National Audit Committeeis responsible <strong>for</strong> providing theoverarching challenge function <strong>and</strong><strong>for</strong> seeking assurance that the toprisks are being managed effectively.Regular reports are made to thecommittee by the Chair of the RiskManagement Board.Concerns raised by the National AuditCommittee in early 2008 resulted ina new approach to risk managementbeing introduced. <strong>The</strong> ownership of riskmanagement was given to the Directorof Funding, Planning <strong>and</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance,who instigated a refreshed processto risk management. As a result, theManagement Group considers risk asthe first agenda item at every monthlymeeting. To in<strong>for</strong>m this discussion, arevised RAG template is commissionedfrom each top risk owner. <strong>The</strong> RAGtemplates provide in<strong>for</strong>mation on thecurrent status of the risk <strong>and</strong> providean assurance that the top risks arebeing effectively mitigated.<strong>The</strong> revised RAG templates <strong>and</strong>comments made by ManagementGroup members are communicatedback to the risk owners, the riskchampions <strong>and</strong> a wider audience inorder to in<strong>for</strong>m any other risks <strong>and</strong>to ensure that we retain line of sightacross the LSC on the top risks.Group <strong>and</strong> regional risk registers havebeen analysed to ensure that the topLSC risks have been identified withinthem <strong>and</strong> that appropriate controlsare in place to mitigate <strong>and</strong> managethe risks.All regions have a risk registerin place <strong>and</strong> risk management isregularly considered by the regionalmanagement team. <strong>The</strong> Regional AuditCommittee receives regular reportson regional risks <strong>and</strong> is responsible<strong>for</strong> providing a challenge function tothe risk owner on their stewardship ofthe risk. <strong>The</strong> main role of the RegionalAudit Committee is to assess <strong>and</strong>advise on the scope <strong>and</strong> effectivenessof the system established by regionalmanagement to identify, assess,manage <strong>and</strong> monitor risk.All National Office groups have arisk register in place. Group risksare managed through the relevantdecision-making boards, whichconsider the top LSC risks at everymeeting.All National Office groups <strong>and</strong> regionshave appointed a risk champion toco-ordinate the risk managementprocess. <strong>The</strong>y are the focal point <strong>for</strong>the receipt of guidance <strong>and</strong> paperson risk management matters. <strong>The</strong>ydo not own the risks. All risks haveassigned risk owners at ManagementGroup level who are responsible<strong>for</strong> ensuring that effective action istaken to mitigate the likelihood ofrisks occurring.<strong>The</strong> national risk manager supportsthe management of risks, providesadvice <strong>and</strong> guidance to colleaguesacross the LSC <strong>and</strong> manages theRisk Management Board team site, avehicle <strong>for</strong> debate <strong>and</strong> the sharing ofissues, concerns <strong>and</strong> good practice.48 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


<strong>Report</strong>ing of Personal Data-related Incidents<strong>The</strong> tables that follow have been prepared in response to Cabinet Office guidance (issued to the LSC via DIUS on2 May 2008) on reporting personal data-related incidents in the management commentary section of departmentalresource accounts.Table 1: Summary of protected personal data-related incidents <strong>for</strong>mally reported to the In<strong>for</strong>mationCommissioner’s Office in 2008–09Date of incident(month)January 2009Further in<strong>for</strong>mationon in<strong>for</strong>mation riskNature of incidentSuspected lossof personal data.All in<strong>for</strong>mationrecovered. No datamisuse identified.Nature of datainvolvedNumber of peoplepotentially affectedNotification stepsLearner personal data 60 Notification to DIUS<strong>and</strong> In<strong>for</strong>mationCommissioner<strong>The</strong> LSC will continue to monitor <strong>and</strong> assess its in<strong>for</strong>mation risks, in light of events notedabove, in order to identify <strong>and</strong> address any weaknesses <strong>and</strong> ensure continuous improvementof its systems.Incidents deemed by the Data Controller not to fall within the criteria <strong>for</strong> reporting to the In<strong>for</strong>mation Commissioner’sOffice but recorded centrally within the department are set out in Table 2. Small, localised incidents are not recordedcentrally <strong>and</strong> are not cited in these figures.Leadership <strong>and</strong> GovernanceTable 2: Summary of other protected personal data-related incidents in 2008–09Category Nature of incident TotalILoss of inadequately protected electronic equipment, devices or paperdocuments from secured government premisesNilIIIIILoss of inadequately protected electronic equipment, devices or paperdocuments from outside secured government premisesInsecure disposal of inadequately protected electronic equipment, devices orpaper documentsIV Unauthorised disclosure NilV Other NilNilNilLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 49


Remuneration <strong>Report</strong><strong>The</strong> Remuneration Committee <strong>for</strong>msan important part of our governancestructure <strong>and</strong> process, providingin<strong>for</strong>med <strong>and</strong> independent decisionson reward policy <strong>and</strong> practice.Given our status as a non-departmentalpublic body, the existence of theRemuneration Committee allows usgreater freedom from our sponsoringdepartment (BIS) on reward policy<strong>and</strong> practice.ChairmanChristopher N Banks CBEChairman, <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council,<strong>and</strong> Chief Executive, Big Thoughts LtdMembersGareth CadwalladerDirector, Airas Intersoft LtdFrances O’GradyDeputy General Secretary, TradesUnion CongressStephen MarstonDirector General, Further Education<strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Group, BIS<strong>The</strong> Chief Executive <strong>and</strong> Directorof Human Resources are invited toattend <strong>and</strong> speak at meetings exceptwhen their own remuneration is beingconsidered. <strong>The</strong> Head of Reward <strong>for</strong>the LSC is also invited to attend,where appropriate.<strong>The</strong> committee met five times duringthe period April 2008 to March 2009.<strong>The</strong> committee determines the reward<strong>for</strong> members of the ManagementGroup <strong>and</strong> other key senior executives.Honorariums <strong>for</strong> National Councilmembers are determined by theSecretary of State. <strong>The</strong> rewardpolicy complies with relevantHM Treasury guidance <strong>and</strong> is basedon the philosophy that remunerationarrangements should support the LSCin the achievement of its businessobjectives. <strong>The</strong> reward policy isdesigned to attract <strong>and</strong> retain the rightcalibre of people, to focus individualsto deliver superior per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>and</strong> toencourage team-based collaborationacross the LSC.In determining the appropriate levelsof reward, the LSC takes into accountlocal market competitiveness, theviews of major stakeholders <strong>and</strong> theUK regulatory framework. Rewardlevels are compared with those inorganisations of similar size <strong>and</strong> focusin each of the LSC’s regions.50 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


<strong>The</strong> Remuneration Committee’s termsof reference are as follows:• To review <strong>and</strong> advise the NationalCouncil on the framework <strong>and</strong>policy <strong>for</strong> the appointment, pay<strong>and</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance of LSC staff.• Subject to any determinationrelating to the Chief Executive’sappointment made by the Secretaryof State, to review <strong>and</strong> makerecommendations to the Chairmanon any revisions to the ChiefExecutive’s terms <strong>and</strong> conditionsof employment, includingremuneration.• To assist the Chairman inmonitoring annually theper<strong>for</strong>mance of the Chief Executiveagainst the annual per<strong>for</strong>mance plan<strong>and</strong>, in light of that per<strong>for</strong>manceappraisal, to advise the Chairmanof any per<strong>for</strong>mance-related payincrease or bonus to be paid.• To review the per<strong>for</strong>mance ofsenior staff within the NationalCouncil who report directly tothe Chief Executive; to reviewthe remuneration of such staffat least annually; <strong>and</strong> to makerecommendations to the ChiefExecutive on any pay increase orremuneration arrangements thatmay be appropriate.Components ofremuneration<strong>The</strong> Chairman of the LSC (who alsochairs the Remuneration Committee)<strong>and</strong> members of the LSC NationalCouncil receive a salary (Chairman)or an honorarium. <strong>The</strong>re is no bonuspayment attached to any of theseappointments.<strong>The</strong> Chief Executive <strong>and</strong> members ofthe Management Group (the National<strong>and</strong> the Regional Directors) receive atotal reward package made up of basesalary, annual bonus, flexible benefits<strong>and</strong> a defined benefit pension. Subjectto the requirements of the role, theremay be a job-need car (or, fromSeptember 2006, a job-need taxablebut non-pensionable car allowance)provided by the LSC. Bonus paymentsare not guaranteed.Since April 2006, the LSC bonus planhas been structured to focus onencouraging <strong>and</strong> rewarding team-basedachievement at both the national<strong>and</strong> regional level, as assessed againstthe Public Service Agreement targetsset by the <strong>for</strong>mer Department <strong>for</strong>Education <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>. For senior staff,a discretionary element recognisesoutst<strong>and</strong>ing individual contributions.Relationshipbetween basesalary <strong>and</strong>variable rewardGeneral<strong>The</strong> LSC sets base salaries at themarket median <strong>and</strong> recognisesachievement through the bonusscheme.Salaries <strong>for</strong> National, Regional<strong>and</strong> other senior Directors arebenchmarked using a range ofappropriate data sources includingthe Association of Colleges’ PrincipalSalary survey, Hay Group managementconsultants <strong>and</strong> Senior Civil Servicepay scales. If an individual’s salaryfalls below 90 per cent of the paybenchmark, an adjustment shouldnormally be made to bring it to thatminimum level.Chief Executive<strong>The</strong> reward package <strong>for</strong> the ChiefExecutive involves two key elements(base salary <strong>and</strong> bonus), which aredetermined by the Secretary of Stateafter considering proposals from theChairman. <strong>The</strong> bonus is assessed onachievement against corporate <strong>and</strong>personal targets. During 2008–09, thesalary increase <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mer ChiefExecutive, Mark Haysom CBE, was3.3 per cent <strong>and</strong> his bonus <strong>for</strong> the yearto March 2008 was £36,242.<strong>The</strong> Chief Executive’s bonus potentialis now set in the same way as <strong>for</strong>members of the Management Group.Achievement of threshold:7.5 per cent of base salaryAchievement of target:15 per cent of base salaryAchievement of maximumabove target:22.5 per cent of base salaryDue to the nature of his role, theChief Executive does not receive anautomatic salary progression award.Base pay changes2008–09Base pay <strong>for</strong> National <strong>and</strong> RegionalDirectors rose by an average of3.3 per cent. This included an amountset aside <strong>for</strong> raising the spot rates (thenormal salary value) <strong>for</strong> each role by2 per cent. <strong>The</strong> remainder was usedto move employees from the 90 percent minimum towards that spot rate.<strong>The</strong> average increase <strong>for</strong> other seniorDirectors was 3.14 per cent (includingan increase in spot rates of 2 per cent).Leadership <strong>and</strong> GovernanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 51


Duration ofcontracts,notice periods<strong>and</strong> terminationarrangementsMembers of theNational CouncilMembers of the National Council donot have service contracts <strong>and</strong> wereappointed by the then Secretary ofState <strong>for</strong> Innovation, Universities<strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>.Appointment is <strong>for</strong> a fixed term,usually four years, <strong>and</strong> on a parttimebasis. Over the course of a year,members of the National Council areexpected to devote 12–15 days toworking <strong>for</strong> the LSC, mainly in eitherhalf- or part-days.An honorarium is offered <strong>for</strong> theseappointments, normally of £4,000.Travel, subsistence <strong>and</strong> other expensesare payable in line with the currentterms <strong>for</strong> LSC executive staff. <strong>The</strong>reare no bonus payments <strong>for</strong> theseappointments.Chair of theNational CouncilAppointment is <strong>for</strong> a fixed term,usually four years, <strong>and</strong> on a part-timebasis – at least two days a week areexpected to be devoted to the workof the LSC.<strong>The</strong> salary <strong>for</strong> the year to March 2009was £51,400. Salary is reviewed inaccordance with guidance providedby the Cabinet Office covering thepay of statutory office holders (theirsalaries are linked to movements in theSenior Civil Service pay b<strong>and</strong>s). Travel,subsistence <strong>and</strong> other expenses arepayable in line with the current terms<strong>for</strong> LSC executive staff. <strong>The</strong>re are nobonus payments <strong>for</strong> this appointment.Resignation can be at any time bynotice in writing to the Secretary ofState <strong>for</strong> Business, Innovation <strong>and</strong><strong>Skills</strong>. <strong>The</strong> Secretary of State may, bygiving written notice, remove the Chairfrom office if he or she is satisfiedthat the member has not attendedNational Council meetings <strong>for</strong> morethan six consecutive months, or thatthe member is unable or unfit to carryout their role, or by giving six months’notice in writing.LSC Management Groupmembers <strong>and</strong> othersenior staffAppointment is by service contract,which can be ended by either partygiving 12 weeks’ written notice.<strong>The</strong> current Chief Executive, GeoffreyRussell, has been appointed on afixed-term contract that ends on31 March 2010. <strong>The</strong> appointment canbe ended by either party giving threemonths’ written notice. Additionally,the LSC has the option to end thecontract after six months of completedservice by providing one month’snotice. However, if the option is nottaken at that point, the notice periodreverts back to three months <strong>for</strong> theremainder of the contract.<strong>The</strong> <strong>for</strong>mer Chief Executive, MarkHaysom CBE, had an open-endedcontract with a six-month noticeperiod on either side.<strong>The</strong>re are no specific terminationclauses in Management Group memberservice contracts.<strong>The</strong> remaining part of theRemuneration <strong>Report</strong> on pages 53 to60 has been audited by the NationalAudit Office.52 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Board members’ emoluments<strong>The</strong> Chief Executive is appointed by the other members of the National Council with the approval of the Secretary of State<strong>for</strong> Business, Innovation <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>. <strong>The</strong> other members of the National Council are appointed by the Secretary of State.<strong>The</strong> amount of the Chief Executive’s bonus is decided by the Remuneration Committee, which reviews per<strong>for</strong>mance againstan annual personal responsibility plan agreed by the Chairman. <strong>The</strong> bonus is also approved by the Secretary of State.<strong>The</strong> LSC holds no contracts with a notice period greater than 12 months.Year endedYear ended31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’000<strong>The</strong> emoluments of the Chairman (Christopher N Banks CBE, age 49) <strong>for</strong> theperiod:Salary 51 51Taxable benefit 0 051 51<strong>The</strong> emoluments of the new Chief Executive (Geoffrey Russell, age 51) <strong>for</strong> theperiod from 23/03/09:Basic salary <strong>and</strong> other emoluments* 6 0Taxable benefit in kind 0 0Pension contribution (opted to join nuvos pension scheme) 1 07 0Leadership <strong>and</strong> Governance221<strong>The</strong> emoluments of the <strong>for</strong>mer Chief Executive (Mark Haysom CBE, age 55)<strong>for</strong> the period:**Basic salary <strong>and</strong> other emoluments223Bonus †Taxable benefit in kindPension contribution (opted to join premium pension scheme)00* Full-year equivalent would be £208,000.30362934289 284** Mark Haysom CBE resigned from his post as Chief Executive on 23 March 2009. He will receive payment of sixmonths of his 2008–09 contractual salary <strong>and</strong> benefits. No bonus is payable.†<strong>The</strong> bonus payment relates to the previous year <strong>and</strong> as per above no further bonus will be paid.LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 53


