12.07.2015 Views

luminescent bacteria in shrimp hatchery and their control through ...

luminescent bacteria in shrimp hatchery and their control through ...

luminescent bacteria in shrimp hatchery and their control through ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CIBA Technical Advisory Series -1LUMINESCENT BACTERIA INSHRIMP HATCHERY AND THEIRCONTROL THROUGHBETTER MANAGEMENT PRACTICELum<strong>in</strong>escent <strong>bacteria</strong> (LB) are ubiquitous <strong>in</strong> the coastal <strong>and</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e environment. Vibrioharveyi, a gram negative <strong>lum<strong>in</strong>escent</strong> bacterium (Fig. 1) is associated with mass mortality of penaeidlarval <strong>shrimp</strong> <strong>and</strong> often responsible for huge economic loss to <strong>shrimp</strong> hatcheries. Control of<strong>lum<strong>in</strong>escent</strong> <strong>bacteria</strong>l disease (LBD) us<strong>in</strong>g antibiotics has been reported to be effective <strong>in</strong> laboratorytrials, while its efficacy <strong>in</strong> field conditions is reportedly very low. However, <strong>shrimp</strong> hatcheriescont<strong>in</strong>ue to resort to use of antibiotics. This leaflet is for advis<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>hatchery</strong> operators on bettermanagement practices (BMPs) to prevent LB problems.Work done <strong>in</strong> CIBAInvestigations were carried out to underst<strong>and</strong>the distribution of <strong>lum<strong>in</strong>escent</strong> <strong>bacteria</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>shrimp</strong>larval production cycles <strong>in</strong> commercial <strong>shrimp</strong>hatcheries dur<strong>in</strong>g various stages of seed production. Atotal of 1195 samples drawn from seawater source,s<strong>and</strong>-filtered water, nauplius, zoea, mysis <strong>and</strong> postlarval rear<strong>in</strong>g tanks, maturation <strong>and</strong> spawn<strong>in</strong>g tanks,Artemia hatch<strong>in</strong>g tank <strong>and</strong> algal culture tanks wereprocessed for <strong>lum<strong>in</strong>escent</strong> <strong>bacteria</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g conventionalmicrobiological techniques.Salient f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsFig 1. Pure culture of Vibrio harveyi ontryprose soya agent• The predom<strong>in</strong>ant source of <strong>lum<strong>in</strong>escent</strong> <strong>bacteria</strong> was found to be the brood <strong>shrimp</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>their</strong>rear<strong>in</strong>g tanks <strong>in</strong> maturation <strong>and</strong> spawn<strong>in</strong>g facilities as revealed by the rate of isolation of these<strong>bacteria</strong>.• Among the <strong>lum<strong>in</strong>escent</strong> <strong>bacteria</strong> isolated from <strong>shrimp</strong> hatcheries, 92 percent were V. harveyi, <strong>and</strong>the rest belonged to V. splendidus, V. logei, V. fischeri <strong>and</strong> Photobacterium sp.• Although the occurrence of <strong>lum<strong>in</strong>escent</strong> <strong>bacteria</strong> was more frequent <strong>in</strong> the maturation <strong>and</strong> spawn<strong>in</strong>gtanks, <strong>lum<strong>in</strong>escent</strong> <strong>bacteria</strong> were not recovered from eggs <strong>and</strong> nauplii. The eggs werewashed with iod<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> formal<strong>in</strong> soon after collection as a management practice <strong>in</strong> hatcheries,which has helped a great deal <strong>in</strong> <strong>their</strong> conta<strong>in</strong>ment after spawn<strong>in</strong>g.• Dur<strong>in</strong>g the seed production cycle affected by LB disease, LB could be recovered from the naupliitank water samples while <strong>in</strong> seed production cycle free from LB disease, LB was detected onlyfrom subsequent zoea stage onwards. This could be due to presence of low counts of LB <strong>in</strong> eggs<strong>and</strong> nauplii, which could not be detected by the rout<strong>in</strong>e cultural methods used. Another plausiblereason could be existence of LB <strong>in</strong> “viable but non-culturable” state followed by <strong>their</strong> resuscitation<strong>in</strong> the tanks dur<strong>in</strong>g the subsequent larval developmental stages.


