30.11.2012 Views

Tamarind monograph.pdf - Crops for the Future

Tamarind monograph.pdf - Crops for the Future

Tamarind monograph.pdf - Crops for the Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.3.3 India<br />

In India, most of <strong>the</strong> area under tamarind cultivation is planted with<br />

unselected, inferior cultivars. Selections from tamarind provenances are<br />

available. The Bharata Agricultural and Industrial Foundation (BAIF), Pune,<br />

India has attempted to supply improved planting material to smallholders by<br />

selecting superior trees from among existing natural populations. The<br />

parameters <strong>for</strong> selection of superior trees have been based entirely on pod<br />

characters such as pod length, pod colour and pulp yield per pod (Daniel,<br />

1999; personal communication) and <strong>the</strong> association of fruit characters has<br />

been worked out (Karale et al., 1999), as well as genotype x environment<br />

effects of different locations on fruit size grades (Parameswari et al., 2000).<br />

Under this programme, 15 superior tamarind provenances have been<br />

identified and a multiplication stand has been established in <strong>the</strong> BAIF's<br />

Central Research Station in Pune. Among <strong>the</strong>m, selections such as<br />

Prathisthan from Maharashtra and Periyakulam (PKM-1) and Urigam from<br />

Tamil Nadu are well established and preferred by farmers. The most<br />

preferred cultivar is Periyakulam 1 (PKM-1), a sour type, a clonal selection<br />

from a local <strong>for</strong>m in a village named Endapalli near Periyakulam. The<br />

Horticultural Research Station of <strong>the</strong> Tamil Nadu Agricultural University,<br />

Periyakulam, released this cultivar which is an early bearer, especially when<br />

grafted when <strong>the</strong>y come into bearing from <strong>the</strong> third year (compared with <strong>the</strong><br />

fifth year in <strong>the</strong> local <strong>for</strong>m). It has a pulp recovery percentage of 39%<br />

compared to <strong>the</strong> local cultivar which is 28%. The yield is also higher in <strong>the</strong><br />

Periyakulam cultivar, with 263 kg/tree against 167 kg/tree in <strong>the</strong> local<br />

cultivar (Daniel, 1999, personal communication).<br />

Studies were also undertaken to select high yielding cultivars based on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

flowering pattern. In seedling populations, early, mid and late flowering<br />

tamarind types have been identified. Duration of flowering is longer in late<br />

flowering trees than in mid and early flowering trees. In mid and late<br />

flowering trees natural cross-pollination is greater than with early flowering<br />

trees which are mostly self-pollinated under natural conditions. Hence mid<br />

and late flowering trees can be selected and are most suitable <strong>for</strong> selection<br />

<strong>for</strong> improvement (Usha and Singh, 1994).<br />

There is also interest in India in using fruit tree genotypes <strong>for</strong> ameliorating<br />

marginal farmland, e.g. in semi-arid areas of Gujarat (see <strong>for</strong> instance Patel<br />

and Singh, 2000), or wastelands as in Tamil Nadhu (see Madhu et al., 2001).<br />

Pareek (1999) lists selections ‘Yogesharai’, ‘PKM’, ‘T3’ and ‘TIB’ as<br />

suitable cultivars <strong>for</strong> arid zones.<br />

8.3.4 Current constraints<br />

The preliminary studies undertaken by different countries provide ample<br />

evidence on <strong>the</strong> status of germplasm evaluations of tamarind. It is also<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!