<strong>The</strong> non-executive members of the National Council were appointed by the then Secretary of State <strong>for</strong> Innovation,Universities <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>.Non-executive membersChristopher N Banks CBEGareth CadwalladerJohn Cridl<strong>and</strong> CBEIan Ferguson CBEMargaret Galliers CBEBryan GraySir Deian HopkinSally Hopson MBEClaire Ighodaro CBEDame Mary MarshFrances O’GradyEmma Pearson-WinstoneMark S<strong>and</strong>ersMalcolm TrobeJill YoudsDate commenced/ Current Emoluments Emolumentsreappointed or term year ended year endedextended (years)* 31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’00015/06/2008 3 0.0 0.001/06/2008 3 4.04.001/09/2007 3 6.30.001/06/2008 3 0.00.011/09/2008 3 4.10.001/01/2004 Indeterminate 4.04.001/09/2007 3 0.00.001/07/2008 2 3.00.001/03/2009 3 4.04.001/03/2009 3 3.74.001/06/2008 3 4.07.601/07/2008 2 3.00.005/01/2009 2 1.00.001/09/2007 3 6.30.001/07/2008 2 3.0 0.0*Number of years rounded up to nearest whole, but no term will extend beyond April 2010.Date ofcessationFormer membersGiles ClarkeShirley Cramer CBEJohn Merry CBEJohn Taylor01/12/2007 0 0.0 2.730/11/2008 1 2.7 4.031/10/2007 0 0.0 2.330/09/2008 4 3.0 4.054 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Senior employeesSalary <strong>and</strong> benefits in kindNational DirectorsYear ended Year ended Year ended Year ended31 March 2009 31 March 2009 31 March 2008 31 March 2008Salary Benefits in kind Salary Benefits in kind£’000 (to nearest £100) £’000 (to nearest £100)David WayNational Director, Adult <strong>Learning</strong>,130–135 0 125–130 0<strong>Skills</strong> <strong>and</strong> Employment <strong>and</strong> Director,National Apprenticeship ServiceRob WyeNational Director, Young People’s <strong>Learning</strong> 130–135 0 125–130 0<strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>Verity BulloughNational Director, Funding, Planning <strong>and</strong>125–130 0 140–145 0Per<strong>for</strong>manceDavid RussellNational Director, Finance <strong>and</strong> Resources 145–150 3,900 140–145 3,700Sally StewartNational Director, Human Resources 115–120 0 15–20 1,000Paul HolmeEconomic Response Director (from 24/11/08) 35–40 0 0 0Leadership <strong>and</strong> GovernanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 55


Year ended31 March 2009Salary£’000Year ended31 March 2009Benefits in kind(to nearest £100)Year ended31 March 2008Salary£’000Year ended31 March 2008Benefits in kind(to nearest £100)Regional DirectorsCaroline NevilleEast of Engl<strong>and</strong> 130–135 0 125–130 2,000Thomas CromptonEast Midl<strong>and</strong>s 130–135 0 0David HughesLondon 140–145 3,500 135–140 3,300Chris RobertsNorth East 135–140 1,500 120–125 2,600John KorzeniewskiNorth West 135–140 0 125–130 1,500Henry BallSouth East (retired July 2008) 55–60 0 130-135 0Marinos PaphitisSouth East (from 01/06/08) 95–100 600 0 0Malcolm GillespieSouth West 130–135 0 130–135 0David Cragg OBEWest Midl<strong>and</strong>s (Machinery of Government 135–140 0 130–135 0Transition Director from 12/05/08)Margaret ColemanYorkshire <strong>and</strong> the Humber 120–125 0 120–125 0Mary ConneelyRegeneration London 130–135 0 125–130 1,100056 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Senior employees (continued)Pension entitlementsReal increase inAccrued pensionpension<strong>and</strong> related<strong>and</strong> relatedlump sumlump sumat age 60 at age 60 CETV at CETV at Real increaseas at 31/03/09 earned in the year 31/03/09 31/03/08** in CETV£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000National DirectorsGeoffrey Russell – – – – –Chief Executive (from 23/03/09) †Mark Haysom CBE* 10–12.5 0–2.5 188 145 29Former Chief ExecutiveDavid Way 45–50 0–2.5 1,011 926 13National Director, Adult <strong>Learning</strong>,<strong>Skills</strong> <strong>and</strong> Employment <strong>and</strong> Director,National Apprenticeship Service<strong>and</strong> lump sum140–145<strong>and</strong> lump sum0–2.5Rob Wye 40–45 0–2.5 876 786 38National Director, Young People’s<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong><strong>and</strong> lump sum130–135<strong>and</strong> lump sum5–7.5Verity Bullough 10–15 0–2.5 157 126 21National Director, Funding, Planning<strong>and</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance<strong>and</strong> lump sum30–35<strong>and</strong> lump sum5–7.5David Russell 55–60 0–2.5 1,385 1,290 7National Director, Finance<strong>and</strong> Resources<strong>and</strong> lump sum175–180<strong>and</strong> lump sum0–2.5Sally Stewart 20–25 2.5–5 330 277 32National Director, Human ResourcesPaul Holme 35–40 0–2.5 745 708 0Economic Response Director <strong>and</strong> lump sum <strong>and</strong> lump sum110–115 0–2.5Leadership <strong>and</strong> Governance*Opted to join premium.** Due to certain factors being incorrect in last year’s CETV calculator, there may be slight differences between lastyear’s reported closing figures <strong>and</strong> this year’s opening figures.†<strong>The</strong> pension entitlements <strong>for</strong> the new Chief Executive were not available at the time of publication <strong>and</strong> are notexpected to be material as only one week’s service has been completed <strong>and</strong> there is no brought <strong>for</strong>ward CETV.LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 57


Regional DirectorsReal increase inAccrued pensionpension<strong>and</strong> related<strong>and</strong> relatedlump sumlump sumat age 60 at age 60 CETV at CETV at Real increaseas at 31/03/09 earned in the year 31/03/09 31/03/08** in CETV£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000Caroline Neville* 10–15 0–2.5 199 160 24East of Engl<strong>and</strong>Thomas Crompton 40–45 7.5–10 849 612 193East Midl<strong>and</strong>s<strong>and</strong> lump sum125–130<strong>and</strong> lump sum27.5–30David Hughes* 15–20 0–2.5 194 160 18LondonChris Roberts 40–45 0–2.5 980 888 32North East<strong>and</strong> lump sum130–135<strong>and</strong> lump sum2.5–5John Korzeniewski 45–50 0–2.5 1,123 1,035 17North West<strong>and</strong> lump sum145–150<strong>and</strong> lump sum0–2.5Henry Ball* 50–55 0–2.5 1,223 1,218 6South East (retired July 2008)<strong>and</strong> lump sum125–130<strong>and</strong> lump sum0–2.5Marinos Paphitis 30–35 5–7.5 568 426 112South East (from 01/06/08)<strong>and</strong> lump sum90–95<strong>and</strong> lump sum17.5–20Malcolm Gillespie 20–25 0–2.5 466 437 18South West<strong>and</strong> lump sum60–65<strong>and</strong> lump sum2.5–5David Cragg OBE 25–30 0–2.5 651 617 18West Midl<strong>and</strong>s (Machinery ofGovernment Transition Directorfrom 12/05/08)<strong>and</strong> lump sum85–90<strong>and</strong> lump sum2.5–5Margaret Coleman 45–50 0–2.5 1,040 953 20Yorkshire <strong>and</strong> the Humber<strong>and</strong> lump sum135–140<strong>and</strong> lump sum2.5–5Mary Conneely* 15–20 0–2.5 262 209 19Regeneration London*Opted to join premium.** Due to certain factors being incorrect in last year’s CETV calculator, there may be slight differences between last year’s reported closing figures <strong>and</strong> this year’s opening figures.58 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


SalaryFor the purposes of the analysis,‘salary’ includes the following whereapplicable:gross salary payablecompensation or redundancyper<strong>for</strong>mance pay or bonusesother allowances, <strong>and</strong>• overtime payable.Benefits in kind<strong>The</strong> monetary value of benefits in kindcovers any benefits provided by theemployer <strong>and</strong> treated by HM Revenue<strong>and</strong> Customs as a taxable emolument.<strong>The</strong> benefits provided by the LSCto National <strong>and</strong> Regional Directorsdisclosed on the previous pages relateto lease cars.Civil Service pensionsPension benefits are providedthrough the Civil Service pensionarrangements. From 1 October 2002,civil servants may be in one of threestatutory-based ‘final salary’ definedbenefit schemes (classic, premium<strong>and</strong> classic plus). <strong>The</strong> schemes areunfunded, with the cost of benefitsmet by monies voted by Parliamenteach year. Pensions payable underclassic, premium <strong>and</strong> classic plusare increased annually in line withchanges in the Retail Prices Index.New entrants after 1 October 2002may choose to join either premiumor a good-quality ‘money purchase’stakeholder arrangement with asignificant employer contribution(partnership pension account).Employee contributions are set at therate of 1.5 per cent of pensionableearnings <strong>for</strong> classic <strong>and</strong> 3.5 per cent<strong>for</strong> premium, nuvos <strong>and</strong> classic plus.Benefits in classic accrue at the rate of1/80th of pensionable salary <strong>for</strong> eachyear of service. In addition, a lump sumequivalent to three years’ pension ispayable on retirement. For premium,benefits accrue at the rate of 1/60thof final pensionable earnings <strong>for</strong> eachyear of service. Unlike classic, there isno automatic lump sum (but membersmay give up (commute) some oftheir pension to provide a lump sum).Classic plus is essentially a variation ofpremium, but with benefits in respectof service be<strong>for</strong>e 1 October 2002calculated broadly as per classic.Nuvos is a relatively new definedbenefit scheme where employeecontributions are currently at3.5 per cent of pensionable pay.Pension benefits build up at therate of 2.3 per cent of pensionableearnings per annum <strong>and</strong> the optionis available at retirement to convertup to 25 per cent of total notionalpension benefits into a lump sum.<strong>The</strong> partnership pension account is astakeholder pension arrangement. <strong>The</strong>employer makes a basic contributionof between 3 per cent <strong>and</strong> 12.5 percent (depending on the age of themember) into a stakeholder pensionproduct chosen by the employee. <strong>The</strong>employee does not have to contribute,but where they do make contributions,the employer will match these up toa limit of 3 per cent of pensionablesalary (in addition to the employer’sbasic contribution). Employers alsocontribute a further 0.8 per cent ofpensionable salary to cover the costof centrally provided risk benefitcover (death in service <strong>and</strong> ill-healthretirement).Further details of the Civil Servicepension arrangements can be found atcivilservice-pensions.gov.uk.Cash equivalenttransfer valuesA cash equivalent transfer value (CETV)is the actuarially assessed capitalisedvalue of the pension scheme benefitsaccrued by a member at a particularpoint in time. <strong>The</strong> benefits valuedare the member’s accrued benefits<strong>and</strong> any contingent spouse’s pensionpayable from the scheme. A CETV is apayment made by a pension schemeor arrangement to secure pensionbenefits in another pension scheme orarrangement when the member leavesa scheme <strong>and</strong> chooses to transfer thebenefits accrued in their <strong>for</strong>mer scheme.<strong>The</strong> pension figures shown relate tothe benefits that the individual hasaccrued as a consequence of their totalmembership of the pension scheme, notjust their service in a senior capacityto which disclosure applies. <strong>The</strong> CETVfigures (<strong>and</strong>, from 2003–04, the otherpension details) include the value ofany pension benefit in another schemeor arrangement that the individualhas transferred to the Civil Servicepension arrangements <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> whichthe Civil Service vote has receiveda transfer payment commensuratewith the additional pension liabilitiesbeing assumed. <strong>The</strong>y also include anyadditional pension benefit accruedto the member as a result of theirpurchasing additional years of pensionservice in the scheme at their owncost. CETVs are calculated within theguidelines <strong>and</strong> framework prescribed bythe Institute <strong>and</strong> Faculty of Actuaries<strong>and</strong> do not take account of any actualor potential reductions to benefitsresulting from Lifetime AllowanceTax which may be due when pensionbenefits are drawn.Leadership <strong>and</strong> GovernanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 59


Please note that the factors used tocalculate the CETV were revised on1 April 2008 on the advice of theScheme Actuary. <strong>The</strong> CETV figure <strong>for</strong>31 March 2008 has been restated usingthe new factors so that it is calculatedon the same basis as the CETV figure<strong>for</strong> 31 March 2009.Real increase in CETVThis reflects the increase in CETVeffectively funded by the employer.It takes account of the increase inaccrued pension due to inflation,contributions paid by the employee(including the value of any benefitstransferred from another pensionscheme or arrangement) <strong>and</strong> usescommon market valuation factors <strong>for</strong>the start <strong>and</strong> end of the period.Geoffrey RussellChief Executive <strong>and</strong>Accounting Officer<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council10 July 200960 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Financial Commentary<strong>Accounts</strong> direction <strong>and</strong>statutory background1. <strong>The</strong>se accounts have beenprepared under an accountsdirection issued by DIUS inaccordance with Schedule 1 tothe <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Act 2000,<strong>and</strong> the financial memor<strong>and</strong>umbetween the Department <strong>for</strong>Education <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> <strong>and</strong> the LSCdated 8 May 2006, that is nowunder the authority of BIS.Going concern2. <strong>The</strong> balance sheet at 31 March2009 shows net liabilities of£164.3 million (2007–08:£220.2 million net liabilities).This reflects the inclusion ofliabilities falling due in futureyears which, to the extent thatthey are not to be met from theLSC’s other sources of income,may only be met by future grantin-aidfrom the LSC’s sponsoringdepartments. This is because,under the normal conventionsapplying to Parliamentary controlover income <strong>and</strong> expenditure, suchgrant-in-aid may not be issued inadvance of need.3. Grant-in-aid <strong>for</strong> 2009–10, takinginto account the amount requiredto meet the LSC’s liabilities fallingdue in the year, has already beenincluded in the departments’estimates <strong>for</strong> that year. <strong>The</strong>seestimates have been approved byParliament, <strong>and</strong> there is no reasonto believe that the departments’future sponsorship <strong>and</strong> futureParliamentary approval will not be<strong>for</strong>thcoming.4. <strong>The</strong> Apprenticeships, <strong>Skills</strong>,Children <strong>and</strong> <strong>Learning</strong> Billpublished in February 2009provides <strong>for</strong> the dissolution of theLSC <strong>and</strong> the transfer of functions,staff <strong>and</strong> property to the YPLA, the<strong>Skills</strong> Funding Agency <strong>and</strong> localauthorities. <strong>The</strong> accounts havebeen prepared on the assumptionthat, under the conventionsof Machinery of Governmentchanges, the LSC’s functions willcontinue in operational existence<strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>eseeable future, albeitthrough different delivery bodies.5. Accordingly, despite the currentbalance sheet position of the LSC,it has been considered appropriateto adopt a going-concern basis <strong>for</strong>the preparation of these financialstatements.Year-end position6. <strong>The</strong> net book value of fixed assetsat 31 March 2009 increased from£54.4 million to £80.1 million,reflecting investment in IT <strong>and</strong> ITsystems. A significant proportionof the increase relates to thedevelopment <strong>and</strong> implementationof the Apprenticeship vacanciesonline matching system.7. At 31 March 2009, the LSChad debtors of £248.9 million(31 March 2008: £219.1 million).<strong>The</strong> increase captures a growthin accrued income relating to theEuropean Social Fund (ESF) as thenew 2007–13 programme gatherspace <strong>and</strong> a growth in otherprepayments.8. At 31 March 2009, the LSC heldcash balances of £111.3 million(31 March 2008: £98.3 million)including funds drawn from theESF as well as grant-in-aid. BIS(<strong>for</strong>merly DIUS) authorises aworking balance of 1 per centof the annual resource budgetthroughout each financial year.At 31 March 2009 the balanceof BIS <strong>and</strong> DCSF funds amountedto £47.7 million, or 0.4 per cent(31 March 2008: 0.3 per cent).9. At 31 March 2009, the LSChad creditors of £561.2 million(31 March 2008: £568.2 million).<strong>The</strong> overall value of creditors isrelatively unchanged, although thecomposition of this year’s balancehas a far greater concentrationof creditors relating to employerresponsiveprogrammes that isconsistent with increased delivery.10. Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing St<strong>and</strong>ard(FRS) 29 requires organisationsto disclose in<strong>for</strong>mation onthe significance of financialinstruments to their financialposition <strong>and</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, <strong>and</strong>this is shown in note 18 tothe accounts.11. <strong>The</strong> most significant creditrisk to the LSC arises from thenon-payment of debts owed byprivate sector training providersthat are contracted to providetraining services. <strong>The</strong> likelihood ofsuch an eventuality is mitigatedby monthly reconciliation of aprovider’s entitlement to funding<strong>and</strong> subsequent amendment tofuture funding in the dem<strong>and</strong>ledsystem. <strong>The</strong> financial impactof this is largely attributable toprovider insolvency. <strong>The</strong> overallfinancial impact is currentlynot material – see note 23 tothe accounts.12. Of the £55.7 million establishedto cover the one-off costsof reorganisation under theagenda <strong>for</strong> change programme,£15.7 million remains to coverexcess property costs <strong>and</strong>additional, ongoing pensionliabilities.Leadership <strong>and</strong> GovernanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 61


