From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

12.07.2015 Views

4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY SOCIAL PROTECTIONHOW CHANGE HAPPENS CASE STUDY:INDIA’S CAMPAIGN FOR A NATIONAL RURALEMPLOYMENT GUARANTEEFor the first time in history, citizens of rural India are nowguaranteed a job. Within 15 days of a valid application, thegovernment is legally obliged to provide 100 days of unskilledwork per year on public works programmes. Activists, politicians,and academics have hailed the National Rural EmploymentGuarantee Act (NREGA), passed in August 2005, as vital forimproving the lot of rural workers.The Act was born of drought and rural distress in the state ofRajasthan, where civil society networks denounced the failure ofpublic food distribution and employment programmes to preventstarvation. Activists submitted a petition to the Supreme Court in2001 on the ‘Right to Food’, which received favourable interimdirectives. Encouraged, they drafted a Rajasthan StateEmployment Guarantee Act in 2003, though this was notimplemented.However, the activists’ success in rallying civil society reflectedthe growth of rights-based approaches in India, favouring ademand-based system over the passive beneficiary employmentprogrammes of the past.From 2001, Congress Party leaders, including party presidentSonia Gandhi, raised the issue in the national party. Congresshad been in opposition nationally since 1996, but held power inRajasthan. In 2003, the party suffered a demoralising loss in theRajasthan election and in other states, leading most to believethat it had no chance in the 2004 national election.Luckily for NREGA activists, impending political defeat weakenedthe resistance of fiscal conservatives in the Congress leadershipto a potentially costly employment guarantee, and also gaveimpetus to those who argued that Congress needed a strong,positive policy programme to revive its fortunes. These factorsled to an employment guarantee being included in the 2004Congress national manifesto.Although unrelated to its presence in the manifesto, theCongress alliance’s surprise victory in the 2004 general election,and its formation of a majority government with the support ofCASE STUDY217

FROM POVERTY TO POWERCASE STUDYtwo left-wing parties that had achieved unprecedented success,marked a watershed for the proposal. Electoral successreinforced the political arguments for action in the minds ofCongress leaders. Taken by surprise at its own victory, theparty’s leadership needed to rapidly cobble together a policyprogramme. The employment guarantee policy was not onlyready to go, but the presence of the left-wing parties would inany case have made it difficult to remove from the programme.A newly formed National Advisory Council, chaired by SoniaGandhi and including influential figures closely associated withthe NREGA, such as professor and activist Jean Drèze, activistAruna Roy, and Congress leader Jairam Ramesh, drew up a draftact based on the civil society draft from Rajasthan.By the time the National Rural Employment Guarantee Bill wassubmitted to Parliament in December 2004, however, theMinistry of Finance had introduced a number of clauses to limitthe government’s potential financial liability, sparking a row withactivists and left-wing leaders.A determined campaign, involving a 50-day march across thecountry’s poorest districts to spread awareness of the concept ofthe right to employment, sit-in protests, direct contacts withpoliticians, and public hearings – all of which won substantialmedia coverage – increased risks for politicians who openlysupported the Ministry of Finance restrictions, because theywould be seen as ‘anti-poor’.Before the bill was re-submitted to Parliament, Sonia Gandhiintervened to remove two of the Ministry of Finance’s demands:that the guarantee of employment could be terminated byadministrative decree; and that employment would be restrictedto applicants holding Below Poverty Line cards. She was alsosuccessful in ensuring that the scheme would be implementedmainly through the panchayats (elected village governments)rather than by national bureaucracies, an option preferred by theMinistry of Rural Development.At the last moment, a ‘corruption clause’ was inserted, permittingsuspension of the scheme should corruption be detected.Activists feared that this would create an incentive not to exposecorruption. In addition, despite attempts by activists to securestate minimum wages under the scheme, an amendment218

4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY SOCIAL PROTECTIONHOW CHANGE HAPPENS CASE STUDY:INDIA’S CAMPAIGN FOR A NATIONAL RURALEMPLOYMENT GUARANTEEFor the first time in his<strong>to</strong>ry, citizens of rural India are nowguaranteed a job. Within 15 days of a valid application, thegovernment is legally obliged <strong>to</strong> provide 100 days of unskilledwork per year on public works programmes. Activists, politicians,and academics have hailed the National Rural EmploymentGuarantee Act (NREGA), passed in August 2005, as vital forimproving the lot of rural workers.The Act was born of drought and rural distress in the state ofRajasthan, where civil society networks denounced the failure ofpublic food distribution and employment programmes <strong>to</strong> preventstarvation. Activists submitted a petition <strong>to</strong> the Supreme Court in2001 on the ‘Right <strong>to</strong> Food’, which received favourable interimdirectives. Encouraged, they drafted a Rajasthan StateEmployment Guarantee Act in 2003, though this was notimplemented.However, the activists’ success in rallying civil society reflectedthe growth of rights-based approaches in India, favouring ademand-based system over the passive beneficiary employmentprogrammes of the past.<strong>From</strong> 2001, Congress Party leaders, including party presidentSonia Gandhi, raised the issue in the national party. Congresshad been in opposition nationally since 1996, but held <strong>power</strong> inRajasthan. In 2003, the party suffered a demoralising loss in theRajasthan election and in other states, leading most <strong>to</strong> believethat it had no chance in the 2004 national election.Luckily for NREGA activists, impending political defeat weakenedthe resistance of fiscal conservatives in the Congress leadership<strong>to</strong> a potentially costly employment guarantee, and also gaveimpetus <strong>to</strong> those who argued that Congress needed a strong,positive policy programme <strong>to</strong> revive its fortunes. These fac<strong>to</strong>rsled <strong>to</strong> an employment guarantee being included in the 2004Congress national manifes<strong>to</strong>.Although unrelated <strong>to</strong> its presence in the manifes<strong>to</strong>, theCongress alliance’s surprise vic<strong>to</strong>ry in the 2004 general election,and its formation of a majority government with the support ofCASE STUDY217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!