From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

12.07.2015 Views

4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY NATURAL DISASTERwith local organisations. National governments were mistakenlywritten off as ‘failed states’ and ignored. Aid was often supplydriven,rather than in response to the expressed needs of theaffected communities. Because aid was often distributed tothose who were more articulate or powerful, such as fishermenwanting replacement boats, rather than marginalised womenand poor communities, it ended up reinforcing inequalities insociety.More broadly, the evaluation highlighted the irrationality of amedia-driven global system that raised over $7,000 per personaffected by the tsunami, but only $3 per person affected by thatyear’s floods in Bangladesh.It concluded by driving home the human security message ofempowerment plus protection, arguing that, for all the successesof the response, ‘A regulatory system is needed to oblige agenciesto put the affected population at the centre of measures ofagency effectiveness’, and called for ‘a fundamental reorientationfrom supplying aid to supporting and facilitating communities’own relief and recovery priorities.’Source: J. Telford, J. Cosgrave, and R. Houghton (2006) ‘Joint Evaluation of theInternational Response to the Indian Ocean Tsunami: Synthesis Report’, London: TsunamiEvaluation Coalition.REDUCING RISKPreviously we just reacted. We’d work together, but now we plan beforethe flood happens. It’s meant that, for example, we didn’t have to leavethis place this year. Before the flood came every family had dried foodand a portable oven stored. Cattle were moved and placed in a safeplace. When we saw that the tube well was going under water we startedto store water in pots. We don’t have to wait for outside help.HAWA PARVIN, VILLAGE DISASTER PREPAREDNESS COMMITTEE,KURIGRAM DISTRICT, BANGLADESH, 2004 87With disasters, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.Mozambique’s response to a potentially lethal combination of floodsand a cyclone in 2007 showed what good national leadership andplanning can achieve, even in one of the world’s poorest countries.249

FROM POVERTY TO POWERThe key to success lay in the government’s prior preparations.In October 2006, it adopted a ‘Master Plan’ for dealing withMozambique’s vulnerability to natural disasters, covering issues rangingfrom the need for re-forestation and the development of a nationalirrigation system to the development of crops that can surviveprolonged droughts. The Master Plan also argued that Mozambiqueneeds to reduce its dependence on agriculture as the main source oflivelihood in rural areas through, for example, the development ofits tourist industry, while setting out a clear strategy for emergencymanagement.The plan notes that many people have grown up in conditions ofwar and disaster, where ‘begging has become almost a way of life’. Itargues that the ‘re-establishment of self-esteem, self-confidence anddignity’ are a basic precondition for ‘combating extreme poverty andreducing the country’s vulnerability to natural disasters’. For this reason,the government is determined to avoid ‘running to internationaldonors without first exhausting national capacities’.The strategy was first tested by the floods of 2007. It was an impressivedebut, as the government succeeded in evacuating everyone from theflooded areas without loss of life. Emergency preparedness measuresundoubtedly reduced the number of deaths and injuries caused by thecyclone that struck around the same time. People whose homes weredestroyed were moved to temporary accommodation centres andprovided with food, some health care, and basic social services. Asubsequent evaluation concluded that, without this assistance, therewould have been deaths and widespread suffering, and that ‘the realneeds for emergency relief were largely met’ by the operation. 88Throughout this exercise, the government of Mozambique made adeliberate decision not to issue an emergency appeal for internationalassistance, demonstrating the impact an effective state can have indealing with risk and vulnerability.A comprehensive human security approach to reducing the risksposed by natural disasters should include ongoing ‘mitigation’ efforts.Planning systems, building codes, and environmental regulations,for example, can limit damage. Early-warning systems and publiceducation programmes are also key: if villagers in Sri Lanka hadknown that the sudden retreat of the sea was the precursor to a tsunami,250

FROM POVERTY TO POWERThe key <strong>to</strong> success lay in the government’s prior preparations.In Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2006, it adopted a ‘Master Plan’ for dealing withMozambique’s vulnerability <strong>to</strong> natural disasters, covering issues rangingfrom the need for re-forestation and the development of a nationalirrigation system <strong>to</strong> the development of crops that can surviveprolonged droughts. The Master Plan also argued that Mozambiqueneeds <strong>to</strong> reduce its dependence on agriculture as the main source oflivelihood in rural areas through, for example, the development ofits <strong>to</strong>urist industry, while setting out a clear strategy for emergencymanagement.The plan notes that many people have grown up in conditions ofwar and disaster, where ‘begging has become almost a way of life’. Itargues that the ‘re-establishment of self-esteem, self-confidence anddignity’ are a basic precondition for ‘combating extreme <strong>poverty</strong> andreducing the country’s vulnerability <strong>to</strong> natural disasters’. For this reason,the government is determined <strong>to</strong> avoid ‘running <strong>to</strong> internationaldonors without first exhausting national capacities’.The strategy was first tested by the floods of 2007. It was an impressivedebut, as the government succeeded in evacuating everyone from theflooded areas without loss of life. Emergency preparedness measuresundoubtedly reduced the number of deaths and injuries caused by thecyclone that struck around the same time. People whose homes weredestroyed were moved <strong>to</strong> temporary accommodation centres andprovided with food, some health care, and basic social services. Asubsequent evaluation concluded that, without this assistance, therewould have been deaths and widespread suffering, and that ‘the realneeds for emergency relief were largely met’ by the operation. 88Throughout this exercise, the government of Mozambique made adeliberate decision not <strong>to</strong> issue an emergency appeal for internationalassistance, demonstrating the impact an effective state can have indealing with risk and vulnerability.A comprehensive human security approach <strong>to</strong> reducing the risksposed by natural disasters should include ongoing ‘mitigation’ efforts.Planning systems, building codes, and environmental regulations,for example, can limit damage. Early-warning systems and publiceducation programmes are also key: if villagers in Sri Lanka hadknown that the sudden retreat of the sea was the precursor <strong>to</strong> a tsunami,250

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!