Development <strong>and</strong>per<strong>for</strong>mance13. <strong>The</strong> accounts cover the periodfrom 1 April 2008 to 31 March2009.14. <strong>The</strong> majority of the LSC’s fundingis grant-in-aid from government.In 2008–09, this amounted to£11,894.9 million (2007–08:£11,167.9 million).15. <strong>The</strong> largest source of incomewas the ESF, which contributed£159.0 million (2007–08:£292.5 million).16. HM Treasury requires NDPBs todisclose the full costs of theiractivities in their accounts. Wehave there<strong>for</strong>e included notionalincome of £10.4 million (2007–08:£11.6 million) <strong>for</strong> the cost ofcapital in our accounts. This isbased on a rate of 3.5 per cent(2007–08: 3.5 per cent). See also‘Cost of capital’ – note 8 to theaccounts.17. <strong>The</strong> results <strong>for</strong> 2008–09 show netexpenditure of £11,838.9 million(2007–08: £11,092.3 million). Thisis derived from the comparisonof expenditure against income <strong>for</strong>the year. As an NDPB, the LSC isrequired to break even one yearwith another against the resourcebudget, <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008–09 thetotal expenditure was within theresource budget set by DIUS of£11,885.4 million. Total reservesin the same period decreased by£56.0 million.18. Capital expenditure in the year(mainly on computer systems)totalled £43.8 million (2007–08:£23.3 million).19. Research <strong>and</strong> developmentexpenditure during the yearamounted to £5.4 million(2007–08: £4.8 million).20. <strong>The</strong> Late Payment of CommercialDebts (Interest) Act requiresgovernment bodies, in the absenceof agreement to the contrary, tomake payments to suppliers within30 days of either the provision ofgoods or services or the date onwhich the invoice was received.<strong>The</strong> target set by HM Treasury<strong>for</strong> payment to supplierswithin 30 days is 95 per cent. In2008–09, the LSC paid 96 per cent(2007–08: 95.3 per cent) of itsinvoices within 30 days <strong>and</strong>70.2 per cent of its invoices within10 days (since October 2008).It incurred £nil in interest chargesin respect of late payments <strong>for</strong>2008–09 (2007–08: £18.36).21. During the year, 25,858 days wereattributable to sickness absence.Using the average number of staffemployed over the year (see note5 to the accounts) this equates toapproximately 8.3 days’ sicknessper employee per year.Main trends <strong>and</strong> factorsunderlying development<strong>and</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance22. In 2008–09 the LSC’s programmeexpenditure increased by5.7 per cent to £11.8 billion.23. Train to Gain expenditureincreased from £355.8 millionin 2007–08 to £876.3 million in2008–09 on the back of increaseddelivery.24. Adult Apprenticeships, aprogramme with similar aims toTrain to Gain, also experiencedsizeable growth during 2007–08.Expenditure grew £118.4 million,a 51.7 per cent increase onthe previous year, reflecting asignificant increase in dem<strong>and</strong><strong>for</strong> delivery of Apprenticeships <strong>for</strong>those aged over 25.25. Despite some difficulties,expenditure on capital projectsincreased markedly over theyear. DIUS capital programmesexpenditure increased by£156.0 million, almost 35 per centup on 2007–08, while the DCSFJoint Capital Fund programmesaw expenditure increase byalmost 320 per cent – from£46.9 million to £196.8 million.<strong>The</strong> LSC will continue to seektrans<strong>for</strong>mation of the FE estatethough a needs-based framework,as recommended by Sir AndrewFoster.26. Total administration costs(excluding depreciation) werereduced by £14.7 million(or 7.5 per cent) relative to lastyear, as the LSC continued to meetits challenging budget throughfurther reductions in staff-related<strong>and</strong> other costs chargeable to theadministration budget.62 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Main trends <strong>and</strong> factorslikely to affect futuredevelopment <strong>and</strong>per<strong>for</strong>mance27. <strong>The</strong> Machinery of Governmentchanges will see the LSC’schallenging agenda taken <strong>for</strong>wardby the <strong>Skills</strong> Funding Agency, theYPLA <strong>and</strong> local authorities from2010. Shadow arrangements tofacilitate the implementation ofthese re<strong>for</strong>ms are expected to bein place by summer 2009.28. Apprenticeships will continue toexp<strong>and</strong> to include greater numbersof young people <strong>and</strong> adults. <strong>The</strong>National Apprenticeship Service,housed in the <strong>Skills</strong> FundingAgency, has been fully operationalfrom April 2009 <strong>and</strong> will be akey driver in the delivery of theentitlement to an Apprenticeshipplace <strong>for</strong> each suitably qualifiedyoung person from 2013.29. In an increasingly challengingeconomic climate, flexibilities havebeen introduced into the skillssystem so that funding can betargeted quickly <strong>and</strong> effectivelyat dem<strong>and</strong>. We will continue towork with colleges <strong>and</strong> providersto explore how their budgets canbe applied flexibly within keypriorities to deliver sustainableemployment outcomes.31. On 5 June 2009, the Governmentannounced the creation of anew Department <strong>for</strong> Business,Innovation <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> (BIS) whosekey role will be to build Britain’scapabilities to compete in theglobal economy. <strong>The</strong> departmentwas created by merging theDepartment <strong>for</strong> Business,Enterprise <strong>and</strong> Regulatory Re<strong>for</strong>m(BERR) <strong>and</strong> DIUS. <strong>The</strong> sponsorshipresponsibility <strong>for</strong> the LSC passedto BIS on that date.32. <strong>The</strong>re is no reason to believe thatthe expected government fundingunderlying the LSC’s goingconcernassertion will be affectedby this change.Auditor33. <strong>The</strong> accounts are audited by theComptroller <strong>and</strong> Auditor General,who is appointed by statute <strong>and</strong>whose Certificate <strong>and</strong> <strong>Report</strong>appears on page 64. Audit feeexpenditure is expected to be£229,750 (2007–08: £184,000),of which £220,000 relates tothe statutory audit of the LSCaccounts, <strong>and</strong> the increase reflectsthe complexity of auditingdem<strong>and</strong>-led systems. In addition,an audit fee of £9,750 wasincurred to support conversion toInternational Financial <strong>Report</strong>ingSt<strong>and</strong>ards in 2009–10.(nao.org.uk) under Publications.<strong>The</strong> National Audit Office iscurrently undertaking a study ofthe Train to Gain programme.35. As Accounting Officer I confirmthat:•there is no relevant auditin<strong>for</strong>mation (as defined) of whichthe auditors are unaware•I have taken all the steps that Iought to in order to ensure thatI am aware of relevant auditin<strong>for</strong>mation, <strong>and</strong>•I have taken all the steps that Iought to in order to establish thatthe LSC’s auditors are aware ofthe in<strong>for</strong>mation.Geoffrey RussellChief Executive <strong>and</strong>Accounting Officer<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council10 July 2009Leadership <strong>and</strong> Governance30. <strong>The</strong> introduction of the SeptemberGuarantee <strong>and</strong> the downturnin the employment market hasmeant that <strong>for</strong> 2009/10 there isincreasing dem<strong>and</strong> on 16–18 FE,Entry to Employment <strong>and</strong> schoolsixth <strong>for</strong>m places. Additionalfunding has been identified in the2009 Budget to provide 54,500extra places in 2009 <strong>and</strong> 2010.34. <strong>The</strong> National Audit Office, onbehalf of the Comptroller <strong>and</strong>Auditor General, also carries outvalue <strong>for</strong> money studies. During2008–09, the studies completedon areas within the LSC’sresponsibility were: <strong>Skills</strong> <strong>for</strong> Life:Progress in Improving Adult Literacy<strong>and</strong> Numeracy <strong>and</strong> Renewing thephysical infrastructure of Englishfurther education colleges. <strong>The</strong>sedocuments are available on theNational Audit Office websiteLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 63


<strong>The</strong> Certificate <strong>and</strong> <strong>Report</strong> of the Comptroller<strong>and</strong> Auditor General to the Houses of ParliamentI certify that I have audited thefinancial statements of the <strong>Learning</strong><strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council (LSC) <strong>for</strong> theyear ended 31 March 2009 underthe <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Act 2000.<strong>The</strong>se comprise the Net ExpenditureStatement, the Balance Sheet, the CashFlow Statement <strong>and</strong> the related notes.<strong>The</strong>se financial statements have beenprepared under the accounting policiesset out within them. I have also auditedthe in<strong>for</strong>mation in the Remuneration<strong>Report</strong> that is described in that reportas having been audited.Respectiveresponsibilities of theNational Council, ChiefExecutive <strong>and</strong> auditor<strong>The</strong> National Council <strong>and</strong> ChiefExecutive as Accounting Officerare responsible <strong>for</strong> preparing the<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, which includes theRemuneration <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> the financialstatements in accordance with the<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Act 2000 <strong>and</strong>directions made thereunder by theSecretary of State <strong>for</strong> Innovation,Universities <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> ensuringthe regularity of financial transactions.<strong>The</strong>se responsibilities are set out inthe Statement of the LSC’s <strong>and</strong> ChiefExecutive’s Responsibilities on page 33.My responsibility is to audit thefinancial statements <strong>and</strong> the part ofthe Remuneration <strong>Report</strong> to be auditedin accordance with relevant legal <strong>and</strong>regulatory requirements, <strong>and</strong> withInternational St<strong>and</strong>ards on Auditing(UK <strong>and</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong>).I report to you my opinion as towhether the financial statements givea true <strong>and</strong> fair view <strong>and</strong> whether thefinancial statements <strong>and</strong> the part of theRemuneration <strong>Report</strong> to be audited havebeen properly prepared in accordancewith the <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Act 2000<strong>and</strong> directions made thereunder bythe Secretary of State <strong>for</strong> Innovation,Universities <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>. I report to youwhether, in my opinion, the in<strong>for</strong>mation,which comprises the ‘Our Targets <strong>and</strong>Achievements’, ‘Management <strong>and</strong>Structure’, ‘How We Take Care of OurPeople’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Financial Commentary’sections of the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, isconsistent with the financial statements.I also report whether in all materialrespects the expenditure <strong>and</strong> incomehave been applied to the purposesintended by Parliament <strong>and</strong> the financialtransactions con<strong>for</strong>m to the authoritieswhich govern them.64 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09In addition, I report to you if the LSChas not kept proper accounting records,if I have not received all the in<strong>for</strong>mation<strong>and</strong> explanations I require <strong>for</strong> my audit,or if in<strong>for</strong>mation specified by HMTreasury regarding remuneration <strong>and</strong>other transactions is not disclosed.I review whether the Statement onInternal Control reflects the LSC’scompliance with HM Treasury’sguidance, <strong>and</strong> I report if it does not.I am not required to consider whetherthis statement covers all risks <strong>and</strong>controls, or <strong>for</strong>m an opinion on theeffectiveness of the LSC’s corporategovernance procedures or its risk <strong>and</strong>control procedures.I read the other in<strong>for</strong>mation containedin the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> considerwhether it is consistent with the auditedfinancial statements. This in<strong>for</strong>mationcomprises the other sections withinthe ‘Our Story’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Leadership <strong>and</strong>Governance’ parts of the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>including the unaudited part of theRemuneration <strong>Report</strong>. I consider theimplications <strong>for</strong> my report if I becomeaware of any apparent misstatementsor material inconsistencies with thefinancial statements. My responsibilitiesdo not extend to any other in<strong>for</strong>mation.Basis of audit opinionsI conducted my audit in accordancewith International St<strong>and</strong>ards onAuditing (UK <strong>and</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong>) issued bythe Auditing Practices Board. My auditincludes examination, on a test basis,of evidence relevant to the amounts,disclosures <strong>and</strong> regularity of financialtransactions included in the financialstatements <strong>and</strong> the part of theRemuneration <strong>Report</strong> to be audited.It also includes an assessment of thesignificant estimates <strong>and</strong> judgementsmade by the LSC <strong>and</strong> AccountingOfficer in the preparation of thefinancial statements, <strong>and</strong> of whetherthe accounting policies are mostappropriate to the LSC’s circumstances,consistently applied <strong>and</strong> adequatelydisclosed.I planned <strong>and</strong> per<strong>for</strong>med my auditso as to obtain all the in<strong>for</strong>mation<strong>and</strong> explanations which I considerednecessary in order to provide me withsufficient evidence to give reasonableassurance that the financial statements<strong>and</strong> the part of the Remuneration<strong>Report</strong> to be audited are free frommaterial misstatement, whethercaused by fraud or error, <strong>and</strong> that inall material respects the expenditure<strong>and</strong> income have been applied to thepurposes intended by Parliament <strong>and</strong>the financial transactions con<strong>for</strong>m tothe authorities which govern them. In<strong>for</strong>ming my opinion I also evaluated theoverall adequacy of the presentation ofin<strong>for</strong>mation in the financial statements<strong>and</strong> the part of the Remuneration<strong>Report</strong> to be audited.OpinionsAudit opinionIn my opinion:● the financial statements give a true<strong>and</strong> fair view, in accordance withthe <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Act 2000 <strong>and</strong>directions made thereunder by theSecretary of State <strong>for</strong> Innovation,Universities <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>, of the state ofthe LSC’s affairs as at 31 March 2009<strong>and</strong> of its net expenditure, recognisedgains <strong>and</strong> losses <strong>and</strong> cash flows <strong>for</strong>the year then ended;● the financial statements <strong>and</strong> the partof the Remuneration <strong>Report</strong> to beaudited have been properly preparedin accordance with the <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>Skills</strong> Act 2000 <strong>and</strong> directions madethereunder by the Secretary of State<strong>for</strong> Innovation, Universities <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>;<strong>and</strong>● in<strong>for</strong>mation, which comprises the‘Our Targets <strong>and</strong> Achievements’,‘Management <strong>and</strong> Structure’, ‘HowWe Take Care of Our People’ <strong>and</strong>‘Financial Commentary’ sections ofthe <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, is consistent withthe financial statementsOpinion on regularity● In my opinion, in all materialrespects the expenditure <strong>and</strong> incomehave been applied to the purposesintended by Parliament <strong>and</strong> thefinancial transactions con<strong>for</strong>m tothe authorities which govern them.<strong>Report</strong>I have no observations to make onthese financial statementsAmyas C E MorseComptroller <strong>and</strong> Auditor General16 July 2009National Audit Office151 Buckingham Palace RoadVictoria, London SW1W 9SS


