Cytogenetic variations in Clarias species 277of 2n = 54. Furthermore, sex chromosomes wereobserved as ZW heteromorphic pair in femalehybrid karyotypes. The ZZ chromosome pair inmale hybrids was similar to that found in male C.gariepinus and male H. longifilis.Hartley (1987) divided the species of thesub-order: Salmonidea into two groups (categoriesA and B) based on chromosome number,chromosome arm number, and the distribution ofone-armed and two-armed chromosomes.Category A karyotypes were widespread both interms of geographic distribution and number ofspecies, while category B karyotypes wererestricted to member of the genera Salmo andOncorhynchus. In category A, it was assumedthat tetraploidy followed arrangement of thediploid ancestral karyotype of 2n = 50, NF = 60(the lowest diploid and chromosome arm numberfound in the smolts) and that the resultingancestral tetraploid salmon had 2n = 100, NF =120 karyotype. Hartley (1987) observed that aseries of pericentric inversion and centric fusionshad reduced chromosome number andchromosome arm number through Brachymystazlenok Gunter, 1866, (2n = 94, NF = 116) andHucho hucho Gunter, 1866, (2n = 82, NF = 114)to the category A karyotypes (2n = 80, NF = 100)and finally to the category B karyotypes (2n = 60,NF = 104). He concluded that by the time thecategory B karyotypes were achieved, centricfusions had played a far greater role in theevolution of the vast majority o the salmonidskaryotypes than pericentric inversions, althoughthe latter had played important role in theevolution of the Atlantic salmon karyotype.The karyotypic evolution of tenNeotropical cichlids showed that the chromosomeevolution of the group was more conservative thandivergent (Feldberg and Bertollo, 1985). Allspecies had a chromosome number of 2n = 48,though with some differences in chromosomemorphology. Pericentric inversions were probablythe main event that led to the karyotypes morecommonly found in this group. On the basis offundamental number (FN), four general groupsreflected the occurrence of a progressive numberof chromosome rearrangements. Group one withFN = 48, (represented by Chaetobranchopsisaustralis Eigenmann and Ward 1907), group twowith FN = 50 – 52 (comprising Geophagusbrasiliensis Heckel, 1840; G. surinamensis Heckel,1840 and Gymnogeophagus balzanii Ribeiro,1918), group three with FN = 54 (represented byCrenicichla lacustris Ribeiro, 1918, C. lepidotaHenkel, 1840 and C. vittala Heckel, 1840 and toBatrachops semifasciatus Heckel, 1840), groupfour with FN = 58 – 60 (represented by Astronotusocellatus Swainson, 1839 and Cichlasoma facetumSwainson, 1839) (Feldberg and Bertollo, 1985).Despite the constancy of chromosome number, 2n= 48, a few distinctive characteristics which areproducts of structural rearrangements ofchromosomes that occurred during their karyotypicevolution can be seen in some species or group ofspecies.Ichthyologists and fish taxonomists in theclassification of related species have often employknowledge from karyotype. For instance, thelarval forms of most species are morphologicallyidentical and quite different from the adult forms.Because of the resemblance among larval forms,their identification if often difficult. Morphologicalobservations are inadequate vis-à-vis theidentification of the species, except where thedevelopmental stages can be followed, which isusually difficult and not documented for many fishspecies. In such cases, Sola et al. (1981) notedthat the knowledge of the karyotype and theirdiversified forms might provide a precisediagnostic criterion. Oliveria et al. (1988) basedthe classification of Neotropic Ostrariophysi onkaryotypic data and noted that 2n = 50 tend toprevail among Ostrariophysi. This character wasalso seen among the Otophysi (2n = 50). TheCypriniformes have a second modal number of 2n= 100, often seen among the families ofCyprinidae and Catostanidae. Yu et al. (1987)proposed that the cypriniformes might haveoriginated from 2n = 50 ancestors. Thecharaciphysi and characiformes differ from thecypriniforms by having almost 2n = 54. Amongthe characiformes, several groups may becharacterized based on their chromosome number.The characiforms, erythrinidae and lebiasinidae aretypified by chromosome number of less than 2n =54 while the Serrasalminae are characterized bychromosome number of more than 2n = 54.From the foregoing review, karyotypicinformation appears to be very important indiscriminating species. The technical andinterpretation problems often encountered by fishcytologists should not be employed as a base forjudging the validity of karyotypic information vis-àvisclassification of related and unrelated species.The identification of artificial (diploidy and/orpolyploidy) and natural hybrids, and of sexdetermining chromosomes is currentlycytogenetically accomplished. For a properdiscrimination of the species, information from fishmolecular biology, anatomy, anatomy, physiologyethology and ecology is highly desirable. Thisstudy further enriches the information on fishcytogenetic by investigating into the karyotypicvariations among members of the Pisces familyClariidae of Anambra river, Nigeria usingleucocytes culture techniques.
