Evaluation of Aardvark Mk IV Flail - gichd
Evaluation of Aardvark Mk IV Flail - gichd Evaluation of Aardvark Mk IV Flail - gichd
6.3.2 Test A1 Weights (A1/1) 6.3.2.1 Description 6.3.2.2 Results: Page 10 of 77 Individual compression load cells were positioned on solid flat level ground and the vehicle driven onto them to measure the weight of each wheel station of the main body. An average from 3 measurements was taken. Test Measurement Result Weight Gross Weight 15377kg 6.3.2.3 Comments & Observations Table 6-3; Weight This is a minimum value for the gross weight (total operational weight, fully fueled up) due to the load cell on wheel station 4 (WS4) being overloaded. It can be compared with the dry weight specified by Aardvark Clearmine in Annex A. DERA/LWS/LSAA/TRD000603/1.2
Figure 6-3; Using load cells to weigh Aardvark DERA/LWS/LSAA/TRD000603/1.2 Page 11 of 77
- Page 1 and 2: Evaluation of Aardvark Mk IV Flail
- Page 3 and 4: Authorisation Prepared by Mr C A Le
- Page 5 and 6: Abstract Aardvark Clearmine Ltd hav
- Page 7 and 8: List of contents Authorisation iii
- Page 9 and 10: List of Tables Table 4-1; Improveme
- Page 11 and 12: Figure 6-45; Aardvark just passed R
- Page 13 and 14: 1 Introduction 1.1 Contractual Matt
- Page 15 and 16: Rear Front Figure 3-1; Aardvark Mar
- Page 17 and 18: 4.1 Additional Alterations: 4.1.1 T
- Page 19 and 20: 6 Test Procedures and Results 6.1 G
- Page 21: Figure 6-2; Measuring the height of
- Page 25 and 26: Figure 6-4; Measuring the Approach
- Page 27 and 28: Figure 6-6; Turning Circle DERA/LWS
- Page 29 and 30: Figure 6-7; Aardvark climbing Birch
- Page 31 and 32: Figure 6-9; Speed = 67m/hr, Depth =
- Page 33 and 34: Figure 6-13; After flailing at 300m
- Page 35 and 36: Figure 6-17; Measuring Level used D
- Page 37 and 38: Figure 6-18; Aardvark entering the
- Page 39 and 40: Figure 6-20; Foliage and terrain en
- Page 41 and 42: This page is intentionally blank DE
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 6-24; Test run before cleara
- Page 45 and 46: This page is intentionally blank DE
- Page 47 and 48: Destroyed Mine Case Figure 6-28; La
- Page 49 and 50: GIAT buried in spoil Figure 6-32; P
- Page 51 and 52: Destroyed Mine Case Figure 6-34; La
- Page 53 and 54: This page is intentionally blank DE
- Page 55 and 56: Figure 6-39; Layout of 3 Figure 6-4
- Page 57 and 58: This page is intentionally blank DE
- Page 59 and 60: Figure 6-44; Layout of Run 4 Figure
- Page 61 and 62: Run stopped before these mines Figu
- Page 63 and 64: This page is intentionally blank DE
- Page 65 and 66: Figure 6-52; Layout of Run 6 Figure
- Page 67 and 68: This page is intentionally blank DE
- Page 69 and 70: Figure 6-57; Layout of Run 7 Figure
- Page 71 and 72: Figure 6-60; TMRP-6 and TMA-2 Figur
6.3.2 Test A1 Weights (A1/1)<br />
6.3.2.1 Description<br />
6.3.2.2 Results:<br />
Page 10 <strong>of</strong> 77<br />
Individual compression load cells were positioned on solid flat level ground and the<br />
vehicle driven onto them to measure the weight <strong>of</strong> each wheel station <strong>of</strong> the main body.<br />
An average from 3 measurements was taken.<br />
Test Measurement Result<br />
Weight Gross Weight 15377kg<br />
6.3.2.3 Comments & Observations<br />
Table 6-3; Weight<br />
This is a minimum value for the gross weight (total operational weight, fully fueled up)<br />
due to the load cell on wheel station 4 (WS4) being overloaded. It can be compared with<br />
the dry weight specified by <strong>Aardvark</strong> Clearmine in Annex A.<br />
DERA/LWS/LSAA/TRD000603/1.2