30.11.2012 Views

Tamarind monograph.pdf - Crops for the Future

Tamarind monograph.pdf - Crops for the Future

Tamarind monograph.pdf - Crops for the Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SriVaseeki, 2001). Maksoud et al. (1994), also observed significant<br />

increases in growth parameters and leaf P and K contents when tamarind<br />

seedlings were planted in pots inoculated with VAM and uptake of P and N<br />

is enhanced (Trate and SriVaseeki, 2001). The occurrence of VAM in soils<br />

varies (Gurumurthy and Sreeivasa, 2000; Ishii, 2000) and <strong>the</strong>re may be <strong>the</strong><br />

need to inoculate artificially. Inoculating tamarind seed with mycorrhizal<br />

inoculations of Glomus fasciculatum and Pisolithus tinctorius stimulated<br />

plant growth and P and N uptake compared to <strong>the</strong>ir non-mycorrhizal (NM)<br />

plants both under water stress and non-stress regimes (Vijaya and Srivasuki,<br />

2001).<br />

Guissou et al. (2001) studied <strong>the</strong> effects of inoculation with an AM fungus,<br />

Glomus aggregatum on water stress tolerance of four fruit trees including<br />

T. indica L. in a P-deficient soil (2.18 mug/g P-Bray I). Results showed that<br />

G. aggregatum stimulated growth and mineral nutrition of fruit trees but did<br />

not improve <strong>the</strong>ir stress tolerance.<br />

Container grown seedlings of several leguminous species including tamarind<br />

were inoculated with three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF): Glomus<br />

faciculatum, G. mosseae and Gigaspora margarita. Mycorrhizal fungi<br />

colonised differentially on <strong>the</strong> tree species tested and <strong>the</strong> overall growth<br />

responses were best <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> legumes o<strong>the</strong>r than tamarind (Selvaraj et al.,<br />

1996). The response to AM appears be much reduced when compared with<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r species of legume.<br />

Functional compatibility between 13 tropical fruit trees - including tamarind<br />

- and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) G. aggregatum and G.<br />

intraradices was investigated (Ba et al. 2000). Marked differences were<br />

found between <strong>the</strong>m in terms of mycorrhizal <strong>for</strong>mation, root colonisation,<br />

relative mycorrhizal dependency (RMD) and phosphorus concentrations in<br />

shoot tissues. Five of <strong>the</strong>m showed dependency by a positive interaction<br />

with G. aggregatum, <strong>the</strong> most effective AMF. <strong>Tamarind</strong> was highly<br />

dependent (50-75% RMD). Phosphorus absorption probably contributed to<br />

this dependency more than <strong>the</strong> absorption of potassium. These results<br />

indicate that some tropical fruit trees do derive benefits from AM<br />

inoculation, while o<strong>the</strong>rs do not.<br />

Application of inoculums to <strong>the</strong> pits be<strong>for</strong>e transplanting <strong>the</strong> seedlings would<br />

<strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e be an effective method of introduction of <strong>the</strong> VAM fungus.<br />

Parameswari et al. (2001 d) found that pelleting tamarind seed with<br />

Azospirillum @ 50 g kg -1 and inoculating with VAM @ 5 g polypot -1<br />

improved <strong>the</strong> seed germination and growth characters up to three months<br />

and aided in elite seedling production of tamarind.<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!