Net Expenditure Statement<strong>for</strong> the year to 31 March 2009Year endedYear ended31 March 2009 31 March 2008Note £’000 £’000IncomeOther income 2 232,872 348,205Total income 232,872 348,205ExpenditureProgramme expenditureSchool sixth <strong>for</strong>ms16–18 further educationFamily <strong>Learning</strong> Impact FundingYoung People ApprenticeshipsLearners with learning difficulties <strong>and</strong>/or disabilitiesLearner Support 16–1814–19 re<strong>for</strong>mDCSF capital19+ further educationOther adult responsiveAdult ApprenticeshipsTrain to GainAdult safeguarded learningOffender <strong>Learning</strong>Learner Support 19+Adult skills re<strong>for</strong>mQuality re<strong>for</strong>mCapacity <strong>and</strong> infrastructureDIUS capitalNon-departmental programmesAdministration costsStaff costsOther costsDepreciation, impairment <strong>and</strong> losses on disposal333333333333333333332,113,280 2,038,7843,298,538 3,164,5698,240 0798,922 778,377224,538 202,802631,485 629,005120,973 177,233196,822 46,8801,468,938 1,874,328188,615 173,986347,288 228,894876,264 355,788214,087 223,378139,045 115,551165,419 124,68780,248 58,99183,772 171,93475,492 65,219606,893 450,979233,086 347,6235a6a6b128,05353,63418,130132,37863,96815,154Total expenditure 12,071,762 11,440,508Net expenditure be<strong>for</strong>e interest (11,838,890) (11,092,303)Cost of capital – notional income 8 10,386 11,612Net expenditure after interest (11,828,504) (11,080,691)Reversal of cost of capital (10,386) (11,612)Net expenditure <strong>for</strong> the year (11,838,890) (11,092,303)FinanceAll activities are continuing.<strong>The</strong>re are no other gains or losses other than net expenditure <strong>for</strong> the year.<strong>The</strong> notes on pages 68 to 91 <strong>for</strong>m part of these accounts.LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 65


Balance Sheetas at 31 March 2009As atAs at31 March 2009 31 March 2008Note £’000 £’000Fixed assetsIntangible assets 9 381 774Tangible assets 10 79,701 53,680Total fixed assets 80,082 54,454Current assetsDebtors 11a 248,916 219,069Cash at bank <strong>and</strong> in h<strong>and</strong> 12 111,287 98,346360,203 317,415CreditorsAmounts falling due within one year 13a (561,212) (568,215)Net current liabilities (201,009) (250,800)Total assets less current liabilities (120,927) (196,346)Provisions <strong>for</strong> liabilities <strong>and</strong> charges 14 (43,342) (23,899)Total net liabilities (164,269) (220,245)Represented byCapital <strong>and</strong> reservesGeneral reserve 19 (164,269) (220,245)Total reserves (164,269) (220,245)<strong>The</strong> notes on pages 68 to 91 <strong>for</strong>m part of these accounts.Geoffrey RussellChief Executive <strong>and</strong> Accounting Officer<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council10 July 200966 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Cash Flow Statement<strong>for</strong> the year to 31 March 2009NoteYear ended31 March 2009£’000Year ended31 March 2008£’000Net cash outflow from operating activities 20 (11,844,778) (11,096,822)Capital expenditurePayment <strong>for</strong> the purchase of fixed assetsProceeds from sale of fixed assetsNet cash outflow from capital expenditure(37,157)10(37,147)(22,927)10(22,917)FinancingGrant-in-aid funding from DCSF/DIUS 19 11,894,866 11,167,929Net cash inflow 21 12,941 48,190<strong>The</strong> notes on pages 68 to 91 <strong>for</strong>m part of these accounts.FinanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 67


Notes to the <strong>Accounts</strong>Accounting policies1 Statement ofaccounting policies<strong>The</strong> financial statements have beenprepared in line with the <strong>Accounts</strong>Direction given by the Secretary ofState <strong>for</strong> Innovation, Universities <strong>and</strong><strong>Skills</strong>, with approval of HM Treasury,in accordance with the <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>Skills</strong> Act 2000. This requires the LSC tocomply with the Government Financial<strong>Report</strong>ing Manual (FReM) issued byHM Treasury which, in turn, requiresthe LSC to comply with the accounting<strong>and</strong> disclosure requirements ofthe Companies Act <strong>and</strong> applicableaccounting st<strong>and</strong>ards issued oradopted by companies (UK GenerallyAccepted Accounting Practices) tothe extent that it is meaningful <strong>and</strong>appropriate to the public sector. <strong>The</strong>particular accounting policies adoptedby the LSC are described below. <strong>The</strong>yhave been applied consistently indealing with items considered materialin relation to the accounts.1.1 Going concern<strong>The</strong> Apprenticeships, <strong>Skills</strong>, Children<strong>and</strong> <strong>Learning</strong> Bill – published inFebruary 2009 – provides <strong>for</strong> thedissolution of the LSC <strong>and</strong> the transferof functions, staff <strong>and</strong> property tothe Young People’s <strong>Learning</strong> Agency(YPLA), the <strong>Skills</strong> Funding Agency <strong>and</strong>local authorities. <strong>The</strong> accounts havebeen prepared on the assumption that,under the conventions of Machineryof Government changes, the LSC’sfunctions will continue in operationalexistence <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>eseeable future,albeit through different delivery bodies.<strong>The</strong> sponsoring departments’ estimates<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>ward plans include provision<strong>for</strong> the continuation of the LSC’sactivities under the Machinery ofGovernment changes so there is noreason to believe that future fundingwill not be <strong>for</strong>thcoming. <strong>The</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e,the accounts have been prepared ona going-concern basis.1.2 Accounting convention<strong>The</strong>se accounts are preparedunder the modified historical costconvention, whereby fixed assets,current asset investments <strong>and</strong> stocks(where material) are reflected atcurrent values.1.3 Intangible fixed assetsIntangible fixed assets mainly compriselicences to use software developedby third parties. However, computersoftware which has been developedexclusively <strong>for</strong> the LSC <strong>and</strong> accounted<strong>for</strong> as an asset is classified as tangible.Intangible fixed assets are valuedat historical cost (or revalued tomarket value where this is readilyascertainable) <strong>and</strong> are accounted <strong>for</strong>as follows:●●Computer software licences arecapitalised as intangible assetswhere they are capable of beingused <strong>for</strong> more than one year <strong>and</strong>have a cost – either individuallyor as a group – equal to or greaterthan £5,000.<strong>The</strong>se licences are amortised on astraight-line basis over the specifiedlife of the software licence – or overthree years where no life is given.1.4 Tangible fixed assetsTangible fixed assets are statedat the lower of replacement cost<strong>and</strong> recoverable amount. Costs ofacquisition comprising only thosecosts that are directly attributableto bringing the asset into workingcondition <strong>for</strong> its intended use arecapitalised.For the purposes of calculating thecurrent value of tangible fixed assets,revaluation is applied (using indicesprepared by the Office <strong>for</strong> NationalStatistics) to the closing carryingvalue of assets in use at 31 March.Tangible fixed assets are also subject toimpairment reviews.<strong>The</strong> minimum level <strong>for</strong> capitalisation ofa tangible fixed asset is £5,000.All assets falling into the followingcategories are capitalised:a) tangible assets which are capable ofbeing used <strong>for</strong> more than one year,<strong>and</strong> have a cost equal to or greaterthan £5,000b) groups of tangible assets thatindividually may be valued at lessthan £5,000 but which together<strong>for</strong>m a single collective assetbecause the items fulfil all thefollowing criteria:i) the items are functionallyinterdependent;ii) the items are acquired at aboutthe same date <strong>and</strong> are planned<strong>for</strong> disposal at about the samedate;iii) the items are under singlemanagerial control; <strong>and</strong>iv) each individual asset thusgrouped has a value of over£1,000.Tangible fixed assets are depreciatedon a straight-line basis in order towrite off the value of the assets overtheir estimated useful economic lives.<strong>The</strong>se are detailed <strong>for</strong> each category ofasset in Table 1 on page 69.1.5 LeasesOperating leases <strong>and</strong> the rentalsare charged to the Net ExpenditureStatement on a straight-line basis overthe lease term, even if the paymentsare not made on such a basis.1.6 Cost of capitalA charge, reflecting the cost of capital,is included in the Net ExpenditureStatement. This charge is calculatedat the Government’s st<strong>and</strong>ard rate of3.5 per cent in real terms on all assetsless liabilities, except <strong>for</strong> bank balancesat the Office of the Paymaster General.When the average capital employedover the year is negative, the cost ofcapital becomes notional income.68 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Table 1: Depreciation of tangible fixed assetsCategory Asset LifeIT Desktop IT 3 yearsOther IT (<strong>for</strong> example, servers 5 years, or the life of the system – whichever is the lower<strong>and</strong> computer software)Plant <strong>and</strong> machinery Plant <strong>and</strong> machinery 3 yearsFurniture <strong>and</strong> fittings Furniture 5 yearsFitting out10 years, or the life of the building lease involved – whicheveris the lower1.7 ProvisionsProvisions are recognised when it isprobable that the LSC will be requiredto settle a present obligation <strong>and</strong> areliable estimate can be made of thatobligation. <strong>The</strong> obligation is normallythe amount that the LSC would payto settle the obligation at the balancesheet date or to transfer it to a thirdparty at that time.1.8 Grant-in-aid from the sponsoringdepartmentsAll grant-in-aid has been recorded asfinancing as it is a contribution fromthe LSC’s controlling party giving riseto a financial interest. It is recorded asfinancing in the Cash Flow Statement<strong>and</strong> credited to the general reserve.1.9 Programme accounting basis<strong>Learning</strong> participation<strong>Learning</strong> participation programmeexpenditure is recognised in theaccounts when the grant is paid tocolleges in line with an agreed profile<strong>for</strong> the academic year.<strong>The</strong> LSC sometimes pays advances offunding to colleges that experience cashflow difficulties. <strong>The</strong>se are repayable,usually over a short term, throughprofiled deductions from futurepayments. Where they have not beenrecovered by the year-end, the balancesare included within advances <strong>and</strong> furthereducation (FE) college debtors.Capital fundingFunding in respect of approvedcapital infrastructure projects in FEcolleges is recognised in accordancewith the LSC Capital H<strong>and</strong>book. Thisnormally means that fully verifiedclaims <strong>for</strong> capital project fundingthat are received between 2 Februaryin the previous financial year <strong>and</strong>1 February in the current financial yearare recognised as expenditure in thecurrent financial year.Exceptionally, the conditions of thecapital grant funding to colleges allowthe LSC to bring <strong>for</strong>ward approvalsof payments <strong>for</strong> evidenced capitalexpenditure, but only where it hasthe funds available to do so. Wherethey occur, the approved values arealso recognised as expenditure in thecurrent year.Exceptional funding supportExceptional funding support providedto colleges in difficulty is charged toexpenditure over the life of the agreedrecovery plan, which will typicallycover a period of four years. Where theplan is <strong>for</strong> a period of greater than oneyear, this element of the funding isshown in FE college prepayments.Youth <strong>and</strong> adult analysisFor the academic year ending 31 July2008, allocations to FE institutionswere mainly assigned between youth<strong>and</strong> adult. Only a small element of theallocations required apportionmentinto both youth <strong>and</strong> adult, <strong>and</strong> thiswas based on the allocations alreadydetailed in the age b<strong>and</strong>s.ApprenticeshipsApprenticeship programmeexpenditure is accounted <strong>for</strong> on thebasis of providers’ actual delivery(subject to contract value) in thefinancial year concerned.Train to GainTrain to Gain programme expenditureis accounted <strong>for</strong> on the basis ofproviders’ actual delivery of training<strong>and</strong> services.Adult safeguarded learningAdult safeguarded learning (ASL)programme expenditure is accounted<strong>for</strong> on the basis of the utilisationof funds paid to local authorities.<strong>The</strong> LSC will recognise a debtor ateach year-end representing amountsof unspent funds, based on use offunds statements submitted by localauthorities <strong>for</strong> the academic yearthat has ended in the financial yearof account. <strong>The</strong> LSC may recover anyunspent funds or may allow localauthorities to utilise the unspent fundsin the following year.School sixth <strong>for</strong>msSchool sixth <strong>for</strong>m programmeexpenditure is accounted <strong>for</strong> onthe basis of amounts that are dueto local authorities in order to payschool sixth <strong>for</strong>ms in their locality. <strong>The</strong>amounts due are based on the LSC<strong>for</strong>mula funding <strong>and</strong> the Government’sMinimum Funding Guarantee.Education Maintenance AllowanceEducation Maintenance Allowance(EMA) expenditure is recognised in theaccounts when the administrator ofthe scheme is reimbursed by the LSC<strong>for</strong> allowance payments to learners.Costs associated with administering thescheme are charged to the accounts onthe basis of activity completed by theend of the financial year.FinanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 69


1.10 Other incomeEuropean Social FundFunding <strong>for</strong> certain projects is receivedfrom the European Commission. Thisincome is matched to the expenditureprofile <strong>for</strong> each project concerned <strong>and</strong>any balance at the end of the financialyear transferred to deferred income(or income may be accrued where theexpenditure exceeds income received<strong>for</strong> any particular financial year asappropriate). Other income principallycomprises fees <strong>and</strong> charges <strong>for</strong> goodsor services provided <strong>and</strong> is statedafter deducting recoverable ValueAdded Tax (VAT).1.11 Pension <strong>and</strong> superannuationcostsPresent <strong>and</strong> past employees arecovered by the provisions of thePrincipal Civil Service Pension Scheme(PCSPS), which is non-contributory<strong>and</strong> unfunded. Although the schemeis a defined benefit scheme, liability<strong>for</strong> payment of future benefits is acharge to the PCSPS <strong>and</strong> the LSC isunable to identify its share of theunderlying assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities. <strong>The</strong>cost of pension cover provided <strong>for</strong> thestaff employed by the LSC is met bypayment of charges calculated on anaccruing basis. <strong>The</strong> accruing cost ofproviding <strong>for</strong> future benefits <strong>for</strong> currentemployees is charged to the NetExpenditure Statement so as to spreadthe total cost over the estimatedremaining service lives of employees ineach scheme. For unfunded schemessuch as the PCSPS this is achievedby charging the actuarially calculatedaccruing superannuation liabilitycharges paid by each individual body.<strong>The</strong>re is a separate scheme statement<strong>for</strong> the PCSPS as a whole.1.12 Early retirement costsWhere the LSC is required to meet theadditional costs of benefits beyond thenormal PCSPS benefits in respect ofemployees who retire early, provisionis made in full <strong>for</strong> this cost when theearly retirement programme has beenannounced <strong>and</strong> is binding. In certaincircumstances, settlement of some orall of the liability may have been madein advance by making a payment tothe Paymaster General’s account atthe Bank of Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> the creditof the Civil Superannuation Vote.<strong>The</strong> prepayment <strong>and</strong> provision aredisclosed separately.1.13 VATIrrecoverable VAT is charged to therelevant expenditure category orincluded in the capitalised purchasecost of fixed assets. Where output taxis charged or input tax is recoverable,the amounts are stated net of VAT.2 Other incomeOther funding <strong>for</strong> activitiesEuropean Social Fund (ESF) 2003/06ESF 2007/13Other programme incomeYear endedYear ended31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’00065,509 292,02793,442 44272,464 55,139231,415 347,608Income from activitiesSub-letting of part of premises 1,408 469Other activities income 49 1281,457 597Total other income 232,872 348,20570 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


