From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec
From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec
3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE LANDValley, as the evening sun lights up the plots of maize and the dusk isredolent with the smells of eucalyptus and herbs, 18-year-oldSegundino punctures the beauty of a tourist paradise: ‘We growmaize, potatoes, wheat, everything, but I want to finish school andcarry on studying. Farming is pure sacrifice. Here in the communityit’s just work and school. We play the odd game of football, but that’sabout it. I want to go to the city.’ 87Segundino’s words are echoed by young people in rural communitiesaround the world. Education, newspapers, radio, television, and theInternet, and consumerism more generally, have profoundly alteredthe way that rural people think about work, farming, and their – andmore particularly, their children’s – futures. Farming has become,often in little more than a decade,a low-status occupation to be avoided. 88Governments can slow the drain to overcrowded capitals by investingin provincial cities and revitalising local economies, but they are seldomable to stop it altogether. Where the productivity and welfare of smallfarmers can be increased through improved irrigation, credit,technology, and organisation, supporting agriculture is synonymouswith development.Where the land is exhausted or inhospitable, and productivityimprovements are unlikely, it may be better for governments and aiddonors to facilitate a dignified exit. The key is to give people the bestrange of positive choices: not obliging them to flee to the shanty townsin hunger and despair, but rather enabling them to make a positivedecision either to stay on the land, or to seek a better life in the city,because they are equipped with skills, capital, and the self-confidenceborn of power and voice, and can prosper in either environment.145
FROM POVERTY TO POWERHOW CHANGE HAPPENS CASE STUDYTHE FISHING COMMUNITIES OF TIKAMGARHTwo hundred men and sari-clad women sit clustered under giant shadetrees on the banks of a dried-up lake: a small pond choked with lilies is allthat remains of what should be a lake teeming with fish, built by kingsover 800 years ago, and recently restored by the community. Birdsong andvoices pierce the dry heat. The land is parched, but the story is uplifting.‘Previously we covered our faces in public,’ laughs one woman.‘Now wetalk back, even to our fathers-in-law.’ And not just fathers-in-law. Thepeople of Tikamgarh have come on an extraordinary journey, winningunprecedented rights to the fishponds, and transforming their own livesalong the way.CASE STUDYLandlords and contractors have traditionally controlled most fishpondsin the impoverished Bundelkhand region of India. Struggles forthe right to fish and to use the fertile land exposed when the ponds dry outduring drought have been violent and continuous, but the 45,000 fishingfamilies of the Bundelkhand seem to be gaining the upper hand.Over the past 20 years, the introduction of new varieties of fish and thepractice of stocking ponds with fish fry raised in nurseries have greatlyincreased yields. Rather than favouring poor people, however, such technologicalimprovements prompted landlords and contractors to seizeeven the smallest of the region’s 1,000 ponds.Protests led the fisheries minister in the Congress Party governmentof Madhya Pradesh, who was himself from a fishing community, to pushthrough legislation in 1996 that granted leases to fishers’ co-operatives.A wave of organisation in poor fishing communities followed. Vikalp,an NGO led by Om Prakash Rawat (a former State Electricity Boardengineer), played a crucial role in helping them to establish co-operatives.Contractors retaliated by setting up bogus co-operatives of their ownand using other tricks to get around the legislation, and when that failedthey resorted to violence. In a particularly bloody struggle overAchrumata Pond, fishers fought a pitched battle with thugs hired by landlordsto steal their fish. The thugs won the first round, burning down thevillagers’ huts, but the victims then turned to other villages for solidarity.146
- Page 112 and 113: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I RULE, THEREF
- Page 114 and 115: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I RULE, THEREF
- Page 116 and 117: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I RULE, THEREF
- Page 118 and 119: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I RULE, THEREF
- Page 120 and 121: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I RULE, THEREF
- Page 122 and 123: 2 POWER AND POLITICS FROM POVERTY T
- Page 124 and 125: PART THREEAn economics for the twen
- Page 126 and 127: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH A TWENTY-FIRST
- Page 128 and 129: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH A TWENTY-FIRST
- Page 130 and 131: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH A TWENTY-FIRST
- Page 132 and 133: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH A TWENTY-FIRST
- Page 134 and 135: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH A TWENTY-FIRST
