12.07.2015 Views

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FROM POVERTY TO POWERbetter off even in a shrinking economy, but in practice redistributionalone has never reduced <strong>poverty</strong> for more than brief interludes. Thesubstantial reduction in <strong>poverty</strong> in most OECD countries during thetwentieth century came through a combination of long-termeconomic growth and modest redistribution. 164According <strong>to</strong> the Commission on Growth and Development, invery poor countries growth is the main route <strong>to</strong> <strong>poverty</strong> reduction,but as a country develops redistribution becomes more important asa way <strong>to</strong> reduce <strong>poverty</strong>. 165 As economies grow worldwide, redistributiontherefore should become an increasingly important feature ofgovernment policy.Economic growth is a measure of the increase in the output ofgoods and services in the monetised part of the economy. Growth mayresult from an increase in the number of workers or an increase intheir productivity (producing more goods and services per worker).The latter can be achieved through better technology, throughimproving the health and skills of the workforce, discovering anddeveloping new natural resources, and through greater efficiency via‘economies of scale’. Upgrading in this way often requires painfulstructural change,such as moving out of agriculture in<strong>to</strong> manufacturingor higher-tech companies squeezing out lower-tech ones, a processmemorably described by the economist Joseph Schumpeter as the‘creative destruction’ at the heart of capitalism. 167For neoclassical economists and for many policy makers, growthin the market economy is so important that they often lose sight of thefact that growth is a means <strong>to</strong> promote human welfare, not an end initself. But growth is inherently disequalising, since richer peoplegenerally find it easier than those living in <strong>poverty</strong> <strong>to</strong> take advantage ofnew opportunities and <strong>to</strong> protect themselves from shocks. Effectivestates are essential <strong>to</strong> containing and reversing this disruption, forexample through taxation, spending, credit, and regional policies andinvestment decisions.At a global level, growth is an increasingly blunt instrument forreducing <strong>poverty</strong>. Between 1981 and 2001, world GDP increased by$18,691bn. Of this, only $278bn, or 1.5 per cent, accrued <strong>to</strong> peopleliving below the $1-a-day <strong>poverty</strong> line, even though they constitutedone in three of the world’s population at the start of the period.180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!