3a Programme expenditureFundingdepartmentYear ended31 March 2009£’000Year ended31 March 2008£’0003.01 School sixth <strong>for</strong>msSchool sixth <strong>for</strong>msTeachers’ pay grant <strong>and</strong> significant growthTotal school sixth <strong>for</strong>msDCSFDCSF2,039,15674,1242,113,2801,967,34471,4402,038,7843.02 16–18 further educationParticipationAdditional Learner SupportInternational BaccalaureateTotal 16–18 further educationDCSFDCSFDCSF3,090,690206,8081,0403,298,5382,935,582228,2337543,164,5693.03 Family <strong>Learning</strong> Impact FundingFamily <strong>Learning</strong> Impact FundingTotal Family <strong>Learning</strong> Impact FundingDCSF 8,2408,240003.04 Young People Apprenticeships16–18 ApprenticeshipsEntry to EmploymentTotal Young People ApprenticeshipsDCSFDCSF629,561169,361798,922603,524174,853778,3773.05 Learners with learning difficulties <strong>and</strong>/ordisabilities (LLDD)Specialist collegesDevelopment FundForensic unitsTotal LLDDDCSFDCSFDCSF207,92513,6572,956224,538185,70214,6942,406202,8023.06 Learner Support16–18 Helpline Assessment <strong>and</strong> Payment Body (HAPB)administration costs16–18 school sixth <strong>for</strong>m hardship16–18 FE hardshipLocal education authority (LEA) transport partnership16–18 residential bursariesCare to LearnFree Childcare <strong>for</strong> Training <strong>and</strong> <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>for</strong> WorkDance <strong>and</strong> Drama AwardsEducation Maintenance Allowance (EMA) student paymentsEMA sector administrationEMA marketingEMA programme maintenanceTotal Learner SupportDCSF 710 0DCSFDCSFDCSFDCSFDCSFDCSFDCSFDCSFDCSFDCSFDCSF3,30122,38512,0784,96133,9138,00914,416490,20334,9725,853684631,4853,85631,32212,0004,74530,003014,178487,27936,2007,6341,788629,005FinanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 71


Year endedYear endedFunding 31 March 2009 31 March 20083.07 14–19 re<strong>for</strong>mdepartment £’000 £’000Education business links DCSF 24,723 24,597<strong>Learning</strong> Agreement pilots DCSF 16,429 19,217Young people not in education, employment or training DCSF 4,969 17,857Increasing flexibility <strong>for</strong> 14- to 16-year-olds DCSF (45) 24,657Young Apprenticeships DCSF 28,249 29,91814–19 fighting funds DCSF 28,532 33,55616–18 structural support DCSF 5,430 0National Apprenticeship Service marketing DCSF 4,708 0Parents-to-be scheme DCSF 3,498 3,44514–19 Apprenticeship improvements DCSF 1,762 420Key Stage 4 engagement programme DCSF 2,347 7,828Area inspections DCSF 371 15,738Total 14–19 re<strong>for</strong>m 120,973 177,2333.08 Joint capital fund16–19 joint capital fund DCSF 196,822 46,880Total joint capital fund 196,822 46,8803.09 19+ further educationParticipation DIUS 1,272,317 1,688,477Additional Learner Support DIUS 147,197 133,256Structural support DIUS 3,816 9,708First Steps provision (via adult safeguarded learningproviders)DIUS 34,629 31,370Capital loan support DIUS 3,067 3,588Isles of Scilly <strong>and</strong> adult bursaries DIUS 2,554 3,074Access to Music DIUS 5,358 4,855Total 19+ further education 1,468,938 1,874,3283.10 Other adult responsiveEmployability skills programme DIUS 30,310 18,381Ufi programme DIUS 158,305 155,605Total other adult responsive 188,615 173,9863.11 Adult Apprenticeships19+ Apprenticeships DIUS 252,851 223,17525+ Apprenticeships DIUS 94,437 5,719Total Adult Apprenticeships 347,288 228,8943.12 Train to GainDelivery (includes wage compensation) DIUS 769,932 256,034Brokerage DIUS 44,497 38,630Infrastructure DIUS 39,679 42,829Level 3 pilots DIUS 7,849 5,574Higher skills <strong>for</strong> women DIUS 4,335 2,416Marketing DIUS 8,441 9,652Evaluation DIUS 1,531 653Total Train to Gain 876,264 355,78872 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


3.13 Adult safeguarded learningPersonal <strong>and</strong> community development learning (PDCL)safeguarded (ASL providers)Year endedYear endedFunding 31 March 2009 31 March 2008department £’000 £’000DIUS 123,618 127,085Neighbourhood learning in deprived communities DIUS 20,776 20,243Family literacy, language <strong>and</strong> numeracy DIUS 25,300 25,721Family learning DIUS 12,455 12,221PCDL safeguarded (further education providers) DIUS 31,938 38,108Total adult safeguarded learning 214,087 223,3783.14 Offender <strong>Learning</strong>Offender <strong>Learning</strong> DIUS 139,045 115,551Total Offender <strong>Learning</strong> 139,045 115,5513.15 Learner Support 19+Administration costs (HAPB) DIUS 1,183 019+ hardship DIUS 43,541 42,076Discretionary Learner Support <strong>for</strong> English <strong>for</strong> Speakers<strong>for</strong> Other LanguagesDIUS 4,342 4,926FE students in higher education institutions DIUS 792 949Residential bursaries DIUS 2,385 2,928Residential pilots DIUS 1,241 0Childcare DIUS 32,923 34,655Sixth Form Childcare scheme DIUS 1,946 2,202Adult <strong>Learning</strong> Grant DIUS 29,953 17,519Career Development Loans DIUS 49,702 21,436Career Development Loans – receipts DIUS (2,589) (2,004)Total Learner Support 19+ 165,419 124,6873.16 Adult skills re<strong>for</strong>mCareers Advice Service DIUS 11,647 0Adult Advancement <strong>and</strong> Careers Service DIUS 2,186 0Level 3 pilot: Removing barriers to training DIUS 4,000 0Adult in<strong>for</strong>mation, advice <strong>and</strong> guidance DIUS 31,970 32,496<strong>Skills</strong> <strong>for</strong> Jobs DIUS 16,091 2,078Learner <strong>Accounts</strong> – trials DIUS 3,548 3,739Centres of Vocational Excellence (CoVE) revenue DIUS 1,931 6,732New St<strong>and</strong>ard DIUS 4,281 3,133<strong>Skills</strong> <strong>for</strong> Life marketing DIUS 5,041 4,678New Entrepreneur scholarships DIUS (447) 6,135Total adult skills re<strong>for</strong>m 80,248 58,991Finance3.17 Quality re<strong>for</strong>mVocational learning improvement fund DIUS 1,089 399Local initiatives fund DIUS 1,169 71,323Raising disability access DIUS 5,017 2,468Marketing <strong>and</strong> communications DIUS 18,256 26,316LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 73


Year endedYear endedFunding 31 March 2009 31 March 2008department £’000 £’000Front-line delivery – Health & Safety DIUS 2,754 2,319ESF match funding DIUS (59) 2,242Research DIUS 5,418 4,787‘Golden hellos’ DIUS 7,836 6,926Framework <strong>for</strong> Excellence DIUS 7,177 4,705<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> Development Fund DIUS 3,913 4,914Mathematics in Education <strong>and</strong> Industry DIUS 2,198 2,191Initial teacher training DIUS (112) 29,985World <strong>Skills</strong> DIUS 2,800 745National Apprenticeship Service DIUS 7,777 0Managing In<strong>for</strong>mation across Partners DIUS 13,632 11,061Qualifications <strong>and</strong> Credit Framework DIUS 1,901 0Other quality re<strong>for</strong>m DIUS 3,006 1,553Total quality re<strong>for</strong>m 83,772 171,9343.18 Capacity <strong>and</strong> infrastructureNational Employer Service delivery DIUS 2,149 1,112<strong>Skills</strong> Pledge DIUS 2,635 0Sector skills pilots DIUS 2,353 13National <strong>Skills</strong> Academies DIUS 14,328 9,117Leadership <strong>and</strong> management DIUS 10,594 5,165<strong>Skills</strong> coaching DIUS 596 4,444In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>and</strong> learning technology (ILT)Joint In<strong>for</strong>mation Systems Committee (JISC) revenueDIUS 24,414 22,484ILT revenue costs DIUS 560 4,102External financial assurance DIUS 3,814 6,619Aimhigher DIUS 9,338 9,338Data services DIUS 2,612 0FE data re<strong>for</strong>m DIUS 0 2,098Other capacity <strong>and</strong> infrastructure DIUS 2,099 727Total capacity <strong>and</strong> infrastructure 75,492 65,2193.19 DIUS capital programmesFE capital buildings DIUS 543,475 322,820FE CoVE capital DIUS 212 3,856ASL capital buildings DIUS 4,908 5,754FE/ASL DDA DIUS 664 11,090Neighbourhood learning in deprived communities DIUS 9,306 10,055Systems development DIUS 18,165 21,778FE capital – ILT DIUS 23,087 36,017Colleges in difficulty DIUS 3,031 35,306LEA loan liabilities DIUS 4,045 4,303Total DIUS capital programmes 606,893 450,97974 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Year endedYear ended31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’0003.20 Non-departmental programmesESF 2003/06 67,384 292,321ESF 2007/13 93,442 465Other 72,260 54,837Total non-departmental programmes 233,086 347,623Total programme expenditure 11,871,945 11,229,008Note: the descriptions <strong>and</strong> classification of some programmes have been changed in 2008–09 to reflect the Grant Letter<strong>and</strong> reporting requirements of DIUS <strong>and</strong> DCSF <strong>for</strong> the same year. Comparatives <strong>for</strong> 2007–08 have been amended so as toensure consistency. <strong>The</strong>re is no financial impact as the change represents a re-analysis of the same programmes.Grants to the private sector totalling £2,019,471 (2007–08: £1,771,262) are included in the values above.3b Programme expenditure by regional officeYear endedYear ended31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’000RegionEast of Engl<strong>and</strong> 1,142,084 1,068,596East Midl<strong>and</strong>s 982,607 930,280London 1,966,508 1,857,877North East 710,177 666,993North West 1,685,784 1,577,542South East 1,789,005 1,660,131South West 1,073,507 1,038,498West Midl<strong>and</strong>s 1,382,545 1,331,930Yorkshire <strong>and</strong> the Humber 1,139,728 1,097,161Total programme expenditure by region 11,871,945 11,229,008FinanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 75


4 Assurances onentitlement to, <strong>and</strong> theproper use of, <strong>Learning</strong><strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council fundsIn order to gain assurance over theproper use of public funds by learningproviders, the LSC has establishedregional <strong>and</strong> national office auditteams within the provider financialmanagement function. As set out inthe Accounting Officer’s Statementon Internal Control, the national <strong>and</strong>regional audit teams are responsible<strong>for</strong> planning, co-ordinating <strong>and</strong>delivering a programme of work tosecure this assurance. <strong>The</strong> outcomes ofaudit work are scrutinised by regional<strong>and</strong> national LSC audit committees.<strong>The</strong> approaches used to obtainassurance depend on the risksassociated with providers <strong>and</strong> fundingstreams, <strong>and</strong> are designed to minimisebureaucracy <strong>for</strong> providers. In broadterms, where grant funding is providedto other public bodies such as FEcolleges, the LSC relies on audit workcarried out by the public bodies’auditors, working to an audit code ofpractice <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards set by the LSC.For private sector <strong>and</strong> other trainingproviders funded under contract, theLSC’s national <strong>and</strong> regional auditteams undertake their own auditwork to ensure that funds have beenproperly applied in the delivery ofthose contracts.Assurance on grantsIncluded in these financial statementsare grants to FE learning providersthat the LSC has paid <strong>for</strong> theacademic years ending 31 July 2008(four months) <strong>and</strong> 31 July 2009(eight months).<strong>The</strong> mismatch between the accountingperiods means that certain <strong>for</strong>malassurances on entitlement <strong>and</strong> theproper use of the funds will onlybe received from these providers inline with their own annual accountsreporting timetable, which extendsbeyond that <strong>for</strong> these financialstatements. Alternative arrangementshave there<strong>for</strong>e been put in placeto provide interim assurance as at31 March 2009. <strong>The</strong> overall picture isdescribed below.4a. FE colleges <strong>and</strong> institutionsDuring the financial year 2008–09,the LSC paid grants of £5,379million (2007–08: £5,495 million) tocolleges <strong>and</strong> other institutions <strong>for</strong>the provision of FE on the basis ofagreed development plans. <strong>The</strong> LSCimplemented plan-led funding <strong>for</strong>2004–05 <strong>and</strong>, under this initiative,the majority of colleges <strong>and</strong> manyother institutions have no longerbeen subject to annual fundingaudit. However, colleges are requiredto return a year-end funding claimcertified by the principal. An enhancedregularity audit has been established<strong>for</strong> all FE colleges, <strong>and</strong> these colleges<strong>and</strong> institutions are also now subjectto cyclical reviews of learner existence<strong>and</strong> eligibility. <strong>The</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>for</strong> themajority of colleges, the primarysources of assurance <strong>for</strong> the LSC’s2008–09 financial statements areaudit opinions on their accounts <strong>for</strong>the academic year ended 31 July2008. Final funding claims <strong>for</strong> theeight colleges not eligible <strong>for</strong> plan-ledfunding in 2007/08 were also requiredto be audited.To provide assurance in respect offunds paid to FE colleges <strong>for</strong> theperiod 1 August 2008 to 31 March2009, colleges provided to the LSC astatement on regularity, propriety <strong>and</strong>compliance, signed by the chair <strong>and</strong>principal on behalf of the governingbody. As at 3 July 2009, 364 collegeshave submitted the requiredstatement.<strong>The</strong> position in respect of the 2007/08academic year is shown in Tables 2<strong>and</strong> 3.Table 2: 2007/08 position of FE colleges (£5,656 million) (2006/07: £5,213 million) Due Received Outst<strong>and</strong>ingAudited final funding claims 7 7 –Financial statements 366 364 2Final regularity opinions 366 364 2<strong>The</strong>re are two colleges that have both their financial statements <strong>and</strong> regularity opinion outst<strong>and</strong>ing. <strong>The</strong>se colleges arebeing pursued by the LSC.Table 3: 2007/08 position of other education institutions (£228 million) (2006/07: £249 million)Due Received Outst<strong>and</strong>ingAudited final funding claims 76 69 776 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


