From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

12.07.2015 Views

3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING WORLD OF WORKThe situation of women workers in global industries is a battlegroundbetween competing visions of economic development, withconsequences for all workers and for the fight against inequality andpoverty. One vision recognises caring work as a vital component ofeconomies and affirms the responsibilities of the state and employersto contribute ‘employment benefits’ and taxes as investments in maintaininga healthy, trained, and productive workforce. The opposingvision ignores the caring economy and treats as ‘savings’ and ‘efficiency’company or government policies to shed the costs of workers’ health,leave time, incapacity, or old age.Although the latter vision ignores the costs of maintaining ahealthy society, these do not go away. They shift to workers, withwomen paying the highest price through their unpaid caring labourand their low wages. Women are ground down by long hours, lowwages, and anxiety, and such ‘indecent work’ fails even to guaranteesufficient food on the table.For years, ILO conventions and the welfare state promoted sharedresponsibility for such costs, divided between the state, the privatesector, and the worker. Replacing welfare state policies (and tradeunion aspirations) based on rights with an exclusive emphasis onresponsibilities (for example, the responsibility of workers to providetheir own support for unpaid caring costs) undermines both workers’lives and the capacity of growth to generate decent jobs, transformlives, and galvanise economies.To ensure that hard-won labour rights are not swept away, but areextended to women and others in the new economy, will requireinnovative and dynamic organisation, backed by effective andaccountable states. It is a huge test for the labour movement, thewomen’s movement, and enlightened business leaders. Globally,organisations such as the UN and the ILO can play an influential role,as can consumers and retailers. At the very least, the outside worldmust help, not hinder, the struggle for workers’ basic rights.167

FROM POVERTY TO POWERPRIVATE SECTOR, PUBLIC INTERESTAs poor men and women seek to feed their families and build betterlives,they grapple with a range of risks and opportunities,their strategiesconstantly evolving to cope with change. In this effort, the market isthe sea in which they swim, and the main denizens of that sea areprivate sector companies.The private sector spans all private, for-profit businesses, fromgiant transnational corporations to backstreet workshops and marketstalls. In the formal economy, private firms enjoy both rights (forexample, limited liability in the case of financial collapse) and responsibilities(to obey laws, for example on working conditions and taxation).How companies balance their rights and responsibilities – that is,whether they have long-term or short-term mindsets, respect labourrights, consider their impact on local communities, or manage theirenvironmental footprint – is determined by the actions of states andcitizens, and the will of their owners, managers, and staff.Private firms directly influence the lives of poor people in six mainways: they provide products and services; generate income and investment;create jobs; develop skills through training and experience;transfer and develop technology; and establish physical and institutionalinfrastructure. Firms also exert indirect influence, for examplethrough their impact on the environment, or in lobbying for changesto government rules and practices.168

3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING WORLD OF WORKThe situation of women workers in global industries is a battlegroundbetween competing visions of economic development, withconsequences for all workers and for the fight against inequality and<strong>poverty</strong>. One vision recognises caring work as a vital component ofeconomies and affirms the responsibilities of the state and employers<strong>to</strong> contribute ‘employment benefits’ and taxes as investments in maintaininga healthy, trained, and productive workforce. The opposingvision ignores the caring economy and treats as ‘savings’ and ‘efficiency’company or government policies <strong>to</strong> shed the costs of workers’ health,leave time, incapacity, or old age.Although the latter vision ignores the costs of maintaining ahealthy society, these do not go away. They shift <strong>to</strong> workers, withwomen paying the highest price through their unpaid caring labourand their low wages. Women are ground down by long hours, lowwages, and anxiety, and such ‘indecent work’ fails even <strong>to</strong> guaranteesufficient food on the table.For years, ILO conventions and the welfare state promoted sharedresponsibility for such costs, divided between the state, the privatesec<strong>to</strong>r, and the worker. Replacing welfare state policies (and tradeunion aspirations) based on rights with an exclusive emphasis onresponsibilities (for example, the responsibility of workers <strong>to</strong> providetheir own support for unpaid caring costs) undermines both workers’lives and the capacity of growth <strong>to</strong> generate decent jobs, transformlives, and galvanise economies.To ensure that hard-won labour rights are not swept away, but areextended <strong>to</strong> women and others in the new economy, will requireinnovative and dynamic organisation, backed by effective andaccountable states. It is a huge test for the labour movement, thewomen’s movement, and enlightened business leaders. Globally,organisations such as the UN and the ILO can play an influential role,as can consumers and retailers. At the very least, the outside worldmust help, not hinder, the struggle for workers’ basic rights.167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!