12.07.2015 Views

Read More DNAPrint Log Entries for Prior Year of 2005 - Kerchner

Read More DNAPrint Log Entries for Prior Year of 2005 - Kerchner

Read More DNAPrint Log Entries for Prior Year of 2005 - Kerchner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 92,0,8,0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 31 December 2004Comments: Was basically interested in NA content.Email address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): dobbsj-Monday-ionet.netGuest: Beverly Ann Lee DuffieldDate-Time: Thursday, February 17, <strong>2005</strong> at 20:18:14 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 90, 0, 10, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 86, 10, 0, 4<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 12/13/2004Comments: MtDNA maternal line haplogroup I. I was very surprised to find 10% EA and a littlesurprised to find 4% SSAF and amazed that there was no NA at all. I was adopted by my paternalgrandparents and was always told that my mothers family was small and dark. I too am the"black sheep" among the blue eyes <strong>of</strong> my paternal family and was presumed to be NA in part. Iresemble the Bannock Shoshone people. Then I got these tests done and am fairly confused. I'dlike to know how far back the EA is as I also have an unknown 16474T in the HVR1 that doesn'tshow up in the Concordance. However I understand that this test "lumps" all Y and MtDNAtogether. On the paternal line the paper trail is quite thorough and goes back to the 1600's andeven further and indicates purely European. Specifically Ireland, Prussia, Germany, England andThe Netherlands. Much <strong>of</strong> the paternal family has been in America since the earliest days. Mynext step will be to have my son tested and just see what happens.Email address (To use delete '-Thursday-' and add @ sign in that position): Duffield12345-Thursday-MSN.COMGuest: CSDDate-Time: Monday, February 07, <strong>2005</strong> at 13:09:55 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 80,?,?,?My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 90,10,0,0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: feb <strong>2005</strong>Comments: mtDNA = Haplogroup H (half the people in the world!) I expected mostly, if not allEuropean. My mother's side is English, Irish, etc. nearly all the way back. Might be a nativeamerican 5-6 generations back but no one knows <strong>for</strong> sure. Since i am adopted, I do not knowmuch about my father's side <strong>of</strong> the family, except that he was probably pretty much like mymom's side. I was surprised to see the 10% east asian as opposed to native American. Now I readthat the 2 are almost impossible to distinguish. Why do they have a separate class <strong>for</strong> NativeAmerican then? I have also read other stories about people who claim that there is no way theycan have east asian. One story where 2 (proven) full brothers tested way different. One 7% EAand the other 12% NA, or something like that. Sounds like even the 2.5 test is not all that reliable.Has anyone there had the sub-clade test <strong>for</strong> Haplogroup H or the new EURO-DNA <strong>of</strong>f thefile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (19 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!