- Page 136 and 137: LIVING OFF THE LANDThe smoky, cold
- Page 138 and 139: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 140 and 141: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 142 and 143: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 144 and 145: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 146 and 147: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 148 and 149: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 150 and 151: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 152 and 153: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 154 and 155: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 156 and 157: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 158 and 159: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 160 and 161: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 164 and 165: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 166 and 167: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 168 and 169: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 170 and 171: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 172 and 173: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 174 and 175: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 176 and 177: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 178 and 179: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 180 and 181: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 182 and 183: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 184 and 185: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 186 and 187: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR
- Page 188 and 189: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR
- Page 190 and 191: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR
- Page 192 and 193: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR
- Page 194 and 195: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR
- Page 196 and 197: GOING FOR GROWTHFifty years ago, Ko
- Page 198 and 199: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH GOING FOR GROW
- Page 200 and 201: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH GOING FOR GROW
- Page 202 and 203: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH GOING FOR GROW
- Page 204 and 205: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH GOING FOR GROW
- Page 206 and 207: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH GOING FOR GROW
- Page 208 and 209: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH GOING FOR GROW
- Page 210 and 211: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH GOING FOR GROW
FROM POVERTY TO POWERHOW CHANGE HAPPENS CASE STUDYTHE FISHING COMMUNITIES OF TIKAMGARHTwo hundred men and sari-clad women sit clustered under giant shadetrees on the banks of a dried-up lake: a small pond choked with lilies is allthat remains of what should be a lake teeming with fish, built by kingsover 800 years ago, and recently res<strong>to</strong>red by the community. Birdsong andvoices pierce the dry heat. The land is parched, but the s<strong>to</strong>ry is uplifting.‘Previously we covered our faces in public,’ laughs one woman.‘Now wetalk back, even <strong>to</strong> our fathers-in-law.’ And not just fathers-in-law. Thepeople of Tikamgarh have come on an extraordinary journey, winningunprecedented rights <strong>to</strong> the fishponds, and transforming their own livesalong the way.CASE STUDYLandlords and contrac<strong>to</strong>rs have traditionally controlled most fishpondsin the impoverished Bundelkhand region of India. Struggles forthe right <strong>to</strong> fish and <strong>to</strong> use the fertile land exposed when the ponds dry outduring drought have been violent and continuous, but the 45,000 fishingfamilies of the Bundelkhand seem <strong>to</strong> be gaining the upper hand.Over the past 20 years, the introduction of new varieties of fish and thepractice of s<strong>to</strong>cking ponds with fish fry raised in nurseries have greatlyincreased yields. Rather than favouring poor people, however, such technologicalimprovements prompted landlords and contrac<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> seizeeven the smallest of the region’s 1,000 ponds.Protests led the fisheries minister in the Congress Party governmen<strong>to</strong>f Madhya Pradesh, who was himself from a fishing community, <strong>to</strong> pushthrough legislation in 1996 that granted leases <strong>to</strong> fishers’ co-operatives.A wave of organisation in poor fishing communities followed. Vikalp,an NGO led by Om Prakash Rawat (a former State Electricity Boardengineer), played a crucial role in helping them <strong>to</strong> establish co-operatives.Contrac<strong>to</strong>rs retaliated by setting up bogus co-operatives of their ownand using other tricks <strong>to</strong> get around the legislation, and when that failedthey resorted <strong>to</strong> violence. In a particularly bloody struggle overAchrumata Pond, fishers fought a pitched battle with thugs hired by landlords<strong>to</strong> steal their fish. The thugs won the first round, burning down thevillagers’ huts, but the victims then turned <strong>to</strong> other villages for solidarity.146