Ufi <strong>and</strong> learndirectThroughout 2008–09 the responsibility<strong>for</strong> the audit of learndirect activityrested with Ufi Ltd. Ufi Ltd hasestablished an adequate assuranceframework that the LSC intends toplace reliance on. <strong>The</strong> national officeaudit team monitors the outcomesof Ufi Ltd assurance work <strong>and</strong> alsoundertakes its own programmeof work.4b. Adult safeguarded learning<strong>The</strong> LSC paid £249 million (2007–08:£240 million) <strong>for</strong> ASL to localauthorities in Engl<strong>and</strong> in the financialyear 2008–09. Four months of thisrelates to the academic year ending31 July 2008 <strong>and</strong> eight monthsrelates to the academic year ending31 July 2009.<strong>The</strong> certification of local authorityfunding <strong>and</strong> expenditure statementsover the use of ASL funding haschanged <strong>for</strong> 2007/08 academic year.<strong>The</strong> LSC no longer requires thatstatements are certified by the AuditCommission, only that they are selfcertifiedby the finance director of thelocal authority. For the year ending 31July 2008, all 147 local authorities thatreceived funding in the period havesubmitted their self-certified use ofASL funding statements to the LSC.4c. School sixth <strong>for</strong>ms<strong>The</strong> LSC paid local authorities £2,113million (2007–08: £2,039 million) <strong>for</strong>school sixth <strong>for</strong>ms in the financial year2008–09. Four months of this relatesto the 12-month period ending31 July 2008. Eight months relates tothe academic year ending 31 July 2009.During 2008–09 all schools wererequired to make two returns to DCSFthrough local authorities in November<strong>and</strong> May. <strong>The</strong> LSC calculated funding<strong>for</strong> each school sixth <strong>for</strong>m in theyear ending 31 July 2009 using datafrom the autumn 2007 return <strong>and</strong>pupil numbers from the autumn 2007census count. Autumn 2007 pupilcensus data was audited in summer2008 at a sample of 347 schools.4d. Education MaintenanceAllowance (EMA)EMA expenditure was £532 million inthe financial year 2008–09 (2007–08:£533 million). <strong>The</strong> LSC undertakes arolling programme of work to provideassurance on the EMA expenditure ithas incurred over the course of thefinancial year.Assurance is obtained through acombination of direct audit work,through the work of the nine regionalaudit teams, or by placing relianceon the work of externally contractedauditors. With the exception of systemissues at Liberata that delayed EMApayments to students, the resultsof the assurance work completedin financial year 2008–09 raised noconcerns over the use of funds inthat year.Assurance on contractsNote 3a of these financial statementsincludes payments made in respect ofprogrammes including Apprenticeships,Train to Gain <strong>and</strong> ESF. <strong>The</strong> LSC’saudit teams deliver assurance overlearning providers’ use of funds basedon audit plans which are approvedby the LSC’s audit committees.Coverage of providers <strong>and</strong> fundingstreams is dependent on a detailedrisk assessment, <strong>and</strong> audits take placeon a cyclical basis. Where audit teamsidentify funds at risk, the LSC takesaction to recover funding.FinanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 77


5a Staff costsIn<strong>for</strong>mation in respect of board members’ <strong>and</strong> senior employees’ emoluments <strong>and</strong> pension entitlements is provided in theRemuneration <strong>Report</strong> on pages 50 to 60.<strong>The</strong> aggregate payroll costs <strong>for</strong> the LSC were as follows:Year endedYear ended31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’000Salaries 123,179 117,319Social security 10,817 10,597Pension costs 24,179 23,574Redundancies (14) 1,153158,161 152,643Other staff (includes agency/contract/seconded staff) 4,693 4,882162,854 157,525Staff costs related to programmes (34,801) (25,147)Total staff costs 128,053 132,3785b Pension costs – Principal Civil Service Pension Schemeemployer contributionsPension benefits are provided through the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (PCSPS). <strong>The</strong> PCSPS is an unfundedmulti-employer defined benefit scheme. <strong>The</strong> LSC is unable to identify its share of the underlying assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities.<strong>The</strong> Scheme Actuary valued the scheme as at 31 March 2008. Details can be found in the resource accounts of theCabinet Office: Civil Superannuation (www.civilservice-pensions.gov.uk).For 2008–09, employers’ contributions of £23,419,088 were paid to the PCSPS by 31 March 2009 (2007–08: £22,681,830)at one of four rates in the range 17.1 per cent <strong>and</strong> 25.5 per cent of pensionable pay (2007–08: 17.1 per cent <strong>and</strong>25.5 per cent), based on salary b<strong>and</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> Scheme Actuary reviews employer contributions every four years followinga full scheme valuation.<strong>The</strong> contribution rates are set to meet the cost of the benefits accruing during 2008–09 to be paid when the memberretires, <strong>and</strong> not the benefits paid during this period to existing pensioners.Employees can opt to open a partnership pension account, a stakeholder pension with an employer contribution. Employers’contributions of £158,165 (2007–08: £174,126) were paid to one or more of a panel of three appointed stakeholder pensionproviders. Employer contributions are age related <strong>and</strong> range from 3 per cent to 12.5 per cent of pensionable pay. Employersalso match employee contributions up to 3 per cent of pensionable pay. Employer contributions of £12,844 (2007–08:£13,998) representing 0.8 per cent of pensionable pay were payable to PCSPS to cover the cost of future provision oflump-sum benefits on death in service <strong>and</strong> ill-health retirement.No contributions were outst<strong>and</strong>ing to the partnership pension providers at the balance sheet dates of 31 March 2009 <strong>and</strong>31 March 2008.78 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


5c Average number of staff employed(i) Year ended March 2009Year endedSenior Inward Agency/ 31 Marchmanagement Payroll seconded temporary 2009staff staff staff staff total staffnumber number number number number<strong>The</strong> average number of staff employed duringthe year, including the Chief Executive, was:GroupAdult <strong>Learning</strong>, <strong>Skills</strong> <strong>and</strong> Employment 1 135 17 153Young People’s <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> 1 66 4 71Finance <strong>and</strong> Resources 1 212 17 230Funding, Planning <strong>and</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance 2 130 3 8 143Human Resources 1 64 1 2 68Sector Shared Services 36 6 42National Apprenticeship Service 11 1* 2 14Regional <strong>and</strong> local LSCs 12 2,446 12 38 2,508Total 18 3,100 17 94 3,229*Inward seconded staff member also part of management group.(ii) Year ended March 2008Year endedSenior Inward Agency/ 31 Marchmanagement Payroll seconded temporary 2008staff staff staff staff total staffnumber number number number number<strong>The</strong> average number of staff employed duringthe year, including the Chief Executive, was:Group<strong>Learning</strong> 121 18 139<strong>Skills</strong> 1 92 1 10 104Resources 1 283 2 65 351Strategy <strong>and</strong> Communications 2 43 7 52Human Resources 1 70 14 85Regional <strong>and</strong> local LSCs 10 2,553 2 155 2,720Total 15 3,162 5 269 3,451FinanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 79


6a Administration (other costs)Year endedYear ended31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’000National <strong>and</strong> regional council members’ emoluments 692 37National <strong>and</strong> regional council members’ associated travel <strong>and</strong> subsistence costs 186 58Travel <strong>and</strong> subsistence – staff 10,189 10,038Recruitment <strong>and</strong> training 3,943 4,772Furniture <strong>and</strong> office equipment 119 1,667IT <strong>and</strong> computer maintenance 11,279 15,984Telecommunications <strong>and</strong> postage 3,461 3,844Publications, printing <strong>and</strong> publicity 2,140 2,097General administration expenditure 3,129 3,275Premises 25,149 22,053External audit fee 230* 184Legal fees <strong>and</strong> other audit fees 18,332 4,32278,849 68,331Non-pay costs related to programmes (25,215) (4,363)Total 53,634 63,968*£220,000 of the 2008–09 value relates to the statutory audit of the LSC’s financial statements <strong>and</strong> the balance relates toaudit fee work in support of the conversion to International Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing St<strong>and</strong>ards in 2009–10.6b Depreciation, impairment <strong>and</strong> losses on disposalYear endedYear ended31 March 2009 31 March 2008Note £’000 £’000Intangible fixed assets 9Depreciation charge <strong>for</strong> period 466 462Loss on disposal 7 0Tangible fixed assets 10Depreciation charge <strong>for</strong> period 15,179 12,467Loss on disposal 472 923Loss on impairment 2,006 1,302Total charged <strong>for</strong> period 18,130 15,15480 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


7 Operating lease commitmentsYear endedYear ended31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’000<strong>The</strong> LSC had annual commitments under non-cancellable operating leasesat 31 March as detailed below:a) L<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> buildingsLeases expiring:Within one year 178 178Between two <strong>and</strong> five years 4,328 4,191More than five years 12,430 11,437Total 16,936 15,806b) OthersLeases expiring:Within one year 549 1,734Between two <strong>and</strong> five years 139 768More than five years 0 0Total 688 2,502<strong>The</strong> annual charge <strong>for</strong> the above leases is included innote 6a <strong>and</strong> consists of the following amounts:L<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> buildings (rents <strong>and</strong> service charges) 14,540 13,685Other leases (includes photocopiers <strong>and</strong> lease cars) 1,254 4,854Total operating lease commitments 15,794 18,5398 Cost of capitalGuidance given by HM Treasury in the Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing Manual requires non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) todisclose the full cost of their activities in their accounts. <strong>The</strong> LSC has there<strong>for</strong>e included in its accounts charges <strong>for</strong> the costof capital.<strong>The</strong> cost of capital has been arrived at by calculating a rate of 3.5 per cent to the average capital employed.Year endedYear ended31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’000Capital employed as at 1 April (318,411) (345,142)Capital employed as at 31 March (275,092) (318,411)Average capital employed (296,752) (331,777)Interest on capital at 3.5 per cent per annum (10,386) (11,612) FinanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 81


9 Intangible fixed assetsITTotalSoftwarePurchased£’000 £’000Cost or valuationAt 1 April 2008 2,404 2,404Additions 80 80Disposals (93) (93)At 31 March 2009 2,391 2,391DepreciationAt 1 April 2008 (1,630) (1,630)Disposals 86 86Charge <strong>for</strong> period (466) (466)At 31 March 2009 (2,010) (2,010)Net book value (NBV)At 1 April 2008 774 774Total NBV intangible fixed assets at 31 March 2009 381 38110 Tangible fixed assetsIT assetsunder Furniture Plant <strong>and</strong> Computers Totalconstruction Vehicles <strong>and</strong> fittings machinery <strong>and</strong> other IT purchased£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000Cost or valuationAt 1 April 2008 7,000 7 24,411 743 65,195 97,356Reclassification of assetsunder construction (26,320) 0 0 0 26,320 0Additions 27,030 0 (17) 28 16,645 43,686Disposals 0 (7) (773) (77) (3,082) (3,939)Impairment 0 0 0 0 (2,886) (2,886)At 31 March 2009 7,710 0 23,621 694 102,192 134,217DepreciationAt 1 April 2008 0 (7) (10,118) (675) (32,876) (43,676)Disposals 0 7 466 77 2,909 3,459Charge <strong>for</strong> period 0 0 (2,584) (42) (12,553) (15,179)Impairment 0 0 0 0 880 880At 31 March 2009 0 0 (12,236) (640) (41,640) (54,516)Net book value (NBV)At 1 April 2008 7,000 0 14,293 68 32,319 53,680Total NBV tangible fixed assetsat 31 March 2009 7,710 0 11,385 54 60,552 79,70182 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


11a DebtorsAs atAs at31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’000Due in one yearAdvances <strong>and</strong> other FE college debtors 42,444 5,284Work-based learning (WBL) debtors 7,943 6,109School sixth <strong>for</strong>m debtors 0 55Trade debtors 536 1,089ESF <strong>and</strong> other debtors 37,913 61,491Sub-total debtors 88,836 74,028ESF <strong>and</strong> other accrued income 108,677 89,476FE college prepayments 36,712 41,706WBL prepayments 82 0Administration cost prepayments 6,665 5,500Other prepayments 7,944 8,357Sub-total accrued income <strong>and</strong> prepayments 160,080 145,039Sub-total debtors, accrued income <strong>and</strong> prepayments 248,916 219,067Capital debtors (sale proceeds of fixed assets) 0 2Sub-total due in one year 248,916 219,069Due in more than one yearAdvances <strong>and</strong> other FE college debtors 0 0Total debtors 248,916 219,069Note: debtors include a provision <strong>for</strong> doubtful debts of £12.6 million at 31 March 2009 (2007–08: £9.4 million).11b Debtors: analysed by type of organisation<strong>The</strong> following note provides an analysis of the debtors, accrued income <strong>and</strong> prepayments detailed above by typeof organisation.As atAs at31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’000Due in one yearLocal authorities 15,989 17,174NHS trusts 166 28Public corporations <strong>and</strong> trading funds 785 978Other central government bodies 124,713 87,993Balances with other government bodies 141,653 106,173FinanceBalances with non-governmental bodies 107,263 112,896Sub-total due in one year 248,916 219,069Due in more than one yearBalances with non-governmental bodies 0 0Total debtors by organisation type 248,916 219,069LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 83


12 Cash at bank <strong>and</strong> in h<strong>and</strong>Cash held at the Office of Paymaster GeneralCash held at other banks <strong>and</strong> in h<strong>and</strong>TotalAs at31 March 2009£’000110,823464111,287As at31 March 2008£’00098,16618098,346<strong>The</strong> Department <strong>for</strong> Business, Innovation <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> (BIS – <strong>for</strong>merly DIUS) authorises a working balance at 31 March of1 per cent of the total resource budget agreed <strong>for</strong> the financial year. This working balance excludes funding <strong>for</strong> ESF whichis also included in the cash held at the Office of Paymaster General above.<strong>The</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance against the BIS working balance target is detailed below:As at31 March 2009£’000As at31 March 2008£’000Total resource budget 11,885,371 11,279,3191 per cent thereof 118,854 112,793Paymaster General account balance <strong>for</strong> BIS funding within the above 47,671 29,89484 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


13a Creditors: amounts falling due within one yearTrade creditorsFE college creditorsWBL creditorsSchool sixth <strong>for</strong>m creditorsTax <strong>and</strong> social securityESF <strong>and</strong> other creditorsAs atAs at31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’0004,27636,239189,5923068,60413,706133,53961154 2518,190 37,837Sub-total creditors 248,657 194,322ESF <strong>and</strong> other deferred income 26,265 64,635WBL accruals 22,791 11,082Other accruals 253,988 295,274Sub-total deferred income <strong>and</strong> accruals 303,044 370,991Sub-total creditors, deferred income <strong>and</strong> accruals 551,701 565,313Capital creditors 9,511 2,902Total creditors 561,212 568,21513b Creditors: analysed by type of organisation<strong>The</strong> following note provides an analysis of the creditors, deferred income <strong>and</strong> accruals detailed above by typeof organisation:As atAs at31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’000Local authoritiesNHS trustsPublic corporations <strong>and</strong> trading fundsOther central government bodiesBalances with other government bodiesBalances with non-governmental bodiesTotal creditors by organisation type19,935 37,483386 4363,092 11,69443,716 129,37867,129 178,991494,083 389,224561,212 568,215FinanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 85


