30.11.2012 Views

Tamarind monograph.pdf - Crops for the Future

Tamarind monograph.pdf - Crops for the Future

Tamarind monograph.pdf - Crops for the Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

light yellow in colour, have been reported to contain high nitrogenase<br />

activity (Quiniones, 1983). Rhizobial isolates from <strong>the</strong> Philippines have been<br />

described as gram negative, with short and long rods (Quiniones, 1983). In<br />

<strong>the</strong> semi-arid region of Nigeria, tamarind has been recognised as a potential<br />

nitrogen fixing tree (Okoro et al., 1986).<br />

In Thailand, Towprayoon et al. (1996) and Chiemsombat et al. (1996)<br />

reported negative results following inoculation with Rhizobium as <strong>the</strong>re was<br />

no indication of nodule <strong>for</strong>mation or <strong>the</strong> association of <strong>the</strong> Rhizobium with<br />

<strong>the</strong> tamarind roots. Also in Pakistan, Qadri and Zehra, (2004) reported that<br />

<strong>the</strong> roots of tamarind do not develop nodule-like structures and have no<br />

bacteria or Rhizobium association commonly observed in o<strong>the</strong>r leguminous<br />

plants. The acetylene reduction assay <strong>for</strong> nitrogen-fixing activity was unable<br />

to demonstrate any symbiotic nitrogen fixation in tamarind roots and<br />

nitrogen-fixing bacteria were absent in <strong>the</strong> roots. The most outstanding<br />

feature noted in <strong>the</strong> roots were finger-like projections called ‘microvilli,’<br />

whose function is unknown, but it has been suggested that <strong>the</strong>y assist in<br />

water absorption. Detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation on <strong>the</strong> root structure of tamarind is<br />

limited.<br />

Yoneyama et al. (1993) studied <strong>the</strong> natural abundance of 15 N (delta 15 N)<br />

in leaves harvested from tropical legumes in Brazil and Thailand. The 15 N<br />

values were lower in Sesbania grandiflora, Leucaena leucocephala and<br />

Casuarina species pointing to a major contribution from N-fixation, while<br />

those of tamarind had high delta 15 N values. Many of <strong>the</strong> above studies<br />

have proved inconclusive. The ability of tamarind to fix atmospheric N<br />

deserves fur<strong>the</strong>r investigation. If specific rhizobia could be identified, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

could be used to enhance nitrogen nutrition and thus increase <strong>the</strong> growth rate<br />

of this species.<br />

Ilango et al. (2000) carried out a series of experiments to test <strong>the</strong> effects of<br />

microbial nodulants, Rhizobium ALM2, 108cells/g and Pseudomodules<br />

striata PBZ, 109 cells/g on growth, biomass production and nutrient uptake<br />

in tamarind at <strong>the</strong> nursery stage. The combined preparation clearly increased<br />

root and shoot length and total leaf area compared to no modulation. There<br />

was thought to be a symbiosis between <strong>the</strong> micro-organisms that helped <strong>the</strong><br />

availability and uptake of nutrients.<br />

5.4.3.3 Mycorrhizal associations<br />

<strong>Tamarind</strong> seedlings inoculated with 13 arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)<br />

from various sources around <strong>the</strong> world have been demonstrated to exhibit<br />

increased leaf number, plant height, stem girth, biomass, phosphate and zinc<br />

content. The number of VAM spores in <strong>the</strong> soil, percentage root colonisation<br />

and external hyphae measured by soil aggregation were also higher.<br />

<strong>Tamarind</strong> responded best to inoculation with Gigaspora margarita, Glomus<br />

fasciculatum and Pisolithus tinctorius (Reena and Bagyaraj, 1990; Trate and<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!