From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec
From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec
5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FINANCE• Assets are held offshore in tax havens that guarantee secrecyand so help rich people avoid paying taxes. The notorious USenergy company Enron showed how it was done. According tothe US Senate report into the company’s collapse, Enron’saccountants set up a global network of 3,500 companies, 440of them in the tax haven of the Cayman Islands, and paid nofederal income tax at all between 1996 and 1999. 46• Corporations are adept at abusing so-called ‘transfer pricing’,which involves under- or overcharging for trade withindifferent company affiliates in order to minimise tax. Onestudy revealed companies recording internal transactions oftelevision antennas from China priced at $0.04 and Japanesetweezers priced at $4,896. 47 Shell companies are set up in taxhavens to further reduce liabilities: roughly half of world tradeis believed to pass through tax havens, at least on paper. 48• Tax competition forces governments to offer ever greater taxholidays to investors to match those of rival locations.• Individuals and companies simply do not pay the taxes due.• Governments are unable to tax an increasing amount ofeconomic activity due to the growth of the informal economy.Moreover, developing countries are under huge pressure throughtrade talks and aid conditions to cut what is currently one of theirmost effective means of raising taxes – trade tariffs.Taxation lies at the heart of the social contract between citizen andstate, and is discussed more fully in Part 2. To make national taxsystems work for the poor, governments need to build up their abilityto collect taxes and to do so progressively, so that rich people pay morethan poor people. But unless international measures are taken to shutdown the luxury boltholes used by tax avoiders, poor countries willcontinue to miss out on the lion’s share of the revenue they are due.Such measures could include rules for greater transparency fromcorporations: for example, specifying how much tax they pay to eachgovernment, rather than a single global aggregate figure across thewhole company; improved exchange of information between governments;and an end to secrecy in offshore tax havens. More ambitiouswould be a global agreement on a minimum level of corporate taxation315
FROM POVERTY TO POWERto reduce the pressure for tax competition, or the creation of a WorldTax Authority that could, among other things, help set rules forallocating the profit income of TNCs, assist the internationalexchange of taxation information, and help to protect national taxregimes from predatory practices such as tax competition. 49In 2003, the then President Chirac of France commissioned ahigh-level study of international taxation as a way to raise money fordevelopment. The Landau Commission concluded that a range ofinternational taxes were both feasible and could raise significantsums. 50 They would need to be introduced simultaneously by allmajor financial centres, to avoid creating a new generation of taxhavens, but the Commission did not see this as an insuperable obstacle.Moreover, such flows would be more stable and predictable than aidthat has to be negotiated every year or two. The options discussedincluded:Environmental taxes: these include taxes on carbon, or sectors notcurrently covered by the Kyoto Protocol, such as maritime and airtransport. Environmental taxes have a double benefit of curbinggreenhouse gas emissions and raising funds for development. TheClimate Change Adaptation Fund discussed on page 410 is an example.Taxes on financial transactions, such as foreign exchange transactions.Sometimes known as a ‘Tobin tax’ 51 , these would impose a very smalltax on the huge daily volumes of financial transactions, which wouldraise significant sums without significantly interfering with the workingsof capital markets.A surtax on the profits of TNCs as a ‘normal counterpart to thebenefits they derive from globalisation’.A tax on arms sales, whether domestic or international.In July 2006 France went a step further and introduced a small‘solidarity contribution’ on airline tickets, the proceeds of which weredestined for buying supplies of drugs to treat HIV, malaria, and TB inthe poorest countries.The anarchy and volatility of international finance constitute amajor threat to the livelihoods of poor communities, and are a criticalmissing piece in the architecture of global governance. Bringing somesort of order will require both international efforts and more assertive316
- Page 282 and 283: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY CLIMATE CH
- Page 284 and 285: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY CLIMATE CH
- Page 286 and 287: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY AFRICA’S
- Page 288 and 289: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY AFRICA’S
- Page 290 and 291: VIOLENCE AND CONFLICTHumanity will
- Page 292 and 293: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY VIOLENCE A
- Page 294 and 295: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY VIOLENCE A
- Page 296 and 297: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY VIOLENCE A
- Page 298 and 299: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY VIOLENCE A
- Page 300 and 301: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY VIOLENCE A
- Page 302 and 303: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY VIOLENCE A