14 Provisions <strong>for</strong> liabilities <strong>and</strong> chargesagenda <strong>for</strong>CareerEarly change Funding Project Developmentretirement <strong>The</strong>me 7 claims Connect Loans Total£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000Provision balance at 1 April 2008 294 18,692 1,530 3,383 0 23,899Additional charge in year 0 3,044 0 0 25,344 28,388Provision utilised in year (97) (3,403) 0 (561) 0 (4,061)Provision unused <strong>and</strong> reversed during the year 0 (2,613) (500) (1,771) 0 (4,884)Balance of provision at 31 March 2009 197 15,720 1,030 1,051 25,344 43,342Early retirementThis covers the LSC’s additional pension contributions that are charged against administration expenditure. <strong>The</strong>se aredefined by <strong>and</strong> made to the scheme administrator <strong>for</strong> the period up to normal retirement age <strong>for</strong> individuals who retiredearly under the LSC’s Reshaping programme.agenda <strong>for</strong> change: <strong>The</strong>me 7This relates to the costs chargeable against administration of reorganising the LSC under the agenda <strong>for</strong> changeprogramme. <strong>The</strong> majority of the balance relates to the liabilities associated with aligning our property portfolio to matchour ongoing needs <strong>and</strong> is based on assumptions from property professionals about the timing of lease re-assignments. <strong>The</strong>remaining element covers the LSC’s additional pension contributions to the scheme administrator in relation to individualswho retired early as part of agenda <strong>for</strong> change.Funding claimsThis relates to entitlement to programme funding. No further disclosure is provided to avoid prejudice in futurenegotiations.Project Connect<strong>The</strong> LSC has recently consolidated the IT services provided to it into a single contract. A consequence of this is a probableoutflow to cover the redundancy costs of some <strong>for</strong>mer LSC staff who have transferred into the new supplier organisationwith TUPE rights. £786,550 of the remaining provision relates to administration costs, with the balance charged againstprogramme expenditure.Career Development Loans<strong>The</strong> LSC has a liability to cover a proportion of the default payments that occur under this programme. <strong>The</strong> majorityof this provision reflects the probable outflow of funds in relation to this together with an element of the cost of coveringinterest-driven liabilities while the recipients of the loans complete their course15 Capital commitmentsCommitments <strong>for</strong> capital expenditure administered by the LSC at the end of the period were as follows:As at31 March 2009£’000As at31 March 2008£’000Payable within one yearAuthorised <strong>and</strong> contracted <strong>for</strong> 00Total capital commitments 0 0Payable between two <strong>and</strong> five yearsAuthorised <strong>and</strong> contracted <strong>for</strong> 0 0Total capital commitments 0 086 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


16 Commitments to make grants to colleges <strong>and</strong> schoolsAt 31 March the LSC had commitments <strong>for</strong> FE participation <strong>and</strong> school sixth <strong>for</strong>m funding relating to the remaining periodof the academic year from April to July, together with capital commitments in respect of FE capital project support.<strong>The</strong> LSC operates two levels of approval <strong>for</strong> all capital projects, an initial approval in principle <strong>and</strong> full approval in detail.Large infrastructure projects there<strong>for</strong>e undergo two levels of approval. <strong>The</strong> commitment <strong>for</strong> FE capital project supportdisclosed below reflects the total value of agreed LSC funding <strong>for</strong> infrastructure projects that have full approval in detail.As atAs at31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’000Payable within one yearFE participation 2,052,921 1,835,310School sixth <strong>for</strong>ms 682,727 659,626FE capital project support 835,979 582,106Other capital grants (accessibility <strong>and</strong> CoVE) 31,084 15,8803,602,711 3,092,922Payable between two to five yearsFE capital project support 770,201 399,097Other capital grants (accessibility <strong>and</strong> CoVE) 0 0770,201 399,09717 Contingent liabilities<strong>The</strong> LSC had no material contingent liabilities at 31 March 2009 (2008: none).Capital programmeIn addition to the commitments outlined in the note above, the LSC has an obligation, subject to a needs-basedprioritisation assessment, to fund some of the FE capital projects that were in development be<strong>for</strong>e the review of the capitalprogramme by Sir Andrew Foster was announced. As the assessment process is still ongoing, no sufficiently reliable estimateof the extent of this liability is available <strong>for</strong> inclusion in these accounts.Through its normal financial intervention process, the LSC will ensure that no college is unable to meet its financialobligations as a result of decisions on capital projects.18 Financial instrumentsFinancial <strong>Report</strong>ing St<strong>and</strong>ard (FRS) 29 requires the LSC to disclose in<strong>for</strong>mation on the significance of financial instrumentsto its financial position <strong>and</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.Finance<strong>The</strong> LSC is exposed to credit risk resulting from the non-payment of debts relating to private sector provision of trainingservices <strong>and</strong> this is most usually attributable to insolvency. Private sector training providers are subject to quality <strong>and</strong>financial status reviews prior to being awarded contracts. Provision of funding is reconciled to earned values on a monthlybasis with future payments adjusted to ensure that the risk of building up debt is minimised. <strong>The</strong> overall financial impact ofsuch instances is not material, as shown in notes 11 <strong>and</strong> 23.As an NDPB almost wholly funded by BIS (<strong>for</strong>merly DIUS) <strong>and</strong> DCSF, <strong>and</strong> with no borrowings, the LSC is not exposed to anymarket or liquidity risk.<strong>The</strong> LSC has no material deposits in interest-bearing accounts <strong>and</strong> all material assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities are denominated insterling; it is not exposed to any significant interest rate or currency risk.LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 87


19 General reserveAs atAs at31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’000Balance at 1 April (220,245) (295,871)Deficit be<strong>for</strong>e interest (11,838,890) (11,092,303)Grant-in-aid funding 11,894,866 11,167,929Balance at 31 March (164,269) (220,245)20 Reconciliation of net expenditure be<strong>for</strong>e interest to net cash flow from operatingactivitiesYear endedYear ended31 March 2009 31 March 2008Note £’000 £’000Net expenditure be<strong>for</strong>e interest (11,838,890) (11,092,303)Depreciation charges 6b 15,645 12,929Loss on disposal of fixed assets 6b 479 923Loss on impairment 6b 2,006 1,302(Increase)/decrease in debtors – excludes capital debtors 11a (29,849) 29,901Decrease in creditors – excludes capital creditors 13a (13,612) (39,139)Increase/(decrease) in provisions <strong>for</strong> liabilities <strong>and</strong> charges 14 19,443 (10,435)Net cash outflow from operating activities (11,844,778) (11,096,822)21 Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in cash balance heldYear endedYear endedNote 31 March 2009 31 March 2008£’000 £’000Cash at bank <strong>and</strong> in h<strong>and</strong> at 1 April 12 98,346 50,156Increase in cash <strong>for</strong> the year – per Cash Flow Statement 12,941 48,190Cash at bank <strong>and</strong> in h<strong>and</strong> at 31 March 111,287 98,34688 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


22 Related party transactions<strong>The</strong> LSC is an NDPB sponsored by BIS (<strong>for</strong>merly DIUS) <strong>and</strong> DCSF, all of whom are regarded as related parties.During the year, the LSC entered into transactions with organisations that can be considered as related because of thenature of the involvement of LSC National Council members <strong>and</strong> Management Group directors, or their close familymembers. <strong>The</strong> table below details the most material transactions <strong>and</strong> the relationship of the organisations to the LSC.All transactions were in the normal course of business <strong>and</strong> were conducted at arm’s length.LSC CouncilRelatedmember/director/ LSC role/ organisation Relatedclose family member relationship role/relationship organisation Transaction(s) Value (£ million)Partner of Rob Wye Partner of Vice Principal Warwickshire LSC provided 28.3National Director College fundingallocationsSpouse of Spouse of Principal City College LSC provided 22.4Malcolm Gillespie Regional Director Plymouth fundingallocationsMargaret Galliers CBE National Council Principal Leicester LSC provided 21.6member College fundingallocationsGareth National Council Governor Thames Valley LSC provided 1.2Cadwallader member University fundingallocationsIan Ferguson CBE National Council Board member UK <strong>Skills</strong> LSC provided 1.1memberfundingallocationsIan Ferguson CBE National Council Chairman Rathbone LSC provided 5.4memberfundingallocationsFinanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 89


23 Losses statement<strong>The</strong> LSC incurred the following losses in the period to 31 March 2009. <strong>The</strong> losses have been charged to the relevantprogramme in Note 3a.Year endedYear ended31 March 2009 31 March 2008Description £’000 £’000WBL <strong>and</strong> Train to Gain2008–09 – cases above £250,000 individually 3392008–09 – cases below £250,000 individually 7482007–08 – cases below £250,000 individually 9061,087 906ESF provision2008–09 – cases above £250,000 individually 1,0342007–08 – cases above £250,000 individually 5972008–09 – cases below £250,000 individually 1,3202007–08 – cases below £250,000 individually 7622,354 1,359Other programme provision2008–09 – cases above £250,000 individually 3752008–09 – cases below £250,000 individually 372007–08 – cases below £250,000 individually 211412 211Total cash losses 3,853 2,476At 31 March 2009 there were 58 cases (20 WBL <strong>and</strong> Train to Gain provision, 33 ESF provision <strong>and</strong> 5 other programmeprovision) of which 3 were above the reporting threshold of £250,000 individually. <strong>The</strong> majority of these losses relate toprofiled payments to providers who have gone into liquidation be<strong>for</strong>e automatic recovery against future payments <strong>and</strong> aresubject to approval from the relevant authority below.<strong>The</strong> Chief Executive of the LSC has delegated authority to approve the write-off of cash losses with an item value of up to£10,000 <strong>and</strong> subject to an overall limit of £250,000 in any one year. <strong>The</strong> LSC has requested BIS <strong>and</strong> HM Treasury approvalto write off the cases above, within their respective delegated authorities, as summarised below:31 March 2009NumberLossAuthority Item value of cases £’000LSC Up to £10,000 25 89BIS £10,000 to £100,000 24 1,075HM Treasury Over £100,000 9 2,689Total losses 58 3,85390 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


24 Special paymentsDuring the course of the financial year, Liberata encountered some difficulties delivering EMA payments to students thatled the LSC to terminate their contract <strong>and</strong> re-engage the previous service provider, Capita. In the course of securingongoing service provision with minimum disruption to learners, while also acting in the wider public interest <strong>and</strong> with theapproval of HM Treasury, the LSC incurred some additional costs as described below.A one-off disengagement payment of £4 million was made to the outgoing service provider to secure the transfer of theexisting systems to the new service provider.<strong>The</strong> LSC also waived its right to dem<strong>and</strong> £3 million of penalty payments from the outgoing service provider.Some additional administration <strong>and</strong> other costs directly related to securing ongoing provision were also incurred by theincoming service provider.25 Post-balance sheet eventsOn 5 June 2009, the Government announced the creation of a new Department <strong>for</strong> Business, Innovation <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> (BIS)whose key role will be to build Britain’s capabilities to compete in the global economy. <strong>The</strong> department was created bymerging the Department <strong>for</strong> Business, Enterprise <strong>and</strong> Regulatory Re<strong>for</strong>m <strong>and</strong> DIUS. <strong>The</strong> sponsorship responsibility <strong>for</strong> theLSC passed to BIS on that date.<strong>The</strong>re is no reason to believe that the expected government funding underlying the LSC’s going-concern assertion will beaffected by this change.<strong>The</strong>re have been no events after the balance sheet date that have had a material impact on the financial statements.<strong>The</strong> financial statements were authorised <strong>for</strong> issue by Geoffrey Russell (Accounting Officer) on 16 July 2009.FinanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 91


Glossary <strong>and</strong> Further In<strong>for</strong>mationThis is a brief guide to the mainstrategies, initiatives, partners <strong>and</strong>programmes with which the LSC isinvolved <strong>and</strong> that are mentioned inthis <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>.More in<strong>for</strong>mation about all our policies<strong>and</strong> activities can be accessed onlineat lsc.gov.uk. Alternatively, call 0870900 6800 <strong>for</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation about yournearest LSC office.14–19 re<strong>for</strong>ms<strong>The</strong> 14–19 re<strong>for</strong>ms will give all youngpeople the opportunity to choosea mix of learning that motivates,interests <strong>and</strong> challenges them, <strong>and</strong>that gives them the knowledge, skills<strong>and</strong> attitude they need in order tosucceed in education, work <strong>and</strong> life.Adult <strong>Learning</strong> Grant (ALG)An allowance of up to £30 per weekgiven to adults on low incomesstudying full time <strong>for</strong> their first fullLevel 2 qualification <strong>and</strong> to youngadults on low incomes studyingfull time <strong>for</strong> their first full Level 3qualification.Adult safeguarded learning (ASL)We maintain a national programme ofleisure <strong>and</strong> occupational courses <strong>for</strong>adults through local further educationcolleges. We also provide extra funding<strong>for</strong> other projects such as family <strong>and</strong>neighbourhood learning.ApprenticeshipsApprenticeships offer training in theworkplace.Young Apprenticeships allow14- to 16-year-olds to spend twodays a week learning a trade, whileApprenticeships (equivalent to GCSElevel) give people aged 16 <strong>and</strong> overon-the-job training to NVQ Level 2while they receive a wage. Somemay also gain a technical certificate.Advanced Apprenticeships (equivalentto A-levels) give people aged 16 <strong>and</strong>over training to NVQ Level 3, as wellas a technical certificate. <strong>The</strong> LSCfunds Apprenticeship training <strong>and</strong>assessment costs.apprenticeships.org.ukCareer Development Loan (CDL)A CDL is a bank loan designed tohelp people pay <strong>for</strong> work-relatedlearning. It can help people gain theexperience, training <strong>and</strong> qualificationsneeded to improve their job skills oreven launch a new career. It can beused to fund a variety of vocational(work-related) courses with a widerange of organisations, <strong>and</strong> is availableto people who are employed, selfemployedor unemployed.Careers Advice Service<strong>The</strong> Careers Advice Service is agovernment-funded service that offerspractical advice to help individualsmake the right career choices whetherthey want to learn new skills, changecareer or return to work.Care to LearnCare to Learn offers support <strong>for</strong>childcare <strong>and</strong> travel costs to individualsunder the age of 20 who want toreturn to learning. Learners can apply<strong>for</strong> <strong>and</strong> receive payments through theLearner Support Service.ConnexionsAn in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>and</strong> advice service<strong>for</strong> young people aged between 13<strong>and</strong> 19. It covers career <strong>and</strong> learningoptions as well as issues relatingto health, housing, relationshipswith family <strong>and</strong> friends, <strong>and</strong> money.connexions.gov.ukDem<strong>and</strong>-led fundingThis is a move towards more fundingbeing driven directly by employer<strong>and</strong> learner choice <strong>and</strong> making surethe FE system is as responsive aspossible to their needs. Lord Leitch’sreport (December 2006) endorsedthis direction of travel. <strong>The</strong> LSC hasintroduced three new funding models<strong>for</strong> adult skills, employer skills <strong>and</strong>14–19 learning, all of which aim to putpurchasing power into the h<strong>and</strong>s ofthe customer – whether employer orindividual learner.Department <strong>for</strong> Business, Innovation<strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> (BIS)bis.gov.ukDepartment <strong>for</strong> Children, Schools<strong>and</strong> Families (DCSF)dcsf.gov.ukDepartment <strong>for</strong> Innovation,Universities <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> (DIUS)See Department <strong>for</strong> Business,Innovation <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>.Department <strong>for</strong> Work <strong>and</strong> Pensions(DWP)dwp.gov.ukEducation Maintenance Allowance(EMA)EMA is a <strong>for</strong>m of financial help <strong>for</strong>young people aged 16 to 18 tosupport them to continue in learning.It offers up to £30 a week.ema.direct.gov.ukEntry to Employment (e2e)A targeted programme <strong>for</strong> peopleaged 16 to 18 who are currently notin education, employment or training(NEET). It helps them to move intoan Apprenticeship, education at NVQLevel 2 or a job.Framework <strong>for</strong> Excellence (FfE)FfE is an approach to managingper<strong>for</strong>mance. It is a single frameworkthat will help increase the quality ofFE provision <strong>and</strong> the way in which thatprovision meets the needs of users. Itwill also help employers <strong>and</strong> learnersto choose the provider best suited totheir needs.Further education (FE)<strong>The</strong>re are two streams of education <strong>for</strong>people over 16: further education <strong>and</strong>higher education. Further educationcovers learning opportunities up toA-level <strong>and</strong> NVQ Level 3 st<strong>and</strong>ard.Higher educationHigher education includes coursesabove A-level or NVQ Level 3st<strong>and</strong>ard. Examples include degree92 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


