From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec From poverty to power - Oxfam-Québec

12.07.2015 Views

3 POVERTY AND WEALTH LIVING OFF THE LANDcountries to try to manage the resource through licences andpermits, rather than seek ever larger catches. 43The Philippines, home to between one and two million fishers, ispiloting an alternative approach known as community-basedcoastal resource management (CB-CRM), whereby fishingcommunities are responsible for restoring ecosystems,patrolling fisheries, and monitoring impact. CB-CRM builds ona long tradition of organisation at both local and national levels.Started by the Filipino association Kilusang Mangingisda, whichis now a nationwide movement with approximately 400,000members, the CB-CRM approach has spread across South-EastAsia.With numbers and organisation came influence, and in 1996 thePhilippines government revised the fisheries law, establishingmunicipal jurisdiction over fishing grounds and creating municipalcouncils where government agencies and representatives offishing communities now discuss and agree on local fisheriesmanagement provisions. 44 Local fishers have seen a halt in thedecline of their catches, and in some cases even a recovery,though overfishing remains a problem.Source: L. van Mulekom (2007) ‘Reflections on Community Based Coastal ResourcesManagement (CB-CRM) in the Philippines and SE Asia’, Oxfam International internalpaper.GREEN REVOLUTION REDUXModernising and improving on largely traditional techniques forploughing, sowing, and harvesting is a mainstay of developmentpractice, and certainly part of the answer to the plight of small farmersand to the rising global demand for food. Some observers placeenormous hopes in the technological revolution under way in thelaboratories of universities and global corporations, trusting in arepeat of the phenomenal increase in agricultural productivity in Asiain the 1960s and 1970s known as the ‘Green Revolution’.The Green Revolution stemmed from two parallel initiatives.Better known is the widespread adoption of new rice and wheatvarieties, combined with the use of chemical fertiliser in largely irrigated127

FROM POVERTY TO POWERenvironments. But equally important was state investment in roads,irrigation, and other infrastructure and institutions to ensure stableprices for farmers. Together, these initiatives spurred significant successin reducing rural poverty, although many farmers went heavily intodebt as they had to invest in fertilisers and pesticides, and there wereserious knock-on effects on the environment.Recently, a number of major donors, led by the Gates and RockefellerFoundations, have set up the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa(AGRA), hoping to repeat the Asian experience. 45 They will face adrastically different terrain to their predecessors half a century ago.The first Green Revolution relied on strong civil-service institutions,functioning credit markets, a predominance of rice and wheatproduction, dense rural populations that made it cost-effective toprovide technical assistance and other services, and abundant waterfor irrigation. Africa, in contrast, has weak or non-existent agriculturalsupport institutions, insufficient water, and a profusion of staple foodcrops. 46 Moreover, the network of state-funded research that made theGreen Revolution possible has largely been supplanted by privatecorporate R&D.It is unlikely that any technological magic bullet will address allthese issues. Even more challenging is the fact that Asia’s achievementwas driven by drastically increasing the use of fossil fuels, irrigation,chemical fertilisers, and pesticides, all of which exacted an environmentalcost which is now coming home to roost. Modern agriculturehas bequeathed a world of exhausted and eroded topsoil, scarce water,irrigation-induced salinisation, water systems polluted by pesticideand fertiliser run-off, and reduced biodiversity. Not to mention globalwarming: agriculture and forestry produce an estimated one-third ofall greenhouse gases. 47In these conditions, incorporating small farmers into currentcommercial agriculture practices hardly appears to be a sustainableoption. All agriculture will have to adapt to growing environmentalconstraints. Technological innovation will undoubtedly play a largerole in such adaptation, and small farmers will have to organise andcultivate state support if they are to overcome their relative technologicalexclusion. If they do not, they risk being driven out of farmingaltogether.128

FROM POVERTY TO POWERenvironments. But equally important was state investment in roads,irrigation, and other infrastructure and institutions <strong>to</strong> ensure stableprices for farmers. Together, these initiatives spurred significant successin reducing rural <strong>poverty</strong>, although many farmers went heavily in<strong>to</strong>debt as they had <strong>to</strong> invest in fertilisers and pesticides, and there wereserious knock-on effects on the environment.Recently, a number of major donors, led by the Gates and RockefellerFoundations, have set up the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa(AGRA), hoping <strong>to</strong> repeat the Asian experience. 45 They will face adrastically different terrain <strong>to</strong> their predecessors half a century ago.The first Green Revolution relied on strong civil-service institutions,functioning credit markets, a predominance of rice and wheatproduction, dense rural populations that made it cost-effective <strong>to</strong>provide technical assistance and other services, and abundant waterfor irrigation. Africa, in contrast, has weak or non-existent agriculturalsupport institutions, insufficient water, and a profusion of staple foodcrops. 46 Moreover, the network of state-funded research that made theGreen Revolution possible has largely been supplanted by privatecorporate R&D.It is unlikely that any technological magic bullet will address allthese issues. Even more challenging is the fact that Asia’s achievementwas driven by drastically increasing the use of fossil fuels, irrigation,chemical fertilisers, and pesticides, all of which exacted an environmentalcost which is now coming home <strong>to</strong> roost. Modern agriculturehas bequeathed a world of exhausted and eroded <strong>to</strong>psoil, scarce water,irrigation-induced salinisation, water systems polluted by pesticideand fertiliser run-off, and reduced biodiversity. Not <strong>to</strong> mention globalwarming: agriculture and forestry produce an estimated one-third ofall greenhouse gases. 47In these conditions, incorporating small farmers in<strong>to</strong> currentcommercial agriculture practices hardly appears <strong>to</strong> be a sustainableoption. All agriculture will have <strong>to</strong> adapt <strong>to</strong> growing environmentalconstraints. Technological innovation will undoubtedly play a largerole in such adaptation, and small farmers will have <strong>to</strong> organise andcultivate state support if they are <strong>to</strong> overcome their relative technologicalexclusion. If they do not, they risk being driven out of farmingal<strong>to</strong>gether.128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!