EYO, Joseph Effiong 278MATERIALS AND METHODSCollection and Care of Catfish: Catfishspecimens were collected from Anambra river,Nigeria. The fish were captured using set nets(mesh size 70 mm – 120 mm) and long line baitedwith earthworm and palm fruits. Specimens werealso bought from the fishers at the landing site. Allcatfishes were transported to Fisheries andHydrobiology wet laboratory, Department of<strong>Zoo</strong>logy, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.Identification and classification of fish were donewith Lowe-McConnell (1972), Sydenham (1983)and Ezenwaji (1989) (see Eyo, 1997). Livespecimens were given 1 ppm potassiumpermanganate (KMnO 4 ) flush prophylactictreatment for 10 minutes. This was to avoid theintroduction of wild ectoparasites and pathogens.Catfishes were acclimatized in nine aquaria tanks(80 x 40 x 40 cm) in groups of eight fish per tankfor 14 days. All fishes were fed with 5 % bodyweight daily with 40 % formulated fish feed (Eyo,2004a). All other culture conditions were asexplained in Eyo and Ezechie (2004).Phytohaemaglutinin Extraction: Phytohemaglutinin(PHA) used for this study wasextracted from kidney bean, Phosealus vulgarisusing a modified method of Rigas and Osgood(1954). Finely ground and sieved red kidney beanseed (250 grams) was digested with one litre of 1% NaCl for twenty-four hours at 4 0 C refrigeration.The extract was centrifuged at 1400 rpm for 15minutes using Multex centrifuge. The light yellowsupernatant was recovered and the precipitatediscarded. The supernatant was adjusted to pH5.7 and cold ethanol added to final concentrationof 30 % ethanol, and centrifuged at 1400 rpm for15 minutes. The precipitate was rejected and 400ml of 10 % ethyl ether, absolute ethanol and 75% ethanol in the ratio (1:1:1) was added to theyellow supernatant. A milky white colourdeveloped upon shaking. The milky whitesupernatant was re-incubated at 4 0 C refrigerationfor 24 hours.After the re-incubation, the extract wascentrifuged at 1400 rpm for 15 minutes. Theresulting yellow supernatant was discarded. Themilky white precipitate was dissolved in 150 ml of1 % NaCl. The pH was re-adjusted to 5.7 and theethanol fractionation repeated by adding 300 ml of1:1:1 volume of absolute ethanol, 10% ethyl etherand 75% ethanol. The resulting milky whiteextract was shaken vigorously and re-incubated at4 0 C for 24 hours. The extract was centrifuged at1400 rpm for 15 minutes. The resulting lightyellow supernatant discarded and the milky whiteprecipitate dissolved in 150 ml of 1% sodiumchloride. The ethanol fractionation was repeatedby adding 200 ml of 1:1:1 volume of ethanol, 10%ether and 75% ethanol. The extract wasvigorously shaken and centrifuged at 2000 pm for15 minutes. The milky white precipitate wasdissolved in 100 ml of 0.1M phosphate buffer pH8.0 and 40 ml of saturated ammonium sulphatesolution added. A light pink colour developed.The light pink extract was centrifuged at 2000 rpmfor 15 minutes and the precipitate discarded, 105ml of saturated ammonium sulphate solution wasadded to 150 ml of the supernatant, shakenvigorously and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 15minutes. The precipitate was dissolved in 100 mldeionized water, shaken vigorously andcentrifuged.The procedure was repeated by adding 50ml of deionized water and 17.5 ml of saturatedammonium solution was added. The extractedwas vigorously shaken and centrifuged at 2000rpm for 15 minutes. The phytohaemagglutinin(PHA) was freed from the ammonium sulphate bydissolving the light pink precipitate