12.07.2015 Views

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FROM POVERTY TO POWERresearch efforts have centred on male-controlled prevention methods.In sub-Saharan Africa, where the target population is primarilyheterosexual and women’s bargaining <strong>power</strong> over sex is limited, aprevention method that could be controlled by women and would notblock procreation is an urgent need. Recent initiatives have sought <strong>to</strong>fill the gap, but a breakthrough is still years away. Likewise, anaffordable female condom that could protect millions of women fromHIV infection has still not been developed.The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, among others, hopes <strong>to</strong>help correct this bias by offering grants <strong>to</strong> fund R&D for neglecteddiseases. The UK, Canada, and other governments are offering whatthey call ‘advance market commitments’: a guarantee <strong>to</strong> buy bulk suppliesof new vaccines in order <strong>to</strong> encourage research. The basic idea is notnew. In 1714 the British government offered £20,000 – a fortune at thetime – <strong>to</strong> whoever could invent a way of measuring longitude at sea.The offer worked: by 1735 the clockmaker and inven<strong>to</strong>r John Harrisonhad produced an accurate maritime chronometer. 65Research is increasingly dominated by the private sec<strong>to</strong>r. In agriculture,five large multinational companies – Bayer, Dow Agro,DuPont, Monsan<strong>to</strong>, and Syngenta – spend $7.3bn per year onagricultural research. This is more than 18 times the budget of thepublicly funded Consultative Group on International AgriculturalResearch. 66 Left <strong>to</strong> its own devices, private sec<strong>to</strong>r research will respond<strong>to</strong> future opportunities for profit, not public need (although the twomay coincide), so tropical diseases or improved varieties of the staplefoods of poor communities, such as cassava and sorghum, are likely <strong>to</strong>be overlooked in favour of high-value, high-profit products.R&D may benefit people living in <strong>poverty</strong>, even when it is dominatedby the wealthy and run by the private sec<strong>to</strong>r. But it is less likely<strong>to</strong> improve their prospects than R&D geared more closely <strong>to</strong> theirneeds, and may run greater risks. Biotechnology, for example, maywell produce drought-resistant strains of seeds that become an essential<strong>to</strong>ol for adapting <strong>to</strong> climate change. However, it could also erode thegenetic diversity on which developing-country farmers rely, and placeexcessive <strong>power</strong> in the hands of transnational corporations throughtheir control of seed strains.56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!