From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec
From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec
3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE LANDBOX 3.2A BEGINNER’S GUIDE TO SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTUREKey principles are to:• Integrate natural biological and ecological processes suchas soil regeneration, predation, and parasitism into foodproduction;• Minimise the use of those non-renewable inputs that causeharm to the environment or to the health of farmers andconsumers;• Make productive use of the knowledge and skills of farmers;• Work together to solve common problems in areas such aspest, watershed, irrigation, forest, and credit management.Defining practices and technologies include:Integrated pest management, which uses ecosystem resilienceand diversity for pest, disease, and weed control;Integrated nutrient management, which seeks to fix nitrogenwithin farm systems rather than import nutrients, and to reducenutrient loss through erosion control;Conservation tillage, which reduces the amount of tillage,sometimes to zero, so that soil can be conserved and availablemoisture can be used more efficiently;Agroforestry, which incorporates multi-functional trees intoagricultural systems and collective management of nearby forestresources;Aquaculture, which incorporates fish, shrimp, and other aquaticresources into farm systems, to increase protein production;Water harvesting, which allows for irrigated cultivation of abandonedand degraded lands owing to better rainwater retention;Livestock integration, which incorporates livestock into farming,including the use of zero-grazing cut-and-carry systems.Source: J. Pretty (2006) ‘Agroecological Approaches To Agricultural Development’,background paper for World Development Report 2008, World Bank.131
FROM POVERTY TO POWERThe jury is also still out on whether the biofuel boom, and the scramblefor land it has triggered, will benefit small farmers and other poorpeople or generate sustained growth. 53 Biofuel plantations for maizeor sugar create jobs, but working conditions are often horrific, wagesare low, and the plantations can squeeze out small farmers. The chairof the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues recently warnedthat 60 million indigenous people worldwide face eviction from theirland to make way for biofuel plantations.In the case of palm oil, small farmers account for a significantproportion of total production in Indonesia and Malaysia, where 80per cent of the world’s palm oil is grown, and could stand to benefitfrom the boom. However, many of Indonesia’s 4.5 million smallproducers are heavily indebted to the companies that buy their crop,and have little power to negotiate decent prices. As with any othercommodity boom, the extent to which small producers can exercisepower in the new market will help to determine whether biofuelsexacerbate exclusion and inequality in the countryside, or whetherthey will provide new pathways out of poverty for small farmers.Moving arable land out of food production and into biofuelswill push up food prices: good news for farmers, but bad for poorconsumers, especially if it leads to global food shortages, as some fear.By early 2008, after several years in which demand outpaced supply,global food stocks had fallen to their lowest level in 20 years. 54 Thefinal irony is that some companies are deforesting land in order toplant palm oil, thus aggravating the global warming which motivatedthe biofuel boom in the first place.An extraordinary amount is being asked of agriculture. The WorldBank estimates that to meet projected demand (based on a combinationof rising population and changing dietary preferences), global cerealproduction will have to increase by nearly 50 per cent and meatproduction by 85 per cent between 2000 and 2030. In addition, theburgeoning demand for biofuels and animal feeds cuts into theproduction of staple foods. 55 Not only must yields rise (there is littlespare land, and the remaining forests must be conserved), but theymust do so sufficiently rapidly and cleanly to compensate for othernegative trends, such as climate change, salinisation, and deterioratingsoil fertility.132
- Page 98 and 99: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I VOTE, THEREF
- Page 100 and 101: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I VOTE, THEREF
- Page 102 and 103: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I VOTE, THEREF
- Page 104 and 105: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I STEAL, THERE
- Page 106 and 107: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I STEAL, THERE
- Page 108 and 109: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I RULE, THEREF
- Page 110 and 111: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I RULE, THEREF
- Page 112 and 113: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I RULE, THEREF
- Page 114 and 115: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I RULE, THEREF
- Page 116 and 117: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I RULE, THEREF
- Page 118 and 119: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I RULE, THEREF
- Page 120 and 121: 2 POWER AND POLITICS I RULE, THEREF
- Page 122 and 123: 2 POWER AND POLITICS FROM POVERTY T
- Page 124 and 125: PART THREEAn economics for the twen
- Page 126 and 127: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH A TWENTY-FIRST
- Page 128 and 129: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH A TWENTY-FIRST
- Page 130 and 131: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH A TWENTY-FIRST
- Page 132 and 133: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH A TWENTY-FIRST
- Page 134 and 135: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH A TWENTY-FIRST
- Page 136 and 137: LIVING OFF THE LANDThe smoky, cold
- Page 138 and 139: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 140 and 141: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 142 and 143: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 144 and 145: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 146 and 147: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 150 and 151: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 152 and 153: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 154 and 155: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 156 and 157: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 158 and 159: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 160 and 161: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 162 and 163: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 164 and 165: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE
- Page 166 and 167: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 168 and 169: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 170 and 171: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 172 and 173: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 174 and 175: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 176 and 177: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 178 and 179: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 180 and 181: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 182 and 183: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 184 and 185: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH THE CHANGING W
- Page 186 and 187: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR
- Page 188 and 189: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR
- Page 190 and 191: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR
- Page 192 and 193: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR
- Page 194 and 195: 3 POVERTY AND WEALTH PRIVATE SECTOR
- Page 196 and 197: GOING FOR GROWTHFifty years ago, Ko
FROM POVERTY TO POWERThe jury is also still out on whether the biofuel boom, and the scramblefor land it has triggered, will benefit small farmers and other poorpeople or generate sustained growth. 53 Biofuel plantations for maizeor sugar create jobs, but working conditions are often horrific, wagesare low, and the plantations can squeeze out small farmers. The chairof the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues recently warnedthat 60 million indigenous people worldwide face eviction from theirland <strong>to</strong> make way for biofuel plantations.In the case of palm oil, small farmers account for a significantproportion of <strong>to</strong>tal production in Indonesia and Malaysia, where 80per cent of the world’s palm oil is grown, and could stand <strong>to</strong> benefitfrom the boom. However, many of Indonesia’s 4.5 million smallproducers are heavily indebted <strong>to</strong> the companies that buy their crop,and have little <strong>power</strong> <strong>to</strong> negotiate decent prices. As with any othercommodity boom, the extent <strong>to</strong> which small producers can exercise<strong>power</strong> in the new market will help <strong>to</strong> determine whether biofuelsexacerbate exclusion and inequality in the countryside, or whetherthey will provide new pathways out of <strong>poverty</strong> for small farmers.Moving arable land out of food production and in<strong>to</strong> biofuelswill push up food prices: good news for farmers, but bad for poorconsumers, especially if it leads <strong>to</strong> global food shortages, as some fear.By early 2008, after several years in which demand outpaced supply,global food s<strong>to</strong>cks had fallen <strong>to</strong> their lowest level in 20 years. 54 Thefinal irony is that some companies are deforesting land in order <strong>to</strong>plant palm oil, thus aggravating the global warming which motivatedthe biofuel boom in the first place.An extraordinary amount is being asked of agriculture. The WorldBank estimates that <strong>to</strong> meet projected demand (based on a combinationof rising population and changing dietary preferences), global cerealproduction will have <strong>to</strong> increase by nearly 50 per cent and meatproduction by 85 per cent between 2000 and 2030. In addition, theburgeoning demand for biofuels and animal feeds cuts in<strong>to</strong> theproduction of staple foods. 55 Not only must yields rise (there is littlespare land, and the remaining forests must be conserved), but theymust do so sufficiently rapidly and cleanly <strong>to</strong> compensate for othernegative trends, such as climate change, salinisation, and deterioratingsoil fertility.132