in 50 ml ofdeionized water, vigorously shaken andcentrifuged. This procedure was repeated twice,and the resulting phytohaemagglutinin (2 grams)was freeze-dried. A stock solution of 1 mg ml -1phytohaemagglutinin was made by dissolving 0.1gram of PHA in 100 ml of 0.85 % sodium chloridesolution. The stock solution was stored at 10 ± 50 C.Blood Sampling: Blood was collected by heartpuncture after anaesthezing the catfishes inL/1500 solution of MS-222 (Methanesulfonate salt)for 3 minutes. The abdomen wiped with absoluteethanol and the visceral cavity opened to exposethe heart. One ml of blood was obtained using asterile 2 ml plastic syringe containing 0.2 ml of 0.1M sodium citrate (an anticoagulant) with a 21gauge, 1-inch needle. The sampled blood fromeach catfish was stored in a labeled sterile capped5 ml plastic tube at 10 ± 5o C until used.Contamination of sampled blood was avoided bydealing with only one sex of a fish species per day.All the equipments were heat sterilized before andafter use. Catfishes sampled for blood were 20males and 18 females of Clarias gariepinus, 21males and 24 females of Clarias anguillaris, 30males and 21 females of Clarias ebriensis and 26males and 30 females of Clarias albopunctatus.Blood Leucocytes Separation: Blood leucocyteswere separated by three simple sedimentationmethods modified from Blaxhall (1981) and theleucocytes-rich supernatant used as inoculums.The methods were:1. Hank’s balance salt solution (HBSS)sedimentation: 1 ml of anticoagulatedblood was diluted with 1 ml of HBSS andmixed by gentle inversion in 5 ml sterile
- Page 1 and 2:
Animal ResearchInternational ®Anim
- Page 4 and 5:
Influence of dietary protein conten
- Page 7 and 8:
MGBENKA, Bernard Obialo et al. 216T
- Page 9 and 10:
MGBENKA, Bernard Obialo et al. 218(
- Page 11 and 12:
EKWUNIFE, Chinyelu Angela 220repeat
- Page 13 and 14:
EKWUNIFE, Chinyelu Angela 222Table
- Page 15 and 16:
Animal Research International (2005
- Page 17 and 18: ORJI, Raphael Christopher Agamadoda
- Page 19 and 20: OGUGUA Victor Nwadiogbu and IKEJIAK
- Page 21 and 22: OGUGUA Victor Nwadiogbu and IKEJIAK
- Page 23 and 24: OLUAH, Ndubuisi Stanley et al. 232G
- Page 25 and 26: OLUAH, Ndubuisi Stanley et al. 234C
- Page 27 and 28: ATAMA, Chinedu and MGBENKA, Bernard
- Page 29 and 30: ATAMA, Chinedu and MGBENKA, Bernard
- Page 31 and 32: Animal Research International (2005
- Page 33 and 34: EZEAGU, Ikechukwu Edwin 242Table 1:
- Page 35 and 36: EZEAGU, Ikechukwu Edwin 244Table 5:
- Page 37 and 38: Animal Research International (2005
- Page 39 and 40: 248Table 1: Percentage (%) mean cru
- Page 41 and 42: 250breakdown proteins into peptones
- Page 43 and 44: Animal Research International (2005
- Page 45 and 46: OKAFOR, Anthony Ikechukwu and CHUKW
- Page 47 and 48: OKAFOR, Fabian Chukwuemenam and OMU
- Page 49 and 50: OKAFOR, Fabian Chukwuemenam and OMU
- Page 51 and 52: OKAFOR, Fabian Chukwuemenam and OMU
- Page 53 and 54: OTITOJU Olawale and ONWURAH Ikechuk
- Page 55 and 56: OTITOJU Olawale and ONWURAH Ikechuk
- Page 57 and 58: OTITOJU Olawale and ONWURAH Ikechuk
- Page 59 and 60: UCHEWA, Emmanuel Nwafoagu et al. 26
- Page 61 and 62: UCHEWA, Emmanuel Nwafoagu et al. 27
- Page 63 and 64: UCHEWA, Emmanuel Nwafoagu et al. 27
- Page 65 and 66: UCHEWA, Emmanuel Nwafoagu et al. 27
- Page 67: EYO, Joseph Effiong 276Karyotype ev
- Page 71 and 72: EYO, Joseph Effiong 280Based on the
- Page 73 and 74: EYO, Joseph Effiong 28210Figure 7:
- Page 75 and 76: EYO, Joseph Effiong 284Relative chr
- Page 77 and 78: EYO, Joseph Effiong 286Cyprinidae,