From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

12.07.2015 Views

3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR, PUBLIC INTERESTSouthern Brazil’s shoe industry or Bangalore’s software cluster. Fortheir part, SMEs need to strengthen their industry associations, so thattheir voice is not drowned out by the well-organised lobbyists of largedomestic companies and TNCs, whose interests are not alwayscompatible with those of small companies. SMEs have also beenwrongly left out of the debates on corporate social responsibility. Justas with large firms, there are both good and bad SMEs, and pressure isneeded to push firms towards responsible social and environmentalpractices.LARGE FIRMSLarge companies, whether under national or foreign ownership, alsoplay a crucial role in economic development and in the lives of poorpeople. Although they tend to be more capital-intensive than SMEs,and so create relatively fewer jobs, they have a wider role in that theycontrol complex production and distribution chains, and introducetechnology that is then picked up by smaller firms.Oxfam’s analysis of Unilever’s ‘poverty footprint’ in Indonesiashowed that, overall, the firm’s operations generate about 300,000full-time equivalent (FTE) jobs. Strikingly, more than half of thesejobs are in Unilever’s ‘downstream’ distribution and retail chain, withonly about one-third ‘upstream’ in the part that makes inputs for thecompany’s products. The value added within the value chain is evenmore dispersed than the benefits of employment within the chain,with Unilever itself accounting for only $212m of the estimated totalof $633m in added value from its operations. 141Large firms are typically better connected with decision-makers,and use that influence to ensure that state policies serve their interestsby giving them tax breaks and other incentives, guaranteeing themhigh profits, minimising competition, or ensuring privileged access tostate spending.In recent years, global companies have entered low-incomeconsumer markets, epitomised by banks selling microfinance servicesor companies selling shampoo and other goods in individual sachetsrather than by the bottle. Deploying vast advertising and salescampaigns to promote their brands, such TNCs have displaced large171

FROM POVERTY TO POWERlocal producers and SMEs. Brands are a crucial asset for major corporationsin their quest for consumer allegiance, and represent a seriousnew obstacle for smaller businesses obliged to compete with thebigger players.While large foreign companies account for a minority of overallinvestment and employment, their clout is increasing, both in termsof investment volume and the introduction of new technology ormanagement practices that domestically owned companies thenfollow. Driven by waves of privatisation, deregulation, and the growthof global production chains, the past 15 years have seen levels offoreign direct investment (FDI) to developing countries increaserapidly – from $43bn in 1990 to $316bn in 2006. 142Although it is often pointed out that FDI has flowed mainly to thebig economies, this largely reflects their greater economic power andlarger populations. Five countries – Brazil, China, India, Mexico, andthe Russian Federation – accounted for 46 per cent of net FDI inflowsin 2005, but this compared with a 55 per cent share of developingcountrypopulation and 63 per cent of their GDP. 143South–South investment is rising faster than North–South flows,as firms in China, India, South Africa, and the East Asian tigers gomultinational. Compared with their developed-country counterparts,southern TNCs are more likely to be state-owned and many arebased in the primary sector (oil, gas, mining) or resource-based manufacturingsuch as iron, steel, and cement. 144 Malaysian and SouthAfrican investors contributed almost a third of the foreign exchangeraised by privatisation efforts in the poorest countries between 1989and 1998. All the major players in the African telecommunicationssector are from other developing countries; these companies havebeen able to use their operating experience in their home markets tocope with the particular risks of doing business in poor countries. 145172

FROM POVERTY TO POWERlocal producers and SMEs. Brands are a crucial asset for major corporationsin their quest for consumer allegiance, and represent a seriousnew obstacle for smaller businesses obliged <strong>to</strong> compete with thebigger players.While large foreign companies account for a minority of overallinvestment and employment, their clout is increasing, both in termsof investment volume and the introduction of new technology ormanagement practices that domestically owned companies thenfollow. Driven by waves of privatisation, deregulation, and the growthof global production chains, the past 15 years have seen levels offoreign direct investment (FDI) <strong>to</strong> developing countries increaserapidly – from $43bn in 1990 <strong>to</strong> $316bn in 2006. 142Although it is often pointed out that FDI has flowed mainly <strong>to</strong> thebig economies, this largely reflects their greater economic <strong>power</strong> andlarger populations. Five countries – Brazil, China, India, Mexico, andthe Russian Federation – accounted for 46 per cent of net FDI inflowsin 2005, but this compared with a 55 per cent share of developingcountrypopulation and 63 per cent of their GDP. 143South–South investment is rising faster than North–South flows,as firms in China, India, South Africa, and the East Asian tigers gomultinational. Compared with their developed-country counterparts,southern TNCs are more likely <strong>to</strong> be state-owned and many arebased in the primary sec<strong>to</strong>r (oil, gas, mining) or resource-based manufacturingsuch as iron, steel, and cement. 144 Malaysian and SouthAfrican inves<strong>to</strong>rs contributed almost a third of the foreign exchangeraised by privatisation efforts in the poorest countries between 1989and 1998. All the major players in the African telecommunicationssec<strong>to</strong>r are from other developing countries; these companies havebeen able <strong>to</strong> use their operating experience in their home markets <strong>to</strong>cope with the particular risks of doing business in poor countries. 145172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!