courses, postgraduate courses <strong>and</strong>Higher National Diplomas (HNDs).<strong>The</strong> Higher Education Funding Council<strong>for</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> (HEFCE) distributes publicmoney <strong>for</strong> teaching <strong>and</strong> research touniversities <strong>and</strong> colleges <strong>and</strong> aims topromote high-quality education <strong>and</strong>research that meets the needs ofstudents, the economy <strong>and</strong> society.Investors in People<strong>The</strong> national st<strong>and</strong>ard of goodpractice <strong>for</strong> workplace training<strong>and</strong> development.investorsinpeople.co.ukJobcentre PlusA government agency supportingpeople of working age from welfareinto work, <strong>and</strong> helping employers tofill their vacancies.<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> ImprovementService (LSIS)<strong>The</strong> LSIS is a new sector-ownedbody <strong>for</strong>med from the QualityImprovement Agency <strong>and</strong> the Centre<strong>for</strong> Excellence in Leadership. Focusingon learners, it aims to developexcellent <strong>and</strong> sustainable FE provisionacross the sector, implementing theGovernment’s re<strong>for</strong>ms <strong>for</strong> learning<strong>and</strong> skills.lsis.gov.uk/LSISHome.aspxLocal authoritiesLocal authorities are responsible <strong>for</strong>meeting the learning needs of allyoung people up to the age of 18.<strong>The</strong>y develop strategic commissioningplans <strong>for</strong> their area, working withneighbouring authorities, assessingdem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>and</strong> required supplyof 16–18 provision, includingthe academic route, Diplomas,Apprenticeships <strong>and</strong> the Foundation<strong>Learning</strong> Tier.Local Employment Partnerships (LEPs)LEPs aim to give 250,000 peoplethe skills that local employers needby 2010. <strong>The</strong>y will also give peoplefrom local communities genuineopportunities to come off benefits<strong>and</strong> really change their lives. <strong>The</strong> LEPsthat exist between Jobcentre Plus <strong>and</strong>employers are supported by DWP, BIS<strong>and</strong> the LSC.Managing In<strong>for</strong>mation acrossPartners (MIAP)MIAP aims to streamline howin<strong>for</strong>mation on learning <strong>and</strong>achievement is collected, h<strong>and</strong>led <strong>and</strong>shared across the education sectorso that excellent services are madeavailable to individuals, employers<strong>and</strong> communities. MIAP, delivered bythe LSC, will introduce an internetbasedLearner Registration Service <strong>and</strong>a unique learner number <strong>for</strong> everyperson in education <strong>and</strong> training –allowing individuals to build a lifelongrecord of their learning participation<strong>and</strong> achievements.National Apprenticeship Service(NAS)A new body, launched in April 2009,that is responsible <strong>for</strong> the delivery ofthe Apprenticeship programme <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>working with employers <strong>and</strong> learners.apprenticeships.org.ukNational <strong>Skills</strong> AcademiesA network of employer-led, world-classcentres of excellence delivering theskills required by each sector of theeconomy.nationalskillsacademy.gov.ukNational Vocational Qualifications(NVQs)NVQs are work-related qualifications,at the following levels:•Level 1 – equal to five GCSEs atgrades D to G•Level 2 – equal to five GCSEs atgrades A* to C•Level 3 – equal to two A-levels orone vocational A-level•Level 4/5 – equal to Higher NationalCertificate, Higher NationalDiploma or degree level.nextstepnextstep is a free service that offersface-to-face help <strong>and</strong> support abouttraining, learning <strong>and</strong> the worldof work.Not in education, employment ortraining (NEET)<strong>The</strong> Government has set a PSA target<strong>for</strong> reducing the numbers of youngpeople who are NEET by 8 per centby 2010. <strong>The</strong> LSC has an importantrole <strong>and</strong> contribution to make – alongwith local authorities – in ensuringthat suitable provision is available,accessible, well understood by youngpeople <strong>and</strong> of high quality.OfqualOfqual – the new regulator ofqualifications, exams <strong>and</strong> tests inEngl<strong>and</strong> – began its interim workin April 2008. <strong>The</strong> Governmentwill be bringing in legislation toestablish Ofqual as the regulator ofqualifications. Until this legislationis passed, it will operate as part ofthe Qualifications <strong>and</strong> CurriculumAuthority.ofqual.gov.ukPublic Service Agreement (PSA)PSAs are a series of cross-governmentgoals. Each government organisation isset a number of key indicators duringeach Comprehensive Spending Reviewperiod that contribute to achieving thebigger goals. <strong>The</strong>se are known as PSAtargets. <strong>The</strong> LSC’s PSA targets, <strong>and</strong> ourprogress towards them, are set out onpage 11 of this <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>.Qualifications <strong>and</strong> CurriculumAgency (QCA)<strong>The</strong> QCA is responsible <strong>for</strong> developingthe national curriculum, whichdefines the knowledge, underst<strong>and</strong>ing<strong>and</strong> skills to which children <strong>and</strong>young people are entitled. It reviewsthe curriculum <strong>and</strong> evaluates itsappropriateness <strong>and</strong> relevance to thechanging needs of learners <strong>and</strong> society.qca.org.ukFinanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 93


Regional Development Agencies(RDAs)<strong>The</strong>se bodies are responsible<strong>for</strong> economic development <strong>and</strong>regeneration in the nine regions ofEngl<strong>and</strong>.School sixth <strong>for</strong>ms<strong>The</strong> LSC became responsible <strong>for</strong>funding school sixth <strong>for</strong>ms inApril 2002 <strong>and</strong> funds 1,760 schoolsixth <strong>for</strong>ms in 138 local educationauthorities (LEAs). In the remaining 12LEAs, the education of over-16s takesplace mainly in FE colleges <strong>and</strong> sixth<strong>for</strong>mcolleges.Sector <strong>Skills</strong> Councils (SSCs)Independent UK-wide organisationsrepresenting groups of employers, SSCsexist to improve skills <strong>and</strong> productivityin their sector.September Guarantee<strong>The</strong> guarantee ensures that all youngpeople have an opportunity to receivea suitable offer of a place in learning<strong>for</strong> at least two years after they leavecompulsory education. In 2008, theguarantee was extended <strong>for</strong> the firsttime to cover all 17-year-olds, withspecific monitoring arrangements <strong>for</strong>those who were enrolled on one-yearor short courses or who had left theactivity they chose on leaving school.<strong>The</strong> agreed start date can be afterthe end of September, but should beno later than the beginning of thefollowing January term.<strong>Skills</strong> CampaignAn ambitious skills communicationsinitiative to raise the aspirations ofmillions of people.lsc.gov.uk/inourh<strong>and</strong>s<strong>Skills</strong> <strong>for</strong> Life<strong>The</strong> Government’s strategy to helpadults who have missed out oneducational achievement. It aims toimprove the literacy, language <strong>and</strong>numeracy skills of 1.5 million adults.<strong>Skills</strong> Funding AgencyThis agency will oversee thedistribution of funds to the sector<strong>and</strong> manage the per<strong>for</strong>mance ofFE colleges. It will also house theNational Apprenticeship Service(NAS), the National Employer Service<strong>and</strong> the adult advancement <strong>and</strong>careers service.<strong>Skills</strong> Pledge<strong>The</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Pledge is a publiccommitment by businesses to traintheir employees. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Pledgeis voluntary <strong>and</strong> is supported byimpartial advice from the Train toGain service.inourh<strong>and</strong>s.lsc.gov.uk/employersskillspledge.html<strong>Skills</strong> Strategy<strong>The</strong> Government launched its <strong>Skills</strong>Strategy in July 2003, promising toimprove support <strong>for</strong> businesses thatdevelop their work<strong>for</strong>ces.Training Quality St<strong>and</strong>ardAn assessment framework designedto recognise <strong>and</strong> celebrate the bestorganisations delivering training <strong>and</strong>development solutions to employers.trainingqualityst<strong>and</strong>ard.co.ukTrain to GainTrain to Gain is a service, managed<strong>and</strong> funded by the LSC, that helpsemployers to find the training theyneed <strong>for</strong> their staff. A dedicated skillsbroker analyses individual businessneeds <strong>and</strong> works with each employerto help them to plan a tailoredtraining programme. Train to Gain skillsbrokers do not work <strong>for</strong> any trainingorganisation, so the advice that theygive to employers is impartial.traintogain.gov.ukUK Commission <strong>for</strong> Employment<strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> (CFES)Led by Sir Michael Rake, the CFESstrengthens the pivotal role thatemployers have in ensuring thatthe UK’s employment <strong>and</strong> skillssystem responds well to the needsof business <strong>and</strong> the public services.It also promotes increased investmentin work<strong>for</strong>ce skills by employers <strong>for</strong>a more highly skilled <strong>and</strong> productiveeconomy.Young People’s <strong>Learning</strong> Agency(YPLA)This new national non-departmentalpublic body will support localauthorities in their new role incommissioning <strong>and</strong> funding 14–19provision. Local capacity on 14–19 willthere<strong>for</strong>e be with local authorities.94 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


List of Related Documents14–19 Education <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> White Paper (publishedFebruary 2005) dfes.gov.uk/publications/14-19education<strong>and</strong>skills/index.shtmlData H<strong>and</strong>ling Procedures in Government: Final <strong>Report</strong>(published June 2008) cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/65948/dhr080625.pdfDelivering World-class <strong>Skills</strong> in a Dem<strong>and</strong>-led System(published January 2007) readingroom.lsc.gov.uk/lsc/national/nat-deliveringworldclassskills-jan07.pdfFramework <strong>for</strong> Excellence: How the Framework Will Work(published June 2007) ffe.lsc.gov.uk/Framework+<strong>for</strong>+Excellence+How+the+Framework+will+work++June+2007.htmFrom Here to Sustainability (published September2005) readingroom.lsc.gov.uk/lsc/2005/ourbusiness/strategy/from-here-to-sustainabilitylsc-strategy<strong>for</strong>sustainabledevelopment.pdfFurther Education: Raising <strong>Skills</strong>, Improving Life Chances(published March 2006) dfes.gov.uk/publications/furthereducation/docs/6514-FE%20White%20Paper.pdfGovernment Investment Strategy 2009–10, LSC GrantLetter <strong>and</strong> LSC Statement of Priorities (publishedNovember 2008) readingroom.lsc.gov.uk/lsc/National/nat-statementofpriorities200910-nov08.pdfIdentifying <strong>and</strong> Managing Underper<strong>for</strong>mance (publishedJanuary 2008) readingroom.lsc.gov.uk/lsc/National/nat-identifyingmanagingunderper<strong>for</strong>mance_yr2_pt1-jan08.pdfLearner Health, Safety <strong>and</strong> Welfare: Safe Learner Blueprint(published September 2007) safelearner.info/downloads/LSCHealthSafety%204-10-07.pdf<strong>The</strong> <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council’s Proposed StatutoryIntervention Policy: Consultation Document (publishedJanuary 2008) readingroom.lsc.gov.uk/Lsc/National/nat-LSCproposedinterventionpolicy-jan2008.pdfLSC Grant Letter 2008–09 dius.gov.uk/publications/LSC-Grant-Letter-2008-09.pdfLSC Single Equality Scheme: Our strategy <strong>for</strong> Equality <strong>and</strong>Diversity (published April 2007) readingroom.lsc.gov.uk/lsc/National/nat-singleequalityscheme-30apr07.pdfNational Employer <strong>Skills</strong> Survey 2007 (publishedMay 2008) readingroom.lsc.gov.uk/lsc/National/natnessurvey2007mainreport-may08.pdfNational Learner Satisfaction Survey 2007 (publishedJuly 2008) research.lsc.gov.uk/lsc+research/published/learner-satisfactionProsperity <strong>for</strong> all in the global economy – world classskills (published December 2006) hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/6/4/leitch_finalreport051206.pdfRaising Expectations: enabling the system to deliver(published March 2008) dfes.gov.uk/consultations/downloadableDocs/Raising%20Expectations%20pdf.pdfRenewing the physical infrastructure of English furthereducation colleges (published July 2008) nao.org.uk/publications/0708/renewing_the_physical_infrastr.aspxA Review of the Capital Programme in Further Education(<strong>The</strong> Foster <strong>Report</strong>) (published March 2009) dius.gov.uk/news_<strong>and</strong>_speeches/announcements/~/media/publications/L/LSC_Capital_Review_accSelf-assessment of health, safety <strong>and</strong> welfare: Guidance<strong>for</strong> organisations funded by the <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council(published March 2009) nationalemployerservice.org.uk/uploads/files/Self-Assessment_March_2009_v4.pdf<strong>Skills</strong> <strong>for</strong> Life: Progress in Improving Adult Literacy<strong>and</strong> Numeracy (published June 2008) nao.org.uk/publications/0708/skills_<strong>for</strong>_life_progress_in_i.aspx<strong>Skills</strong> in Engl<strong>and</strong> 2007 (published September 2007)readingroom.lsc.gov.uk/lsc/National/SiE_Volume1final_12Sept07.pdfTrain to Gain: A Plan <strong>for</strong> Growth (published November2007) dius.gov.uk/publications/Train-to-Gain-Executive­Summary.pdfWorld-class Apprenticeships: Unlocking Talent, Building<strong>Skills</strong> <strong>for</strong> All (published January 2008) dius.gov.uk/news_<strong>and</strong>_speeches/press_releases/~/media/publications/W/world_class_apprenticeshipsWorld Class <strong>Skills</strong>: Implementing the Leitch Review of<strong>Skills</strong> in Engl<strong>and</strong> (published July 2007) dius.gov.uk/publications/worldclassskills.pdfFinanceLSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09 95


Figures in this report are based on the latest in<strong>for</strong>mation available at the time of going to print.Printed in the UK <strong>for</strong> <strong>The</strong> Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery OfficeID 6149388 07/09Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum.96 LSC <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> 2008–09


<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> CouncilNational OfficePublished by TSO (<strong>The</strong> Stationery Office)<strong>and</strong> available from:Onlinewww.tsoshop.co.ukCheylesmore HouseQuinton RoadCoventry CV1 2WTT 0845 019 4170F 024 7682 3675lsc.gov.ukMail,Telephone, Fax & EmailTSOPO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GNTelephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522Order through the Parliamentary Hotline:Lo-call 0845 7 023474Fax orders: 0870 600 5533Email: customer.services@tso.co.ukTextphone: 0870 240 3701<strong>The</strong> Parliamentary Bookshop12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square,London SW1A 2JXTelephone orders/General enquiries: 020 7219 3890Fax orders: 020 7219 3866Email: bookshop@parliament.ukInternet: www.bookshop.parliament.ukTSO@Blackwell <strong>and</strong> other accredited agentsCustomers can also order publications fromTSO Irel<strong>and</strong>16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD028 9023 8451 Fax 028 9023 5401Making <strong>Skills</strong> Matter is the LSC’s <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008–09.Extracts from this publication may be reproduced<strong>for</strong> non-commercial educational or trainingpurposes on the condition that the sourceis acknowledged <strong>and</strong> the findings arenot misrepresented.This publication is available in electronic <strong>for</strong>mon the <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Council website:lsc.gov.ukIf you require this publication in an alternative<strong>for</strong>mat or language, please contact the LSC HelpDesk: 0870 900 6800Publication reference: LSC-P-NAT-090125©LSC July 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!