From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec
From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec
3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR, PUBLIC INTERESTand environmental impact of a company’s core business model(which is what really counts in determining its development impact).CSR is examined at greater length on pages 349–50.A number of factors are pushing TNCs in the direction of socialresponsibility. The increasing focus of many corporations on domesticmarkets in countries such as China and India should encourage themto take a more long-term view, since social and political stability andprosperity hold the key to their future profitability. The growingimportance of brand and reputation, both to customers and theirability to employ and retain the best recruits, means that corporateleaders are placing more attention on ‘non-financial risk’, includingpublic criticism of their social and environmental impacts. The concernsof their main shareholders, such as large pension funds, about thelong-term impact of corporate misbehaviour on share value and thewider economy are another motivating factor. In developing countries,an increasingly independent media, together with vocal citizens’groups, means that companies’‘licence to operate’ is no longer merelya question of bribing a few government officials.However, firms are not merely passive followers of external signals.Within any given industry, different firms can choose to follow differentstrategies, with dramatically different impacts on people living inpoverty. Following a financial crisis and devaluation in Indonesia in1998, Unilever reacted to higher import prices by switching to sourcinglocally, whereas other foreign companies in the same consumer goodssector closed down altogether. 157 As a result, Unilever’s business decisionincreased its local linkages, while exiting companies added to risingunemployment levels.Corporate leadership can be crucial at such ‘fork in the road’moments of decision,but important roles are also played by active citizensand local communities where TNCs operate. In Eastern Zambia, thearrival of the South African supermarket chain Shoprite spelled disasterfor local farmers. Not only did the supermarket take away many of theircustomers, it would not buy the farmers’ produce, preferring to importhigher-quality goods from South Africa. Unrest became widespread asrural incomes plummeted and local businesses saw Shoprite scoop up thebest premises in town. Even those employed by the company resented theway that all its senior managers were brought in from South Africa.177
FROM POVERTY TO POWERLocal NGOs and academics got involved, alerting ‘Mr Fritz’,Shoprite’s ‘big boss’ in the capital, Lusaka, that the local communitywas threatening to burn down the store unless the company changedits ways. A university professor helped win over the company by settingout a plausible business case for local sourcing, given the unreliabilityof road transport links to South Africa. Thanks to a series of partnershipsbacked by Shoprite, farmers were able to raise their standards ofproduction, and the supermarket switched to local suppliers withoutsignificant reductions in quality or damage to its profitability.Shoprite is now expanding the scheme to its other stores in Zambia. 158A healthy private sector is essential in the fight against poverty andinequality. Private firms, large and small, must be able to turn a profit,but should do so in ways that strengthen national development andbenefit poor women and men.Companies can choose to adopt strategiesthat aim to profit by investing in, rather than by exploiting, theirworkforce, the environment, or the community.In the Shoprite example, active citizens used broad mobilisation(backed, admittedly, by the threat of violence) to successfully changecorporate policies and practices. Parallel to popular action, effectivestates must ensure that good companies are not undermined by bad,because in too many situations business pressures undermine goodintentions. In developing countries, states can help harness the privatesector for development by setting minimum standards for all, andshifting the centre of gravity from ‘exploit for profit’ to ‘invest for profit’.Measures include properly funding labour inspectorates and guaranteeingan enabling environment for businesses, particularly SMEs,through improved access to credit and technology. In the North,governments can use regulation to improve the development impactof TNCs, an issue discussed in Part 5.178
- Page 144 and 145: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 146 and 147: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 148 and 149: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 150 and 151: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 152 and 153: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 154 and 155: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 156 and 157: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 158 and 159: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 160 and 161: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 162 and 163: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 164 and 165: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 166 and 167: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 168 and 169: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 170 and 171: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 172 and 173: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 174 and 175: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 176 and 177: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 178 and 179: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 180 and 181: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 182 and 183: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 184 and 185: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 186 and 187: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR
- Page 188 and 189: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR
- Page 190 and 191: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR
- Page 192 and 193: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR
- Page 196 and 197: GOING FOR GROWTHFifty years ago, Ko
- Page 198 and 199: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH GOING FOR GROW
- Page 200 and 201: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH GOING FOR GROW
- Page 202 and 203: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH GOING FOR GROW
- Page 204 and 205: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH GOING FOR GROW
- Page 206 and 207: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH GOING FOR GROW
- Page 208 and 209: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH GOING FOR GROW
- Page 210 and 211: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH GOING FOR GROW
- Page 212 and 213: SUSTAINABLE MARKETSIn using markets
- Page 214 and 215: PART FOURLiving with risk 198Social
- Page 216 and 217: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY LIVING WIT
- Page 218 and 219: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY LIVING WIT
- Page 220 and 221: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY LIVING WIT
- Page 222 and 223: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY LIVING WIT
- Page 224 and 225: SOCIAL PROTECTIONIt may seem surpri
- Page 226 and 227: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY SOCIAL PRO
- Page 228 and 229: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY SOCIAL PRO
- Page 230 and 231: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY SOCIAL PRO
- Page 232 and 233: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY SOCIAL PRO
- Page 234 and 235: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY SOCIAL PRO
- Page 236 and 237: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY SOCIAL PRO
- Page 238 and 239: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY FINANCEwil
- Page 240 and 241: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY FINANCEinc
- Page 242 and 243: 4 RISK AND VULNERABILITY HUNGER AND
3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR, PUBLIC INTERESTand environmental impact of a company’s core business model(which is what really counts in determining its development impact).CSR is examined at greater length on pages 349–50.A number of fac<strong>to</strong>rs are pushing TNCs in the direction of socialresponsibility. The increasing focus of many corporations on domesticmarkets in countries such as China and India should encourage them<strong>to</strong> take a more long-term view, since social and political stability andprosperity hold the key <strong>to</strong> their future profitability. The growingimportance of brand and reputation, both <strong>to</strong> cus<strong>to</strong>mers and theirability <strong>to</strong> employ and retain the best recruits, means that corporateleaders are placing more attention on ‘non-financial risk’, includingpublic criticism of their social and environmental impacts. The concernsof their main shareholders, such as large pension funds, about thelong-term impact of corporate misbehaviour on share value and thewider economy are another motivating fac<strong>to</strong>r. In developing countries,an increasingly independent media, <strong>to</strong>gether with vocal citizens’groups, means that companies’‘licence <strong>to</strong> operate’ is no longer merelya question of bribing a few government officials.However, firms are not merely passive followers of external signals.Within any given industry, different firms can choose <strong>to</strong> follow differentstrategies, with dramatically different impacts on people living in<strong>poverty</strong>. Following a financial crisis and devaluation in Indonesia in1998, Unilever reacted <strong>to</strong> higher import prices by switching <strong>to</strong> sourcinglocally, whereas other foreign companies in the same consumer goodssec<strong>to</strong>r closed down al<strong>to</strong>gether. 157 As a result, Unilever’s business decisionincreased its local linkages, while exiting companies added <strong>to</strong> risingunemployment levels.Corporate leadership can be crucial at such ‘fork in the road’moments of decision,but important roles are also played by active citizensand local communities where TNCs operate. In Eastern Zambia, thearrival of the South African supermarket chain Shoprite spelled disasterfor local farmers. Not only did the supermarket take away many of theircus<strong>to</strong>mers, it would not buy the farmers’ produce, preferring <strong>to</strong> importhigher-quality goods from South Africa. Unrest became widespread asrural incomes plummeted and local businesses saw Shoprite scoop up thebest premises in <strong>to</strong>wn. Even those employed by the company resented theway that all its senior managers were brought in from South Africa.177