12.07.2015 Views

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDgovernments in exchange for aid failed, selectivity would rewardachievement rather than promises. Of course, walking away may leavepoor people in the lurch, and oblige more expensive interventionslater on. The model for the selectivity-based allocation of aid is the‘poor but virtuous’ country, where extensive <strong>poverty</strong> coincides with awell-intentioned and legitimate government. Unfortunately, few suchcountries exist. For all its superficial appeal, selectivity is unlikely <strong>to</strong> beof much help <strong>to</strong> the poorest communities.Selectivity highlights a paradox: aid tends <strong>to</strong> work best in countriesthat need it least. This dilemma has no easy answers, but some generalprinciples should apply. First, aid must not undermine the state, forexample by setting up long-term parallel systems <strong>to</strong> deliver services thatdrain staff from an already enfeebled state system. On the contrary, theaim must be <strong>to</strong> build an effective and accountable state. Second,humility is in order. Donors alone cannot ‘solve’ the problem of nationbuilding;they can merely support or undermine indigenous efforts.Nation-building is a long-term exercise ill-suited <strong>to</strong> the short concentrationspans of rich-country politicians. Finally, if walking awayexacerbates human suffering, then aid donors should do so only if theyare certain that the long-term benefits outweigh the immediate costs.INGOS AND AID QUALITYINGOs are relatively free from the pull of domestic politics thatdis<strong>to</strong>rts the aid efforts of governments, and the ethos of altruism runswide and deep within them. However, altruism can at times become amask for hubris and is not always sufficient <strong>to</strong> keep self-interest at bay.Having grown in size and profile, INGOs can at times exaggerate theirown importance or delude themselves in<strong>to</strong> believing that they aloneare privy <strong>to</strong> the answers <strong>to</strong> development’s riddles.The au<strong>to</strong>nomy of INGOs is restricted by the high dependence ofsome on funding from Northern governments, primarily as implementingagents for official aid and emergency relief programmes. 158That dependence is likely <strong>to</strong> rise if governments stick <strong>to</strong> their 2005promises <strong>to</strong> increase aid volumes, leading INGOs <strong>to</strong> become furtherenmeshed with the foreign policy aims of rich countries.As INGOs have grown in size and influence, their thinking andpractice have evolved. The charity ethos that predominated in the371

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!