12.07.2015 Views

A Guide to the Law of Securitisation in Australia - Clayton Utz

A Guide to the Law of Securitisation in Australia - Clayton Utz

A Guide to the Law of Securitisation in Australia - Clayton Utz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.3.8 DisclaimersTheir use <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>formation memorandumAn <strong>in</strong>formation memorandum almost always conta<strong>in</strong>s a detaileddisclaimer <strong>of</strong> liability. This is usually found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ImportantNotice section at <strong>the</strong> front <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation memorandum.Disclaimers vary <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir language, but usually fall <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> one <strong>of</strong>two classes:• <strong>of</strong>ten, but not always, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation memorandum conta<strong>in</strong>san express denial <strong>of</strong> liability <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> representations orstatements conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> it.• usually <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs will be directed <strong>to</strong> make and rely upon <strong>the</strong>irown <strong>in</strong>quiries <strong>in</strong> relation <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> securities on <strong>of</strong>fer.Disclaimers as a means <strong>of</strong> avoid<strong>in</strong>g a contraventionIt is clear that a disclaimer cannot oust section 52 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TPA(and presumably sections 1041H <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporations Act and12DA <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ASIC Act). Where a person engages <strong>in</strong> mislead<strong>in</strong>gor deceptive conduct through a defective <strong>in</strong>formationmemorandum, a disclaimer as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first disclaimer above, willbe <strong>in</strong>effective.Us<strong>in</strong>g disclaimers <strong>to</strong> elim<strong>in</strong>ate relianceSections 1041I <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporations Act and 12GF <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ASIC Acteach require that a pla<strong>in</strong>tiff establish a causal connectionbetween <strong>the</strong> mislead<strong>in</strong>g and deceptive conduct and <strong>the</strong> lossclaimed (“loss or damage by conduct <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r person”).The second class <strong>of</strong> disclaimer referred <strong>to</strong> above seeks <strong>to</strong>elim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong> causal connection between <strong>the</strong> mislead<strong>in</strong>g ordeceptive conduct and <strong>the</strong> alleged damage, by advis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tend<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs that <strong>the</strong>y must not rely on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formationmemorandum.Although <strong>the</strong>re are some authorities <strong>in</strong> support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> secondclass <strong>of</strong> disclaimer, a consistent and uniform judicial approachhas yet <strong>to</strong> emerge on this issue. It is likely that <strong>the</strong> courts wouldbe more prepared <strong>to</strong> uphold such a disclaimer where <strong>the</strong>recipient, as with a capital markets issue, is sophisticated.However, it is equally likely that a court’s approach will also be<strong>in</strong>fluenced by its assessment <strong>of</strong> how practical it would have beenfor an <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> rely on its own <strong>in</strong>quiries. If <strong>the</strong> court takes <strong>the</strong>view that an <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>r could not have reasonably implemented <strong>the</strong>direction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> disclaimer, <strong>the</strong>n it probably will not give effect <strong>to</strong>its terms.3.4 ConclusionThe Corporations Act and <strong>the</strong> ASIC Act (and o<strong>the</strong>r similarlegislation) impose substantial civil consequences on thoseresponsible for <strong>the</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> a defective <strong>in</strong>formationmemorandum. Securitisers need <strong>to</strong> be particularly m<strong>in</strong>dful <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se and <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitute procedures for <strong>the</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> an<strong>in</strong>formation memorandum <strong>in</strong> a systematic manner <strong>to</strong> ensure itscompleteness and accuracy. It is only by <strong>the</strong>se means that <strong>the</strong>risks for securitisers from defective <strong>in</strong>formation memorandumswill be m<strong>in</strong>imised.The next two sections <strong>of</strong> this publication deal with some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>revenue impacts on securitisation. These are stamp duty (section4) and tax (section 5).23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!