From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec
From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec
5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM CLIMATE CHANGEobligations to make – or pay for – carbon cuts are based on pastresponsibility for emissions and current capacity to pay, while guaranteeingthe right to development of poor countries. In contrast withother approaches, it takes intra-national inequality (of income andemissions) into account by exempting the income and emissions ofpeople who fall below a minimal ‘global middle class’ thresholdof about $9,000 per capita. It argues that rich countries bear responsibilityfor current climate change and so should pay for the lion’s shareof global adaptation and mitigation efforts, allowing developingcountries to focus on poverty reduction and development. 226However the burden is shared, reversing centuries of rising carbonemissions will not be an easy task. How can governments, companies,and individuals ensure that emissions peak, and then fall, within thenext ten years? This question lies at the heart of the increasingly urgentdebates on how to respond to climate change. The three main optionsuse traditional tools of government policy:Standards: Governments could reach global and/or national agreementssetting emission standards for different industries, and agree aregime to enforce these rules. Examples include quality standards onvehicle emissions or legal requirements that new housing be carbonneutral.Subsidies: Rich-country governments could subsidise carbon reductionefforts – for example research into new technologies in fields such asrenewable energy or carbon capture – or they could support companiesor individuals producing or adopting existing low-carbon equipment.All countries should also end perverse subsidies that actually encouragefossil fuel use. Rich countries collectively subsidise domestic fossil fuelproduction and consumption in the range of $10bn–$57bn each yearin tax breaks and direct support. If redirected, this could financedeveloping-country adaptation. 227Taxes: By ensuring that the true cost of carbon emissions is reflectedin the prices paid by consumers, governments can create a systemwideincentive for low-carbon solutions and encourage innovation tomeet this new demand. A tax on carbon emissions could curb greenhousegases and at the same time raise funds for adaptation or other purposes.Taxes on air travel are increasingly justified as carbon taxes.However, although simpler to implement, taxes will not necessarily413
FROM POVERTY TO POWERreduce the quantity of emissions, which is the critical factor in combatingglobal warming.Another approach that has gained great momentum combinesstandards and taxes to use price pressures to drive down carbon usevia a regional,national,or global market for carbon emissions reductions.Modelled on US efforts to reduce sulphur dioxide emissions under theClean Air Act, carbon trading allows companies to buy and sell‘carbon permits’ so that those who find it easiest to reduce emissionsdo so, and make a profit by selling the resulting carbon savings toother companies who find it harder to cut their carbon footprint.While individual governments have used all of the aboveapproaches to reducing emissions, carbon trading has been adoptedas a central tool for driving the global response, and it is evolvingquickly. In 2006, international carbon markets turned over around$30bn (1.6bn tonnes of carbon emissions, or CO 2e 228 ) and volumeswere expected to double in 2007. 229 The largest markets are theEuropean Union’s Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS), which wasworth $24bn in 2006 (1bn tonnes of CO 2e) and the Kyoto Protocol’sClean Development Mechanism (CDM), worth $5bn (520m tonnes).The remaining carbon markets – incipient domestic markets inAustralia, Japan, Canada, and the USA – form a tiny fraction of totalvolumes. 230 Unlike the EU scheme or the CDM, these are not tied tothe Kyoto commitments. There is also a small but growing voluntarymarket in offsets ($100m/20m tonnes of CO 2ein 2006).The two main types of carbon trading that make up today’s marketsare emissions trading and offset trading. In the former, also known as‘cap and trade’, the government sets a ceiling (or cap) on emissionsfrom a particular economic sector and a schedule for lowering thatceiling over time. Companies in that sector are allocated a tradeablepermit (or allowance) for their emissions, and must pay a fine if theiremissions exceed that amount. Companies that find it cheaper toreduce their emissions can do so and sell their permits to other, dirtier,companies. The EU Emissions Trading Scheme is an early example ofthis kind of carbon market.Trading in carbon offsets involves reducing emissions from projectsoutside of an economy that has an established mandatory cap onemissions. For example, by funding an energy efficiency project in a414
- Page 380 and 381: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDTHE Q
- Page 382 and 383: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDplann
- Page 384 and 385: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDreduc
- Page 386 and 387: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDcan s
- Page 388 and 389: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDgover
- Page 390 and 391: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDThe g
- Page 392 and 393: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDIn fo
- Page 394 and 395: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDIn th