Advice to hatcheries1. The occurrence of <strong>lum<strong>in</strong>escent</strong> <strong>bacteria</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g nauplii stage <strong>in</strong> the rear<strong>in</strong>g tank water couldbe an <strong>in</strong>dicator of impend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>lum<strong>in</strong>escent</strong> <strong>bacteria</strong>l disease outbreak <strong>in</strong> the larval rear<strong>in</strong>gtanks <strong>and</strong> possibly help <strong>in</strong> the prognosis of LBD <strong>in</strong> <strong>shrimp</strong> hatcheries.2. Recognize that brood <strong>shrimp</strong> is the ma<strong>in</strong> source of LB <strong>in</strong> hatcheries, for which the follow<strong>in</strong>gmanagement measures (adopted from Better Management Practices (BMP) Manual for BlackTiger Shrimp, Penaeus monodon Hatcheries <strong>in</strong> Viet Nam by NACA, 2005) may be followed toavoid the occurrence of the disease:• Broodstock should be placed immediately after collection <strong>in</strong> filtered <strong>and</strong> UV treated seawater <strong>in</strong>dividually <strong>and</strong> transported.• Dis<strong>in</strong>fect the broodstock thoroughly <strong>in</strong> the quarant<strong>in</strong>e unit by immers<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a bath of100 ppm (1 ml/10 l) potassium permanganate (KMnO4) or liquid povidone (PVP) iod<strong>in</strong>efor 30-60 seconds before releas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> maturation/ spawn<strong>in</strong>g tanks.• Add 10-30 ppm of EDTA <strong>in</strong> hold<strong>in</strong>g tanks for chelat<strong>in</strong>g heavy metals <strong>and</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>bacteria</strong>lcontam<strong>in</strong>ation.• Dis<strong>in</strong>fect the area around the ablated eye with pure liquid povidone (PVP) iod<strong>in</strong>e solutionafter ablation.• For spawn<strong>in</strong>g, the matured spawners should be kept <strong>in</strong>dividually <strong>in</strong> waters filtered<strong>through</strong> activated carbon, cartridge filters (1-5 µ) <strong>and</strong> preferably treated with UV.• Follow<strong>in</strong>g spawn<strong>in</strong>g, the broodstock should be quickly removed from the spawn<strong>in</strong>g tanks.After about 1-5 hours the tanks should be dra<strong>in</strong>ed slowly <strong>through</strong> a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary 300 µmesh filter (to reta<strong>in</strong> faeces <strong>and</strong> other debris) <strong>and</strong> then <strong>through</strong> 50-60 µ nylon net partiallysubmerged <strong>in</strong> a tank/bucket (to reta<strong>in</strong> the eggs).• The eggs should then be washed for 5 m<strong>in</strong>utes with a steady, but slow current of cleanseawater. After wash<strong>in</strong>g, the eggs are gathered <strong>in</strong> the net <strong>and</strong> then dipped <strong>in</strong>to an aeratedbath of 50 ppm povidone iod<strong>in</strong>e solution (0.5 ml <strong>in</strong> 10 l of water) for one m<strong>in</strong>ute.F<strong>in</strong>ally, they are washed once aga<strong>in</strong> for 5 m<strong>in</strong>utes with a steady, but slow current ofclean seawater.• After hatch<strong>in</strong>g, only nauplii that are attracted to the light should be collected, s<strong>in</strong>cethese are the healthiest. The nauplii should then be washed for 5 m<strong>in</strong>utes with a steady,but slow current of clean seawater. After wash<strong>in</strong>g, the nauplii are gathered <strong>in</strong> the net<strong>and</strong> then dipped <strong>in</strong>to an aerated bath of 100-300 ppm (1-3 ml/10 l) of formal<strong>in</strong> for30 seconds. They are then dipped <strong>in</strong>to an aerated bath of 50 ppm (0.5 ml/10 l) povidoneiod<strong>in</strong>e solution for one m<strong>in</strong>ute. F<strong>in</strong>ally, they are washed aga<strong>in</strong> for 5 m<strong>in</strong>utes with asteady, but slow current of clean seawater.• Dur<strong>in</strong>g larval rear<strong>in</strong>g, uneaten food <strong>and</strong> faeces may need to be siphoned out from thebottom of the tanks periodically. This should be done by turn<strong>in</strong>g off the air supply <strong>and</strong>allow<strong>in</strong>g the larvae to come to the surface of the tank.• Artemia nauplii should be dis<strong>in</strong>fected with 50% hydrogen peroxide with strong aeration<strong>and</strong> the float<strong>in</strong>g debris are removed. The dis<strong>in</strong>fected nauplii are washed <strong>in</strong> clean freshor sea water before use.(This advisory is based on the work on Lum<strong>in</strong>escent <strong>bacteria</strong> carried out byDr S.V. Alav<strong>and</strong>i under a project funded by Indian Council of Agriculture Research)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!