A Guide to the Law of Securitisation in Australia - Clayton Utz

More documents

Recommendations

Info

14 Synthetic securitisations14.1 IntroductionIn a synthetic securitisation, the credit risk in relation tospecified receivables is transferred to a special purpose vehicle(and from there to investors who acquire notes issued by thespecial purpose vehicle) without any transfer of the receivablesthemselves.As is the case in the United States, the most common form ofsynthetic securitisation in Australia is a synthetic collateraliseddebt obligation (a synthetic CDO). In this type of transaction,the special purpose vehicle issues notes (credit linked notes) therepayment of which is linked to the credit of a number of named,and usually well-known, companies (reference entities). Ifenough of the reference entities become insolvent or default inpayment of their debts, noteholders may not receive fullrepayment of their credit linked notes. Credit linked notes insynthetic CDO transactions have been issued both to retail andto wholesale investors in Australia (and are one of the fewsecuritisation structures in Australia that has retail investors -see section 1).Synthetic securitisations in Australia have also occurred inrelation to:• corporate loans;• small and large commercial property mortgages; and• equipment leases,amongst other assets.There are relatively few legal issues associated with syntheticsecuritisations in Australia. One of the advantages of asynthetic securitisation is that it can avoid the legal problemsassociated with outright transfers of some assets - and inparticular complex tax and stamp duty issues.The principal legal issue peculiar to synthetic securitisations iswhether the risk transfer agreement may be characterised as aninsurance contract.14.2 Insurance contractThe transfer of risk that occurs in a synthetic securitisation willusually be documented by way of a credit swap usingInternational Swaps and Derivatives Association provisions.This is not always the case, however, particularly where thetransaction is not a synthetic CDO. Other types of documents,such as financial guarantees, may be used.Regardless of the document used, there is usually some risk thatthe risk transfer contract may be characterised as an insurancecontract. Like an insurance contract, these transactions involvethe transfer of the risk of a future event happening in return forthe payment of a fee.It is important that the risk transfer contract not be characterisedas insurance contracts because if it is:• the transaction will be subject to the Insurance Contracts Act1984 which will incorporate terms into the contract,including duties of disclosure, which may not be appropriate;• the parties may be conducting an insurance business withinthe scope of the Insurance Act 1973 and, if so, will requireauthorisation under that Act;• this will affect the GST treatment of the transactions(insurance contracts are taxable supplies but swaps andguarantees are generally not); and• insurance contracts are generally subject to stamp duty.The position under Australian law in relation to characterisingcontracts as insurance contracts is very similar to that in theUnited Kingdom. There is no single test for determining whethera contract is an insurance contract, it is a matter of comparingthe features of the contract to the usual features of an insurancecontract. As in the United Kingdom, the credit swap market inAustralia has satisfied itself that there is no significant risk ofrecharacterisation – principally because there is no necessaryrequirement in a credit swap that the buyer of protection needsuffer any loss for which a payment under the credit swap willcompensate (that is, the buyer of the protection need not haveany exposure to the reference entities of the relevant creditswap).The analysis becomes more difficult where the syntheticsecuritisation relates to assets on a bank’s balance sheet (and inparticular where the reference entities are not well knownentities). Nevertheless, it is usually possible to conclude thatthese are sufficient differences such as to prevent the risktransfer contract from being characterised as an insurancecontract.73
14.3 GamingIn the past, another concern has been that the transfer contractnot breach any gaming or wagering laws.Section 1101I of the Corporations Act now provides that acontract in relation to a financial product is valid and enforceabledespite any gaming or wagering laws. This would apply to mostcontracts for the transfer of risk in a synthetic securitisation.In addition, if the contract is governed by New South Wales lawthe relevant gaming legislation in that State has a relativelynarrow definition of “unlawful game” which is unlikely to applyto these types of transactions.14.4 ConclusionSynthetic structures are now widely accepted in both thewholesale and retail markets. They are unlikely ever to approachthe volume of traditional securitisations. But we would expectmore transactions in coming years as banks increasingly tailorproducts to investor demands.74
Page 6:
12.7.3 Euroentitlements............
Page 9 and 10:
1 General overview of the nature of
Page 12:
An interest in a managed investment
Page 15 and 16:
142.3.4 Provision of a financial se
Page 17 and 18:
3 The disclosure and civil liabilit
Page 19 and 20:
18The statutory source for this ste
Page 21 and 22:
The implication of this approach in
Page 23 and 24: Interestingly, the majority then we
Page 25 and 26: 4 Stamp duty and securitisation244.
Page 27 and 28: 264.8 Relief for mortgage-backed se
Page 29 and 30: 4.10 ConclusionStamp duty is a very
Page 31 and 32: Despite the absence of an express a
Page 33 and 34: 32share of the profits of the compa
Page 35 and 36: (d) before the issue:(i) the compan
Page 37 and 38: 365.4 Debt/equity rulesDivision 974
Page 39 and 40: Entities that make GST-free supplie
Page 41 and 42: • “ enterprise” is defined in
Page 43 and 44: 6 The Consumer Credit Code andsecur
Page 45 and 46: 7 The regulation of the participati
Page 47 and 48: inclusion within the ELE depends on
Page 49 and 50: 8 Set-off and securitisation8.1 Int
Page 51 and 52: 50However, this result and the prin
Page 53 and 54: 9 Insolvency and securitisation529.
Page 55 and 56: 54• if the trustee has not limite
Page 57 and 58: Section 588FG provides a measure of
Page 59 and 60: 10 Issues relating to debt securiti
Page 61 and 62: 60indemnity existed) and had no han
Page 63 and 64: The effect of the decision has been
Page 65 and 66: the ASX has discretion to ask the e
Page 67 and 68: • Public Trustee Members - for pr
Page 69 and 70: When Austraclear receives notificat
Page 71 and 72: have been completed in relation to
Page 73: Some CMBS transactions allow the is
Page 77 and 78: 16 Clayton UtzOur securitisation te
show all

A Guide to the Law of Securitisation in Australia - Clayton Utz

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?