- Page 396 and 397: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDcount
- Page 398 and 399: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDHOW C
- Page 400 and 401: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDIn su
- Page 402 and 403: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM HUMANITA
- Page 404 and 405: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM HUMANITA
- Page 406 and 407: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM HUMANITA
- Page 408 and 409: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM HUMANITA
- Page 410 and 411: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM HUMANITA
- Page 412 and 413: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM HUMANITA
- Page 414 and 415: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM HUMANITA
- Page 416 and 417: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM HUMANITA
- Page 418 and 419: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM HUMANITA
- Page 420 and 421: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM HUMANITA
- Page 422 and 423: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM HUMANITA
- Page 424 and 425: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM CLIMATE
- Page 426 and 427: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM CLIMATE
- Page 428 and 429: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM CLIMATE
- Page 432 and 433: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM CLIMATE
- Page 434 and 435: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM CLIMATE
- Page 436 and 437: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM CLIMATE
- Page 438 and 439: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM CLIMATE
- Page 440 and 441: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM CLIMATE
- Page 442 and 443: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM GLOBAL G
- Page 444 and 445: PART SIX
- Page 446 and 447: 6 CONCLUSION A NEW DEAL FOR A NEW C
- Page 448 and 449: ANNEX
- Page 450 and 451: ANNEX HOW CHANGE HAPPENSmeetings, s
- Page 452 and 453: ANNEX HOW CHANGE HAPPENSTHE COMPONE
- Page 454 and 455: ANNEX HOW CHANGE HAPPENSinstitution
- Page 456 and 457: ANNEX HOW CHANGE HAPPENSOrganisatio
- Page 458 and 459: ANNEX HOW CHANGE HAPPENSthe planned
- Page 460 and 461: ANNEX HOW CHANGE HAPPENSTechnologic
- Page 462 and 463: NOTESPART 1: INTRODUCTION1 The infa
- Page 464 and 465: NOTESPART 2: POWER AND POLITICS1 J.
- Page 466 and 467: NOTES82 J. Beall and S. Fox (2006)
- Page 468 and 469: NOTES5 There has, however, been inc
- Page 470 and 471: NOTES73 See also DFID (2005) ‘Gro
- Page 472 and 473: NOTES139 Author interview, December
- Page 474 and 475: NOTES10 Sources for Figure 4.2: Chi
- Page 476 and 477: NOTES63 WHO (2006) ‘Cumulative Nu
- Page 478 and 479: NOTES124 K. Annan (2005) ‘In Larg
FROM POVERTY TO POWERreduce the quantity of emissions, which is the critical fac<strong>to</strong>r in combatingglobal warming.Another approach that has gained great momentum combinesstandards and taxes <strong>to</strong> use price pressures <strong>to</strong> drive down carbon usevia a regional,national,or global market for carbon emissions reductions.Modelled on US efforts <strong>to</strong> reduce sulphur dioxide emissions under theClean Air Act, carbon trading allows companies <strong>to</strong> buy and sell‘carbon permits’ so that those who find it easiest <strong>to</strong> reduce emissionsdo so, and make a profit by selling the resulting carbon savings <strong>to</strong>other companies who find it harder <strong>to</strong> cut their carbon footprint.While individual governments have used all of the aboveapproaches <strong>to</strong> reducing emissions, carbon trading has been adoptedas a central <strong>to</strong>ol for driving the global response, and it is evolvingquickly. In 2006, international carbon markets turned over around$30bn (1.6bn <strong>to</strong>nnes of carbon emissions, or CO 2e 228 ) and volumeswere expected <strong>to</strong> double in 2007. 229 The largest markets are theEuropean Union’s Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS), which wasworth $24bn in 2006 (1bn <strong>to</strong>nnes of CO 2e) and the Kyo<strong>to</strong> Pro<strong>to</strong>col’sClean Development Mechanism (CDM), worth $5bn (520m <strong>to</strong>nnes).The remaining carbon markets – incipient domestic markets inAustralia, Japan, Canada, and the USA – form a tiny fraction of <strong>to</strong>talvolumes. 230 Unlike the EU scheme or the CDM, these are not tied <strong>to</strong>the Kyo<strong>to</strong> commitments. There is also a small but growing voluntarymarket in offsets ($100m/20m <strong>to</strong>nnes of CO 2ein 2006).The two main types of carbon trading that make up <strong>to</strong>day’s marketsare emissions trading and offset trading. In the former, also known as‘cap and trade’, the government sets a ceiling (or cap) on emissionsfrom a particular economic sec<strong>to</strong>r and a schedule for lowering thatceiling over time. Companies in that sec<strong>to</strong>r are allocated a tradeablepermit (or allowance) for their emissions, and must pay a fine if theiremissions exceed that amount. Companies that find it cheaper <strong>to</strong>reduce their emissions can do so and sell their permits <strong>to</strong> other, dirtier,companies. The EU Emissions Trading Scheme is an early example ofthis kind of carbon market.Trading in carbon offsets involves reducing emissions from projectsoutside of an economy that has an established manda<strong>to</strong>ry cap onemissions. For example, by funding an energy efficiency project in a414