- Page 304 and 305: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY SHOCKS AND
- Page 306 and 307: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY SHOCKS AND
- Page 308 and 309: PART FIVEWho rules the world? 292Th
- Page 310 and 311: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM WHO RULE
- Page 312 and 313: THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SYSTEMT
- Page 314 and 315: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FINANCEm
- Page 316 and 317: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FINANCEI
- Page 318 and 319: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FINANCEw
- Page 320 and 321: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FINANCEp
- Page 322 and 323: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FINANCEp
- Page 324 and 325: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FINANCEA
- Page 326 and 327: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FINANCEI
- Page 328 and 329: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FINANCEB
- Page 330 and 331: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FINANCEc
- Page 334 and 335: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FINANCEn
- Page 336 and 337: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGB
- Page 338 and 339: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGD
- Page 340 and 341: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGA
- Page 342 and 343: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGT
- Page 344 and 345: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGH
- Page 346 and 347: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGT
- Page 348 and 349: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGA
- Page 350 and 351: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGM
- Page 352 and 353: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADING2
- Page 354 and 355: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGF
- Page 356 and 357: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGp
- Page 358 and 359: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGG
- Page 360 and 361: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGI
- Page 362 and 363: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGd
- Page 364 and 365: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGT
- Page 366 and 367: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGC
- Page 368 and 369: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TRADINGT
- Page 370 and 371: THE INTERNATIONAL AID SYSTEMA few y
- Page 372 and 373: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDTABLE
- Page 374 and 375: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDIt is
- Page 376 and 377: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDthe s
- Page 378 and 379: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDThe a
- Page 380 and 381: 5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM AIDTHE Q
5 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FINANCE• Assets are held offshore in tax havens that guarantee secrecyand so help rich people avoid paying taxes. The no<strong>to</strong>rious USenergy company Enron showed how it was done. According <strong>to</strong>the US Senate report in<strong>to</strong> the company’s collapse, Enron’saccountants set up a global network of 3,500 companies, 440of them in the tax haven of the Cayman Islands, and paid nofederal income tax at all between 1996 and 1999. 46• Corporations are adept at abusing so-called ‘transfer pricing’,which involves under- or overcharging for trade withindifferent company affiliates in order <strong>to</strong> minimise tax. Onestudy revealed companies recording internal transactions oftelevision antennas from China priced at $0.04 and Japanesetweezers priced at $4,896. 47 Shell companies are set up in taxhavens <strong>to</strong> further reduce liabilities: roughly half of world tradeis believed <strong>to</strong> pass through tax havens, at least on paper. 48• Tax competition forces governments <strong>to</strong> offer ever greater taxholidays <strong>to</strong> inves<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> match those of rival locations.• Individuals and companies simply do not pay the taxes due.• Governments are unable <strong>to</strong> tax an increasing amount ofeconomic activity due <strong>to</strong> the growth of the informal economy.Moreover, developing countries are under huge pressure throughtrade talks and aid conditions <strong>to</strong> cut what is currently one of theirmost effective means of raising taxes – trade tariffs.Taxation lies at the heart of the social contract between citizen andstate, and is discussed more fully in Part 2. To make national taxsystems work for the poor, governments need <strong>to</strong> build up their ability<strong>to</strong> collect taxes and <strong>to</strong> do so progressively, so that rich people pay morethan poor people. But unless international measures are taken <strong>to</strong> shutdown the luxury boltholes used by tax avoiders, poor countries willcontinue <strong>to</strong> miss out on the lion’s share of the revenue they are due.Such measures could include rules for greater transparency fromcorporations: for example, specifying how much tax they pay <strong>to</strong> eachgovernment, rather than a single global aggregate figure across thewhole company; improved exchange of information between governments;and an end <strong>to</strong> secrecy in offshore tax havens. More ambitiouswould be a global agreement on a minimum level of corporate taxation315