12.07.2015 Views

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 POWER AND POLITICS I HAVE RIGHTS, THEREFORE I AMProgress in human rights became one of the hallmarks of thesecond half of the twentieth century, with the spread of democracyand decolonisation leading <strong>to</strong> a massive expansion in the proportionof the world’s population that exercised some degree of say in theorganisation of society. The advent of mass literacy and improvementsin health meanwhile strengthened their ability <strong>to</strong> exercise thoserights.Human rights can be grouped in<strong>to</strong> three distinct generations:civil and political, or so-called ‘negative’ rights such as freedom from<strong>to</strong>rture, which the state must guarantee; economic, social, and cultural,or ‘positive rights’, such as the right <strong>to</strong> education, which the state mustfinance and actively promote; and finally collective rights, such asself-determination, which the state must respect. Most recently, theUN has tried <strong>to</strong> extend the notion of rights <strong>to</strong> non-state ac<strong>to</strong>rs suchas corporations. 8<strong>From</strong> universal franchise and the abolition of slavery onwards,new forms of rights have initially been viewed by those in positions of<strong>power</strong> as unreasonable or unjustified, but have slowly been absorbedin<strong>to</strong> the mainstream consensus. The latest candidates are the culturallycontentious issues of equal rights for women and for children.For many years after the UN Declaration, the rhe<strong>to</strong>ric of humanrights was reduced <strong>to</strong> a weapon in the propaganda battles of the ColdWar. As the economist J.K. Galbraith once joked, ‘Under capitalism,man exploits man. Under socialism, it is the other way around.’Neither side had much time for human rights. The West pointedthe finger at socialist countries for denying civil and political rights.The East criticised the capitalist countries for their failure <strong>to</strong> secureeconomic and social rights for all citizens and for supporting crueldicta<strong>to</strong>rs such as Zaire’s Mobu<strong>to</strong> Sese Seko or Chile’s Augus<strong>to</strong>Pinochet. There was little active interaction between the worlds ofrights and development.The end of the Cold War brought convergence, with manydevelopment practitioners combining the two disciplines in<strong>to</strong> whatbecame known as a ‘rights-based approach’ <strong>to</strong> development. Byreuniting economic and social rights with political and civil rights,this approach aimed <strong>to</strong> build a comprehensive vision of a new, just,and viable ‘social contract’ between state and citizen. 925

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!