12.07.2015 Views

A Guide to the Law of Securitisation in Australia - Clayton Utz

A Guide to the Law of Securitisation in Australia - Clayton Utz

A Guide to the Law of Securitisation in Australia - Clayton Utz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 The Consumer Credit Code andsecuritisation426.1 IntroductionThe Consumer Credit Code (<strong>the</strong> Code) commenced operation <strong>in</strong>all States and Terri<strong>to</strong>ries <strong>of</strong> <strong>Australia</strong> (o<strong>the</strong>r than Tasmania) on 1November 1996. The Code commenced operation <strong>in</strong> Tasmania on1 March 1997.With few exceptions, <strong>the</strong> Code regulates all personal, domesticand household credit, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g personal loans, hous<strong>in</strong>g loans,overdrafts, credit card facilities, credit and debt facilities (<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>extent credit is provided), consumer leases, consumer hirepurchase and retail credit. As a result, it affects many <strong>Australia</strong>nsecuritisations <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g mortgage-backed programs.6.2 The credit providerThe Code is directed primarily <strong>to</strong>wards, and imposes obligationson, <strong>the</strong> actual provider <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regulated credit. In addition, but <strong>to</strong>a lesser extent, it also imposes obligations on and affects o<strong>the</strong>rparties <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lend<strong>in</strong>g process (eg. agents <strong>of</strong> creditproviders, suppliers <strong>of</strong> goods and services purchased with creditand <strong>in</strong>surers).The Code def<strong>in</strong>es a credit provider as a “person that providescredit and <strong>in</strong>cludes a prospective credit provider”. Section 4 <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Code def<strong>in</strong>es credit <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g terms:“(1) For <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> this Code, credit is provided if under acontract:(a) payment <strong>of</strong> a debt owed by one person (<strong>the</strong> deb<strong>to</strong>r) <strong>to</strong>ano<strong>the</strong>r (<strong>the</strong> credit provider) is deferred; or(b) one person (<strong>the</strong> deb<strong>to</strong>r) <strong>in</strong>curs a deferred debt <strong>to</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r(<strong>the</strong> credit provider).”In securitisation programs us<strong>in</strong>g trusts or special purposevehicles, a loan may be orig<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> two ways:• conduit programs which <strong>in</strong>volve an orig<strong>in</strong>a<strong>to</strong>r orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g aloan with funds provided by a trustee or special purposevehicle. The trustee or special purpose vehicle is <strong>the</strong> lender(or mortgagee) and under this arrangement is <strong>the</strong> creditprovider for <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Code; or• assignment programs where a lender lends money <strong>to</strong> aborrower and equitably assigns <strong>the</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g debt <strong>to</strong> atrustee or special purpose vehicle. The orig<strong>in</strong>al lender <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>credit provider. But does it rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> credit provider after<strong>the</strong> assignment or does <strong>the</strong> trustee or special purpose vehiclebecome <strong>the</strong> credit provider? This is answered by section 166<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Code which provides:“(1) If <strong>the</strong> rights <strong>of</strong> a credit provider under a credit contract,mortgage or guarantee are assigned or pass by law <strong>to</strong>ano<strong>the</strong>r person, this Code from <strong>the</strong>n on applies <strong>to</strong> that o<strong>the</strong>rperson and does not impose any fur<strong>the</strong>r obligation on <strong>the</strong>credit provider.(2) The deb<strong>to</strong>r, mortgagor or guaran<strong>to</strong>r has and may exercise <strong>the</strong>same rights <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> credit contract, mortgage orguarantee aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> assignee as <strong>the</strong> deb<strong>to</strong>r, mortgagor orguaran<strong>to</strong>r has aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> credit provider.(3) Subsection (1) does not apply while <strong>the</strong> credit providercont<strong>in</strong>ues <strong>to</strong> receive payments from <strong>the</strong> deb<strong>to</strong>r, or wouldcont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> do so if <strong>the</strong> deb<strong>to</strong>r complied with <strong>the</strong> creditcontract.”Typically, <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al lender rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> servicer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assignedloans and <strong>the</strong> deb<strong>to</strong>rs are unaware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assignment. As aresult, section 166(1) will not apply <strong>to</strong> make <strong>the</strong> trustee orspecial purpose vehicle <strong>the</strong> credit provider (see section 166(3)).Deb<strong>to</strong>rs are normally only be given notice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assignment if<strong>the</strong> trustee or special purpose vehicle perfects its title <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>loans (ie. it takes a legal assignment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> loans). If it does so,<strong>the</strong> trustee or special purpose vehicle will <strong>the</strong>n become <strong>the</strong> creditprovider.6.3 Failure <strong>to</strong> comply with <strong>the</strong> CodeThe consequences <strong>to</strong> a credit provider for fail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> comply with<strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Code can be divided <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> five categories:6.3.1 Crim<strong>in</strong>al consequencesThe commission <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence exposes <strong>the</strong> credit provider, certa<strong>in</strong><strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> a corporate credit provider and persons or corporateswho aided and abetted <strong>the</strong> commission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>to</strong>monetary penalties. The maximum penalty currently provided for<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Code is $10,000.6.3.2 Part 6 – Civil consequencesKey requirements: Division 1 <strong>of</strong> Part 6 sets up a regime underwhich, if a key requirement is breached, civil consequences mayflow. Put simply, those civil consequences are that <strong>the</strong> deb<strong>to</strong>r maynot be required <strong>to</strong> pay any <strong>in</strong>terest under <strong>the</strong> credit contract or<strong>the</strong> credit provider may be required <strong>to</strong> make a payment (<strong>of</strong> up <strong>to</strong>$500,000 per type <strong>of</strong> breach) <strong>to</strong> consolidated revenue or <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> astatu<strong>to</strong>ry trust fund.O<strong>the</strong>r contraventions: Division 2 <strong>of</strong> Part 6 provides that a courtmay order <strong>the</strong> credit provider <strong>to</strong> make restitution or paycompensation <strong>to</strong> any person affected by a contravention, o<strong>the</strong>r thanone for which a civil effect is specifically provided for <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Code.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!