12.07.2015 Views

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

v2010.10.26 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRY2.4.2.6.1 Definition. Supporting hyperplane ∂H .Assuming set Y and some normal a≠0 reside in opposite halfspaces 2.19(Figure 29a), then a hyperplane supporting Y at point y p ∈ ∂Y is described∂H − = { y | a T (y − y p ) = 0, y p ∈ Y , a T (z − y p ) ≤ 0 ∀z∈Y } (128)Given only normal a , the hyperplane supporting Y is equivalently describedwhere real function∂H − = { y | a T y = sup{a T z |z∈Y} } (129)σ Y (a) = sup{a T z |z∈Y} (553)is called the support function for Y .Another equivalent but nontraditional representation 2.20 for a supportinghyperplane is obtained by reversing polarity of normal a ; (1678)∂H + = { y | ã T (y − y p ) = 0, y p ∈ Y , ã T (z − y p ) ≥ 0 ∀z∈Y }= { y | ã T y = − inf{ã T z |z∈Y} = sup{−ã T z |z∈Y} } (130)where normal ã and set Y both now reside in H + (Figure 29b).When a supporting hyperplane contains only a single point of Y , thathyperplane is termed strictly supporting. 2.21△A full-dimensional set that has a supporting hyperplane at every pointon its boundary, conversely, is convex. A convex set C ⊂ R n , for example,can be expressed as the intersection of all halfspaces partially bounded byhyperplanes supporting it; videlicet, [250, p.135]C = ⋂a∈R n {y | a T y ≤ σ C (a) } (131)by the halfspaces theorem (2.4.1.1.1).There is no geometric difference between supporting hyperplane ∂H + or∂H − or ∂H and 2.22 an ordinary hyperplane ∂H coincident with them.2.19 Normal a belongs to H + by definition.2.20 useful for constructing the dual cone; e.g., Figure 55b. Tradition would instead haveus construct the polar cone; which is, the negative dual cone.2.21 Rockafellar terms a strictly supporting hyperplane tangent to Y if it is unique there;[307,18, p.169] a definition we do not adopt because our only criterion for tangency isintersection exclusively with a relative boundary. Hiriart-Urruty & Lemaréchal [199, p.44](confer [307, p.100]) do not demand any tangency of a supporting hyperplane.2.22 If vector-normal polarity is unimportant, we may instead signify a supportinghyperplane by ∂H .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!